A randomized phase 2 trial of gemcitabine/cisplatin with or without cetuximab in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma

Maha Hussain, Stephanie Daignault, Neeraj Agarwal, Petros D Grivas, Arlene O Siefker-Radtke, Igor Puzanov, Gary R MacVicar, Ellis Glenn Levine, Sandy Srinivas, Przemyslaw Twardowski, Mario A Eisenberger, David I Quinn, Ulka N Vaishampayan, Evan Y Yu, Scott Dawsey, Kathleen C Day, Mark L Day, Mahmoud Al-Hawary, David C Smith, Maha Hussain, Stephanie Daignault, Neeraj Agarwal, Petros D Grivas, Arlene O Siefker-Radtke, Igor Puzanov, Gary R MacVicar, Ellis Glenn Levine, Sandy Srinivas, Przemyslaw Twardowski, Mario A Eisenberger, David I Quinn, Ulka N Vaishampayan, Evan Y Yu, Scott Dawsey, Kathleen C Day, Mark L Day, Mahmoud Al-Hawary, David C Smith

Abstract

Background: Epidermal growth factor receptor overexpression is associated with poor outcomes in urothelial carcinoma (UC). Cetuximab (CTX) exhibited an antitumor effect in in vivo UC models. The efficacy of gemcitabine/cisplatin (GC) with or without CTX in patients with advanced UC was evaluated.

Methods: Patients with advanced UC, measurable disease, and adequate organ function were randomized 1:2 to cisplatin (70 mg/m(2) ) on day 1 plus gemcitabine (1000 mg/m(2) ) on days 1, 8, and 15 (arm A) or GC plus CTX (500 mg/m(2) ) on days 1 and 15 (arm B). The primary endpoint was the overall response rate. The secondary endpoints were the response duration, safety, progression-free survival, overall survival, determination of whether or not CTX sensitized nonresponders to GC, and exploratory biomarker analysis. The accrual targets were 27 and 54 patients for the 2 arms, respectively. The overall response rate was reported by arm with binomial confidence intervals (CIs). Kaplan-Meier methods were used for time-to-event endpoints.

Results: Eighty-eight eligible patients were randomized; 87 were toxicity-evaluable, and 85 were response-evaluable. The overall response rates were 57.1% for arm A (95% CI = 37%-76%) and 61.4% for arm B (95% CI = 48%-74%). The median progression-free survival times were 8.5 months for arm A (95% CI = 5.7-10.4 months) and 7.6 months for arm B (95% CI = 6.1-8.7 months). The median overall survival times were 17.4 months for arm A (95% CI = 12.8 months to unreached) and 14.3 months for arm B (95% CI = 11.6-22.2 months). The most common grade 3/grade 4 adverse events in both arms were myelosuppression and nausea. Thromboembolism, acneiform rash, fatigue, pain, hypersensitivity reactions, elevated transaminases, hyponatremia, and hypomagnesemia were more common in arm B; 3 grade 5 adverse events occurred in arm B. The presence of primary disease significantly correlated with thromboembolism. An increased soluble E-cadherin level after cycle 2 correlated with a higher risk of death.

Conclusions: GC plus CTX was feasible but was associated with more adverse events and no improvements in outcomes.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00645593.

Keywords: cetuximab; chemotherapy; cisplatin; gemcitabine; urothelial carcinoma.

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICT OF INTEREST DISCLOSURES

© 2014 American Cancer Society.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials flow diagram. GC indicates gemcitabine/cisplatin; CTX, cetuximab.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Kaplan-Meier curves: (A) progression-free survival and (B) overall survival. G/C indicates gemcitabine/cisplatin; Cetux, cetuximab.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Soluble E-cadherin level changes after cycle 2 versus the baseline per treatment arm. G/C indicates gemcitabine/ cisplatin; Cetux, cetuximab.

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner