Dynamic External Pelvimetry Test in Third Trimester Pregnant Women: Shifting Positions Affect Pelvic Biomechanics and Create More Room in Obstetric Diameters

Marco Siccardi, Cristina Valle, Fiorenza Di Matteo, Marco Siccardi, Cristina Valle, Fiorenza Di Matteo

Abstract

Dystocia in labor is still a clinical challenge. The "contracted pelvis" is the absence of pelvic mobility, which leads to fetal-pelvic disproportion, obstructed labor, and operative delivery. Maternal pelvis biomechanics studies by high technological techniques have shown that maternal shifting positions during pregnancy and labor can create more room in the pelvis for safe delivery. The external and internal pelvic diameters are related. The present study aims to evaluate the external obstetric pelvic diameters in shifting positions using a clinical technique suitable for daily practice in every clinical setting: the dynamic external pelvimetry test (DEP test). Seventy pregnant women were recruited, and the obstetric external pelvic diameters were measured, moving the position from kneeling standing to "hands-and-knees" to kneeling squat position. Results showed modification of the pelvic diameters in shifting position: the transverse and longitudinal diameters of Michaelis sacral area, the inter-tuberosities diameter, the bi-trochanters diameter, and the external conjugate widened; the bi-crestal iliac diameter, the bi-spinous iliac diameter, and the base of the Trillat's triangle decreased. The test showed good reproducibility and reliability. Linear correlations were found between diameters and between the range of motion of the diameters. The maternal pelvis is confirmed to modify the diameters changing its tridimensional shape. The pelvic inlet edge's inclination is inferred to be modified, facilitating the fetal descend. The pelvic outlet enlarged the transverse diameter, facilitating birth. The DEP test estimates the pelvic diameters' modification with postural changes, as magnetic resonance (MR) and computational biomechanics studies have demonstrated.

Keywords: biomechanics; childbirth; dystocia; labor; obstetrics; pelvimetry; pelvis; pregnancy.

Conflict of interest statement

Marco Siccardi recognized that he has an intellectual property right for the BMK instrument, CE patented. Co-authors don't have to disclose any patents or copyrights

Copyright © 2021, Siccardi et al.

Figures

Figure 1. The diameters of the Dynamic…
Figure 1. The diameters of the Dynamic External Pelvimetry test.
A: the transverse diameter of the sacral area. B: the longitudinal diameter of the sacral area. C: the longitudinal hemi-diameter of the sacral area. D: the base of Trillat's triangle. E: the iliac bi-spinous diameter. F: the iliac bi-crestal diameter. G: the bi-trochanters diameter. H: the ischial inter-tuberosities diameter. I: the external obstetric conjugate.
Figure 2. DEP test: shifting positions procedure.
Figure 2. DEP test: shifting positions procedure.
A, D: p1, straight-leg positions. A: standing kneeling position. D: supine position. B, E: p2, bent-leg positions. B: "all-fours" position. E: bent-leg supine position. C: p3, kneeling squat position.
Figure 3. Graphic representation of the values…
Figure 3. Graphic representation of the values of the pelvic diameter in shifting positions
Data are shown in millimeters as mean and standard deviation, minimum and maximum. The paired t-test was statistically significant for all the diameters, not in all positions. p1: straight-leg position. p2: bent-leg position. p3: squat position. *p-value

Figure 4. Intra-observer and inter-observer agreement

A,…

Figure 4. Intra-observer and inter-observer agreement

A, B: Intra-observer Bland-Altman plot showing mean difference ±2…

Figure 4. Intra-observer and inter-observer agreement
A, B: Intra-observer Bland-Altman plot showing mean difference ±2 standard deviation (SD) values (v). C, D: inter-observer Brand-Altman plot showing mean difference ±2 SD values (v). ROM: the range of motion.

Figure 5. Pelvic anteroposterior diameters in shifting…

Figure 5. Pelvic anteroposterior diameters in shifting positions.

A, p1: straight-leg position. B, p3: squat…

Figure 5. Pelvic anteroposterior diameters in shifting positions.
A, p1: straight-leg position. B, p3: squat position. Red line: external conjugate measured in straight-leg position. Yellow line: obstetric conjugate measured in the straight-leg position. Grey line: midlet anteroposterior diameter measured in the straight-leg position. Blue line: outlet anteroposterior diameter measured in straight-leg position. Black line: anterior sacral promontory inclination, angle respect the lumbar spine anterior line. Orange line: lumbar spine anterior line. Orange arrows: the longitudinal hemi-diameter of the Michaelis area. Orange angle: the angle between the lumbar spine and the external conjugate, according to Desseauve et al. [6]. Green dots: pelvic movement fulcra (lumbar-sacral posterior zygoapophyseal joint and hip joint). Green curved arrow: the direction of the sacral base, according to Hemmerich et al. [5]. Graphic images of the pelvis sagittal sections show the biodynamics of the anteroposterior diameters' measurements from the present study and literature cited in the text: the external conjugate, the midlet, and outlet anteroposterior diameter increase. The obstetric conjugate decreases from the straight-leg to the squat position. The lumbar-sacral junction flexion increases the longitudinal hemi-diameter of the Michaelis area, and the sacral promontory flattens. The external conjugate becomes close to perpendicular to the lumbar spine anterior line, approaching the theoretical best birth position.

Figure 6. Pelvic diameters and inlet edge…

Figure 6. Pelvic diameters and inlet edge modification to the squat positions

A, B: figures…

Figure 6. Pelvic diameters and inlet edge modification to the squat positions
A, B: figures show the direction of pelvic diameters' measurement change to the squat position. A: anterior view of the pelvis. B: posterior view of the pelvis. Blue arrows: subpubic arch angle and inter-tuberosities diameter. Dark grey arrows: bi-trochanter diameter. Light blue arrows: iliac bi-crestal diameter. Green arrows: ischial bi-spinous diameter. Yellow arrows: iliac bi-spinous diameter. Dark red arrows: the base of Trillat's triangle. Grey arrows: longitudinal hemi-diameter of Michaelis sacral rhombus. Orange arrows: transverse diameter of Michaelis sacral rhombus. Red dots: the posterior superior iliac spines. Red line: pelvic inlet edge. C, D: hipbones orientation in the frontal plane. C: frontal section of the ischium-iliac bones in starting position. D: frontal section of the ischium-iliac bones in the squat position. Red line: pelvic inlet. Black arrows: arcuate lines' edge inclination. Blue arrows: inter-tuberosities diameter modification direction to the squat position. Light blue arrows: bi-crestal diameter modification direction to the squat position. Arrowed green line: midpelvic transverse measure in starting position. Arrowed blue line: pelvic outlet transverse measure in starting position.
Figure 4. Intra-observer and inter-observer agreement
Figure 4. Intra-observer and inter-observer agreement
A, B: Intra-observer Bland-Altman plot showing mean difference ±2 standard deviation (SD) values (v). C, D: inter-observer Brand-Altman plot showing mean difference ±2 SD values (v). ROM: the range of motion.
Figure 5. Pelvic anteroposterior diameters in shifting…
Figure 5. Pelvic anteroposterior diameters in shifting positions.
A, p1: straight-leg position. B, p3: squat position. Red line: external conjugate measured in straight-leg position. Yellow line: obstetric conjugate measured in the straight-leg position. Grey line: midlet anteroposterior diameter measured in the straight-leg position. Blue line: outlet anteroposterior diameter measured in straight-leg position. Black line: anterior sacral promontory inclination, angle respect the lumbar spine anterior line. Orange line: lumbar spine anterior line. Orange arrows: the longitudinal hemi-diameter of the Michaelis area. Orange angle: the angle between the lumbar spine and the external conjugate, according to Desseauve et al. [6]. Green dots: pelvic movement fulcra (lumbar-sacral posterior zygoapophyseal joint and hip joint). Green curved arrow: the direction of the sacral base, according to Hemmerich et al. [5]. Graphic images of the pelvis sagittal sections show the biodynamics of the anteroposterior diameters' measurements from the present study and literature cited in the text: the external conjugate, the midlet, and outlet anteroposterior diameter increase. The obstetric conjugate decreases from the straight-leg to the squat position. The lumbar-sacral junction flexion increases the longitudinal hemi-diameter of the Michaelis area, and the sacral promontory flattens. The external conjugate becomes close to perpendicular to the lumbar spine anterior line, approaching the theoretical best birth position.
Figure 6. Pelvic diameters and inlet edge…
Figure 6. Pelvic diameters and inlet edge modification to the squat positions
A, B: figures show the direction of pelvic diameters' measurement change to the squat position. A: anterior view of the pelvis. B: posterior view of the pelvis. Blue arrows: subpubic arch angle and inter-tuberosities diameter. Dark grey arrows: bi-trochanter diameter. Light blue arrows: iliac bi-crestal diameter. Green arrows: ischial bi-spinous diameter. Yellow arrows: iliac bi-spinous diameter. Dark red arrows: the base of Trillat's triangle. Grey arrows: longitudinal hemi-diameter of Michaelis sacral rhombus. Orange arrows: transverse diameter of Michaelis sacral rhombus. Red dots: the posterior superior iliac spines. Red line: pelvic inlet edge. C, D: hipbones orientation in the frontal plane. C: frontal section of the ischium-iliac bones in starting position. D: frontal section of the ischium-iliac bones in the squat position. Red line: pelvic inlet. Black arrows: arcuate lines' edge inclination. Blue arrows: inter-tuberosities diameter modification direction to the squat position. Light blue arrows: bi-crestal diameter modification direction to the squat position. Arrowed green line: midpelvic transverse measure in starting position. Arrowed blue line: pelvic outlet transverse measure in starting position.

References

    1. Abnormal labor: diagnosis and management. Drennan Drennan, K K, Blackwell Blackwell, S S, Sokol RJ. Glob Libr Women's Med. 2008
    1. MR obstetric pelvimetry: effect of birthing position on pelvic bony dimensions. Michel SC, Rake A, Treiber K, et al. Am J Roentgenol. 2002;179:1063–1067.
    1. Does pregnancy and/or shifting positions create more room in a woman's pelvis? Reitter A, Daviss BA, Bisits A, et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;211:662.
    1. Development and validation of a computational model for understanding the effects of an upright birthing position on the female pelvis. Hemmerich A, Diesbourg T, Dumas GA. J Biomech. 2018;77:99–106.
    1. The effects of squatting while pregnant on pelvic dimensions: a computational simulation to understand childbirth. Hemmerich A, Bandrowska T, Dumas GA. J Biomech. 2019;87:64–74.
    1. Assessment of pelvic-lumbar-thigh biomechanics to optimize the childbirth position: an "in vivo" innovative biomechanical study. Desseauve D, Pierre F, Fernandez A, Panjo H, Decatoire A, Lacouture P, Fradet L. Sci Rep. 2019;9:15968.
    1. A safe, low-cost, easy-to-use 3D camera platform to assess risk of obstructed labor due to cephalopelvic disproportion. Gleason RL Jr, Yigeremu M, Debebe T, et al. PLoS One. 2018;13:203865.
    1. Three-dimensional camera anthropometry to assess risk of cephalopelvic disproportion-related obstructed labour in Ethiopia. Tolentino L, Yigeremu M, Teklu S, et al. Interface Focus. 2019;9:20190036.
    1. The movements of the maternal pelvis — a review. Sanderson TA. MIDIRS Midwifery Digest. 2012;22:1–8.
    1. A review and comparison of common maternal positions during the second-stage of labor. Huang J, Zang Y, Ren LH, Li FJ, Lu H. Int J Nurs Sci. 2019;6:460–467.
    1. External anthropometric measurement and pelvimetry among nulliparous women in Lubumbashi: risk factors and predictive score of mechanical dystocia. Malonga FK, Mukuku O, Ngalula MT, Luhete PK, Kakoma JB. Pan Afr Med J. 2018;31:69–74.
    1. Height, weight, external pelvic diameters and cesarean section: a cohort study in southern province of Rwanda (Huye District) Kakoma JBSZ, Kalibushi J, Ramazani RK. Rwanda Med J. 2010;68:21–24.
    1. Evaluation of sacral rhomboid dimensions to predict contracted pelvis: a pilot study of Indian primigravidae. Bansal S, Guleria K, Agarwal N. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2011;61:523–527.
    1. A postural approach to the pelvic diameters of obstetrics: the dynamic external pelvimetry test. Siccardi M, Valle C, Di Matteo F, Angius V. Cureus. 2019;11:0.
    1. Evaluating two postural change methods for the positional dynamic measurement of the diameters of the Michaelis sacral rhomboid area. Siccardi M, Valle C, Di Matteo F, Angius V. J Reprod Med Gynecol Obstet. 2020;5:35.
    1. Estimating the mobility of the Michaelis sacral rhombus in pregnant women. Siccardi M, Valle C, Angius V, Di Matteo F. Cureus. 2020;12:0.
    1. Selecting the number of trials in experimental biomechanics studies. Forrester SE. Int Biomech. 2015;2:62–72.
    1. Pelvic shape of contemporary young women: related factors and impact on daily life. Shinkawa H, Takahata Y. Hiroshima Int Univ Nurs J. 2014;11:13–25.
    1. The Modified-Modified Schober Test for range of motion assessment of lumbar flexion in patients with low back pain: a study of criterion validity, intra- and inter-rater reliability and minimum metrically detectable change. Tousignant M, Poulin L, Marchand S, Viau A, Place C. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27:553–559.
    1. The lumbar and sacrum movement pattern during the back squat exercise. McKean MR, Dunn PK, Burkett BJ. J Strength Cond Res. 2010;24:2731–2741.
    1. The sacroiliac joint: an overview of its anatomy, function and potential clinical implications. Vleeming A, Schuenke MD, Masi AT, Carreiro JE, Danneels L, Willard FH. J Anat. 2012;221:537–567.
    1. The thoracolumbar fascia: anatomy, function and clinical considerations. Willard FH, Vleeming A, Schuenke MD, Danneels L, Schleip R. J Anat. 2012;221:507–536.
    1. Tarnier S, Budin P. Traité de l'art des accouchements, tome trosiemme: dystocie maternelle. Paris: G. Steinheil, Libraire-Éditeur; 1898.
    1. Sutton J. Midwifery Best Practice. Vol. 4. Edinburgh: Elsevier Science Limited; 2003. The rhombus of Michaelis: birth without active pushing and a physiological second stage of labour; pp. 90–92.
    1. Association between obstetric conjugate diameter measured by transabdominal ultrasonography during pregnancy and the type of delivery. Daghighi MH, Poureisa M, Ranjkesh M. Iran J Radiol. 2013;10:185–187.
    1. The birth canal: correlation between the pubic arch angle, the interspinous diameter, and the obstetrical conjugate: a computed tomography biometric study in reproductive age women. Perlman S, Raviv-Zilka L, Levinsky D, Gidron A, Achiron R, Gilboa Y, Kivilevitch Z. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019;32:3255–3265.
    1. How osteopathy could help obstetrics in diagnosis and therapy, preliminary report about safety and efficacy of osteopathy in an obstetrics department in Italy. Siccardi M, Valle C, Di Matteo F, et al. J Perinat Med. 2017;45:308–309.
    1. Human birth observed in real-time open magnetic resonance imaging. Bamberg C, Rademacher G, Güttler F, et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;206:505.
    1. Waist-to-hip ratio and mortality in heart failure. Streng KW, Voors AA, Hillege HL, et al. Eur J Heart Fail. 2018;20:1269–1277.

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner