Attractive toxic sugar bait (ATSB) methods decimate populations of Anopheles malaria vectors in arid environments regardless of the local availability of favoured sugar-source blossoms

John C Beier, Günter C Müller, Weidong Gu, Kristopher L Arheart, Yosef Schlein, John C Beier, Günter C Müller, Weidong Gu, Kristopher L Arheart, Yosef Schlein

Abstract

Background: Attractive toxic sugar bait (ATSB) methods are a new and promising "attract and kill" strategy for mosquito control. Sugar-feeding female and male mosquitoes attracted to ATSB solutions, either sprayed on plants or in bait stations, ingest an incorporated low-risk toxin such as boric acid and are killed. This field study in the arid malaria-free oasis environment of Israel compares how the availability of a primary natural sugar source for Anopheles sergentii mosquitoes: flowering Acacia raddiana trees, affects the efficacy of ATSB methods for mosquito control.

Methods: A 47-day field trial was conducted to compare impacts of a single application of ATSB treatment on mosquito densities and age structure in isolated uninhabited sugar-rich and sugar-poor oases relative to an untreated sugar-rich oasis that served as a control.

Results: ATSB spraying on patches of non-flowering vegetation around freshwater springs reduced densities of female An. sergentii by 95.2% in the sugar-rich oasis and 98.6% in the sugar-poor oasis; males in both oases were practically eliminated. It reduced daily survival rates of female An. sergentii from 0.77 to 0.35 in the sugar-poor oasis and from 0.85 to 0.51 in the sugar-rich oasis. ATSB treatment reduced the proportion of older more epidemiologically dangerous mosquitoes (three or more gonotrophic cycles) by 100% and 96.7%, respectively, in the sugar-poor and sugar-rich oases. Overall, malaria vectorial capacity was reduced from 11.2 to 0.0 in the sugar-poor oasis and from 79.0 to 0.03 in the sugar-rich oasis. Reduction in vector capacity to negligible levels days after ATSB application in the sugar-poor oasis, but not until after 2 weeks in the sugar-rich oasis, show that natural sugar sources compete with the applied ATSB solutions.

Conclusion: While readily available natural sugar sources delay ATSB impact, they do not affect overall outcomes because the high frequency of sugar feeding by mosquitoes has an accumulating effect on the probability they will be attracted to and killed by ATSB methods. Operationally, ATSB methods for malaria vector control are highly effective in arid environments regardless of competitive, highly attractive natural sugar sources in their outdoor environment.

© 2012 Beier et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Averages (± 1 standard error) of light trap captures of female and male Anopheles sergentii in three oases (sugar-rich, sugar-poor, and control) from 1 November to 17 December, 2009, in Israel (vertical dot lines in panels indicate the date of implementation of ATSB).

References

    1. Muller G, Schlein Y. Sugar questing mosquitoes in arid areas gather on scarce blossoms that can be used for control. Int J Parasitol. 2006;36:1077–1080. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2006.06.008.
    1. Muller GC, Schlein Y. Efficacy of toxic sugar baits against adult cistern-dwelling Anopheles claviger. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2008;102:480–484. doi: 10.1016/j.trstmh.2008.01.008.
    1. Schlein Y, Muller GC. An approach to mosquito control: using the dominant attraction of flowering Tamarix jordani trees against Culex pipiens. J Med Entomol. 2008;45:384–390. doi: 10.1603/0022-2585(2008)45[384:AATMCU];2.
    1. Muller GC, Kravchenko VD, Schlein Y. Decline of Anopheles sergentiiand Aedes caspius populations following presentation of attractive toxic (spinosad) sugar bait stations in an oasis. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2008;24:147–149. doi: 10.2987/8756-971X(2008)24[147:DOASAA];2.
    1. Muller GC, Junnila A, Schlein Y. Effective control of adult Culex pipiensby spraying an attractive toxic sugar bait solution in the vegetation near larval habitats. J Med Entomol. 2010;47:63–66. doi: 10.1603/033.047.0108.
    1. Muller GC, Junnila A, Qualls W, Revay EE, Kline DL, Allan S, Schlein Y, Xue RD. Control of Culex quinquefasciatus in a storm drain system in Florida using attractive toxic sugar baits. Med Vet Entomol. 2010;24:346–351. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2915.2010.00876.x.
    1. Muller GC, Beier JC, Traore SF, Toure MB, Traore MM, Bah S, Doumbia S, Schlein Y. Successful field trial of attractive toxic sugar bait (ATSB) plant-spraying methods against malaria vectors in the Anopheles gambiae complex in Mali, West Africa. Malar J. 2010;9:210. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-9-210.
    1. Enayati A, Hemingway J. Malaria management: past, present, and future. Ann Rev Entomol. 2010;55:569–591. doi: 10.1146/annurev-ento-112408-085423.
    1. Environmental Protection Agency. R.E.D Facts: Boric Acid. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, Washington D.C.; 1993. Report PB94-161668; EPA/738/F-93/006.
    1. Yuval B. The other habit: sugar feeding by mosquitoes. Bull Soc Vector Ecol. 1992;17:150–156.
    1. Foster WA. Mosquito sugar feeding and reproductive energetics. Ann Rev Entomol. 1995;40:443–474. doi: 10.1146/annurev.en.40.010195.002303.
    1. Grimstad PR, DeFoliart GR. Nectar sources of Wisconsin mosquitoes. J Med Entomol. 1974;11:331–341.
    1. Muller G, Schlein Y. Plant tissues: the frugal diet of mosquitoes in adverse conditions. Med Vet Entomol. 2005;19:413–422. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2915.2005.00590.x.
    1. Muller GC, Beier JC, Traore SF, Toure MB, Traore MM, Bah S, Doumbia S, Schlein Y. Field experiments of Anopheles gambiae attraction to local fruits/seedpods and flowering plants in Mali to optimize strategies for malaria vector control in Africa using attractive toxic sugar bait methods. Malar J. 2010;9:262. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-9-262.
    1. Zahar AR. Review of the ecology of malaria vectors in the WHO Eastern Mediterranean Region. Bull World Health Organ. 1974;50:427–440.
    1. Farid MA. The implications of Anopheles sergentii for malaria eradication programmes east of the Mediterranean. Bull World Health Organ. 1956;15:821–828.
    1. Kligler IJ. The epidemiology of malaria in Palestine. A contribution to the epidemiology of malaria. Am J Hyg. 1926;6:431–449.
    1. Saliternik Z. The specific biological characteristics of Anopheles(Myzomyia)sergentii(Theo.) and their correlation with malaria control in Israel. Bull Entomol Res. 1955;46:445–462. doi: 10.1017/S0007485300031023.
    1. Saliternik Z. Methods of malaria eradication under the conditions peculiar to Israel. Isr J Med Sci. 1966;2:232–238.
    1. Kitron U, Spielman A. Suppression of transmission of malaria through source reduction: antianopheline measures applied in Israel, the United States, and Italy. Rev Infect Dis. 1989;11:391–406. doi: 10.1093/clinids/11.3.391.
    1. Saliternik Z. The history of the struggle against malaria and its eradication in Israel. (In Hebrew) American Physicians Fellowship Inc Jerusalem. 1979. p. 217.
    1. Yekutiel P. Infective diseases in Israel. Changing patterns over 30 years. Isr J Med Sci. 1979;15:976–982.
    1. Gu W, Muller G, Schlein Y, Novak RJ, Beier JC. Natural plant sugar sources of Anopheles mosquitoes strongly impact malaria transmission potential. PLoS One. 2011;6:e15996. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015996.
    1. Zohary M, Orshansky G. Structure and ecology of the vegetation in the Dead Sea region of Palestine. Palest J Bot. 1949;4:177–206.
    1. Danin A. Flora and Vegetation of Israel. Dordrecht: Junk; 1988.
    1. Beaumont P, Blake GH, Wagstaff JM. The Middle East, A Geographical Study. London: John Wiley & Sons; 1976.
    1. Ashbel D. Bio-climatic Atlas of Israel. Jerusalem: Meteorology Department of the Hebrew University; 1951. p. 151.
    1. Margalit J, Avrahami M, Tahori AS. Mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) breeding in the Dead Sea Area. Isr J Zool. 1973;22:27–37.
    1. Schlein Y, Muller GC. Experimental control of Phlebotomus papatasi by spraying attractive toxic sugar bait (ATSB) on vegetation. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2010;104:766–771. doi: 10.1016/j.trstmh.2010.08.014.
    1. Detinova TS. Age grouping methods in Diptera of medical importance. World Health Organization Monographs Series 47. Geneva. 1962.
    1. Gu W, Novak RJ. Habitat-based modeling of impacts of mosquito larval interventions on entomological inoculation rates, incidence, and prevalence of malaria. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2005;73:546–552.
    1. Dye C. Vectorial capacity: must we measure all its components? Parasitol Today. 1986;2:203–209. doi: 10.1016/0169-4758(86)90082-7.
    1. Gary RE Jr, Foster WA. Anopheles gambiae feeding and survival on honeydew and extra-floral nectar of peridomestic plants. Med Vet Entomol. 2004;18:102–107. doi: 10.1111/j.0269-283X.2004.00483.x.
    1. Gary RE Jr, Foster WA. Diel timing and frequency of sugar feeding in the mosquito Anopheles gambiae, depending on sex, gonotrophic state and resource availability. Med Vet Entomol. 2006;20:308–316. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2915.2006.00638.x.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors et collaborateurs

Les conditions médicales

Interventions en matière de drogue

3
S'abonner