Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Influence of Surgeon Specialization on Outcomes Following Appendicectomy in Children

Donagh A Healy, Dominic Doyle, Elvin Moynagh, Michael Maguire, Iftikhar Ahmed, Ahmed S Ahmed, Martin Caldwell, Tim O'Hanrahan, Stewart R Walsh, Donagh A Healy, Dominic Doyle, Elvin Moynagh, Michael Maguire, Iftikhar Ahmed, Ahmed S Ahmed, Martin Caldwell, Tim O'Hanrahan, Stewart R Walsh

Abstract

The aim of this study is to assess the influence of surgeon specialization on outcomes following appendicectomy in children.General surgeons and pediatric surgeons manage appendicitis in children; however, the influence of subspecialization on outcomes remains unclear.Two authors searched Medline and Embase to identify relevant studies. Eligible studies were comparative and provided data on children who had appendicectomy while under the care of general or pediatric surgical teams. Two authors initially screened titles and abstracts and then full text manuscripts were evaluated. Data were extracted by 2 authors using an electronic spreadsheet. Pooled risk ratios and pooled mean differences were used in analyses.We identified 9 relevant studies involving 50,963 children who were managed by general surgery teams and 15,032 children who were managed by pediatric surgery teams. A normal appendix was removed in 4660/48,105 children treated by general surgery units and in 889/14,760 children treated by pediatric units (pooled risk ratio 1.79; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.26-2.54; P = 0.001). Children managed in general units had shorter mean hospital stays compared with children managed in pediatric units (pooled mean difference -0.70 days; 95%CI -1.09 to -0.30; P = 0.0005). There were no significant differences regarding wound infections, intra-abdominal abscesses, readmissions, or mortality.We found that children who were managed by specialized pediatric surgery teams had lower rates of negative appendicectomy although mean length of stay was longer. Our article is based upon a group of heterogeneous and mostly retrospective studies and therefore there is little external validity. Further studies are needed.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no funding and conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Results of the search.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Forest plot for negative appendicectomy rate.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Forest plot for wound infections.

References

    1. Alloo J, Gerstle T, Shilyansky J, et al. Appendicitis in children less than 3 years of age: a 28-year review. Pediatr Surg Int 2004; 19:777–779.
    1. Aarabi S, Sidhwa F, Riehle KJ, et al. Pediatric appendicitis in New England: epidemiology and outcomes. J Pediatr Surg 2011; 46:1106–1114.
    1. Stewart B, Khanduri P, McCord C, et al. Global disease burden of conditions requiring emergency surgery. Br J Surg 2014; 101:e9–e22.
    1. Archampong D, Borowski D, Wille-Jorgensen P, et al. Workload and surgeon's specialty for outcome after colorectal cancer surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 3:CD005391.
    1. Hagen TP, Vaughan-Sarrazin MS, Cram P. Relation between hospital orthopaedic specialisation and outcomes in patients aged 65 and older: retrospective analysis of US Medicare data. BMJ 2010; 340:c165.
    1. Hillner BE, Smith TJ, Desch CE. Hospital and physician volume or specialization and outcomes in cancer treatment: importance in quality of cancer care. J Clin Oncol 2000; 18:2327–2340.
    1. Halm EA, Lee C, Chassin MR. Is volume related to outcome in health care? A systematic review and methodologic critique of the literature. Ann Intern Med 2002; 137:511–520.
    1. Tiboni S, Bhangu A, Hall NJ. Outcome of appendicectomy in children performed in paediatric surgery units compared with general surgery units. Br J Surg 2014; 101:707–714.
    1. Downs SH, Black N. The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health 1998; 52:377–384.
    1. Review Manager (RevMan) [Computer program]. Version 5.3. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014.
    1. Alexander F, Magnuson D, DiFiore J, et al. Specialty versus generalist care of children with appendicitis: an outcome comparison. J Pediatr Surg 2001; 36:1510–1513.
    1. Emil SG, Taylor MB. Appendicitis in children treated by pediatric versus general surgeons. J Am Coll Surg 2007; 204:34–39.
    1. Somme S, To T, Langer JC. Effect of subspecialty training on outcome after pediatric appendectomy. J Pediatr Surg 2007; 42:221–226.
    1. Whisker L, Luke D, Hendrickse C, et al. Appendicitis in children: a comparative study between a specialist paediatric centre and a district general hospital. J Pediatr Surg 2009; 44:362–367.
    1. Collins HL, Almond SL, Thompson B, et al. Comparison of childhood appendicitis management in the regional paediatric surgery unit and the district general hospital. J Pediatr Surg 2010; 45:300–302.
    1. Mizrahi I, Mazeh H, Levy Y, et al. Comparison of pediatric appendectomy outcomes between pediatric surgeons and general surgery residents. J Surg Res 2013; 180:185–190.
    1. da Silva PS, de Aguiar VE, Waisberg J. Pediatric surgeon vs general surgeon: does subspecialty training affect the outcome of appendicitis? Pediatr Int 2014; 56:248–253.
    1. Cheong LH, Emil S. Determinants of appendicitis outcomes in Canadian children. J Pediatr Surg 2014; 49:777–781.
    1. Kokoska ER, Minkes RK, Silen ML, et al. Effect of pediatric surgical practice on the treatment of children with appendicitis. Pediatrics 2001; 107:1298–1301.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors et collaborateurs

Les conditions médicales

Interventions en matière de drogue

3
S'abonner