Aerobic exercise interventions for adults living with HIV/AIDS

Kelly O'Brien, Stephanie Nixon, Anne-Marie Tynan, Richard Glazier, Kelly O'Brien, Stephanie Nixon, Anne-Marie Tynan, Richard Glazier

Abstract

Background: Access to combination antiretroviral therapy has turned HIV into a chronic and manageable disease for many. This increased chronicity has been mirrored by increased prevalence of health-related challenges experienced by people living with HIV (Rusch 2004). Exercise is a key strategy for people living with HIV and by rehabilitation professionals to address these disablements; however, knowledge about the effects of exercise among adults living with HIV still is emerging.

Objectives: To examine the safety and effectiveness of aerobic exercise interventions on immunologic and virologic, cardiopulmonary, psychologic outcomes and strength, weight, and body composition in adults living with HIV.

Search strategy: Searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCIENCE CITATION INDEX, CINAHL, HEALTHSTAR, PsycINFO, SPORTDISCUS and Cochrane Review Group Databases were conducted between 1980 and June 2009. Searches of published and unpublished abstracts and proceedings from major international and national HIV/AIDS conferences were conducted, as well as a handsearch of reference lists and tables of contents of relevant journals and books.

Selection criteria: We included studies of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing aerobic exercise interventions with no aerobic exercise interventions or another exercise or treatment modality, performed at least three times per week for at least four weeks among adults (18 years of age or older) living with HIV.

Data collection and analysis: Data on study design, participants, interventions, outcomes, and methodological quality were abstracted from included studies by two reviewers. Meta-analyses, using RevMan 5 computer software, were performed on outcomes when possible.

Main results: A total of 14 studies met inclusion criteria for this review and 30 meta-analyses over several updates were performed. Main results indicated that performing constant or interval aerobic exercise, or a combination of constant aerobic exercise and progressive resistive exercise for at least 20 minutes at least three times per week for at least five weeks appears to be safe and may lead to significant improvements in selected outcomes of cardiopulmonary fitness (maximum oxygen consumption), body composition (leg muscle area, percent body fat), and psychological status (depression-dejection symptoms). These findings are limited to participants who continued to exercise and for whom there were adequate follow-up data.

Authors' conclusions: Aerobic exercise appears to be safe and may be beneficial for adults living with HIV. These findings are limited by the small sample sizes and large withdrawal rates described in the studies. Future research would benefit from participant follow-up and intention-to-treat analysis. Further research is required to determine the optimal parameters in which aerobic exercise may be most beneficial for adults living with HIV.

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Figures

1
1
Forest plot of comparison: 1 Constant or interval aerobic exercise compared with non‐exercise, outcome: 1.1 CD4 count (cells/mm3).
2
2
Forest plot of comparison: 2 Constant aerobic exercise compared with non‐exercise., outcome: 2.1 CD4 count (cells/mm3).
3
3
Forest plot of comparison: 3 Interval aerobic exercise compared with non‐exercise., outcome: 3.1 CD4 count (cells/mm3).
4
4
Forest plot of comparison: 4 Moderate aerobic exercise compared with heavy aerobic exercise., outcome: 4.1 CD4 count (cells/mm3).
5
5
Forest plot of comparison: 5 Constant or interval aerobic exercise and progressive resistive exercise compared with no exercise, outcome: 5.1 CD4 count (cells/mm3).
6
6
Forest plot of comparison: 1 Constant or interval aerobic exercise compared with non‐exercise, outcome: 1.2 CD4 Percentage (%).
7
7
Forest plot of comparison: 2 Constant aerobic exercise compared with non‐exercise., outcome: 2.2 CD4 Percentage (%).
8
8
Forest plot of comparison: 1 Constant or interval aerobic exercise compared with non‐exercise, outcome: 1.3 Viral Load.
9
9
Forest plot of comparison: 2 Constant aerobic exercise compared with non‐exercise., outcome: 2.3 Viral Load (log10 copies).
10
10
Forest plot of comparison: 5 Constant or interval aerobic exercise and progressive resistive exercise compared with no exercise, outcome: 5.2 Viral Load (log10 copies).
11
11
Forest plot of comparison: 1 Constant or interval aerobic exercise compared with non‐exercise, outcome: 1.4 VO2 Max (ml/kg/min).
12
12
Forest plot of comparison: 2 Constant aerobic exercise compared with non‐exercise., outcome: 2.4 VO2max (ml/kg/min).
13
13
Forest plot of comparison: 4 Moderate aerobic exercise compared with heavy aerobic exercise., outcome: 4.2 VO2max (ml/kg/min).
14
14
Forest plot of comparison: 1 Constant or interval aerobic exercise compared with non‐exercise, outcome: 1.5 (Maximum Heart Rate (HRmax) (beats/min).
15
15
Forest plot of comparison: 5 Constant or interval aerobic exercise and progressive resistive exercise compared with no exercise, outcome: 5.6 Exercise time (min).
16
16
Forest plot of comparison: 1 Constant or interval aerobic exercise compared with non‐exercise, outcome: 1.6 Mean Body Weight (kg).
17
17
Forest plot of comparison: 2 Constant aerobic exercise compared with non‐exercise., outcome: 2.5 Weight (kg).
18
18
Forest plot of comparison: 5 Constant or interval aerobic exercise and progressive resistive exercise compared with no exercise, outcome: 5.3 Mean Body Weight (kg).
19
19
Forest plot of comparison: 1 Constant or interval aerobic exercise compared with non‐exercise, outcome: 1.11 Percent Body Fat (%).
20
20
Forest plot of comparison: 2 Constant aerobic exercise compared with non‐exercise., outcome: 2.9 Percent Body Fat (%).
21
21
Forest plot of comparison: 5 Constant or interval aerobic exercise and progressive resistive exercise compared with no exercise, outcome: 5.5 Body Composition ‐ Mean Leg Muscle Area (cm2).
22
22
Forest plot of comparison: 1 Constant or interval aerobic exercise compared with non‐exercise, outcome: 1.8 Waist Circumference (cm).
23
23
Forest plot of comparison: 2 Constant aerobic exercise compared with non‐exercise., outcome: 2.6 Waist Circumference (cm).
24
24
Forest plot of comparison: 1 Constant or interval aerobic exercise compared with non‐exercise, outcome: 1.9 Hip Circumference (cm).
25
25
Forest plot of comparison: 2 Constant aerobic exercise compared with non‐exercise., outcome: 2.7 Hip Circumference (cm).
26
26
Forest plot of comparison: 1 Constant or interval aerobic exercise compared with non‐exercise, outcome: 1.10 Waist to Hip Ratio.
27
27
Forest plot of comparison: 2 Constant aerobic exercise compared with non‐exercise., outcome: 2.8 Waist to Hip Ratio.
28
28
Forest plot of comparison: 1 Constant or interval aerobic exercise compared with non‐exercise, outcome: 1.7 Mean Body Mass Index (kg/cm2).
29
29
Forest plot of comparison: 5 Constant or interval aerobic exercise and progressive resistive exercise compared with no exercise, outcome: 5.4 Body Composition ‐ Mean Fatt Mass (kg).
30
30
Forest plot of comparison: 1 Constant or interval aerobic exercise compared with non‐exercise, outcome: 1.12 Profile of Mood State (POMS) Depression‐Dejection subscale.
1.1. Analysis
1.1. Analysis
Comparison 1 Constant or interval aerobic exercise compared with non‐exercise, Outcome 1 CD4 count (cells/mm3).
1.2. Analysis
1.2. Analysis
Comparison 1 Constant or interval aerobic exercise compared with non‐exercise, Outcome 2 CD4 Percentage (%).
1.3. Analysis
1.3. Analysis
Comparison 1 Constant or interval aerobic exercise compared with non‐exercise, Outcome 3 Viral Load (copies/mL).
1.4. Analysis
1.4. Analysis
Comparison 1 Constant or interval aerobic exercise compared with non‐exercise, Outcome 4 VO2 Max (ml/kg/min).
1.5. Analysis
1.5. Analysis
Comparison 1 Constant or interval aerobic exercise compared with non‐exercise, Outcome 5 Maximum Heart Rate (HRmax) (beats/min).
1.6. Analysis
1.6. Analysis
Comparison 1 Constant or interval aerobic exercise compared with non‐exercise, Outcome 6 Body Weight (kg).
1.7. Analysis
1.7. Analysis
Comparison 1 Constant or interval aerobic exercise compared with non‐exercise, Outcome 7 Body Mass Index (kg/cm2).
1.8. Analysis
1.8. Analysis
Comparison 1 Constant or interval aerobic exercise compared with non‐exercise, Outcome 8 Waist Circumference (cm).
1.9. Analysis
1.9. Analysis
Comparison 1 Constant or interval aerobic exercise compared with non‐exercise, Outcome 9 Hip Circumference (cm).
1.10. Analysis
1.10. Analysis
Comparison 1 Constant or interval aerobic exercise compared with non‐exercise, Outcome 10 Waist to Hip Ratio.
1.11. Analysis
1.11. Analysis
Comparison 1 Constant or interval aerobic exercise compared with non‐exercise, Outcome 11 Percent Body Fat (%).
1.12. Analysis
1.12. Analysis
Comparison 1 Constant or interval aerobic exercise compared with non‐exercise, Outcome 12 Profile of Mood State (POMS) Depression‐Dejection Subscale.
2.1. Analysis
2.1. Analysis
Comparison 2 Constant aerobic exercise vs. non‐exercise., Outcome 1 CD4 count (cells/mm3).
2.2. Analysis
2.2. Analysis
Comparison 2 Constant aerobic exercise vs. non‐exercise., Outcome 2 CD4 Percentage (%).
2.3. Analysis
2.3. Analysis
Comparison 2 Constant aerobic exercise vs. non‐exercise., Outcome 3 Viral Load (log10 copies).
2.4. Analysis
2.4. Analysis
Comparison 2 Constant aerobic exercise vs. non‐exercise., Outcome 4 VO2max (ml/kg/min).
2.5. Analysis
2.5. Analysis
Comparison 2 Constant aerobic exercise vs. non‐exercise., Outcome 5 Body Weight (kg).
2.6. Analysis
2.6. Analysis
Comparison 2 Constant aerobic exercise vs. non‐exercise., Outcome 6 Waist Circumference (cm).
2.7. Analysis
2.7. Analysis
Comparison 2 Constant aerobic exercise vs. non‐exercise., Outcome 7 Hip Circumference (cm).
2.8. Analysis
2.8. Analysis
Comparison 2 Constant aerobic exercise vs. non‐exercise., Outcome 8 Waist to Hip Ratio.
2.9. Analysis
2.9. Analysis
Comparison 2 Constant aerobic exercise vs. non‐exercise., Outcome 9 Percent Body Fat (%).
3.1. Analysis
3.1. Analysis
Comparison 3 Interval aerobic exercise vs. non‐exercise., Outcome 1 CD4 count (cells/mm3).
4.1. Analysis
4.1. Analysis
Comparison 4 Moderate aerobic exercise vs. heavy aerobic exercise., Outcome 1 CD4 count (cells/mm3).
4.2. Analysis
4.2. Analysis
Comparison 4 Moderate aerobic exercise vs. heavy aerobic exercise., Outcome 2 VO2max (ml/kg/min).
5.1. Analysis
5.1. Analysis
Comparison 5 Constant or interval aerobic exercise and progressive resistive exercise compared with no exercise, Outcome 1 CD4 count (cells/mm3).
5.2. Analysis
5.2. Analysis
Comparison 5 Constant or interval aerobic exercise and progressive resistive exercise compared with no exercise, Outcome 2 Viral Load (log10 copies).
5.3. Analysis
5.3. Analysis
Comparison 5 Constant or interval aerobic exercise and progressive resistive exercise compared with no exercise, Outcome 3 Exercise time (min).
5.4. Analysis
5.4. Analysis
Comparison 5 Constant or interval aerobic exercise and progressive resistive exercise compared with no exercise, Outcome 4 Body Weight (kg).
5.5. Analysis
5.5. Analysis
Comparison 5 Constant or interval aerobic exercise and progressive resistive exercise compared with no exercise, Outcome 5 Leg Muscle Area (cm2).
5.6. Analysis
5.6. Analysis
Comparison 5 Constant or interval aerobic exercise and progressive resistive exercise compared with no exercise, Outcome 6 Fat Mass (kg).

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner