The Penicillin for the Emergency Department Outpatient treatment of CELLulitis (PEDOCELL) trial: update to the study protocol and detailed statistical analysis plan (SAP)

Fiona Boland, Michael Quirke, Brenda Gannon, Sinead Plunkett, John Hayden, John McCourt, Ronan O'Sullivan, Joseph Eustace, Conor Deasy, Abel Wakai, Fiona Boland, Michael Quirke, Brenda Gannon, Sinead Plunkett, John Hayden, John McCourt, Ronan O'Sullivan, Joseph Eustace, Conor Deasy, Abel Wakai

Abstract

Background: Cellulitis is a painful, potentially serious, infectious process of the dermal and subdermal tissues and represents a significant disease burden. The statistical analysis plan (SAP) for the Penicillin for the Emergency Department Outpatient treatment of CELLulitis (PEDOCELL) trial is described here. The PEDOCELL trial is a multicentre, randomised, parallel-arm, double-blinded, non-inferiority clinical trial comparing the efficacy of flucloxacillin (monotherapy) with combination flucloxacillin/phenoxymethylpenicillin (dual therapy) for the outpatient treatment of cellulitis in the emergency department (ED) setting. To prevent outcome reporting bias, selective reporting and data-driven results, the a priori-defined, detailed SAP is presented here.

Methods/design: Patients will be randomised to either orally administered flucloxacillin 500 mg four times daily and placebo or orally administered 500 mg of flucloxacillin four times daily and phenoxymethylpenicillin 500 mg four times daily. The trial consists of a 7-day intervention period and a 2-week follow-up period. Study measurements will be taken at four specific time points: at patient enrolment, day 2-3 after enrolment and commencing treatment (early clinical response (ECR) visit), day 8-10 after enrolment (end-of-treatment (EOT) visit) and day 14-21 after enrolment (test-of-cure (TOC) visit). The primary outcome measure is investigator-determined clinical response measured at the TOC visit. The secondary outcomes are as follows: lesion size at ECR, clinical treatment failure at each follow-up visit, adherence and persistence of trial patients with orally administered antibiotic therapy at EOT, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and pharmacoeconomic assessments. The plan for the presentation and comparison of baseline characteristics and outcomes is described in this paper.

Discussion: This trial aims to establish the non-inferiority of orally administered flucloxacillin monotherapy with orally administered flucloxacillin/phenoxymethylpenicillin dual therapy for the ED-directed outpatient treatment of cellulitis. In doing so, this trial will bridge a knowledge gap in this understudied and common condition and will be relevant to clinicians across several different disciplines. The SAP for the PEDOCELL trial was developed a priori in order to minimise analysis bias.

Trial registration: EU Clinical Trials Register (EudraCT number: 2016-001528-69). Registered on 5 April 2016. ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT02922686 . Registered on 9 August 2016.

Keywords: Abscess; Cellulitis; Emergency department; Flucloxacillin; Phenoxymethylpenicillin; Randomised controlled trial; Statistical analysis plan; Wound infection.

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The Clinical Research Ethics Committee, University College Cork, Ireland approved the study for all centres on 23 September 2016 (Reference number: ECM 5 (2) 22/09/2016). Recruitment will not begin in any individual centre until all local approvals have been obtained.

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

    1. Dwan K, et al. Reporting of clinical trials: a review of research funders’ guidelines. Trials. 2008;9(1):1. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-9-66.
    1. Quirke M, et al. Oral flucloxacillin and phenoxymethylpenicillin versus flucloxacillin alone for the emergency department outpatient treatment of cellulitis: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2013;14(1):1. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-164.
    1. Bucko AD, et al. Randomized, double-blind, multicenter comparison of oral cefditoren 200 or 400 mg BID with either cefuroxime 250 mg BID or cefadroxil 500 mg BID for the treatment of uncomplicated skin and skin-structure infections. Clin Ther. 2002;24(7):1134–47. doi: 10.1016/S0149-2918(02)80024-8.
    1. Spellberg B, et al. Antimicrobial agents for complicated skin and skin-structure infections: justification of noninferiority margins in the absence of placebo-controlled trials. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;49(3):383–91. doi: 10.1086/600296.
    1. Cramer JA, et al. Medication compliance and persistence: terminology and definitions. Value Health. 2008;11(1):44–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00213.x.
    1. Kilburn SA, et al. Interventions for cellulitis and erysipelas. 2010. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2010;(6). doi:10.1002/14651858.CD004299.pub2.
    1. Lee BY, et al. The economic burden of community‐associated methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA‐MRSA) Clin Microbiol Infect. 2013;19(6):528–36. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2012.03914.x.
    1. Talan DA, et al. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole versus placebo for uncomplicated skin abscess. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(9):823–32. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1507476.
    1. D’Agostino RB, Massaro JM, Sullivan LM. Non‐inferiority trials: design concepts and issues—the encounters of academic consultants in statistics. Stat Med. 2003;22(2):169–86. doi: 10.1002/sim.1425.
    1. Piaggio G, et al. Reporting of noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials: extension of the CONSORT 2010 statement. JAMA. 2012;308(24):2594–604. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.87802.
    1. Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2001;1(1):1. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-1-2.
    1. Storck AJ, et al. Development of a health-related quality of life questionnaire (HRQL) for patients with extremity soft tissue infections (ESTI) BMC Infect Dis. 2006;6(1):1. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-6-148.

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner