A brief historical perspective on dental implants, their surface coatings and treatments

Celeste M Abraham, Celeste M Abraham

Abstract

This review highlights a brief, chronological sequence of the history of dental implants. This historical perspective begins with ancient civilizations and spotlights predominant dentists and their contributions to implant development through time. The physical, chemical and biologic properties of various dental implant surfaces and coatings are discussed, and specific surface treatments include an overview of machined implants, etched implants, and sand-blasted implants. Dental implant coatings such as hydroxyapatite, fluoride, and statin usage are further reviewed.

Keywords: Dental history; implant surface; implants; surface coating..

References

    1. Ring Malvin E, editor. 2nd ed. Abradale Press; 1985. Dentistry: an illustrated history.
    1. Asbell Milton B. Dentistry. a historical perspective: being a historical account of the history of dentistry from ancient tmes.with emphasis upon the United States from the colonial to the present period. Bryn Mawr PaDorrance & Co. 1988: 1–256.
    1. Maggiolo Manuel de l’art dentaire [Manuel of dental art]. Nancy France C.Le Seure. 1809
    1. Greenfield EJ. Implantation of artificial crown and bridge abutments. Int J Oral Implant. 1991;7(2):63–8.
    1. Linkow LI, Dorfman JD. Implantology in dentistry: A brief historical perspective. N Y State Dent J. 1991;57(6):31–5.
    1. Burch RHDr. Pinkney Adams-a dentist before his time. Ark Dent. 1997;68(3):14–5.
    1. Goldberg NI, Gershkoff A. The implant lower denture. Dent Dig. 1949;55(11):490–4.
    1. Bodine RL. Experimental subperiosteal dental implants. U.S. Armed Forces Med J. 1953;4:441–51.
    1. Cherchieve R. Considerazioni fisiologiche e pratiche su una osservazione originale di un impianto endosseo. Inform Dent. 1959;24:677–80.
    1. Linkow LI. Intraosseous implants utilized as fixed bridge abutments. J Oral Implant Transplant Surg. 1964;10:17–23.
    1. Linkow LI. The radiographic role in endosseous implants interventions. Chron Omaha District Dent Soc. 1966;29:304–11.
    1. Sandhaus S. Tecnica e strumentario dell’impianto C..S. (Crystalline Bone Screw). . Informatore Odonto-Stomatologico. 1968;4:19–24.
    1. Markle DH, Grenoble DE, Melrose RJ. Histologic evaluation of vitreous carbon endosteal implants in dogs. Biomater Med Dev Artif Organs . 1975;3(1):97–114.
    1. Weiss CM, Judy KW. Intramucosal inserts solve patients' problems with maxillary dentures. II. Quintessence Int Dent Dig. 1974;5(4):9–15.
    1. Small IA, Misiek D. A sixteen-year evaluation of the mandibular staple bone plate. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1986;44:60–6.
    1. Brånemark PI, Zarb G, Albrektsson T, editors. Chicago: : Quintessence Publishing; 1985. Tissue-integrated prostheses: Osseointegration in clinical dentistry.
    1. Brånemark PI, Hansson BO, Adell R , et al. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw: Experience from a 10-year period. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1977;16:1–132.
    1. Brånemark PI. Osseointegration and its experimental background. J Prosthet Dent. 1983;50 (3):399–410.
    1. Osteointegration: Associated Branemark Ossointegration Centers 2010. Available from: .
    1. SF1 Barg Implant Abutments: Sterngoid Dental LLC 13 March. Available from . . 2013
    1. Leney WR. In recognition of an implant pioneer: Prof.Dr. Andre Schroeder. . Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1993;8(2):135–6.
    1. Tatum OH, Hardin J. The Omni implant system In Clarke’s Clinical Dentistry Vol 5 Philadelphia. Pa JB Lippincott. 1984
    1. Dr Gerald A. Niznick Available from: .
    1. Driskell TD, editor. The stryker precision implant system Root form series McKinney RV Endosteal dental implants. Mosby Year Book. 1991;8
    1. Kirsch A, Ackermann KL. The IMZ osseointegrated implant system. Dent Clin North Am . 1989;33(4):733–91.
    1. Part 2: Internal Non-Hex Connection 2007 , 292-303.Available from:
    1. Straumann USA LLC.Available from: 2014.
    1. Eriksson C, Lausmaa J, Nygren H. Interactions between human whole blood and modified TiO2-surfaces: Influence of surface topography and oxide thickness on leukocyte adhesion and activation. Biomaterials. 2001;22:1987–96.
    1. Wen X, Wang X, Zhang N. Microsurface of metallic biomaterials: A literature review. J BioMed Mater Eng. 1996;6:173–89.
    1. Albrektsson T, Jacobsson M. Bone-metal interface in osseointegration. J Prosthet Dent. 1987;57:5–10.
    1. Schroeder A, van der Zypen E, Stich H, Sutter F. The reactions of bone. connective tissue and epithelium to endosteal implants with titanium sprayed surfaces. J Maxillofac Surg. 1981;9:15–25.
    1. Sabane AV. Surface characteristics of dental implants: A review. J Indian Acad Dental Special. 2011;2 (2):18–21.
    1. Alla RK, Ginjupalli K, Upadhya N, Shammas M, Rama Krishna R, Ravichandra S. Surface roughness of implants: A review. Trends Biomat Artif Org. 2011;25(3):112.
    1. Boyan BD, Lossdorfer S, Wang L , et al. Osteoblasts generate an osteogenic microenvironment when grown on surfaces with rough microtopographies. Eur Cell Mater. 2003;6:22–7.
    1. Matsuo M, Nakamura T, Kishi Y, Takahashi K. Microvascular changes after placement of titanium implants: Scanning electron microscopy observations of machined and titanium plasma-sprayed implants in dogs. J Periodontol. 1999;70:1330–8.
    1. Novaes AB Jr, Souza SL, de Oliveira PT, Souza AM. Histomorphometric analysis of the bone-implant contact obtained with 4 different implant surface treatments placed side by side in the dog mandible. The Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2002;17:377–83.
    1. Brånemark PI, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T. Chicago:: Quintessence; 1985. Tissue Integrated Prostheses. pp. 201–8.
    1. MacDonald D, Rapuano B, Deo N, Stranick M, Somasundaran P, Boskey A. Thermal and chemical modification of titanium-aluminum-vanadium implant materials: Effects on surface properties. glycoprotein adsorpion.and MG63 cell attachment. Biomaterials. 2004; 25:3135–46.
    1. Braceras I, De Maeztu MA, Alava JI, Gay-Escoda C. In vivo low-density bone apposition on different implant surface materials. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;38:274–8.
    1. Cho SA, Park KT. The removal torque of titanium screw inserted in rabbit tibia treated by dual acid etching. Biomaterials. 2003;24:3611–7.
    1. Wong M , Eulenberger J, Schenk R, Hunziker E. Effect of surface topology on the osseointegration of implant materials in trabecular bone. J Biomed Mater Res. 1995;29:1567–75.
    1. Park JY, Davies JE. Red blood cell and platelet interactions with titanium implant surfaces. Clin Oral Implant Res. 2000;12:530–9.
    1. Ducheyne P, Cuckler JM. Bioactive ceramic prosthetic coatings. Clin Orthop Relat R. 1992;39(276):102–14.
    1. Dacy JA, Spears R, Hallmon WW , et al. Effects of phosphated titanium and enamel matrix derivatives on osteoblast behavior in vitro. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007;22(5):701–9.
    1. De Wilde EA, Jimbo R, Wennerberg A , et al. The soft tissue immunologic response to hydroxyapatite-coated transmucosal implant surfaces: A study in humans. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2013
    1. Rosenberg ES, Torosian JP, Slots J. Microbial differences in two clinically distinct types of failures of osseointegrated implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1991;2:135–44.
    1. Verheyen CC, Dhert WJ, Petit PL, Rozing PM, de Groot K. In vitro study on the integrity of a hydroxylapatite coating when challenged with staphylococci. J Biomed Mater Res. 1993;27:775–81.
    1. Bornstein MM, Valderrama P, Jones AA, Wilson TG, Seibl R, Cochran DL. Bone apposition around two different sandblasted and acid-etched titanium implant surfaces: A histomorphometric study in canine mandibles. Clin Oral Implan Res. 2008;19:233–41.
    1. Engquist B, Astrand P, Dahlgren S, Engquist E, Feldmann H, Grondahl K. Marginal bone reaction to oral implants: A prospective comparative study of Astra Tech and Brånemark System implants. Clin Oral Implan Res. 2002;13:30–7.
    1. van Steenberghe D, De Mars G, Quirynen M, Jacobs R, Naert I. A prospective split-mouth comparative study of two screw-shaped self-tapping pure titanium implant systems. Clin Oral Implan Res. 2000;11:202–9.
    1. Gupta A, Dhanraj M, Sivagami G. Status of surface treatment in endosseous implant: A literary overview. Ind J Dent Res. 2010;21:433–8.
    1. Gurgel BC, Goncalves PF, Pimentel SP , et al. An oxidized implant surface may improve bone-to-implant contact in pristine bone and bone defects treated with guided bone regeneration: An experimental study in dogs. J Periodontol. 2008;79:1225–31.
    1. Allen CM, Robert LK, Tien-Mien G, Chu Meoghan Mac P, Daniel LA. Development of niobium oxide coatings on sand-blasted titanium alloy dental implants. Mat Sci Applic. 2012;3(5):301–5.
    1. Ellingsen J. Pre-treatment of titanium implants with fluoride improves their retention in bone. J Mat Sci Mat Med. 1995;6:749–53.
    1. Ellingsen JE, Johansson CB, Wennerberg A, Holmen A. Improved retention and bone-to-implant contact with fluoride-modified titanium implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Imp. 2004;19:659–66.
    1. Gaggl A, Schultes G, Muller WD, Karcher H. Scanning electron microscopic analysis of laser-treated titanium implant surfaces: A comparative study. Biomaterials. 2000;21:1067–73.
    1. Hallgren C, Reimers H, Chakarov D, Gold J, Wennerberg A. An in vivo tudy of bone response to implants topographically modified by laser micromachining. Biomaterials. 2003;24:701–10.
    1. Frenkel SR, Simon J, Alexander H, Dennis M, Ricci JL. Osseointegration on metallic implant surfaces: Effects of microgeometry and growth factor treatment. J Biomed Mater Res. 2002;63:706–13.
    1. Jansen JA, olke JGC, Swann S, van der Waerden JPCM, de Groot K. Application of magnetron-sputtering for producing ceramic coatings on implant materials. Clin Oral Implan Res. 1993;4:28–34.
    1. Kwak HB, Kim JY, Kim KJ , et al. Risedronate directly inhibits osteoclast differentiation and inflammatory bone loss. Biol Pharm Bull. 2009;32:1193–8.
    1. Yoshinari M, Oda Y, Inoue T, Matsuzaka K, Shimono M. Bone response to calcium phosphate-coated and bisphosphonate-immobilized titanium implants. Biomaterials. 2002;23:2879–85.
    1. Josse S, Faucheux C, Soueidan A , et al. Novel biomaterials for bisphosphonate delivery. Biomaterials. 2005;26:2073–80.
    1. Meraw SJ, Reeve CM. Qualitative analysis of peripheral peri-implant bone and influence of alendronate sodium on early bone regeneration. J Periodontol. 1999;70:1228–33.
    1. Meraw SJ, Reeve CM, Wollan PC. Use of alendronate in peri-implant defect regeneration. J Periodontol. 1999;70:151–8.
    1. Kajiwara H, Yamaza T, Yoshinari M , et al. The bisphosphonate pamidronate on the surface of titanium stimulates bone formation around tibial implants in rats. Biomaterials. 2005;26:581–7.
    1. Yoshinari M, Oda Y, Ueki H, Yokose S. Immobilization of bisphosphonates on surface modified titanium. Biomaterials. 2001;22:709–15.
    1. Goldstein JL, Brown MS. Regulation of the mevalonate pathway. Nature. 1990;343:425–30.
    1. Mundy G, Garrett R, Harris S , et al. Stimulation of bone formation in vitro and in rodents by statins. Science. 1999;286:1946–9.
    1. Ayukawa Y, Yasukawa E, Moriyama Y , et al. Local application of statin promotes bone repair through the suppression of osteoclasts and the enhancement of osteoblasts at bone-healing sites in rats. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009;107 (3):336–42.
    1. Edwards CJ, Hart DJ, Spector TD. Oral statins and increased bone-mineral density in postmenopausal women. Lancet. 2000;355:2218–9.
    1. Montagnani A, Gonnelli S, Cepollaro C , et al. Effect of Simvastatin treatment on bone mineral density and bone turnover in hypercholesterolemic postmenopausal women: A 1-year longitudinal study. Bone. 2003;32:427–33.
    1. Yang F, Zhao SF, Zhang F, He FM, Yang GL. Simvastatin-loaded porous implant surfaces stimulate preosteoblasts differentiation: An in vitro study. Oral Surg Oral Med O Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010;111(5):551–6.
    1. Alt V, Bitschnau A, Osterling J , et al. The effects of combined Gentamycin-hydroxyapatite coating for cementless joint prostheses on the reduction of infection rates in a rabbit infection prophylaxis model. Biomaterials. 2006;27:4627–34.
    1. Herr Y, Woo J, Kwon Y, Park J, Heo S, Chung J. Implant surface conditioning with Tetracycline-HCl: A SEM study. Key Eng Mat. 2008;361:849–52.
    1. Persson LG, Ericsson I, Berglundh T, Lindhe J. Osseointegration following treatment of peri-implantitis and replacement of implant components: An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol. 2001;28:258–63.
    1. Avila G, Misch K, Galindo-Moreno P, Wang HL. Implant surface treatment using biomimetic agents. Implant Dent. 2009;18:17–26.
    1. Becker J, Kirsch A, Schwarz F , et al. Bone apposition to titanium implants biocoated with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2): A pilot study in dogs. Clin Oral Invest. 2006;10:217–24.
    1. Sigurdsson TJ, Nguyen S, Wikesjo UM. Alveolar ridge augmentation with rhBMP-2 and bone-to-implant contact in induced bone. Int J Periodont Rest. 2001;21:461–73.
    1. Schouten C, Meijer GJ, van den Beucken JJ, Spauwen PH, Jansen JA. Effects of implant geometry. surface properies.and TGF-?1 on peri-implant bone response An experimental study in goats. . Clin Oral Implan Res . 2009;20:421–9.
    1. Researchers increase the success rate of tooth implants. Available from: . 2013.
    1. Bougas K, Jimbo R, Vandeweghe S , et al. In vivo evaluation of a novel implant coating agent: Laminin-1. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2013

Source: PubMed

Sponsors et collaborateurs

Les conditions médicales

Interventions en matière de drogue

3
S'abonner