Rationale and Design of the COVID-19 Outpatient Prevention Evaluation (COPE - Coalition V) Randomized Clinical Trial: Hydroxychloroquine vs. Placebo in Non-Hospitalized Patients

Haliton Alves de Oliveira Junior, Cleusa P Ferri, Icaro Boszczowski, Gustavo B F Oliveira, Alexandre B Cavalcanti, Regis G Rosa, Renato D Lopes, Luciano C P Azevedo, Viviane C Veiga, Otavio Berwanger, Álvaro Avezum, Haliton Alves de Oliveira Junior, Cleusa P Ferri, Icaro Boszczowski, Gustavo B F Oliveira, Alexandre B Cavalcanti, Regis G Rosa, Renato D Lopes, Luciano C P Azevedo, Viviane C Veiga, Otavio Berwanger, Álvaro Avezum

Abstract

Background: Despite the need for targeting specific therapeutic options for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), there has been no evidence of effectiveness of any specific treatment for the outpatient clinical setting. There are few randomized studies evaluating hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) in non-hospitalized patients. These studies indicate no benefit from the use of HCQ, but they assessed different primary outcomes and presented important biases for outcome evaluation.

Objective: To evaluate if HCQ may prevent hospitalization due to COVID-19 compared to a matching placebo.

Methods: The COVID-19 Outpatient Prevention Evaluation (COPE) study is a pragmatic, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial evaluating the use of HCQ (800 mg on day 1 and 400 mg from day 2 to day 7) or matching placebo for the prevention of hospitalization due to COVID-19 in early non-hospitalized confirmed or suspected cases. Inclusion criteria are adults (≥ 18 years) seeking medical care with mild symptoms of COVID-19, with randomization ≤ 7 days after symptom onset, without indication of hospitalization at study screening, and with at least one risk factor for complication (> 65 years; hypertension; diabetes mellitus; asthma; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or other chronic lung diseases; smoking; immunosuppression; or obesity). All hypothesis tests will be two-sided. A p-value < 0.05 will be considered statistically significant in all analyses. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04466540.

Results: Clinical outcomes will be centrally adjudicated by an independent clinical event committee blinded to the assigned treatment groups. The primary efficacy endpoint will be assessed following the intention-to-treat principle.

Conclusion: This study has the potential to reliably answer the scientific question of HCQ use in outpatients with COVID-19. To our knowledge, this is the largest trial evaluating HCQ in non-hospitalized individuals with COVID-19.

Figures

Figura 1. –Diagrama CONSORT mostrando o fluxo…
Figura 1. –Diagrama CONSORT mostrando o fluxo de trabalho e o recrutamento planejado para o estudo. ITT: intenção de tratar; mITT: intenção de tratar modificada.
Figura 2. Esquema de coleta de dados…
Figura 2. Esquema de coleta de dados e seguimento dos participantes.
Figure 1. CONSORT diagram showing the study…
Figure 1. CONSORT diagram showing the study workflow and planned recruitment.
Figure 2. Data gathering and participant follow-up…
Figure 2. Data gathering and participant follow-up scheme.

References

    1. Xu XW, Wu XX, Jiang XG, Xu KJ, Ying LJ, Ma CL, et al. Clinical Findings in a Group of Patients Infected with the 2019 Novel Coronavirus (SARS-Cov-2) Outside of Wuhan, China: Retrospective Case Series. BMJ. 2020;368:m606. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m606.
    1. World Health Organization. Clinical Management of Severe Acute Respiratory Infection When Novel Coronavirus (nCoV) Infection is Suspected. Geneva: WHO Library; 2020.
    1. Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, Ren L, Zhao J, Hu Y, et al. Clinical Features of Patients Infected with 2019 Novel Coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet. 2020;395(10223):497-506. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30183-5.
    1. Li B, Yang J, Zhao F, Zhi L, Wang X, Liu L, et al. Prevalence and Impact of Cardiovascular Metabolic Diseases on COVID-19 in China. Clin Res Cardiol. 2020;109(5):531-38. doi: 10.1007/s00392-020-01626-9.
    1. Abella BS, Jolkovsky EL, Biney BT, Uspal JE, Hyman MC, Frank I, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Hydroxychloroquine vs Placebo for Pre-Exposure SARS-CoV-2 Prophylaxis Among Health Care Workers: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2021;181(2):195-202. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.6319.
    1. Rajasingham R, Bangdiwala AS, Nicol MR, Skipper CP, Pastick KA, Axelrod ML, et al. Hydroxychloroquine as Pre-exposure Prophylaxis for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Healthcare Workers: A Randomized Trial. Clin Infect Dis. 2021;72(11):835-43. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1571.
    1. Barnabas RV, Brown ER, Bershteyn A, Stankiewicz Karita HC, Johnston C, et al. Hydroxychloroquine as Postexposure Prophylaxis to Prevent Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Infection: A Randomized Trial. Ann Intern Med. 2021 Mar;174(3):344-52. doi: 10.7326/M20-6519.
    1. Boulware DR, Pullen MF, Bangdiwala AS, Pastick KA, Lofgren SM, Okafor EC, et al. A Randomized Trial of Hydroxychloroquine as Postexposure Prophylaxis for Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(6):517-25. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2016638.
    1. Mitjà O, Corbacho-Monné M, Ubals M, Alemany A, Suñer C, Tebé C, et al. A Cluster-Randomized Trial of Hydroxychloroquine for Prevention of Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(5):417-27. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2021801.
    1. Mitjà O, Corbacho-Monné M, Ubals M, Tebé C, Peñafiel J, Tobias A, et al. Hydroxychloroquine for Early Treatment of Adults With Mild Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Randomized, Controlled Trial. Clin Infect Dis. 2021;73(11):4073-81. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1009.
    1. Skipper CP, Pastick KA, Engen NW, Bangdiwala AS, Abassi M, Lofgren SM, et al. Hydroxychloroquine in Nonhospitalized Adults with Early COVID-19: A Randomized Trial. Ann Intern Med. 2020;173(8):623-31. doi: 10.7326/M20-4207.
    1. Omrani AS, Pathan SA, Thomas SA, Harris TRE, Coyle PV, Thomas CE, et al. Randomized Double-Blinded Placebo-Controlled Trial of Hydroxychloroquine with or without Azithromycin for Virologic Cure of Non-Severe COVID-19. EClinicalMedicine. 2020;29:100645. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100645.
    1. Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Diretrizes para Diagnóstico e Tratamento da COVID-19 (Clinical Guideline Covid-19) [Internet]. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde. 2020 [cited 2021 Mar 18]. Available from: .
    1. World Health Organization. Country & Technical Guidance - Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) [Internet]. Geneva: WHO. 2021 [cited 2021 Mar 18]. Available from: .
    1. Costa IBSDS, Bittar CS, Rizk SI, Araújo Filho AE, Santos KAQ, Machado TIV, et al. The Heart and COVID-19: What Cardiologists Need to Know. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2020;114(5):805-16. doi: 10.36660/abc.20200279.
    1. Ryan TP. Sample Size Determination and Power. New Jersey: Wiley; 2013.
    1. Shein-Chung C, Wang JSH. Sample Size Calculations in Clinical Research, Second Edition (Chapman & Hall/CRC Biostatistics Series). 2nd ed. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC Biostatistics Series; 2008.
    1. Lachin JM, Matts JP, Wei LJ. Randomization in Clinical Trials: Conclusions and Recommendations. Control Clin Trials. 1988;9(4):365-74. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(88)90049-9.
    1. Haybittle JL. Repeated Assessment of Results in Clinical Trials of Cancer Treatment. Br J Radiol. 1971;44(526):793-7. doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-44-526-793.
    1. Blenkinsop A, Parmar MK, Choodari-Oskooei B. Assessing the Impact of Efficacy Stopping Rules on the Error Rates Under the Multi-Arm Multi-Stage Framework. Clin Trials. 2019;16(2):132-41. doi: 10.1177/1740774518823551.
    1. Raghunathan T, Berglund PA, Solenberger PW. Multiple Imputation in Practice: With Examples Using IVEware. Milton Park: Taylor & Francis; 2018.
    1. Patricia Berglund SGH. Multiple Imputation of Missing Data Using SAS. Cary: SAS Institute; 2014.

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner