Shape of the OGTT glucose response curve: relationship with β-cell function and differences by sex, race, and BMI in adults with early type 2 diabetes treated with metformin

Kristina M Utzschneider, Naji Younes, Neda Rasouli, Joshua I Barzilay, Mary Ann Banerji, Robert M Cohen, Erica V Gonzalez, Faramarz Ismail-Beigi, Kieren J Mather, Philip Raskin, Deborah J Wexler, John M Lachin, Steven E Kahn, GRADE Research Group

Abstract

Introduction: The shape of the glucose curve during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) reflects β-cell function in populations without diabetes but has not been as well studied in those with diabetes. A monophasic shape has been associated with higher risk of diabetes, while a biphasic pattern has been associated with lower risk. We sought to determine if phenotypic or metabolic characteristics were associated with glucose response curve shape in adults with type 2 diabetes treated with metformin alone.

Research design and methods: This is a cross-sectional analysis of 3108 metformin-treated adults with type 2 diabetes diagnosed <10 years who underwent 2-hour 75 g OGTT at baseline as part of the Glycemia Reduction Approaches in Diabetes: A Comparative Effectiveness Study (GRADE). Insulin sensitivity (homeostasis model of insulin sensitivity, HOMA2-S) and β-cell function (early, late, and total incremental insulin and C peptide responses adjusted for HOMA2-S) were calculated. Glucose curve shape was classified as monophasic, biphasic, or continuous rise.

Results: The monophasic profile was the most common (67.8% monophasic, 5.5% biphasic, 26.7% continuous rise). The monophasic subgroup was younger, more likely male and white, and had higher body mass index (BMI), while the continuous rise subgroup was more likely female and African American/black. HOMA2-S and fasting glucose did not differ among the subgroups. The biphasic subgroup had the highest early, late, and total insulin and C peptide responses (all p<0.05 vs monophasic and continuous rise). Compared with the monophasic subgroup, the continuous rise subgroup had similar early insulin (p=0.3) and C peptide (p=0.6) responses but lower late insulin (p<0.001) and total insulin (p=0.008) and C peptide (p<0.001) responses.

Conclusions: Based on the large multiethnic GRADE cohort, sex, race, age, and BMI were found to be important determinants of the shape of the glucose response curve. A pattern of a continuously rising glucose at 2 hours reflected reduced β-cell function and may portend increased glycemic failure rates.

Trial registration number: NCT01794143.

Keywords: OGTT; diabetes mellitus; glucose; insulin; type 2.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: KMU reports support from Medtronic and personal fees from Novo Nordisk, outside the submitted work. NR reports grants and other support from Novo Nordisk, outside the submitted work. RMC reports grants from the National Institutes of Health during the conduct of the study, and other support from Bristol Myers Squibb and Pfizer, outside the submitted work. DJW reports grants from NIDDK which funded the trial during the conduct of the study and other support from Novo Nordisk, outside the submitted work. SEK reports grants from NIH during the conduct of the study, personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, personal fees from Eli Lilly and Company, and personal fees from Intarcia, Janssen, Merck, Neurimmune, Novo Nordisk, and Pfizer, outside the submitted work. KJM reports grants from the National Institutes of Health during the conduct of the study, and at the time of publication KJM is an employee of Eli Lilly and Company. Data collection, analysis, and preparation of the manuscript occurred prior to this employment and were independent of Eli Lilly and Company. NY, JIB, MAB, EVG, FI-B, JML, and PR have nothing to disclose. KMU and SEK are supported by funding from the US Department of Veterans Affairs.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Classification analysis of OGTT glucose response curve shapes by sex and race (A) and sex, race, BMI, waist to hip ratio, and duration of diabetes (B). In B, only sex and BMI remained as significant independent classifiers. The percentages within each column are shown on the plot. AA, African American; AI, American Indian; BMI, body mass index; OGTT, oral glucose tolerance test.
Figure 2
Figure 2
OGTT glucose response curve shape for the whole cohort classified as monophasic, biphasic, or continuous rise. Mean glucose (A), insulin (B), and C peptide (C) are depicted at each OGTT time-point separately for participants within each of the subgroups. Pointwise 95% CIs are drawn around the means at each time-point. OGTT, oral glucose tolerance test.
Figure 3
Figure 3
OGTT glucose response curve shapes stratified by sex: monophasic, biphasic, or continuous rise. Mean glucose (A women, D men), insulin (B women, E men), and C peptide (C women, F men) are depicted at each OGTT time-point separately for participants within each of the subgroups. Pointwise 95% CIs are drawn around the means at each time-point. OGTT, oral glucose tolerance test.

References

    1. Manco M, Nolfe G, Pataky Z, et al. . Shape of the OGTT glucose curve and risk of impaired glucose metabolism in the EGIR-RISC cohort. Metabolism 2017;70:42–50. 10.1016/j.metabol.2017.02.007
    1. Kanauchi M, Kimura K, Kanauchi K, et al. . Beta-cell function and insulin sensitivity contribute to the shape of plasma glucose curve during an oral glucose tolerance test in non-diabetic individuals. Int J Clin Pract 2005;59:427–32. 10.1111/j.1368-5031.2005.00422.x
    1. Tschritter O, Fritsche A, Shirkavand F, et al. . Assessing the shape of the glucose curve during an oral glucose tolerance test. Diabetes Care 2003;26:1026–33. 10.2337/diacare.26.4.1026
    1. de Andrade Mesquita L, Pavan Antoniolli L, Cittolin-Santos GF, et al. . Distinct metabolic profile according to the shape of the oral glucose tolerance test curve is related to whole glucose excursion: a cross-sectional study. BMC Endocr Disord 2018;18:56. 10.1186/s12902-018-0286-7
    1. Cheng X, Yang N, Li Y, et al. . The shape of the glucose response curve during an oral glucose tolerance test heralds β-cell function in a large Chinese population. BMC Endocr Disord 2019;19:119. 10.1186/s12902-019-0446-4
    1. Tura A, Morbiducci U, Sbrignadello S, et al. . Shape of glucose, insulin, C-peptide curves during a 3-H oral glucose tolerance test: any relationship with the degree of glucose tolerance? Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2011;300:R941–8. 10.1152/ajpregu.00650.2010
    1. Nolfe G, Spreghini MR, Sforza RW, et al. . Beyond the morphology of the glucose curve following an oral glucose tolerance test in obese youth. Eur J Endocrinol 2012;166:107–14. 10.1530/EJE-11-0827
    1. Kim JY, Michaliszyn SF, Nasr A, et al. . The shape of the glucose response curve during an oral glucose tolerance test heralds biomarkers of type 2 diabetes risk in obese youth. Diabetes Care 2016;39:1431–9. 10.2337/dc16-0352
    1. Bervoets L, Mewis A, Massa G. The shape of the plasma glucose curve during an oral glucose tolerance test as an indicator of beta cell function and insulin sensitivity in end-pubertal obese girls. Horm Metab Res 2015;47:445–51. 10.1055/s-0034-1395551
    1. Arslanian S, El Ghormli L, Young Kim J, et al. . The shape of the glucose response curve during an oral glucose tolerance test: forerunner of heightened glycemic failure rates and accelerated decline in β-cell function in today. Diabetes Care 2019;42:164–72. 10.2337/dc18-1122
    1. Nathan DM, Buse JB, Kahn SE, et al. . Rationale and design of the glycemia reduction approaches in diabetes: a comparative effectiveness study (GRADE). Diabetes Care 2013;36:2254–61. 10.2337/dc13-0356
    1. Matthews DR, Hosker JP, Rudenski AS, et al. . Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and beta-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man. Diabetologia 1985;28:412–9. 10.1007/BF00280883
    1. Wallace TM, Levy JC, Matthews DR. Use and abuse of HOMA modeling. Diabetes Care 2004;27:1487–95. 10.2337/diacare.27.6.1487
    1. Breiman L, Friedman J, Olshen RA. Classification and regression trees: Wadsworth, 1984.
    1. R Core Team . R: a language and environment for statistical computing: R Foundation of statistical computing; 2019, 2021. Available: [Accessed 7 May 2021].
    1. Arslanian SA, El Ghormli L, Kim JY, et al. . OGTT glucose response curves, insulin sensitivity, and β-cell function in rise: comparison between youth and adults at randomization and in response to interventions to preserve β-cell function. Diabetes Care 2021;44:817–25. 10.2337/dc20-2134
    1. CDC . National diabetes statistics report 2020 estimates of diabetes and its burden in the United States 2020 2021.
    1. Bancks MP, Kershaw K, Carson AP, et al. . Association of modifiable risk factors in young adulthood with racial disparity in incident type 2 diabetes during middle adulthood. JAMA 2017;318:2457–65. 10.1001/jama.2017.19546
    1. Aguayo-Mazzucato C. Functional changes in beta cells during ageing and senescence. Diabetologia 2020;63:2022–9. 10.1007/s00125-020-05185-6
    1. Grill V, Adamson U, Cerasi E. Immediate and time-dependent effects of glucose on insulin release from rat pancreatic tissue. Evidence for different mechanisms of action. J Clin Invest 1978;61:1034–43. 10.1172/JCI109002
    1. Cerasi E. Potentiation of insulin release by glucose in man I. Quantitative analysis of the enhancement of glucose-induced insulin secretion by pretreatment with glucose in normal subjects. Acta Endocrinol 1975;79:483–501.
    1. Ismail HM, Cleves MA, Xu P, et al. . The pathological evolution of glucose response curves during the progression to type 1 diabetes in the TrialNet pathway to prevention study. Diabetes Care 2020;43:2668–74. 10.2337/dc20-0701
    1. Abdul-Ghani MA, Lyssenko V, Tuomi T, et al. . The shape of plasma glucose concentration curve during OGTT predicts future risk of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2010;26:280–6. 10.1002/dmrr.1084

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner