Optimal endoscopy timing in patients with acute variceal bleeding: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Da Hyun Jung, Cheal Wung Huh, Na Jin Kim, Byung-Wook Kim, Da Hyun Jung, Cheal Wung Huh, Na Jin Kim, Byung-Wook Kim

Abstract

Although current guidelines recommend performing endoscopy within 12 hours for acute variceal bleeding (AVB), the optimal timing remains controversial. This study aimed to assess the effect of endoscopy timing on the mortality and rebleeding rates in AVB through a systematic review and meta-analysis of all eligible studies. PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase were searched for relevant publications up to January 2019. Overall mortality, rebleeding rate, and other clinical outcomes were determined. For the non-randomized studies, the risk of bias assessment tool was used to assess the methodological quality of the included publications. The Mantel-Haenszel random-effects model of the RevMan software (Cochrane) and the inverse variance method were used to analyse binary end points and continuous outcomes, respectively. This meta-analysis included five studies with 854 and 453 participants who underwent urgent (≤12 hours) and non-urgent endoscopies (>12 hours), respectively. All the included studies were retrospective in nature, because of obvious ethical issues. No significant differences in the severity indexes were found between the urgent and non-urgent groups. Three studies showed 6-week mortality and the others in-hospital mortality as main outcomes. No significant difference in overall mortality rate was found between the groups (odds ratio [OR]: 0.72, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.36-1.45, p = 0.36). The rebleeding rate was similar between the two groups (OR: 1.21, 95% CI: 0.76-1.93, p = 0.41). Other outcomes such as successful haemostasis, need for salvage therapy, length of hospital stay, and number of blood transfusions were also similar between the groups. We demonstrated that endoscopy timing does not affect the mortality or rebleeding rate of patients with AVB. Therefore, an appropriate timing of endoscopy would be more important than an urgent endoscopy depending on each patient's condition.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of the studies included in the meta-analysis.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Risk of bias of the enrolled studies.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Forrest plot of the overall mortality rate for comparison between the urgent and non-urgent groups.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Forrest plot of rebleeding for comparison between the urgent and non-urgent groups.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Forrest plot of other outcomes for comparison between the urgent and non-urgent groups. (A) Successful haemostasis; (B) need for salvage therapy; (C) length of hospital stay; (D) number of blood transfusions.

References

    1. Carbonell N, et al. Improved survival after variceal bleeding in patients with cirrhosis over the past two decades. Hepatology. 2004;40:652–659. doi: 10.1002/hep.20339.
    1. D’Amico G, De Franchis R, Cooperative Study G. Upper digestive bleeding in cirrhosis. Post-therapeutic outcome and prognostic indicators. Hepatology. 2003;38:599–612. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2003.50385.
    1. de Franchis R, Baveno VIF. Expanding consensus in portal hypertension: Report of the Baveno VI Consensus Workshop: Stratifying risk and individualizing care for portal hypertension. J. Hepatol. 2015;63:743–752. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2015.05.022.
    1. Garcia-Tsao G, et al. Prevention and management of gastroesophageal varices and variceal hemorrhage in cirrhosis. Hepatology. 2007;46:922–938. doi: 10.1002/hep.21907.
    1. Yoo JJ, et al. Timing of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy does not influence short-term outcomes in patients with acute variceal bleeding. World J. Gastroenterol. 2018;24:5025–5033. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i44.5025.
    1. Cheung J, Soo I, Bastiampillai R, Zhu Q, Ma M. Urgent vs. non-urgent endoscopy in stable acute variceal bleeding. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2009;104:1125–1129. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.78.
    1. Huh, C. W. et al. Optimal endoscopy timing according to the severity of underlying liver disease in patients with acute variceal bleeding. Dig Liver Dis, 10.1016/j.dld.2019.01.013 (2019).
    1. Chen PH, et al. Delayed endoscopy increases re-bleeding and mortality in patients with hematemesis and active esophageal variceal bleeding: a cohort study. J. Hepatol. 2012;57:1207–1213. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2012.07.038.
    1. Hsu YC, et al. Delayed endoscopy as a risk factor for in-hospital mortality in cirrhotic patients with acute variceal hemorrhage. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2009;24:1294–1299. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2009.05903.x.
    1. Liberati A, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2009;62:e1–34. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.006.
    1. Kim SY, et al. Testing a tool for assessing the risk of bias for nonrandomized studies showed moderate reliability and promising validity. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2013;66:408–414. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.09.016.
    1. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327:557–560. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557.
    1. Rudler M, et al. Recalibrated MELD and hepatic encephalopathy are prognostic factors in cirrhotic patients with acute variceal bleeding. Liver Int. 2018;38:469–476. doi: 10.1111/liv.13632.
    1. Thabut D, et al. Multicenter prospective validation of the Baveno IV and Baveno II/III criteria in cirrhosis patients with variceal bleeding. Hepatology. 2015;61:1024–1032. doi: 10.1002/hep.27407.
    1. Bambha K, et al. Predictors of early re-bleeding and mortality after acute variceal haemorrhage in patients with cirrhosis. Gut. 2008;57:814–820. doi: 10.1136/gut.2007.137489.
    1. Amitrano L, Guardascione MA, Bennato R, Manguso F, Balzano A. MELD score and hepatocellular carcinoma identify patients at different risk of short-term mortality among cirrhotics bleeding from esophageal varices. J. Hepatol. 2005;42:820–825. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2005.01.021.
    1. Moitinho E, et al. Prognostic value of early measurements of portal pressure in acute variceal bleeding. Gastroenterology. 1999;117:626–631. doi: 10.1016/S0016-5085(99)70455-5.
    1. Reverter E, et al. A MELD-based model to determine risk of mortality among patients with acute variceal bleeding. Gastroenterology. 2014;146:412–419 e413. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2013.10.018.
    1. Page, M. J., Higgins, J. P. T. & Sterne, J. A. C. Chapter 13: Assessing risk of bias due to missing results in a synthesis. In: Higgins, J. P. T., Thomas, J., Chandler, J., Cumpston, M., Li, T., Page, M. J., Welch, V. A. (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.0 (updated July 2019). Cochrane, Available from (2019).

Source: PubMed

Sponsors et collaborateurs

Les conditions médicales

Interventions en matière de drogue

3
S'abonner