Reduction of door-to-balloon time in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction by single-catheter primary percutaneous coronary intervention method

Kyong Hee Lee, Sho Torii, Mitsutoshi Oguri, Tsuyosi Miyaji, Takahiko Kiyooka, Yuujirou Ono, Kouhei Asada, Taichi Adachi, Akihiko Takahashi, Yuji Ikari, Kyong Hee Lee, Sho Torii, Mitsutoshi Oguri, Tsuyosi Miyaji, Takahiko Kiyooka, Yuujirou Ono, Kouhei Asada, Taichi Adachi, Akihiko Takahashi, Yuji Ikari

Abstract

Objectives: The objectives of this study is to confirm reduction of door-to-balloon (D2B) time with single-catheter percutaneous coronary intervention (SC-PCI) method.

Background: Reduction of total ischemic time is important in the emergency treatment of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). There have been no established methods in primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to shorten ischemic time via radial access. Ikari left curve was reported as a universal guiding catheter for left and right coronary arteries. Several procedure steps can be skipped by SC-PCI method as the advantage of a universal catheter.

Methods: This study is a retrospective analysis of a total of 1,275 consecutive STEMI cases treated with primary PCI in 14 hospitals. Patients were divided into two groups, SC-PCI method (n = 298) and conventional PCI method (n = 977). Primary endpoints were door-to-balloon (D2B) time and radiation exposure dose.

Results: The mean age was 68 ± 13 years old. Radial access was used in 85% of participants. PCI success was achieved in 99.5% of participants and the SC-PCI method was successfully performed in 92.6%. The D2B time was shorter (68 ± 46 vs. 74 ± 50 min, respectively; p = .02), and the radiation exposure dose was lower (1,664 ± 970 vs. 2008 ± 1,605 mGy, respectively; p < .0001) in the SC-PCI group than in the conventional group.

Conclusion: Primary PCI with SC-PCI method for patients with STEMI demonstrated shorter D2B time and lower radiation exposure dose.

Keywords: Ikari catheter; radial access; radiation exposure.

Conflict of interest statement

Sho Torii received institutional research support from Boston Scientific Japan, honoraria from Boston Scientific Japan, Abbott vascular Japan, and Medtronic Japan. Yuji Ikari received a research grant from Boston Scientific and an inventor of the Ikari curve. The other authors have no conflicting interests to disclose.

© 2021 The Authors. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Single‐catheter primary percutaneous coronary intervention (SC‐PCI) method and conventional methods. In primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), coronary angiography is performed first. In SC‐PCI method, an Ikari left curve is used as a diagnostic catheter both for left and right coronary arteries and a guiding catheter to perform PCI. In the conventional methods, initial diagnostic angiography was performed using diagnostic catheters. These can be done in several ways; Conventional method #1) using the Judkins R and Judkins L diagnostic catheters, Conventional method #2) using a diagnostic catheter to contrast the contralateral side of the culprit artery and a guiding catheter to contrast the culprit artery, or Conventional method #3) using a universal diagnostic catheter (TIG, Mitsudo etc.) to contrast both sides and then change to a guiding catheter. The SC‐PCI method can skip several steps; five steps compared with the conventional method #1 as two catheter insertions, two catheter removals, and one engagement to the coronary artery, two steps compared with conventional method #2, or three steps compared with conventional method #3
Figure 2
Figure 2
Door‐to‐balloon time (D2B). The D2B time was significantly shorter in the single catheter primary percutaneous coronary intervention (SC‐PCI) method group (68 ± 46 vs. 76 ± 51 min, respectively; p = .02) than in the conventional method group. When the D2B time is divided into door‐to‐sheath (D2S) time and sheath‐to‐balloon (S2B) time, the S2B time was significantly different (19 ± 14 vs. 23 ± 14 min, respectively; p < .0001), but the D2S time was not significantly different (49 ± 42 vs. 53 ± 46 min, respectively; p = .18) [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Figure 3
Figure 3
Radiation exposure dose and fluorescent time. (A) Radiation exposure dose and (B) fluorescent time [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Figure 4
Figure 4
Analysis of sheath‐to‐balloon time by institute. Reduced sheath‐to‐balloon time with the single catheter primary percutaneous coronary intervention (SC‐PCI) method was analyzed separately for each institution. For this analysis, we used data from ten institutes, where at least five cases of the SC‐PCI method were enrolled. The sheath‐to‐balloon time in the SC‐PCI method was shorter in 90% of institutes, and the difference was statistically significant in 80%

References

    1. O'Gara PT, Kushner FG, Ascheim DD, et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST‐elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61:e78‐e140.
    1. Ibanez B, James S, Agewall S, et al. 2017 ESC guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST‐segment elevation: the task force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST‐segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2018;39:119‐177.
    1. Fox KA, Steg PG, Eagle KA, et al. Decline in rates of death and heart failure in acute coronary syndromes, 1999‐2006. Jama. 2007;297:1892‐1900.
    1. Roule V, Ardouin P, Blanchart K, et al. Prehospital fibrinolysis versus primary percutaneous coronary intervention in ST‐elevation myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials. Crit Care. 2016;20:359.
    1. Keeley EC, Boura JA, Grines CL. Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review of 23 randomised trials. Lancet. 2003;361:13‐20.
    1. Mandelzweig L, Battler A, Boyko V, et al. The second euro heart survey on acute coronary syndromes: characteristics, treatment, and outcome of patients with ACS in Europe and the Mediterranean Basin in 2004. Eur Heart J. 2006;27:2285‐2293.
    1. Karrowni W, Vyas A, Giacomino B, et al. Radial versus femoral access for primary percutaneous interventions in ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction patients: a meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;6:814‐823.
    1. McNamara RL, Wang Y, Herrin J, et al. Effect of door‐to‐balloon time on mortality in patients with ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47:2180‐2186.
    1. Nallamothu BK, Normand SL, Wang Y, et al. Relation between door‐to‐balloon times and mortality after primary percutaneous coronary intervention over time: a retrospective study. Lancet. 2015;385:1114‐1122.
    1. Cannon CP, Gibson CM, Lambrew CT, et al. Relationship of symptom‐onset‐to‐balloon time and door‐to‐balloon time with mortality in patients undergoing angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. Jama. 2000;283:2941‐2947.
    1. Ducas RA, Labos C, Allen D, et al. Association of pre‐hospital ECG administration with clinical outcomes in st‐segment myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Can J Cardiol. 2016;32:1531‐1541.
    1. Le May MR, So DY, Dionne R, et al. A citywide protocol for primary PCI in ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:231‐240.
    1. Bradley EH, Herrin J, Wang Y, et al. Strategies for reducing the door‐to‐balloon time in acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:2308‐2320.
    1. Sørensen JT, Terkelsen CJ, Nørgaard BL, et al. Urban and rural implementation of pre‐hospital diagnosis and direct referral for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute ST‐elevation myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 2011;32:430‐436.
    1. Diercks DB, Kontos MC, Chen AY, et al. Utilization and impact of pre‐hospital electrocardiograms for patients with acute ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction: data from the NCDR (National Cardiovascular Data Registry) ACTION (acute coronary treatment and intervention outcomes network) registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:161‐166.
    1. Zarich SW, Sachdeva R, Fishman R, et al. Effectiveness of a multidisciplinary quality improvement initiative in reducing door‐to‐balloon times in primary angioplasty. J Interv Cardiol. 2004;17:191‐195.
    1. Koh JQ, Tong DC, Sriamareswaran R, et al. In‐hospital' CODE STEMI' improves door‐to‐balloon time in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Emerg Med Australas. 2018;30:222‐227.
    1. Isono H, Maeno T, Watanabe S. Reduction in door‐to‐balloon time with training for effective and efficient Action in medical service‐better process (TEAMS‐BP) at a Community Hospital in Japan. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2018;244:305‐315.
    1. Torii S, Fujii T, Murakami T, et al. Impact of a single universal guiding catheter on door‐to‐balloon time in primary transradial coronary intervention for ST segment elevation myocardial infarction. Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2017;32:114‐119.
    1. Youssef AA, Hsieh YK, Cheng CI, Wu CJ. A single transradial guiding catheter for right and left coronary angiography and intervention. EuroIntervention. 2008;3:475‐481.
    1. Mehran R, Rao SV, Bhatt DL, et al. Standardized bleeding definitions for cardiovascular clinical trials: a consensus report from the bleeding academic research consortium. Circulation. 2011;123:2736‐2747.
    1. Singer AJ, Shembekar A, Visram F, et al. Emergency department activation of an interventional cardiology team reduces door‐to‐balloon times in ST‐segment‐elevation myocardial infarction. Ann Emerg Med. 2007;50:538‐544.
    1. Mahler SA, Chan HY, Carden DL, Wolcott C, Conrad SA. Emergency department activation of interventional cardiology to reduce door‐to‐balloon time. West J Emerg Med. 2010;11:363‐366.
    1. Kwak MJ, Kim K, Rhee JE, et al. The effect of direct communication between emergency physicians and interventional cardiologists on door to balloon times in STEMI. J Korean Med Sci. 2008;23:706‐710.
    1. Kohan LC, Nagarajan V, Millard MA, Loguidice MJ, Fauber NM, Keeley EC. Impact of around‐the‐clock in‐house cardiology fellow coverage on door‐to‐balloon time in an academic medical center. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2017;13:139‐142.

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner