A new era of prospective real-world safety evaluation primary report of XIENCE V USA (XIENCE V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System condition-of-approval post-market study)

Mitchell W Krucoff, David R Rutledge, Luis Gruberg, Lalitha Jonnavithula, John N Katopodis, William Lombardi, Vivian W Mao, Samin K Sharma, Charles A Simonton, Hoshedar P Tamboli, Jin Wang, Olivia Wilburn, Weiying Zhao, Krishnankutty Sudhir, James B Hermiller, Mitchell W Krucoff, David R Rutledge, Luis Gruberg, Lalitha Jonnavithula, John N Katopodis, William Lombardi, Vivian W Mao, Samin K Sharma, Charles A Simonton, Hoshedar P Tamboli, Jin Wang, Olivia Wilburn, Weiying Zhao, Krishnankutty Sudhir, James B Hermiller

Abstract

Objectives: The XIENCE V USA (XIENCE V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System Condition-of-Approval Post-Market study) sought to: 1) evaluate the safety of everolimus-eluting coronary stent systems (EECSS) in a contemporary cohort of real-world subjects; and 2) prospectively test the quality of event reporting with analysis of matched patients from the randomized SPIRIT IV (Clinical Evaluation of the XIENCE V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in the Treatment of Subjects With de Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions) trial.

Background: Randomized trials have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of EECSS in selected "standard-risk" patients.

Methods: The XIENCE V USA trial was a prospective, multicenter, single-arm study in unselected patients. The primary endpoint was Academic Research Consortium (ARC)-defined definite and probable stent thrombosis (ST); the co-primary endpoint was the composite of cardiac death and myocardial infarction at 1 year. Secondary analyses included: 1) stratification by standard-risk and extended-risk cohorts; and 2) late ST after dual antiplatelet therapy interruption.

Results: Of 5,054 participants (1,875 standard-risk; 3,179 extended-risk), 4,958 (98.1%) reached 1-year follow-up. The rate of ARC-defined definite and probable ST was 0.84% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.60% to 1.14%) in the overall population and 0.33% (95% CI: 0.12% to 10.72%) and 1.14% (95% CI: 0.80% to 11.58%) in the standard-risk and extended-risk cohorts, respectively. No late ST was observed after dual antiplatelet therapy interruption in either cohort after 6 months. The composite rate of cardiac death and ARC-defined myocardial infarction was 6.5% (95% CI: 5.79% to 17.17%) in the overall population, 3.8% (95% CI: 2.98% to 14.78%) in the standard-risk cohort, and 8.0% (95% CI: 7.09% to 19.02%) in the extended-risk cohort.

Conclusions: This study comprehensively reports ST rates for EECSS in a contemporary real-world population. The absence of ST after dual antiplatelet therapy interruption beyond 6 months in standard-risk and high-risk patients is notable. Consistent safety outcomes between matched standard-risk cohorts from the XIENCE V USA study and the SPIRIT IV randomized trial suggest that this study affords a reliable benchmark for understanding the safety of EECSS in the context of real-world clinical practice. (XIENCE V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System [EECSS] USA Post-Approval Study; NCT00676520).

Copyright © 2011 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner