Somatic mutation profiles of MSI and MSS colorectal cancer identified by whole exome next generation sequencing and bioinformatics analysis

Bernd Timmermann, Martin Kerick, Christina Roehr, Axel Fischer, Melanie Isau, Stefan T Boerno, Andrea Wunderlich, Christian Barmeyer, Petra Seemann, Jana Koenig, Michael Lappe, Andreas W Kuss, Masoud Garshasbi, Lars Bertram, Kathrin Trappe, Martin Werber, Bernhard G Herrmann, Kurt Zatloukal, Hans Lehrach, Michal R Schweiger, Bernd Timmermann, Martin Kerick, Christina Roehr, Axel Fischer, Melanie Isau, Stefan T Boerno, Andrea Wunderlich, Christian Barmeyer, Petra Seemann, Jana Koenig, Michael Lappe, Andreas W Kuss, Masoud Garshasbi, Lars Bertram, Kathrin Trappe, Martin Werber, Bernhard G Herrmann, Kurt Zatloukal, Hans Lehrach, Michal R Schweiger

Abstract

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is with approximately 1 million cases the third most common cancer worldwide. Extensive research is ongoing to decipher the underlying genetic patterns with the hope to improve early cancer diagnosis and treatment. In this direction, the recent progress in next generation sequencing technologies has revolutionized the field of cancer genomics. However, one caveat of these studies remains the large amount of genetic variations identified and their interpretation.

Methodology/principal findings: Here we present the first work on whole exome NGS of primary colon cancers. We performed 454 whole exome pyrosequencing of tumor as well as adjacent not affected normal colonic tissue from microsatellite stable (MSS) and microsatellite instable (MSI) colon cancer patients and identified more than 50,000 small nucleotide variations for each tissue. According to predictions based on MSS and MSI pathomechanisms we identified eight times more somatic non-synonymous variations in MSI cancers than in MSS and we were able to reproduce the result in four additional CRCs. Our bioinformatics filtering approach narrowed down the rate of most significant mutations to 359 for MSI and 45 for MSS CRCs with predicted altered protein functions. In both CRCs, MSI and MSS, we found somatic mutations in the intracellular kinase domain of bone morphogenetic protein receptor 1A, BMPR1A, a gene where so far germline mutations are associated with juvenile polyposis syndrome, and show that the mutations functionally impair the protein function.

Conclusions/significance: We conclude that with deep sequencing of tumor exomes one may be able to predict the microsatellite status of CRC and in addition identify potentially clinically relevant mutations.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1. Qualities of the targeted whole…
Figure 1. Qualities of the targeted whole exome sequencing approach.
(A) Venn diagram of captured exons of normal and tumor samples. Captured exons with at least one read were counted. (B) Representative normalized coverage-distribution plot. The fraction of bait-covered exons in the genome achieving coverages equal or lower than the normalized coverage is indicated on the x-axis. The mean coverage per exon was divided by the mean coverage of all exons.
Figure 2. Identification process of somatic relevant…
Figure 2. Identification process of somatic relevant SNVs.
(A) Schematic of the bioinformatics SNV detection workflow. (B) Extraction of functionally relevant somatic mutations for MSI and MSS colorectal cancers. Variants were detected with the GS Reference Mapper before they were filtered for their localization, annotation in dbSNP130 or the 1000genomes, somatic and functionally impairment. From dbSNP130 or the 1000genomes variants with frequencies above 1% were used. For MSI CRC 359 variants and for MSS CRC 45 with predicted altered protein functions were identified.
Figure 3. Characterization of primary identified SNVs.
Figure 3. Characterization of primary identified SNVs.
(A) Proportional Venn diagram. Fractions of called SNVs identical to the Genomes Project data and dbSNP130. Only data for which the minor allele frequency or the average heterozygosity was known and below 1% were used for comparison. (B) Distribution of synonymous, missense, nonsense and mutations affecting the start or stop codon are shown in relation to all somatic mutations. (C) BMPR1A mutations p.W487R and p.E502G are located at the protein kinase domain of BMPR1A. Reference amino acids are in green, the mutated forms are shown in red. The net structure at the left lower side indicates the ATP binding domain. (D) BMPR1A mutations show decreased signaling acitivity. Activity of wt mBMPR1A, mBMPR1A E502G and mBMPR1A W487R was determined in C2C12 cells using a SMAD-responsive Luciferase reporter gene assay. Induced Luciferase activity was normalized to Renilla acitivty. The activity of untransfected cells was set to 0% and the activity of wt mBmpr1a was set to 100%. Significant differences were calculated with a two-tailed t-test and marked as: * p≤0.05, ** p≤0.01, *** p≤0.001.

References

    1. Peinado MA, Malkhosyan S, Velazquez A, Perucho M. Isolation and characterization of allelic losses and gains in colorectal tumors by arbitrarily primed polymerase chain reaction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992;89:10065–10069.
    1. Thibodeau SN, Bren G, Schaid D. Microsatellite instability in cancer of the proximal colon. Science. 1993;260:816–819.
    1. Ionov Y, Peinado MA, Malkhosyan S, Shibata D, Perucho M. Ubiquitous somatic mutations in simple repeated sequences reveal a new mechanism for colonic carcinogenesis. Nature. 1993;363:558–561.
    1. Aaltonen LA, Peltomaki P, Leach FS, Sistonen P, Pylkkanen L, et al. Clues to the pathogenesis of familial colorectal cancer. Science. 1993;260:812–816.
    1. Lynch HT, Lynch PM, Lanspa SJ, Snyder CL, Lynch JF, et al. Review of the Lynch syndrome: history, molecular genetics, screening, differential diagnosis, and medicolegal ramifications. Clin Genet. 2009;76:1–18.
    1. Fallik D, Borrini F, Boige V, Viguier J, Jacob S, et al. Microsatellite instability is a predictive factor of the tumor response to irinotecan in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Cancer Res. 2003;63:5738–5744.
    1. Sjoblom T, Jones S, Wood LD, Parsons DW, Lin J, et al. The consensus coding sequences of human breast and colorectal cancers. Science. 2006;314:268–274.
    1. Jones S, Zhang X, Parsons DW, Lin JC, Leary RJ, et al. Core signaling pathways in human pancreatic cancers revealed by global genomic analyses. Science. 2008;321:1801–1806.
    1. Greenman C, Stephens P, Smith R, Dalgliesh GL, Hunter C, et al. Patterns of somatic mutation in human cancer genomes. Nature. 2007;446:153–158.
    1. Wood LD, Parsons DW, Jones S, Lin J, Sjoblom T, et al. The genomic landscapes of human breast and colorectal cancers. Science. 2007;318:1108–1113.
    1. The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. Comprehensive genomic characterization defines human glioblastoma genes and core pathways. Nature. 2008;455:1061–1068.
    1. Stiller M, Knapp M, Stenzel U, Hofreiter M, Meyer M. Direct multiplex sequencing (DMPS)–a novel method for targeted high-throughput sequencing of ancient and highly degraded DNA. Genome Res. 2009;19:1843–1848.
    1. Schweiger MR, Kerick M, Timmermann B, Albrecht MW, Borodina T, et al. Genome-wide massively parallel sequencing of formaldehyde fixed-paraffin embedded (FFPE) tumor tissues for copy-number- and mutation-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2009;4:e5548.
    1. Ng SB, Turner EH, Robertson PD, Flygare SD, Bigham AW, et al. Targeted capture and massively parallel sequencing of 12 human exomes. Nature. 2009;461:272–276.
    1. Krawitz PM, Schweiger MR, Rodelsperger C, Marcelis C, Kolsch U, et al. Identity-by-descent filtering of exome sequence data identifies PIGV mutations in hyperphosphatasia mental retardation syndrome. Nat Genet. 2010;42:827–829.
    1. Ley TJ, Mardis ER, Ding L, Fulton B, McLellan MD, et al. DNA sequencing of a cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukaemia genome. Nature. 2008;456:66–72.
    1. Shah SP, Morin RD, Khattra J, Prentice L, Pugh T, et al. Mutational evolution in a lobular breast tumour profiled at single nucleotide resolution. Nature. 2009;461:809–813.
    1. Pleasance ED, Cheetham RK, Stephens PJ, McBride DJ, Humphray SJ, et al. A comprehensive catalogue of somatic mutations from a human cancer genome. Nature. 2010;463:191–196.
    1. Pleasance ED, Stephens PJ, O'Meara S, McBride DJ, Meynert A, et al. A small-cell lung cancer genome with complex signatures of tobacco exposure. Nature. 2010;463:184–190.
    1. Hedges DJ, Burges D, Powell E, Almonte C, Huang J, et al. Exome sequencing of a multigenerational human pedigree. PLoS ONE. 2009;4:e8232.
    1. Shen L, Toyota M, Kondo Y, Lin E, Zhang L, et al. Integrated genetic and epigenetic analysis identifies three different subclasses of colon cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:18654–18659.
    1. Adzhubei IA, Schmidt S, Peshkin L, Ramensky VE, Gerasimova A, et al. A method and server for predicting damaging missense mutations. Nat Methods. 2010;7:248–249.
    1. Schwarz JM, Rodelsperger C, Schuelke M, Seelow D. MutationTaster evaluates disease-causing potential of sequence alterations. Nat Methods. 2010;7:575–576.
    1. De Grassi A, Segala C, Iannelli F, Volorio S, Bertario L, et al. Ultradeep sequencing of a human ultraconserved region reveals somatic and constitutional genomic instability. PLoS Biol. 8:e1000275.
    1. Lipkin SM, Wang V, Stoler DL, Anderson GR, Kirsch I, et al. Germline and somatic mutation analyses in the DNA mismatch repair gene MLH3: Evidence for somatic mutation in colorectal cancers. Hum Mutat. 2001;17:389–396.
    1. Toyota M, Ahuja N, Ohe-Toyota M, Herman JG, Baylin SB, et al. CpG island methylator phenotype in colorectal cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96:8681–8686.
    1. Goel A, Nagasaka T, Arnold CN, Inoue T, Hamilton C, et al. The CpG island methylator phenotype and chromosomal instability are inversely correlated in sporadic colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology. 2007;132:127–138.
    1. Howe JR, Sayed MG, Ahmed AF, Ringold J, Larsen-Haidle J, et al. The prevalence of MADH4 and BMPR1A mutations in juvenile polyposis and absence of BMPR2, BMPR1B, and ACVR1 mutations. J Med Genet. 2004;41:484–491.
    1. Markowitz S, Wang J, Myeroff L, Parsons R, Sun L, et al. Inactivation of the type II TGF-beta receptor in colon cancer cells with microsatellite instability. Science. 1995;268:1336–1338.
    1. Howe JR, Bair JL, Sayed MG, Anderson ME, Mitros FA, et al. Germline mutations of the gene encoding bone morphogenetic protein receptor 1A in juvenile polyposis. Nat Genet. 2001;28:184–187.
    1. Howe JR, Roth S, Ringold JC, Summers RW, Jarvinen HJ, et al. Mutations in the SMAD4/DPC4 gene in juvenile polyposis. Science. 1998;280:1086–1088.
    1. Hahn SA, Schutte M, Hoque AT, Moskaluk CA, da Costa LT, et al. DPC4, a candidate tumor suppressor gene at human chromosome 18q21.1. Science. 1996;271:350–353.
    1. Bodmer WF. Cancer genetics: colorectal cancer as a model. J Hum Genet. 2006;51:391–396.
    1. Langmead B, Trapnell C, Pop M, Salzberg SL. Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome. Genome Biol. 2009;10:R25.
    1. Venkatraman ES, Olshen AB. A faster circular binary segmentation algorithm for the analysis of array CGH data. Bioinformatics. 2007;23:657–663.
    1. Kiefer F, Arnold K, Kunzli M, Bordoli L, Schwede T. The SWISS-MODEL Repository and associated resources. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37:D387–392.
    1. Pieper U, Eswar N, Braberg H, Madhusudhan MS, Davis FP, et al. MODBASE, a database of annotated comparative protein structure models, and associated resources. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32:D217–222.
    1. Jonk LJ, Itoh S, Heldin CH, ten Dijke P, Kruijer W. Identification and functional characterization of a Smad binding element (SBE) in the JunB promoter that acts as a transforming growth factor-beta, activin, and bone morphogenetic protein-inducible enhancer. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:21145–21152.
    1. Hampf M, Gossen M. A protocol for combined Photinus and Renilla luciferase quantification compatible with protein assays. Anal Biochem. 2006;356:94–99.

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner