Erythromycin induces supranormal gall bladder contraction in diabetic autonomic neuropathy

S M Catnach, A B Ballinger, M Stevens, P D Fairclough, R C Trembath, P L Drury, P J Watkins, S M Catnach, A B Ballinger, M Stevens, P D Fairclough, R C Trembath, P L Drury, P J Watkins

Abstract

Gall bladder motor function is impaired in some patients with diabetes. It has been suggested that the abnormalities of gall bladder motility are confined to those patients with autonomic neuropathy. Erythromycin, a motilin receptor agonist, causes gall bladder contraction in both normal subjects and patients with gall stones with impaired gall bladder emptying. The effect of erythromycin on gall bladder motility in seven patients with diabetes with an autonomic neuropathy, six patients with diabetes without autonomic neuropathy, and 17 normal subjects was studied using ultrasound. There was no significant difference in gall bladder fasting volume between the three groups, but the patients with diabetes with autonomic neuropathy had impaired postprandial gall bladder emptying compared with normal subjects (percentage emptied (SEM) 40 (10.3)% v 64 (2.8)%, p < 0.01) and those with autonomic neuropathy (48 (7.7)%, NS). Erythromycin produced a dramatic reduction in gall bladder fasting volume in patients with diabetes with an autonomic neuropathy, compared with either normal subjects or patients with diabetes without autonomic neuropathy (percentage reduction 62 (4.6)% in patients with autonomic neuropathy, v 37 (17.6)% in those without autonomic neuropathy, and 26 (7.3)% in the normal subjects, (p < 0.02) and returned gall bladder emptying to normal in all patients with impaired emptying. The pronounced effect of erythromycin in diabetic autonomic neuropathy suggests denervation supersensitivity and that the action of erythromycin on the gall bladder is neurally modulated.

References

    1. Diabetes. 1969 Jul;18(7):493-8
    1. Gastroenterology. 1992 Jun;102(6):2071-6
    1. N Engl J Med. 1980 Jun 5;302(23):1274-7
    1. Gastroenterology. 1980 Jul;79(1):40-6
    1. Gastroenterology. 1981 Oct;81(4):663-7
    1. Gastroenterology. 1982 Apr;82(4):711-9
    1. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1982 Oct 2;285(6346):916-8
    1. Dig Dis Sci. 1982 Nov;27(11):1019-24
    1. Gastroenterology. 1983 Jan;84(1):148-54
    1. Gastroenterology. 1983 May;84(5 Pt 1):1012-9
    1. Gastroenterology. 1983 Oct;85(4):830-6
    1. Gastroenterology. 1985 Mar;88(3):787-91
    1. Gastroenterology. 1985 Oct;89(4):716-22
    1. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1985 Nov;145(5):1009-11
    1. Dig Dis Sci. 1986 Feb;31(2):157-61
    1. Gastroenterology. 1986 Aug;91(2):313-7
    1. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1987 May;148(5):875-9
    1. Dig Dis Sci. 1987 Aug;32(8):824-8
    1. Gastroenterology. 1988 Jul;95(1):170-6
    1. Gastroenterology. 1989 Mar;96(3):860-3
    1. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1989;15(6):535-9
    1. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1990 Jan;170(1):25-31
    1. Am J Epidemiol. 1990 Aug;132(2):327-35
    1. Am J Gastroenterol. 1990 Aug;85(8):981-5
    1. Dig Dis Sci. 1990 Sep;35(9):1089-97
    1. Am J Physiol. 1990 Sep;259(3 Pt 1):G355-63
    1. J Clin Invest. 1973 Jun;52(6):1467-79

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner