Prevalence and epidemiological characteristics of congenital cataract: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Xiaohang Wu, Erping Long, Haotian Lin, Yizhi Liu, Xiaohang Wu, Erping Long, Haotian Lin, Yizhi Liu

Abstract

Congenital cataract (CC) is the primary cause of treatable childhood blindness worldwide. The establishment of reliable, epidemiological estimates is an essential first step towards management strategies. We undertook an initial systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the prevalence and other epidemiological characteristics of CC. PubMed, Medline, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched before January 2015. A meta-analysis with random-effects model based on a proportions approach was performed to determine the population-based prevalence of CC and to describe the data regarding the laterality, morphology, associated comorbidities and etiology. Heterogeneity was analyzed using the meta-regression method, and subgroup analyses were performed. 27 studies were selected from 2,610 references. The pooled prevalence estimate was 4.24 per 10,000 people, making it a rare disease based on WHO standards. Subgroup analyses revealed the highest CC prevalence in Asia, and an increasing prevalence trend through 2000. Other epidemiological characteristics showed CC tended to be bilateral, isolated, hereditary and in total/nuclear morphology. Huge heterogeneity was identified across most estimates (I(2) > 75%). Most of the variations could be explained by sample size, research period and age at diagnosis. The findings provide suggestions for etiology of CC, improvements in screening techniques and development of public health strategies.

Figures

Figure 1. Flowchart of study selection process.
Figure 1. Flowchart of study selection process.
Figure 2. Forest plot for the prevalence…
Figure 2. Forest plot for the prevalence of CC in population-based studies.
Figure 3. Publication bias testing for population-based…
Figure 3. Publication bias testing for population-based CC prevalence studies.
(a) Funnel plots. Each point represents a separate study on the indicated association. The vertical line represents the mean effect size. The points are distributed asymmetrically, indicating the existence of publication bias. (b) Linear regression test of funnel plot asymmetry (Egger test). The intercept indicating bias is 3.07. P-value = 0.21, indicating insignificant publication bias.
Figure 4. Forest plots for the subgroup…
Figure 4. Forest plots for the subgroup analysis of population-based CC prevalence.
(a) Forest plot of the subgroup analysis by world region. (b) Forest plot of the subgroup analysis by research period. (c) Forest plot of the subgroup analysis by age at diagnosis. (d) Forest plot of the subgroup analysis by sample size. (e) Forest plot of the subgroup analysis by study design.

References

    1. Jain I. S., Pillay P., Gangwar D. N., Dhir S. P. & Kaul V. K. Congenital cataract: etiology and morphology. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 20, 238–242 (1983).
    1. Pi L. H. et al.. Prevalence of eye diseases and causes of visual impairment in school-aged children in Western China. J Epidemiol 22, 37–44 (2012).
    1. Foster A., Gilbert C. & Rahi J. Epidemiology of cataract in childhood: a global perspective. Journal of cataract and refractive surgery 23 Suppl 1, 601–604 (1997).
    1. SanGiovanni J. P. et al.. Infantile cataract in the collaborative perinatal project: prevalence and risk factors. Arch Ophthalmol 120, 1559–1565 (2002).
    1. Lambert S. R. & Drack A. V. Infantile cataracts. Survey of ophthalmology 40, 427–458 (1996).
    1. Rahi J. S. & Dezateux C. Measuring and interpreting the incidence of congenital ocular anomalies: lessons from a national study of congenital cataract in the UK. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 42, 1444–1448 (2001).
    1. Widdus R. Public-private partnerships for health: their main targets, their diversity, and their future directions. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 79, 713–720 (2001).
    1. Taruscio D., Capozzoli F. & Frank C. Rare diseases and orphan drugs. Annali dell’Istituto superiore di sanita 47, 83–93, doi: 10.4415/ann_11_01_17 (2011).
    1. Lin H., Long E., Chen W. & Liu Y. Documenting rare disease data in China. Science 349, 1064, doi: 10.1126/science.349.6252.1064-b (2015).
    1. Holmes J. M., Leske D. A., Burke J. P. & Hodge D. O. Birth prevalence of visually significant infantile cataract in a defined U.S. population. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 10, 67–74 (2003).
    1. Bermejo E. & Martinez-Frias M. L. Congenital eye malformations: clinical-epidemiological analysis of 1,124,654 consecutive births in Spain. Am J Med Genet 75, 497–504 (1998).
    1. Stoll C., Alembik Y., Dott B. & Roth M. P. Congenital eye malformations in 212,479 consecutive births. Ann Genet 40, 122–128 (1997).
    1. Lin H. et al.. Congenital cataract: prevalence and surgery age at Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center (ZOC). PLoS One 9, e101781, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101781 (2014).
    1. Johar S. R., Savalia N. K., Vasavada A. R. & Gupta P. D. Epidemiology based etiological study of pediatric cataract in western India. Indian J Med Sci 58, 115–121 (2004).
    1. Bhatti T. R. et al.. Descriptive epidemiology of infantile cataracts in metropolitan Atlanta, GA, 1968-1998. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 157, 341–347, doi: 10.1001/archpedi.157.4.341 (2003).
    1. Abrahamsson M., Magnusson G., Sjostrom A., Popovic Z. & Sjostrand J. The occurrence of congenital cataract in western Sweden. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 77, 578–580 (1999).
    1. Nordmann J. [Congenital and infantile cataract]. Bericht uber die Zusammenkunft. Deutsche Ophthalmologische Gesellschaft 69, 283–291 (1969).
    1. Rahi J. S. & Dezateux C. Congenital and infantile cataract in the United Kingdom: underlying or associated factors. British Congenital Cataract Interest Group. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41, 2108–2114 (2000).
    1. Wirth M. G., Russell-Eggitt I. M., Craig J. E., Elder J. E. & Mackey D. A. Aetiology of congenital and paediatric cataract in an Australian population. Br J Ophthalmol 86, 782–786 (2002).
    1. Haargaard B., Wohlfahrt J., Fledelius H. C., Rosenberg T. & Melbye M. A nationwide Danish study of 1027 cases of congenital/infantile cataracts: etiological and clinical classifications. Ophthalmology 111, 2292–2298, doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.06.024 (2004).
    1. Perucho-Martinez S., De-la-Cruz-Bertolo J. & Tejada-Palacios P. Pediatric cataracts: epidemiology and diagnosis. Retrospective review of 79 cases. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol 82, 37–42 (2007).
    1. Lim Z., Rubab S., Chan Y. H. & Levin A. V. Pediatric cataract: the Toronto experience-etiology. Am J Ophthalmol 149, 887–892, doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2010.01.012 (2010).
    1. You C. et al.. Visual impairment and delay in presentation for surgery in chinese pediatric patients with cataract. Ophthalmology 118, 17–23, doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.04.014 (2011).
    1. Forster J. E., Abadi R. V., Muldoon M. & Lloyd I. C. Grading infantile cataracts. Ophthalmic & physiological optics: the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians 26, 372–379, doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2006.00370.x (2006).
    1. Stroup D. F. et al.. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. Jama 283, 2008–2012 (2000).
    1. Tham Y. C. et al.. Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology 121, 2081–2090, doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.05.013 (2014).
    1. Newcombe R. G. Two-sided confidence intervals for the single proportion: comparison of seven methods. Statistics in medicine 17, 857–872 (1998).
    1. Jones L. et al.. Prevalence and risk of violence against children with disabilities: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Lancet (London, England) 380, 899–907, doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(12)60692-8 (2012).
    1. Stewart-Brown S. L. & Haslum M. N. Partial sight and blindness in children of the 1970 birth cohort at 10 years of age. J Epidemiol Community Health 42, 17–23 (1988).
    1. Haargaard B., Wohlfahrt J., Fledelius H. C., Rosenberg T. & Melbye M. Incidence and cumulative risk of childhood cataract in a cohort of 2.6 million Danish children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 45, 1316–1320 (2004).
    1. Hu D. N. Prevalence and mode of inheritance of major genetic eye diseases in China. J Med Genet 24, 584–588 (1987).
    1. Stayte M., Reeves B. & Wortham C. Ocular and vision defects in preschool children. Br J Ophthalmol 77, 228–232 (1993).
    1. Nie W. Y. et al..A pilot study of ocular diseases screening for neonates in China. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi 44, 497–502 (2008).
    1. Chen Z., Lei F., Chen B. & Qin P. Epidemiological investigaion of blindness and low vision in children aged from 3 years to 6 years in Huiji District of Zhengzhou City, China. Rec Adv Ophthalmol 34, 441–444 (2014).
    1. Yang L. et al.. Epidemiologic survey of eye in Cangzhou school children. Int Eye Sci. 14, 908–912 (2014).
    1. Halilbasic M. et al.. Pediatric cataract in Tuzla Canton, Bosnia and Herzegovina. Med Glas (Zenica) 11, 127–131 (2014).
    1. Lawan A. Congenital eye and adnexial anomalies in Kano, a five year review. Niger J Med 17, 37–39 (2008).
    1. Eckstein M., Vijayalakshmi P., Killedar M., Gilbert C. & Foster A. Aetiology of childhood cataract in south India. Br J Ophthalmol 80, 628–632 (1996).

Source: PubMed

Sponsors et collaborateurs

Les conditions médicales

Interventions en matière de drogue

3
S'abonner