Neurogenic pain relief by repetitive transcranial magnetic cortical stimulation depends on the origin and the site of pain

J-P Lefaucheur, X Drouot, I Menard-Lefaucheur, F Zerah, B Bendib, P Cesaro, Y Keravel, J-P Nguyen, J-P Lefaucheur, X Drouot, I Menard-Lefaucheur, F Zerah, B Bendib, P Cesaro, Y Keravel, J-P Nguyen

Abstract

Objective: Drug resistant neurogenic pain can be relieved by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the motor cortex. This study was designed to assess the influence of pain origin, pain site, and sensory loss on rTMS efficacy.

Patients and methods: Sixty right handed patients were included, suffering from intractable pain secondary to one of the following types of lesion: thalamic stroke, brainstem stroke, spinal cord lesion, brachial plexus lesion, or trigeminal nerve lesion. The pain predominated unilaterally in the face, the upper limb, or the lower limb. The thermal sensory thresholds were measured within the painful zone and were found to be highly or moderately elevated. Finally, the pain level was scored on a visual analogue scale before and after a 20 minute session of "real" or "sham" 10 Hz rTMS over the side of the motor cortex corresponding to the hand on the painful side, even if the pain was not experienced in the hand itself.

Results: and discussion: The percentage pain reduction was significantly greater following real than sham rTMS (-22.9% v -7.8%, p = 0.0002), confirming that motor cortex rTMS was able to induce antalgic effects. These effects were significantly influenced by the origin and the site of pain. For pain origin, results were worse in patients with brainstem stroke, whatever the site of pain. This was consistent with a descending modulation within the brainstem, triggered by the motor corticothalamic output. For pain site, better results were obtained for facial pain, although stimulation was targeted on the hand cortical area. Thus, in contrast to implanted stimulation, the target for rTMS procedure in pain control may not be the area corresponding to the painful zone but an adjacent one. Across representation plasticity of cortical areas resulting from deafferentation could explain this discrepancy. Finally, the degree of sensory loss did not interfere with pain origin or pain site regarding rTMS effects.

Conclusion: Motor cortex rTMS was found to result in a significant but transient relief of chronic pain, influenced by pain origin and pain site. These parameters should be taken into account in any further study of rTMS application in chronic pain control.

References

    1. Brain. 2002 Jul;125(Pt 7):1660-4
    1. Neurophysiol Clin. 2001 Aug;31(4):247-52
    1. Appl Neurophysiol. 1982;45(1-2):156-9
    1. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1984;7:309-38
    1. Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien). 1991;52:137-9
    1. Neurology. 1992 Jul;42(7):1302-6
    1. J Neurosurg. 1993 Mar;78(3):393-401
    1. Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien). 1993;58:150-3
    1. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1994 Aug;91(2):79-92
    1. Lancet. 1996 Jul 27;348(9022):233-7
    1. Neuroreport. 1996 Sep 2;7(13):2068-70
    1. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1996;138(11):1300-6
    1. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1996 Dec;101(6):478-82
    1. No Shinkei Geka. 1997 Apr;25(4):315-9
    1. Ann Neurol. 1997 May;41(5):621-30
    1. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 1997;68:54-60
    1. Neuroimage. 1996 Feb;3(1):1-9
    1. Am J Psychiatry. 1997 Dec;154(12):1752-6
    1. Pain. 1999 Sep;82(3):245-51
    1. Neurosci Lett. 1996 May 24;210(1):45-8
    1. Pain. 1999 Nov;83(2):259-73
    1. Biol Psychiatry. 2000 Feb 15;47(4):325-31
    1. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 1999;73(1-4):122-5
    1. Biol Psychiatry. 2000 Nov 15;48(10):962-70
    1. Biol Psychiatry. 2001 Mar 1;49(5):460-3
    1. Clin Neurophysiol. 2001 Apr;112(4):627-35
    1. J Neurosci. 2001 May 15;21(10):3609-18
    1. Neuroreport. 2001 Sep 17;12(13):2963-5
    1. J Neurosci. 2002 Jul 1;22(13):5563-71

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner