The Effect of Renal Impairment on the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Talazoparib in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors

Chandrasekar Durairaj, Jayeta Chakrabarti, Cristiano Ferrario, Holger W Hirte, Sunil Babu, Sarina A Piha-Paul, Anna Plotka, Justin Hoffman, Haihong Shi, Diane D Wang, Chandrasekar Durairaj, Jayeta Chakrabarti, Cristiano Ferrario, Holger W Hirte, Sunil Babu, Sarina A Piha-Paul, Anna Plotka, Justin Hoffman, Haihong Shi, Diane D Wang

Abstract

Background: Pharmacokinetic (PK) studies suggest that talazoparib is primarily eliminated unchanged via renal excretion. The current study investigated how varying degrees of renal impairment may affect the PK of talazoparib, and evaluated the safety and tolerability of talazoparib, in patients with advanced solid tumors with/without renal impairment.

Methods: Patients with advanced solid tumors and normal renal function or different degrees of renal impairment measured by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR: mild = 60-89, moderate = 30-59, severe = 15-29 mL/min/1.73 m2) were enrolled in this open-label, non-randomized, phase I study. Talazoparib was administered orally at 0.5 mg/day for 22 days. Primary PK parameters included the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h (AUC0-24) and maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax) at steady state (Day 22). Safety and tolerability were also investigated.

Results: Thirty-four patients were enrolled. At Day 22, compared with patients with normal renal function (n = 9), patients with mild (n = 9), moderate (n = 8), or severe (n = 8) renal impairment had a 12.2%, 43.0%, and 163.3% increase in talazoparib AUC0-24, and a 11.1%, 31.6%, and 89.3% increase in talazoparib Cmax, respectively. Talazoparib was generally well tolerated, and overall there were no notable differences in the treatment-emergent adverse event profile across renal function groups.

Conclusions: Exposure to talazoparib increased with worsening renal impairment. Overall, this study confirms current dosing recommendations in patients with mild and moderate renal impairment (1 mg/day and 0.75 mg/day, respectively) and indicates that a lower starting dose of 0.5 mg/day should be considered for patients with severe renal impairment.

Clinical trials registration: NCT02997163.

Conflict of interest statement

Chandrasekar Durairaj, Jayeta Chakrabarti, Anna Plotka, Justin Hoffman, Haihong Shi, and Diane D. Wang are employees of Pfizer and receive stock and stock options as part of their employment. Cristiano Ferrario has received consulting fees from Astellas, Bayer, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche, and research funding from Astellas, AstraZeneca, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche/Genentech, Sanofi, Seattle Genetics, and Zymeworks. Holger W. Hirte has no disclosures to declare. Sunil Babu has received honoraria from Alexion Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Lilly; consulting fees from Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Argenx, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Bristol-Myers Squibb; speaker fees from Alexion Pharmaceuticals; research/grant funding (through his institution) from Abbvie, Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Amgen, Argenx, AstraZeneca/Medimmune, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Genentech/Roche, Janssen Oncology, Lilly, Merck, Nektar, Novartis, Sanofi, Syndax, and TG Therapeutics; and travel/accommodation expenses from Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Lilly. Sarina A. Piha-Paul has received research/grant funding (through her institution) from AbbVie, Inc., Alkermes, Aminex Therapeutics, Amphivena Therapeutics, Inc., BioMarin Pharmaceutical, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squib, Cerulean Pharma Inc., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, Curis, Inc., Daichi Sanko, Eli Lilly, Five Prime Therapeutics, Genmab A/S, GlaxoSmithKline, Helix BioPharma Corp., Incyte Corp., Jacobio Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd, Medimmune, LLC., Medivation, Inc., Merck Sharp and Dohme Corp., NewLink Genetics Corporation/Blue Link Pharmaceuticals, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Pieris Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Pfizer, Principia Biopharma, Inc., Puma Biotechnology, Inc., Rapt Therapeutics, Inc., Seattle Genetics, Taiho Oncology, Tesaro, Inc., TransThera Bio, and XuanZhu Biopharma. NCI/NIH Core Grant, P30CA016672 (CCSG Shared Resources).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Median talazoparib plasma concentration following multiple oral doses of talazoparib in patients with varying degrees of renal function (Day 22, PK population). PK pharmacokinetics
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Regression and 90% CI of natural log-transformed plasma talazoparib a AUC0–24 and b CL/F versus CLcr (mL/min) following administration of multiple oral doses of talazoparib in patients with varying degrees of renal impairment (Day 22, PK analysis population). AUC0–24 area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h, CI confidence interval, CL/F apparent oral clearance, CLcr creatinine clearance, PK pharmacokinetics

References

    1. Shen Y, Rehman FL, Feng Y, Boshuizen J, Bajrami I, Elliott R, et al. BMN 673, a novel and highly potent PARP1/2 inhibitor for the treatment of human cancers with DNA repair deficiency. Clin Cancer Res. 2013;19(18):5003–5015. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-1391.
    1. Lord CJ, Ashworth A. PARP inhibitors: Synthetic lethality in the clinic. Science. 2017;355(6330):1152–1158. doi: 10.1126/science.aam7344.
    1. Murai J, Huang SY, Renaud A, Zhang Y, Ji J, Takeda S, et al. Stereospecific PARP trapping by BMN 673 and comparison with olaparib and rucaparib. Mol Cancer Ther. 2014;13(2):433–443. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-13-0803.
    1. European Medicines Agency. TALZENNA® (talazoparib) Summary of Product Characteristics. July 2019. . Accessed 26 Jun 2020.
    1. Pfizer Inc. TALZENNA® (talazoparib) [prescribing information]. March 2020. . Accessed 26 Jun 2020.
    1. Ettl J, Quek RGW, Lee K-H, Rugo HS, Hurvitz S, Gonçalves A, et al. Quality of life with talazoparib versus physician's choice of chemotherapy in patients with advanced breast cancer and germline BRCA1/2 mutation: patient-reported outcomes from the EMBRACA phase III trial. Ann Oncol. 2018;29(9):1939–1947. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdy257.
    1. Litton JK, Rugo HS, Ettl J, Hurvitz SA, Gonçalves A, Lee K-H, et al. Talazoparib in patients with advanced breast cancer and a germline BRCA mutation. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(8):753–763. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1802905.
    1. Hurvitz SA, Gonçalves A, Rugo HS, Lee K-H, Fehrenbacher L, Mina LA, et al. Talazoparib in patients with a germline BRCA-mutated advanced breast cancer: detailed safety analyses from the phase III EMBRACA Trial. Oncologist. 2020;25:e439–e450. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0493.
    1. Hoffman J, Chakrabarti J, Plotka A, Milillo Naraine A, Kanamori D, Moroose R, et al. Talazoparib has no clinically relevant effect on QTc interval in patients with advanced solid tumors. Anticancer Drugs. 2019;30(5):523–532. doi: 10.1097/CAD.0000000000000772.
    1. Yu Y, Chung CH, Plotka A, Quinn K, Shi H, Papai Z, et al. A Phase 1 mass balance study of (14) C-labeled talazoparib in patients with advanced solid tumors. J Clin Pharmacol. 2019;59(9):1195–1203.
    1. de Bono J, Ramanathan RK, Mina L, Chugh R, Glaspy J, Rafii S, et al. Phase I, dose-escalation, two-part trial of the PARP inhibitor talazoparib in patients with advanced germline BRCA1/2 mutations and selected sporadic cancers. Cancer Discov. 2017;7(6):620–629. doi: 10.1158/-16-1250.
    1. Elmeliegy M, Láng I, Smolyarchuk EA, Chung C-H, Plotka A, Shi H, et al. Evaluation of the effect of P-glycoprotein inhibition and induction on talazoparib disposition in patients with advanced solid tumours. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2020;86(4):771–778. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14178.
    1. Yu Y, Durairaj C, Shi H, Wang DD. Population pharmacokinetics of talazoparib in patients with advanced cancer. J Clin Pharmacol. 2020;60(2):218–228. doi: 10.1002/jcph.1520.
    1. European Medicines Agency. Assessment report: Talzenna [procedure no. EMEA/H/C/004674/0000]. 2019 [cited 26 Jun 2020]. Available at:
    1. European Medicines Agency. Guideline on the evaluation of the pharmacokinetics of medicinal products in patients with decreased renal function. 2015. . Accessed 26 June 2020.
    1. Park EJ, Wu K, Mi Z, Dong T, Lawrence JP, Ko CW, et al. A systematic comparison of Cockcroft-Gault and Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equations for classification of kidney dysfunction and dosage adjustment. Ann Pharmacother. 2012;46(9):1174–1187. doi: 10.1345/aph.1Q757.

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner