An observational study of end-tidal carbon dioxide trends in general anesthesia

Annemarie Akkermans, Judith A R van Waes, Aleda Thompson, Amy Shanks, Linda M Peelen, Michael F Aziz, Daniel A Biggs, William C Paganelli, Jonathan P Wanderer, Daniel L Helsten, Sachin Kheterpal, Wilton A van Klei, Leif Saager, Annemarie Akkermans, Judith A R van Waes, Aleda Thompson, Amy Shanks, Linda M Peelen, Michael F Aziz, Daniel A Biggs, William C Paganelli, Jonathan P Wanderer, Daniel L Helsten, Sachin Kheterpal, Wilton A van Klei, Leif Saager

Abstract

Purpose: Despite growing evidence supporting the potential benefits of higher end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2) levels in surgical patients, there is still insufficient data to formulate guidelines for ideal intraoperative ETCO2 targets. As it is unclear which intraoperative ETCO2 levels are currently used and whether these levels have changed over time, we investigated the practice pattern using the Multicenter Perioperative Outcomes Group database.

Methods: This retrospective, observational, multicentre study included 317,445 adult patients who received general anesthesia for non-cardiothoracic procedures between January 2008 and September 2016. The primary outcome was a time-weighted average area-under-the-curve (TWA-AUC) for four ETCO2 thresholds (< 28, < 35, < 45, and > 45 mmHg). Additionally, a median ETCO2 was studied. A Kruskal-Wallis test was used to analyse differences between years. Random-effect multivariable logistic regression models were constructed to study variability.

Results: Both TWA-AUC and median ETCO2 showed a minimal increase in ETCO2 over time, with a median [interquartile range] ETCO2 of 33 [31.0-35.0] mmHg in 2008 and 35 [33.0-38.0] mmHg in 2016 (P <0.001). A large inter-hospital and inter-provider variability in ETCO2 were observed after adjustment for patient characteristics, ventilation parameters, and intraoperative blood pressure (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.36; 95% confidence interval, 0.18 to 0.58).

Conclusions: Between 2008 and 2016, intraoperative ETCO2 values did not change in a clinically important manner. Interestingly, we found a large inter-hospital and inter-provider variability in ETCO2 throughout the study period, possibly indicating a broad range of tolerance for ETCO2, or a lack of evidence to support a specific targeted range. Clinical outcomes were not assessed in this study and they should be the focus of future research.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow chart. ASA = American Society of Anesthesiologist; CPT = current procedural terminology; ETCO2 = end-tidal carbon dioxide. LMA = laryngeal mask airway; MPOG = Multicenter Perioperative Outcomes Group. *Blood transfusion > two units was defined as: more than two units of packed cells or whole blood or more than 600 mL of cell saver blood during general anesthesia. †Patients were excluded when they met the inclusion criteria of more than one subgroup: e.g., chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and laparoscopic surgery. ‡Only the first case within 30 days was included
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Trend in TWA-AUC ETCO2 for four different thresholds. The trend over time in mean time-weighted average area-under-the-curve (TWA-AUC) per quarter for an end-tidal carbon dioxide levels (ETCO2) of < 28 mmHg, < 35 mmHg, < 45 mmHg, and > 45 mmHg. The TWA-AUC decreased over time for an ETCO2 threshold of < 28, < 35, and < 45 mmHg, whereas the TWA-AUC ETCO2 > 45 mmHg increased over time
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Trend in median ETCO2 over time. The boxplots show an increase in median end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2) values between 2008 and 2016 for the general cohort (A) and the subgroups (B–E). The triangle represents the mean, the whiskers represent the spread between the 10th and 90th percentile. The median ETCO2 was lower for patients presenting for intracranial and carotid artery surgery (B) compared with the general cohort. The median ETCO2 was higher for patients in the (robotic) laparoscopic cohort (C, D) and for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (E) compared with the general cohort (A)

References

    1. Way M, Hill GE. Intraoperative end-tidal carbon dioxide concentrations: what is the target? Anesthesiol Res Pract. 2011;2011:1–3. doi: 10.1155/2011/271539.
    1. Wax DB, Lin H-M, Hossain S, et al. Intraoperative carbon dioxide management and outcomes. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010;27:819–823. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32833cca07.
    1. Mas A, Saura P, Joseph D, et al. Effect of acute moderate changes in PaCO2 on global hemodynamics and gastric perfusion. Crit Care Med. 2000;28:360–365. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200002000-00012.
    1. Dony P, Dramaix M, Boogaerts JG. Hypocapnia measured by end-tidal carbon dioxide tension during anesthesia is associated with increased 30-day mortality rate. J Clin Anesth. 2017;36:123–126. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.10.028.
    1. Takahashi CE, Brambrink AM, Aziz MF, et al. Association of intraprocedural blood pressure and end tidal carbon dioxide with outcome after acute stroke intervention. Neurocrit Care. 2014;20:202–208. doi: 10.1007/s12028-013-9921-3.
    1. Slutsky AS, Ranieri VM. Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury. N Engl J Med. 2013;22369:2126–2136. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1208707.
    1. Serpa Neto A, Hemmes SNT, Barbas CSV, et al. Association between driving pressure and development of postoperative pulmonary complications in patients undergoing mechanical ventilation for general anaesthesia: a meta-analysis of individual patient data. Lancet Respir Med. 2016;4:272–280. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(16)00057-6.
    1. Akça O, Doufas AG, Morioka N, et al. Hypercapnia improves tissue oxygenation. Anesthesiology. 2002;97:801–806. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200210000-00009.
    1. Fleischmann E, Herbst F, Kugener A, et al. Mild hypercapnia increases subcutaneous and colonic oxygen tension in patients given 80% inspired oxygen during abdominal surgery. Anesthesiology. 2006;104:944–949. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200605000-00009.
    1. Akça O, Kurz A, Fleischmann E, et al. Hypercapnia and surgical site infection: a randomized trial. Br J Anaesth. 2013;111:759–767. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet233.
    1. Contreras M, Ansari B, Curley G, et al. Hypercapnic acidosis attenuates ventilation-induced lung injury by a nuclear factor-κB-dependent mechanism. Crit Care Med. 2012;40:2622–2630. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318258f8b4.
    1. Marhong J, Fan E. Carbon dioxide in the critically ill: too much or too little of a good thing? Respir Care. 2014;59:1597–1605. doi: 10.4187/respcare.03405.
    1. Contreras M, Masterson C, Laffey JG. Permissive hypercapnia: what to remember. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2015;28:26–37. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000151.
    1. Lele EE, Hantos Z, Bitay M, et al. Bronchoconstriction during alveolar hypocapnia and systemic hypercapnia in dogs with a cardiopulmonary bypass. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2011;175:140–145. doi: 10.1016/j.resp.2010.10.004.
    1. Emery MJ, Eveland RL, Min JH, et al. CO2 relaxation of the rat lung parenchymal strip. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2013;186:33–39. doi: 10.1016/j.resp.2012.12.014.
    1. Pfeiffer B, Hachenberg T, Wendt M, et al. Mechanical ventilation with permissive hypercapnia increases intrapulmonary shunt in septic and nonseptic patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care Med. 2002;30:285–289. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200202000-00003.
    1. Curley G, Kavanagh BP, Laffey JG. Hypocapnia and the injured brain: more harm than benefit. Crit Care Med. 2010;38:1348–1359. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181d8cf2b.
    1. Freundlich RE, Kheterpal S. Perioperative effectiveness research using large databases. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2011;25:489–498. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2011.08.008.
    1. Kheterpal S. Clinical research using an information system: The multicenter perioperative outcomes group. Anesthesiol Clin. 2011;29:377–388. doi: 10.1016/j.anclin.2011.06.002.
    1. Dempsey J, Smith C. Pathophysiology of human ventilatory control. Eur Respir J. 2014;44:495–512. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00048514.
    1. Danic MJ, Chow M, Alexander G, et al. Anesthesia considerations for robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: A review of 1,500 cases. J Robot Surg. 2007;1:119–123. doi: 10.1007/s11701-007-0024-z.
    1. Kalmar AF, Foubert L, Hendrickx JFA, et al. Influence of steep Trendelenburg position and CO2 pneumoperitoneum on cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, and respiratory homeostasis during robotic prostatectomy. Br J Anaesth. 2010;104:433–439. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeq018.
    1. Sood J. Advancing frontiers in anaesthesiology with laparoscopy. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:14308–14314. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i39.14308.
    1. Bender SP, Paganelli WC, Gerety LP, et al. Intraoperative lung-protective ventilation trends and practice patterns. Anesth Analg. 2015;121:1231–1239. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000940.
    1. Merlo J, Chaix B, Ohlsson H, et al. A brief conceptual tutorial of multilevel analysis in social epidemiology: using measures of clustering in multilevel logistic regression to investigate contextual phenomena. J Epidemiol Community Heal. 2006;60:290–297. doi: 10.1136/jech.2004.029454.
    1. von Elm E, Altman D, Egger M, et al. STROBE Initiative. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61:344–349. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.008.
    1. Corallo AN, Croxford R, Goodman DC, et al. A systematic review of medical practice variation in OECD countries. Health Policy (New York) 2014;114:5–14. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.08.002.
    1. Hovorka J. Carbon dioxide homeostasis and recovery after general anaesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1982;26:498–504. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1982.tb01806.x.

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner