The effect of an EDTA-based chelation regimen on patients with diabetes mellitus and prior myocardial infarction in the Trial to Assess Chelation Therapy (TACT)

Esteban Escolar, Gervasio A Lamas, Daniel B Mark, Robin Boineau, Christine Goertz, Yves Rosenberg, Richard L Nahin, Pamela Ouyang, Theodore Rozema, Allan Magaziner, Richard Nahas, Eldrin F Lewis, Lauren Lindblad, Kerry L Lee, Esteban Escolar, Gervasio A Lamas, Daniel B Mark, Robin Boineau, Christine Goertz, Yves Rosenberg, Richard L Nahin, Pamela Ouyang, Theodore Rozema, Allan Magaziner, Richard Nahas, Eldrin F Lewis, Lauren Lindblad, Kerry L Lee

Abstract

Background: The Trial to Assess Chelation Therapy (TACT) showed clinical benefit of an EDTA-based infusion regimen in patients aged ≥50 years with prior myocardial infarction. Diabetes mellitus before enrollment was a prespecified subgroup.

Methods and results: Patients received 40 infusions of EDTA chelation or placebo. A total of 633 (37%) patients had diabetes mellitus (322 EDTA and 311 placebo). EDTA reduced the primary end point (death, reinfarction, stroke, coronary revascularization, or hospitalization for angina; 25% versus 38%; hazard ratio, 0.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.44-0.79; P<0.001) over 5 years. The result remained significant after Bonferroni adjustment for multiple subgroups (99.4% CI, 0.39-0.88; adjusted P=0.002). All-cause mortality was reduced by EDTA chelation (10% versus 16%; hazard ratio, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.36-0.88; P=0.011), as was the secondary end point (cardiovascular death, reinfarction, or stroke; 11% versus 17%; hazard ratio, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.39-0.91; P=0.017). However, after adjusting for multiple subgroups, those results were no longer significant. The number needed to treat to reduce 1 primary end point over 5 years was 6.5 (95% CI, 4.4-12.7). There was no reduction in events in non-diabetes mellitus (n=1075; P=0.877), resulting in a treatment by diabetes mellitus interaction (P=0.004).

Conclusions: Post-myocardial infarction patients with diabetes mellitus aged ≥50 demonstrated a marked reduction in cardiovascular events with EDTA chelation. These findings support efforts to replicate these findings and define the mechanisms of benefit. However, they do not constitute sufficient evidence to indicate the routine use of chelation therapy for all post-myocardial infarction patients with diabetes mellitus.

Clinical trial registration: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00044213.

Keywords: diabetes mellitus; myocardial infarction; secondary prevention.

Figures

Figure 1. Consort Diagram
Figure 1. Consort Diagram
* Screened patients not randomized due to inclusion/exclusion criteria, unwillingness to participate, or other reasons ** Among patients who withdrew from the study or were lost to follow-up, 18 met the primary endpoint prior to withdrawal or becoming lost. Among the patients who had not experienced an event prior to withdrawal or becoming lost, 6 were found through search of death registries to have died. All of these events were included in the primary endpoint analysis
Figure 2a
Figure 2a
Primary endpoint in diabetic patients.
Figure 2b
Figure 2b
Primary endpoint in non-diabetic patients.
Figure 3a
Figure 3a
Secondary endpoint in diabetic patients.
Figure 3b
Figure 3b
Secondary endpoint in non-diabetic patients.
Figure 4a
Figure 4a
Myocardial Infarction in diabetic patients by infusion group.
Figure 4b
Figure 4b
Mortality in diabetic patients by infusion group.

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner