A Phase II study of neoadjuvant axitinib for reducing the extent of venous tumour thrombus in clear cell renal cell cancer with venous invasion (NAXIVA)

Grant D Stewart, Sarah J Welsh, Stephan Ursprung, Ferdia A Gallagher, James O Jones, Jacqui Shields, Christopher G Smith, Thomas J Mitchell, Anne Y Warren, Axel Bex, Ekaterini Boleti, Jade Carruthers, Tim Eisen, Kate Fife, Abdel Hamid, Alexander Laird, Steve Leung, Jahangeer Malik, Iosif A Mendichovszky, Faiz Mumtaz, Grenville Oades, Andrew N Priest, Antony C P Riddick, Balaji Venugopal, Michelle Welsh, Kathleen Riddle, Lisa E M Hopcroft, NAXIVA Trial Group, Robert J Jones, Niki Couper, Lisa E M Hopcroft, Robert Hill, Athena Matakidou, Cara Caasi, James Watson, Lauren Wallis, Ruby Cross, Sarah W Burge, Anne George, Tobias Klatte, Tevita F Aho, James N Armitage, Sabrina Rossi, Charlie Massie, Shubha Anand, Tiffany Haddow, Marc Dodd, Wenhan Deng, Ezequiel Martin, Philip Howden, Stephanie Wenlock, Evis Sala, Stefan Symeonides, Lynn Ho, Jennifer Baxter, Stuart Leslie, Duncan McLaren, John Brush, Marie O'Donnell, Alisa Griffin, Ruth Orr, Catriona Cowan, Thomas Powles, Anna Pejnovic, Sophia Tincey, Lee Grant, Martin Nuttall, Lucy Willsher, Christian Barnett, David Nicol, James Larkin, Alison Fielding, Grant D Stewart, Sarah J Welsh, Stephan Ursprung, Ferdia A Gallagher, James O Jones, Jacqui Shields, Christopher G Smith, Thomas J Mitchell, Anne Y Warren, Axel Bex, Ekaterini Boleti, Jade Carruthers, Tim Eisen, Kate Fife, Abdel Hamid, Alexander Laird, Steve Leung, Jahangeer Malik, Iosif A Mendichovszky, Faiz Mumtaz, Grenville Oades, Andrew N Priest, Antony C P Riddick, Balaji Venugopal, Michelle Welsh, Kathleen Riddle, Lisa E M Hopcroft, NAXIVA Trial Group, Robert J Jones, Niki Couper, Lisa E M Hopcroft, Robert Hill, Athena Matakidou, Cara Caasi, James Watson, Lauren Wallis, Ruby Cross, Sarah W Burge, Anne George, Tobias Klatte, Tevita F Aho, James N Armitage, Sabrina Rossi, Charlie Massie, Shubha Anand, Tiffany Haddow, Marc Dodd, Wenhan Deng, Ezequiel Martin, Philip Howden, Stephanie Wenlock, Evis Sala, Stefan Symeonides, Lynn Ho, Jennifer Baxter, Stuart Leslie, Duncan McLaren, John Brush, Marie O'Donnell, Alisa Griffin, Ruth Orr, Catriona Cowan, Thomas Powles, Anna Pejnovic, Sophia Tincey, Lee Grant, Martin Nuttall, Lucy Willsher, Christian Barnett, David Nicol, James Larkin, Alison Fielding

Abstract

Background: Surgery for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with venous tumour thrombus (VTT) extension into the renal vein (RV) and/or inferior vena cava (IVC) has high peri-surgical morbidity/mortality. NAXIVA assessed the response of VTT to axitinib, a potent tyrosine kinase inhibitor.

Methods: NAXIVA was a single-arm, multi-centre, Phase 2 study. In total, 20 patients with resectable clear cell RCC and VTT received upto 8 weeks of pre-surgical axitinib. The primary endpoint was percentage of evaluable patients with VTT improvement by Mayo level on MRI. Secondary endpoints were percentage change in surgical approach and VTT length, response rate (RECISTv1.1) and surgical morbidity.

Results: In all, 35% (7/20) patients with VTT had a reduction in Mayo level with axitinib: 37.5% (6/16) with IVC VTT and 25% (1/4) with RV-only VTT. No patients had an increase in Mayo level. In total, 75% (15/20) of patients had a reduction in VTT length. Overall, 41.2% (7/17) of patients who underwent surgery had less invasive surgery than originally planned. Non-responders exhibited lower baseline microvessel density (CD31), higher Ki67 and exhausted or regulatory T-cell phenotype.

Conclusions: NAXIVA provides the first Level II evidence that axitinib downstages VTT in a significant proportion of patients leading to reduction in the extent of surgery.

Clinical trial registration: NCT03494816.

Conflict of interest statement

GDS—educational grants from Pfizer, AstraZeneca and Intuitive Surgical; consultancy fees from Pfizer, Merck, EUSA Pharma and CMR Surgical; Travel expenses from Pfizer and Speaker fees from Pfizer. TE—employment: Roche (current), AstraZeneca (to March 2020); stock: AstraZeneca, Roche; research support: AstraZeneca, Bayer, Pfizer. FAG—research support from GE Healthcare; Grants from GSK; Consulting for AZ on behalf of the University of Cambridge. KF has received advisory, consultancy or speaker fees from ESAI, Ipsen, Roche, Novartis, Merck, Pfizer, EUSA Pharma, BMS, MSD and Sanofi and conference support from Novartis, Ipsen, MSD and EUSA Pharma and Institutional research funding from Roche, Merck and Exelixis. AB received honoraria for participation in advisory boards for Pfizer, Novartis, and Ipsen, and an educational grant from Pfizer. RJ has received educational grants from Astellas, Bayer, Clovis and Exelixis; consultancy fees from Roche, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Bayer, Novartis/AAA, Astellas, Janssen, MSD, Pfizer, Merck Serono; honoraria from Roche, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Bayer, Astellas, Janssen, MSD, Pfizer, Merck Serono; conference support from MSD and Bayer; advisory board payment from Roche. The remaining authors declare no competing interests.

© 2022. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1. Description of Mayo level and…
Fig. 1. Description of Mayo level and study cohort.
a Summary of Mayo level, figure adapted from ref. [37]. b Consort diagram. *Participants who had at least one dose of the study drug were included in the evaluable population, irrespective of whether surgery was performed.
Fig. 2. Mayo level at baseline, week…
Fig. 2. Mayo level at baseline, week 3 and week 9 for eligible and evaluable patients.
Note that N105 had a RV-only VTT response receding from the medial to the insertion of the gonadal vein to lateral to it. Supplementary Fig. S1 shows examples of two IVC responder patients.
Fig. 3. Percentage change in VTT length…
Fig. 3. Percentage change in VTT length over the axitinib treatment period.
a Line chart showing percentage change in VTT length for IVC responders, RV responders and non-responders. Waterfall plot of VTT response against tumour response at (b) 3 and (c) 9 weeks of treatment. N0601 (surgery expedited), N0605 (surgery expedited) and N0903 (exited trial due to new brain metastasis) did not have scans at week 9. Bar colour indicates the patient’s overall RECIST status distinct from VTT assessment.
Fig. 4. Immumofluorescence analysis of baseline biopsies.
Fig. 4. Immumofluorescence analysis of baseline biopsies.
Representative images of baseline biopsies stained for a blood vessels (CD31), b proliferating cells (Ki67) and e CD8 + T-cell activation status (Granzyme B and PD-1). Whole slides were scanned and quantified using automated computer image analysis on HALO (c, d, fh two-tailed Student t test).

References

    1. Kirkali Z, Van Poppel H. A critical analysis of surgery for kidney cancer with vena cava invasion. Eur Urol. 2007;52:658–62. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.05.009.
    1. Blute ML, Leibovich BC, Lohse CM, Cheville JC, Zincke H. The Mayo Clinic experience with surgical management, complications and outcome for patients with renal cell carcinoma and venous tumour thrombus. BJU Int. 2004;94:33–41. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2004.04897.x.
    1. Parra J, Drouin SJ, Hupertan V, Comperat E, Bitker MO, Rouprêt M. Oncological outcomes in patients undergoing radical nephrectomy and vena cava thrombectomy for renal cell carcinoma with venous extension: a single-centre experience. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2011;37:422–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2011.01.028.
    1. Lambert EH, Pierorazio PM, Shabsigh A, Olsson CA, Benson MC, McKiernan JM. Prognostic risk stratification and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing surgical treatment for renal cell carcinoma with vascular tumor thrombus. Urology. 2007;69:1054–8. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.02.052.
    1. Cost NG, Delacroix SE, Sleeper JP, Smith PJ, Youssef RF, Chapin BF, et al. The impact of targeted molecular therapies on the level of renal cell carcinoma vena caval tumor thrombus. Eur Urol. 2011;59:912–8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.02.032.
    1. Bigot P, Fardoun T, Bernhard JC, Xylinas E, Berger J, Rouprêt M, et al. Neoadjuvant targeted molecular therapies in patients undergoing nephrectomy and inferior vena cava thrombectomy: is it useful? World J Urol. 2014;32:109–14. doi: 10.1007/s00345-013-1088-1.
    1. Peng C, Gu L, Wang L, Huang Q, Wang B, Guo G, et al. Role of presurgical targeted molecular therapy in renal cell carcinoma with an inferior vena cava tumor thrombus. Onco Targets Ther. 2018;11:1997–2005. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S158114.
    1. Fukuda H, Kondo T, Takagi T, Iizuka J, Nagashima Y, Tanabe K. Limited benefit of targeted molecular therapy for inferior vena cava thrombus associated with renal cell carcinoma. Int J Clin Oncol. 2017;22:767–73. doi: 10.1007/s10147-017-1119-9.
    1. Ujike T, Uemura M, Kawashima A, Nagahara A, Fujita K, Miyagawa Y, et al. Clinical and histopathological effects of presurgical treatment with sunitinib for renal cell carcinoma with inferior vena cava tumor thrombus at a single institution. Anticancer Drugs. 2016;27:1038–43. doi: 10.1097/CAD.0000000000000422.
    1. Horn T, Thalgott MK, Maurer T, Hauner K, Schulz S, Fingerle A, et al. Presurgical treatment with sunitinib for renal cell carcinoma with a level III/IV vena cava tumour thrombus. Anticancer Res. 2012;32:1729–35.
    1. Tanaka Y, Hatakeyama S, Hosogoe S, Tanaka T, Hamano I, Kusaka A, et al. Presurgical axitinib therapy increases fibrotic reactions within tumor thrombus in renal cell carcinoma with thrombus extending to the inferior vena cava. Int J Clin Oncol. 2018;23:134–41. doi: 10.1007/s10147-017-1169-z.
    1. Terakawa T, Hussein AA, Bando Y, Guru KA, Furukawa J, Shigemura K, et al. Presurgical pazopanib for renal cell carcinoma with inferior vena caval thrombus: a single-institution study. Anticancer Drugs. 2018;29:565–71. doi: 10.1097/CAD.0000000000000627.
    1. Wood CG, Ferguson JE, Parker JS, Moore DT, Whisenant JG, Maygarden SJ, et al. Neoadjuvant pazopanib and molecular analysis of tissue response in renal cell carcinoma. JCI Insight. 2020;5:132852. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.132852.
    1. Rini BI, Plimack ER, Takagi T, Elson P, Wood LS, Dreicer R, et al. A Phase II study of pazopanib in patients with localized renal cell carcinoma to optimize preservation of renal parenchyma. J Urol. 2015;194:297–303. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.03.096.
    1. Karam JA, Devine CE, Urbauer DL, Lozano M, Maity T, Ahrar K, et al. Phase 2 trial of neoadjuvant axitinib in patients with locally advanced nonmetastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol. 2014;66:874–80.
    1. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P-A. Classification of surgical complications. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–13. doi: 10.1097/.
    1. Simon R. Optimal two-stage designs for phase II clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1989;10:1–10. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(89)90015-9.
    1. Koyama T, Chen H. Proper inference from Simon’s two-stage designs. Stat Med. 2008;27:3145–54. doi: 10.1002/sim.3123.
    1. Smith CG, Moser T, Mouliere F, Field-Rayner J, Eldridge M, Riediger AL, et al. Comprehensive characterization of cell-free tumor DNA in plasma and urine of patients with renal tumors. Genome Med. 2020;12:23. doi: 10.1186/s13073-020-00723-8.
    1. Adalsteinsson VA, Ha G, Freeman SS, Choudhury AD, Stover DG, Parsons HA, et al. Scalable whole-exome sequencing of cell-free DNA reveals high concordance with metastatic tumors. Nat Commun. 2017;8:1324. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-00965-y.
    1. Motzer RJ, Banchereau R, Hamidi H, Powles T, McDermott D, Atkins MB, et al. Molecular subsets in renal cancer determine outcome to checkpoint and angiogenesis blockade. Cancer Cell. 2020;38:803–17.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2020.10.011.
    1. McDermott DF, Huseni MA, Atkins MB, Motzer RJ, Rini BI, Escudier B, et al. Clinical activity and molecular correlates of response to atezolizumab alone or in combination with bevacizumab versus sunitinib in renal cell carcinoma. Nat Med. 2018;24:749–57. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0053-3.
    1. Motzer RJ, Robbins PB, Powles T, Albiges L, Haanen JB, Larkin J, et al. Avelumab plus axitinib versus sunitinib in advanced renal cell carcinoma: biomarker analysis of the phase 3 JAVELIN Renal 101 trial. Nat Med. 2020;26:1733–41. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-1044-8.
    1. Bex A, Mulders P, Jewett M, Wagstaff J, van Thienen JV, Blank CU, et al. Comparison of immediate vs deferred cytoreductive nephrectomy in patients with synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma receiving sunitinib: the SURTIME randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2019;5:164–70. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.5543.
    1. Welsh SJ, Thompson N, Warren A, Priest AN, Barrett T, Ursprung S, et al. Dynamic biomarker and imaging changes from a phase II study of pre- and post-surgical sunitinib. BJU Int. 2021. 10.1111/bju.15600. Online ahead of print.
    1. Ursprung S, Priest AN, Zaccagna F, Qian W, Machin A, Stewart GD, et al. Multiparametric MRI for assessment of early response to neoadjuvant sunitinib in renal cell carcinoma. PLoS ONE. 2021;16:e0258988. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258988.
    1. Biyani CS, Pecanka J, Rouprêt M, Jensen JB, Mitropoulos D. Intraoperative adverse incident classification (EAUiaiC) by the European association of urology ad hoc complications guidelines panel. Eur Urol. 2020;77:601–10. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.11.015.
    1. Gore ME, Szczylik C, Porta C, Bracarda S, Bjarnason GA, Oudard S, et al. Final results from the large sunitinib global expanded-access trial in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Br J Cancer. 2015;113:12–9. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2015.196.
    1. Sharma R, Kadife E, Myers M, Kannourakis G, Prithviraj P, Ahmed N. Determinants of resistance to VEGF-TKI and immune checkpoint inhibitors in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2021;40:186. doi: 10.1186/s13046-021-01961-3.
    1. Gadd M, Pranavan G, Malik L. Association between tyrosine-kinase inhibitor induced hypertension and treatment outcomes in metastatic renal cancer. Cancer Rep. 2020;3:e1275.
    1. Choueiri TK, Powles T, Burotto M, Escudier B, Bourlon MT, Zurawski B, et al. Nivolumab plus cabozantinib versus sunitinib for advanced renal-cell carcinoma. N. Engl J Med. 2021;384:829–41. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2026982.
    1. Motzer R, Alekseev B, Rha S-Y, Porta C, Eto M, Powles T, et al. Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab or everolimus for advanced renal cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2021;384:1289–300. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2035716.
    1. Rini BI, Plimack ER, Stus V, Gafanov R, Hawkins R, Nosov D, et al. Pembrolizumab plus axitinib versus sunitinib for advanced renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2019;380:1116–27. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1816714.
    1. Dynamic changes of the immune infiltrate after neoadjuvant avelumab/axitinib in patients (pts) with localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC) who are at high risk of relapse after nephrectomy (NeoAvAx). J Clin Oncol. 2022. .
    1. Gorin MA, Patel HD, Rowe SP, Hahn NM, Hammers HJ, Pons A, et al. Neoadjuvant nivolumab in patients with high-risk nonmetastatic renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol Oncol. 2021.
    1. Stewart GD, Welsh SJ, Ursprung S, Gallagher F, Mendichovszky I, Riddick A, et al. NAXIVA: a phase II neoadjuvant study of axitinib for reducing extent of venous tumor thrombus in clear cell renal cell cancer (RCC) with venous invasion. JCO. 2021;39:275–275. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2021.39.6_suppl.275.
    1. Neves RJ, Zincke H. Surgical treatment of renal cancer with vena cava extension. Br J Urol. 1987;59:390–5. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.1987.tb04832.x.

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner