A randomized trial of a minimal intervention for sexual concerns after cancer: a comparison of self-help and professionally delivered modalities

Janette Perz, Jane M Ussher, Australian Cancer and Sexuality Study Team, Janette Perz, Jane M Ussher, Australian Cancer and Sexuality Study Team

Abstract

Background: Information and discussion of sexual changes with a health professional is a high priority for many cancer patients in order to assist with sexual changes and ensure that sexual intimacy does not cease post-cancer. The PLISSIT model is widely recommended as a framework for providing sexual information and support, allowing for the discussion of sexual changes at various levels of increasing intensity. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the early stages of the PLISSIT model by examining the relative efficacy of written information provision about cancer related sexual changes, and information provision accompanied by a single session of counselling, for people with cancer and their partners, across a range of cancer types.

Method: Eighty-eight people with cancer and 53 partners across a range of sexual and non-sexual cancers, took part in a randomised trial which adopted mixed method analysis to examine changes in psychological wellbeing, quality of life, relationship satisfaction and communication, and sexual functioning, following written information provision about cancer related sexual changes (self-help condition; SH), or written information accompanied by a single session of counselling (health professional condition; HP).

Results: Ratings of the usefulness and efficacy of the SH and HP interventions, collected through analysis of Likert scales, open ended survey items and interviews, indicated that both conditions were found to be useful and efficacious by the majority of participants, serving to increase awareness of sexuality, improve couple communication about sex, and help in the management of sexual changes, through the exploration of non-coital sexual practices. In contrast, the quantitative analysis of standardized instruments found no significant improvements in psychological wellbeing, quality of life, relationship satisfaction and communication, or sexual functioning. There were significant reductions in self-silencing in the HP condition, and a trend towards increases in sexual satisfaction across both conditions.

Conclusion: These results offer support for the early stages of the PLISSIT model, in terms of normalization and increased awareness of sexual changes after cancer, increased couple communication about sexual changes, and legitimation of exploration of a range of non-coital sexual practices and intimacy. However, more complex and intensive interventions are needed to address sexual functioning and psychological wellbeing. The findings provide support for the proposition that providing permission to discuss sexuality should be the core feature underpinning all stages of interventions designed to provide sexuality information and support for people with cancer and their partners, and also demonstrate the potential importance of limited information and specific suggestions.

Trial registration: This study was registered in the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry. ( ACTRN12615000399594 ) on 29 April 2015.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Participant flow diagram

References

    1. Greenfield DM, Walters SJ, Coleman RE, Hancock BW, Snowden JA, Shalet SM, et al. Quality of Life, Self-Esteem, Fatigue, and Sexual Function in Young Men after Cancer: A Controlled Cross-Sectional Study. Cancer. 2010;116(6):1592–1601. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24898.
    1. Galbraith ME, Arechiga A, Ramirez J, Pedro LW. Prostate cancer survivors’ and partners’ self-reports of health-related quality of life, treatment symptoms, and marital satisfaction 2.5-5.5 years after treatment. Onc Nurs For. 2005;32(2):E30–41.
    1. Howlett K, Koetters T, Edrington J, West C, Paul S, Lee K, et al. Changes in Sexual Function on Mood and Quality of Life in Patients Undergoing Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer. Onc Nurs For. 2010;37(1):E58–E66.
    1. Traa MJ, De Vries J, Roukema JA, Den Oudsten BL. Sexual (dys) function and the quality of sexual life in patients with colorectal cancer: a systematic review. Ann. Oncol. 2012;23(1):19–27. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdr133.
    1. Milbury K, Cohen L, Jenkins R, Skibber JM, Schover LR. The Association Between Psychosocial and Medical Factors with Long-Term Sexual Dysfunction After Treatment for Colorectal Cancer. Supp Care Canc. 2013;21(3):793–802. doi: 10.1007/s00520-012-1582-9.
    1. Ussher JM, Perz J, Gilbert E. Information needs associated with changes to sexual well-being after breast cancer. J Advan Nurs. 2013;69(3):327–337. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2012.06010.x.
    1. Hordern AJ, Street AF. Communicating about patient sexuality and intimacy after cancer: mismatched expectations and unmet needs. Med J Aust. 2007;186(5):224–227.
    1. McKee JAL, Schover LR. Sexuality Rehabilitation. Cancer. 2001;92(4 Suppl):1008–1012. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(20010815)92:4+<1008::AID-CNCR1413>;2-2.
    1. Hawkins Y, Ussher JM, Gilbert E, Perz J, Sandoval M, Sundquist K. Changes in sexuality and intimacy after the diagnosis of cancer. The experience of partners in a sexual relationship with a person with cancer. Cance Nurs. 2009;34(4):271–280. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0b013e31819b5a93.
    1. Gilbert E, Perz J, Ussher JM: Talking about Sex with Health Professionals: The Experience of People with Cancer and their Partners. Eur J Canc Care 2014, in press.
    1. Intimacy and sexuality for women with gynaecological cancer - starting a conversation []
    1. Psychosocial impact in the areas of body image and sexuality for women with breast cancer []
    1. National Centre for Gynaecological Cancers . The psychosexual care of women affected by gynaecological cancers. Australia: Cancer; 2011.
    1. Clinical practice guidelines for the psychosocial care of adults with cancer []
    1. Annon JS. PLISSIT therapy. In: Corsine RJ, editor. Handbook of Innovative Psychotherapies. New York: Wiley and Sons; 1981. pp. 629–639.
    1. Mick J, Hughes M, Cohen M. Using the BETTER Model to Assess Sexuality. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2004;8(1):84–86. doi: 10.1188/04.CJON.84-86.
    1. Hughes MK. Sexuality and the cancer survivor: A silent coexistence. Cancer Nurs. 2000;23(6):477–482. doi: 10.1097/00002820-200012000-00011.
    1. Katz A. The Sounds of Silence: Sexuality Information for Cancer Patients. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(1):238–241. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.101.
    1. Ayaz S, Kubilay G. Effectiveness of the PLISSIT model for solving the sexual problems of patients with stoma. J Clin Nursg. 2009;18(1):89–98. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02282.x.
    1. Penson RT, Gallagher J, Gioiella ME, Wallace M, Borden K, Duska LA, et al. Sexuality and cancer: Conversation comfort zone. Oncologist. 2000;5(4):336–344. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.5-4-336.
    1. Stausmire JM. Sexuality at the end of life. Am J Hosp Pall Med. 2004;21(1):33–39. doi: 10.1177/104990910402100109.
    1. White ID. Oncosexology and the role of the nurse: integration, specialisation or isolation? Sexologies. 2007;16(4):304–308. doi: 10.1016/j.sexol.2007.06.011.
    1. White ID, Faithfull S, Allan H. The re-construction of women’s sexual lives after pelvic radiotherapy: A critique of social constructionist and biomedical perspectives on the study of female sexuality after cancer treatment. Soc Sci Med. 2013;76:188–196. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.10.025.
    1. Schwartz S, Plawecki RN. Consequences of chemotherapy on the sexuality of patients with lung cancer. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2002;6(4):1–5. doi: 10.1188/02.CJON.212-216.
    1. Rasmusson E-M, Thomé B. Women’s Wishes and Need for Knowledge Concerning Sexuality and Relationships in Connection with Gynecological Cancer Disease. Sex Disabil. 2008;26(4):207–218. doi: 10.1007/s11195-008-9097-5.
    1. Boehmer U. Communication about prostate cancer between men and their wives. In: Jf Fam Prac vol. 2001;50:226–231.
    1. Schover LR, Jenkins R, Sui D, Adams JH, Marion MS, Jackson KE. Randomized trial of peer counseling on reproductive health in African American breast cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(10):1620–1626. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.7159.
    1. Herbenick D, Reece M, Hollub A, Satinsky S, Dodge B. Young female breast cancer survivors. Their sexual function and interest in sexual enhancement products and services. Cancer Nurs. 2008;31(6):417–425. doi: 10.1097/01.NCC.0000339252.91194.6c.
    1. Latini DM, Hart SL, Coon DW, Knight SJ. Sexual Rehabilitation After Localized Prostate Cancer: Current Interventions and Future Directions. Canc Journal. 2009;15:34–40. doi: 10.1097/PPO.0b013e31819765ef.
    1. Taylor S, Harley C, Ziegler L, Brown J, Velikova G. Interventions for sexual problems following treatment for breast cancer: A systematic review. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011;130(3):711–724. doi: 10.1007/s10549-011-1722-9.
    1. Chisholm KE, McCabe MP, Wootten AC, Abbott JAM. Review: Psychosocial interventions addressing sexual or relationship functioning in men with prostate cancer. JSex Med. 2012;9(5):1246–1260.
    1. Miles C, Candy B, Jones L, Williams R, Tookman A, King M: Interventions for sexual dysfunction following treatments for cancer. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2007, Issue 4. Art. No.: CD005540. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005540.pub2.
    1. Rowland JH, Meyerowitz B, Crespi C, Leedham B, Desmond K, Ganz P. Addressing intimacy and partner communication after breast cancer: A randomized controlled group intervention. Breast Canc Res Treat. 2009;118:99–111. doi: 10.1007/s10549-009-0398-x.
    1. Scott JL, Halford WK, Ward BG. United we stand? The effects of a couple-coping intervention on adjustment to early stage breast or gynecological cancer. J Consult Clin Psych. 2004;72(6):1122–1135. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.72.6.1122.
    1. Berglund G, Bolund C, Gustavsson UL, Sjoden PO. Starting Again - A comparison study of a group rehabilitation program for cancer patients. Acta Oncol. 1993;32:15–21. doi: 10.3109/02841869309083879.
    1. Canada AL, Neese LE, Sui D, Schover LR. Pilot intervention to enhance sexual rehabilitation for couples after treatment for localized prostate carcinoma. Cancer. 2005;104(12):2689–2700. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21537.
    1. Christensen DN. Postmastectomy couple counseling: An outcome study of a structured treatment protocol. J Sex Marital Ther. 1983;9(4):266–275. doi: 10.1080/00926238308410913.
    1. Kalaitzi C, Papadopoulos VP, Michas K, Vlasis K, Skandalakis P, Filippou D. Combined brief psychosexual intervention after mastectomy: Effects on sexuality, body image, and psychological well-being. J Surg Oncol. 2007;96(3):235–240. doi: 10.1002/jso.20811.
    1. Baucom DH, Porter LS, Kirby JS, Gremore TM, Wiesenthal N, Aldridge W, et al. A couple-based intervention for female breast cancer. Psycho-Oncol. 2009;18(3):276–283. doi: 10.1002/pon.1395.
    1. Maughan K, Clarke C. The effect of a clinical nurse specialist in gynaecological oncology on quality of life and sexuality. J Clin Nurs. 2001;10(2):221–229. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2702.2001.00465.x.
    1. Ussher JM, Perz J, Gilbert E, Wong WTK, Mason C, Hobbs K, et al. Talking about sex after cancer: A discourse analytic study of health care professional accounts of sexual communication with patients. Psychol Heal. 2013;28(12):1370–1390. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2013.811242.
    1. Reese JB, Porter LS, Regan KR, Keefe FJ, Azad NS, Diaz LA, Herman JM, Haythornthwaite JA: A randomized pilot trial of a telephone-based couples intervention for physical intimacy and sexual concerns in colorectal cancer. Psycho-oncol 2014;23(9):1005–13.
    1. Krychman ML, Katz A. Breast cancer and sexuality: Multi-modal treatment options. J Sex Med. 2012;9(1):5–13. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2011.02566.x.
    1. Brotto L, Heiman J, Goff B, Greer B, Lentz G, Swisher E, et al. A psychoeducational intervention for sexual dysfunction in women with gynecologic cancer. Arch Sex Beh. 2008;37(2):317–329. doi: 10.1007/s10508-007-9196-x.
    1. Perz J, Ussher JM, Gilbert E. Feeling well and talking about sex: psycho-social predictors of sexual functioning after cancer. BMC Cancer. 2014;14(1):228–247. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-228.
    1. Lindau ST, Surawska H, Paice J, Baron SR. Communication about sexuality and intimacy in couples affected by lung cancer and their clinical-care providers. Psycho-oncol. 2011;20:179–185. doi: 10.1002/pon.1787.
    1. Jonker-Pool G, Hoekstra HJ, van Imhoff GW, Sonneveld DJA, Sleijfer DT, van Driel MF, et al. Male sexuality after cancer treatment-needs for information and support: Testicular cancer compared to malignant lymphoma. Patient Educ Couns. 2004;52(2):143–150. doi: 10.1016/S0738-3991(03)00025-9.
    1. Jarden M, Schjodt I, Thygesen KH. The impact of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation on sexuality: a systematic review of the literature. Bone Marrow Trans. 2012;47(5):716–24. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2011.169.
    1. van der Horst-Schrivers ANA, van Ieperen E, Wymenga A, Boezen H, Weijmar-Schultz WCM, Kema IP, et al. Sexual Function in Patients with Metastatic Midgut Carcinoid Tumours. Neuroendocrinology. 2009;89(2):231–236. doi: 10.1159/000178754.
    1. Beckjord EB, Arora NK, Bellizzi K, Hamilton AS, Rowland JH. Sexual Well-Being Among Survivors of Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma. Oncol Nurs For. 2011;38(5):E351–359.
    1. Low C, Fullarton M, Parkinson E, O’Brien K, Jackson SR, Lowe D, et al. Issues of intimacy and sexual dysfunction following major head and neck cancer treatment. Oral Oncol. 2009;45(10):898–903. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2009.03.014.
    1. Beck JM. Nurses’ attitudes towards the sexuality of colorectal patients. Nurs Stand. 2009;23(31):44–48.
    1. Sackett DL, Rosenberg WMC, Gray JAM, Haynes RB, Richardson WS. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. BMJ. 1996;312:71–72. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7023.71.
    1. Grossman J, Mackenzie FJ. The randomised control trial: gold standard, or merely standard? Pers Biol Med. 2005;48(4):516–534. doi: 10.1353/pbm.2005.0092.
    1. Creswell JW. Mixed methods procedures. In: Creswell JW, editor. Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. 3. Los Angeles, CA: Sage; 2009. pp. 203–225.
    1. Perz J, Ussher JM, Gilbert E. Constructions of sex and intimacy after cancer: Q methodology study of people with cancer, their partners, and health professionals. BMC Cancer. 2013;13:270. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-13-270.
    1. Ussher JM, Perz J, Gilbert E, Wong WKT, Hobbs K. Renegotiating sex after cancer: Resisting the coital imperative. Canc Nurs. 2013;36(6):454–462. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0b013e3182759e21.
    1. Ware JEJ, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-item short-form health survey. Med Care. 1996;24:220–233. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199603000-00003.
    1. Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psych Scand. 1983;67(6):361–370. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x.
    1. Bjelland I, Dahl AA, Haug TT, Neckelmann D. The validity of the hospital anxiety and depression scale. An updated literature review. J Psychosom Res. 2002;52:69–77. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3999(01)00296-3.
    1. Jack DC. Silencing the self: Women and depression. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press; 1991.
    1. Sabourin S, Valois P, Lussier Y. Development and Validation of a Brief Version of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale With a Nonparametric Item Analysis Model. Psychol Assess. 2005;17(1):15–27. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.17.1.15.
    1. Catania J. Dyadic Sexual Communication Scale. In: Davis M, editor. Handbook of Sexuality-Related Measures. London: Sage; 1998.
    1. Keller A, McGarvey EL, Clayton AH. Reliability and construct validity of the Changes in Sexual Functioning Questionnaire short-form (CSFQ-14) J SexMar Ther. 2006;32(1):43–52. doi: 10.1080/00926230500232909.
    1. Sexuality, intimacy and cancer: A self-help guide for people with cancer and their partner []
    1. Braun V, Clark JA. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3:77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
    1. Barbour RS. Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: A case of the tail wagging the dog? BMJ. 2001;322:1115–1117. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7294.1115.
    1. Hordern AJ, Street AJ. Constructions of sexuality and intimacy after cancer: Patient and health professional perspectives. Soc Sci Med. 2007;64:1704–1718. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.12.012.
    1. Beck AM, Robinson JW, Carlson LE. Sexual intimacy in heterosexual couples after prostate cancer treatment: What we know and what we still need to learn. Urologic Oncol. 2009;27(2):137–143. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2007.11.032.
    1. Arrington MI. Prostate Cancer and the Social Construction of Masculine Sexual Identity. Int J Men’s Health. 2008;7(3):299–306. doi: 10.3149/jmh.0703.299.
    1. Bokhour BG, Clarke JA, Inui TS, Silliman RA, Talcott JA. Sexuality After Treatment for Early Prostate Cancer. J Gen Int Med. 2001;16:649–655. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2001.00832.x.
    1. Badr H, Carmack Taylor CL. Sexual dysfunction and spousal communication in couples coping with prostate cancer. Psycho-Oncol. 2009;18(7):735–746. doi: 10.1002/pon.1449.
    1. Dahn JR, Penedo FJ, Gonzalez JS, Esquiabro M, Antoni MH, Roos BA, et al. Sexual functioning and quality of life after prostate cancer treatment: considering sexual desire. Urology. 2004;63(2):273–277. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2003.09.048.
    1. Danile A, Haddow S: Erectile Dysfunction After Prostate Cancer. The Clinical Advisor 2011;14(3):64–68
    1. Holmes L. Sexuality in gynaecological cancer patients. Canc Nurs Prac. 2005;4(6):35–39. doi: 10.7748/cnp2005.07.4.6.35.c172.
    1. Ussher JM, Perz J, Gilbert E. Changes to sexual well-being and intimacy after breast cancer. Cancer Nurs. 2012;35(6):456–464. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0b013e3182395401.
    1. Bergmark K, Avall-Lundqvist E, Dickman PW, Henningsohn L, Steineck G. Vaginal changes and sexuality in women with a history of cervical cancer. New EngJ Med. 1999;340(18):1383–1389. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199905063401802.
    1. Safarinejad MR, Shafiei N, Safarinejad S. Quality of Life and Sexual Functioning in Young Women with Early-Stage Breast Cancer 1 Year after Lumpectomy. Psycho-oncol. 2013;22(6):1242–1248. doi: 10.1002/pon.3130.
    1. McPhillips K, Braun V, Gavey N. Defining (hetero) sex: How imperative is the coital imperative? Wom Stud Int For. 2001;24:229–240. doi: 10.1016/S0277-5395(01)00160-1.
    1. Barsky JMR. Sexual Dysfunction and Chronic Illness: The Role of Flexibility in Coping. J Sex Mar Ther. 2006;32(3):235–253. doi: 10.1080/00926230600575322.
    1. Dowsett GW, Lyons A, Duncan D, Wassersug RJ. Flexibility in Men’s Sexual Practices in Response to Iatrogenic Erectile Dysfunction after Prostate Cancer Treatment. Sex Med. 2014;2(3):115–120. doi: 10.1002/sm2.32.
    1. Bilodeau BA, Degner LF. Information needs, sources of information, and decisional roles in women with breast cancer. Onc Nurs For. 1996;23:691–696.
    1. Fridfinnsdottir EB. Icelandic women’s identifications of stressors and social support during the diagnostic phase of breast cancer. J Advan Nurs. 1997;25:526–531. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1997.t01-1-1997025526.x.
    1. Perez DJ, Allan SG, Humm GP, Wynne CJ. The information needs of patients with breast cancer. Aust New Zeal J Med. 1995;25:521–522. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.1995.tb01499.x.
    1. Cowan C, Hoskins R. Information preferences of women receiving chemotherapy for breast cancer. Eur J Canc Care. 2007;16(6):543–550. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2354.2007.00782.x.
    1. Luker KA, Beaver K, Leinster SJ, Owens RG. Information needs and sources of information for women with breast cancer: a follow-up study. J Advanc Nurs. 1996;23:487–495. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1996.tb00010.x.
    1. Salonen P, Tarkka MT, Kellokumpu-Lehtinen PL, Astedt-Kurki T, Kaunonen M. Telephone intervention and quality of life in women with breast cancer. Cancer Nurs. 2009;32:177–190. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0b013e31819b5b65.
    1. Giesler RB, Given B, Given CW, Rawl S, Monahan P, Burns D, et al. Improving the quality of life of patients with prostate carcinoma: a randomized trial testing the efficacy of a nurse-driven intervention. Cancer. 2005;104(4):752–762. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21231.
    1. Perz J, Ussher JM, Butow P, Wain G. Gender differences in cancer carer psychological distress: an analysis of moderators and mediators. Eur J Canc Care. 2011;20(5):610–619. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2354.2011.01257.x.
    1. Massie MJ. Prevalence of Depression in Patients With Cancer. JNCI Monographs. 2004;2004(32):57–71. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgh014.
    1. Hagedoorn M, Sanderman R, Bolks HN, Tuinstra J, Coyne JC. Distress in couples coping with cancer: A meta-analysis and critical review of role and gender effects. Psychol Bull. 2008;134(1):1–30. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.134.1.1.
    1. Manne S, Badr H. Intimacy and relationship processes in couples’ psychosocial adaptation to cancer. In: Cancer vol. 2008;112:2541–2555.
    1. Weber BA, Roberts B, Resnick M, Deimling G, Zauszniewski J, Musil C, et al. The effect of dyadic intervention on self-efficacy, social support, and depression for men with prostate cancer. Psycho-Oncol. 2004;13:47–60. doi: 10.1002/pon.718.
    1. Lepore S, Helgeson V, Eton D, Schulz R. Improving quality of life in men with prostate cancer: a randomized controlled trial of group education interventions. Health Psychol. 2003;22:443–452. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.22.5.443.
    1. Brotto L, Heiman J. Mindfulness in sex therapy: Applications for women with sexual difficulties following gynecologic cancer. Sex Rel Ther. 2007;22(1):3–11. doi: 10.1080/14681990601153298.
    1. Jackson M. Sex research and the construction of sexuality: A tool of male supremacy? Woms Stud Int For. 1984;7(1):43–51.
    1. Gavey N, McPhillips K, Braun V. Interruptus Coitus: Heterosexuals Accounting for Intercourse. Sexualities. 1999;2(1):35–68. doi: 10.1177/136346099002001003.
    1. Carr JG, Gilroy FD, Sherman MF. Silencing the self and depression among women. Psych Wom Quart. 1996;20:375–392. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.1996.tb00306.x.
    1. Jack DC. Silencing the self: The power of social imperatives in women’s depression. In: Formanek R, Gurian A, editors. Women and depression: A lifespan perspective. New York: Springer; 1987. pp. 161–181.
    1. Zunkel G. Relational coping processes: couples’ response to a diagnosis of early stage breast cancer. J Psych Oncol. 2002;20(4):39–55. doi: 10.1300/J077v20n04_03.
    1. Kayser K, Watson LE, Andrade JT. Cancer as a “we-disease”: Examining the process of coping from a relational perspective. Fam Syst Health. 2007;25(4):404–418. doi: 10.1037/1091-7527.25.4.404.
    1. Manne S, Ostroff J, Winkel G, Goldstein L, Fox K, Grana G. Posttraumatic growth after breast cancer: Patient, partner, and couple perspectives. Psychosom Med. 2004;66(3):442–454.
    1. Manne S, Ostroff JS, Norton TR, Fox K, Goldstein L, Grana G. Cancer-related relationship communication in couples coping with early stage breast cancer. Psycho-Oncol. 2006;15(3):234–247. doi: 10.1002/pon.941.
    1. Ptacek JT, Ptacek JJ, Dodge KL. Coping with breast cancer from the perspectives of husbands and wives. J Psychosoc Oncol. 1994;12(3):47–72. doi: 10.1300/J077V12N03_04.
    1. Badr H, Acitelli L, Carmack Taylor CL. Does talking about their relationship affect couples’ marital and psychological adjustment to lung cancer? J Canc Surviv. 2008;2(1):53–64. doi: 10.1007/s11764-008-0044-3.
    1. Mishel MH, Belyea M, Germino BB, Stewart JL, Bailey DE, Robertson C, et al. Helping patients with localized prostate carcinoma manage uncertainty and treatment side effects. Cancer. 2002;94(6):1854–1866. doi: 10.1002/cncr.10390.
    1. Regan TW, Lambert SD, Girgis A, Kelly B, Kayser K, Turner J. Do couple-based interventions make a difference for couples affected by cancer?: A systematic review. BMC Cancer. 2012;12:279. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-12-279.
    1. Taylor B, Davis S. The Extended PLISSIT Model for Addressing the Sexual Wellbeing of Individuals with an Acquired Disability or Chronic Illness. Sex Disabil. 2007;25(3):135–139. doi: 10.1007/s11195-007-9044-x.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors et collaborateurs

Les conditions médicales

Interventions en matière de drogue

3
S'abonner