Continuous and intermittent exercise responses in individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

S Sabapathy, R A Kingsley, D A Schneider, L Adams, N R Morris, S Sabapathy, R A Kingsley, D A Schneider, L Adams, N R Morris

Abstract

Background: While the acute physiological responses to continuous exercise have been well documented in individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), no previous study has examined the response to intermittent exercise in these patients.

Methods: We examined the physiological responses of 10 individuals with moderate COPD (forced expiratory volume in 1 second 52 (15)% predicted) who performed both an intermittent (1 min exercise and rest intervals) and a continuous cycle ergometer test on separate days. Both intermittent and continuous exercise tests were performed at the same power output, calculated as 70% of the peak power attained during an incremental exercise test.

Results: Intermittent exercise was associated with significantly lower values for oxygen uptake, carbon dioxide output, expired ventilation, heart rate, plasma lactate concentration, and ratings of breathlessness than continuous exercise. Subjects were able to complete a significantly greater total amount of work during intermittent exercise (71 (32) kJ) than during continuous exercise (31 (24) kJ). The degree of dynamic lung hyperinflation (change in end expiratory lung volume) was significantly lower during intermittent exercise (0.23 (0.07) l) than in continuous exercise (0.52 (0.13) l).

Conclusions: The greater amount of work performed and lower measured physiological responses achieved with intermittent exercise may allow for greater peripheral training adaptations in individuals with more limited lung function. The results suggest that intermittent exercise may be superior to continuous exercise as a mode of training for patients with COPD.

References

    1. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001 Apr;163(5):1256-76
    1. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997 Feb;155(2):555-61
    1. Eur Respir J. 1999 Aug;14(2):258-63
    1. Acta Physiol Scand. 1960 Apr 25;48:448-53
    1. Acta Physiol Scand. 1960 Apr 25;48:454-60
    1. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001 Sep 1;164(5):770-7
    1. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002 Mar;34(3):471-7
    1. Eur Respir J. 2002 Jul;20(1):12-9
    1. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2003 Mar 3;134(2):77-83
    1. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2003 Nov;90(5-6):620-5
    1. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2004 Jan 15;139(2):203-13
    1. J Infect Dis. 2004 Sep 1;190(5):869-78
    1. N Y State J Med. 1974 Jun;74(6):951-5
    1. Acta Physiol Scand Suppl. 1978;454:1-32
    1. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1982 Jun;52(6):1506-13
    1. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1982 Dec;53(6):1594-602
    1. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1985 May;131(5):700-8
    1. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1991 Jan;143(1):9-18
    1. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1991 Jan;70(1):223-30
    1. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1994 Nov;26(11):1327-34
    1. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1995 Jun;78(6):2228-34
    1. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1996 Jan;153(1):288-93
    1. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001 Jul;33(7 Suppl):S647-55

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner