The relationship between infliximab concentrations, antibodies to infliximab and disease activity in Crohn's disease

Niels Vande Casteele, Reena Khanna, Barrett G Levesque, Larry Stitt, G Y Zou, Sharat Singh, Steve Lockton, Scott Hauenstein, Linda Ohrmund, Gordon R Greenberg, Paul J Rutgeerts, Ann Gils, William J Sandborn, Séverine Vermeire, Brian G Feagan, Niels Vande Casteele, Reena Khanna, Barrett G Levesque, Larry Stitt, G Y Zou, Sharat Singh, Steve Lockton, Scott Hauenstein, Linda Ohrmund, Gordon R Greenberg, Paul J Rutgeerts, Ann Gils, William J Sandborn, Séverine Vermeire, Brian G Feagan

Abstract

Objective: Although low infliximab trough concentrations and antibodies to infliximab (ATI) are associated with poor outcomes in patients with Crohn's disease (CD), the clinical relevance of ATI in patients with adequate infliximab concentrations is uncertain. We evaluated this question using an assay sensitive for identification of ATI in the presence of infliximab.

Design: In an observational study, 1487 trough serum samples from 483 patients with CD who participated in four clinical studies of maintenance infliximab therapy were analysed using a fluid phase mobility shift assay. Infliximab and ATI concentrations most discriminant for remission, defined as a C-reactive protein concentration of ≤ 5 mg/L, were determined by receiver operating characteristic curves. A multivariable regression model evaluated these factors as independent predictors of remission.

Results: Based upon analysis of 1487 samples, 77.1% of patients had detectable and 22.9% had undetectable infliximab concentrations, of which 9.5% and 71.8%, respectively, were positive for ATI. An infliximab concentration of > 2.79 μg/mL (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.681; 95% CI 0.632 to 0.731) and ATI concentration of < 3.15 U/mL (AUC = 0.632; 95% CI 0.589 to 0.676) were associated with remission. Multivariable analysis showed that concentrations of both infliximab trough (OR 1.8; 95% CI 1.3 to 2.5; p < 0.001) and ATI (OR 0.57; 95% CI 0.39 to 0.81; p = 0.002) were independent predictors of remission.

Conclusions: The development of ATI increases the probability of active disease even at low concentrations and in the presence of a therapeutic concentration of drug during infliximab maintenance therapy. Evaluation of strategies to prevent ATI formation, including therapeutic drug monitoring with selective infliximab dose intensification, is needed.

Keywords: CROHN'S DISEASE; INFLIXIMAB; PHARMACOKINETICS; PHARMACOLOGY; TNF.

Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
XY plot of infliximab (IFX) and antibody to infliximab (ATI) concentration of all 1487 samples. Lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) for IFX and ATI using the homogenous mobility shift assay was respectively 0.98 μg/mL and 3.13 U/mL. Seventeen data points were outside the axis limits: 4/17 samples had IFX >35 μg/mL (none were positive for ATI) and 13/17 samples had ATI >90 U/mL (none were positive for IFX). Positive (+) and negative (–) signs represent respectively samples with detectable and undetectable IFX or ATI.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showing the infliximab threshold that best discriminated disease activity, as measured by C-reactive protein (concentration ≤5 mg/L was defined as inactive disease).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Median C-reactive protein (CRP) concentration (mg/L) per quartile of infliximab trough (IFX) concentration (A) and antibody to infliximab (ATI) concentration (B). IFX concentration (μg/mL) quartiles (Q) were Q1

Figure 4

Whiskers boxplot (5th–95th centile) representing…

Figure 4

Whiskers boxplot (5th–95th centile) representing the C-reactive protein concentration (mg/L) in samples with…

Figure 4
Whiskers boxplot (5th–95th centile) representing the C-reactive protein concentration (mg/L) in samples with an infliximab (IFX) trough concentration above or below the threshold of 3 μg/mL, both for antibody to IFX (ATI) negative (
Similar articles
Cited by
References
    1. Baert F, Noman M, Vermeire S, et al. . Influence of immunogenicity on the long-term efficacy of infliximab in Crohn's disease. N Engl J Med 2003;348:601–8. - PubMed
    1. Steenholdt C, Bendtzen K, Brynskov J, et al. . Cut-off levels and diagnostic accuracy of infliximab trough levels and anti-infliximab antibodies in Crohn's disease. Scand J Gastroenterol 2011;46:310–18. - PubMed
    1. Vande Casteele N, Gils A, Singh S, et al. . Antibody response to infliximab and its impact on pharmacokinetics can be transient. Am J Gastroenterol 2013;108:962–71. - PubMed
    1. Steenholdt C, Ainsworth MA, Tovey M, et al. . Comparison of techniques for monitoring infliximab and antibodies against infliximab in Crohn's disease. Ther Drug Monit 2013;35:530–8. - PubMed
    1. Vande Casteele N, Buurman DJ, Sturkenboom MGG, et al. . Detection of infliximab levels and anti-infliximab antibodies: a comparison of three different assays. Aliment Pharmacol Therap 2012;36:765–71. - PubMed
Show all 37 references
Publication types
MeSH terms
Related information
Full text links [x]
[x]
Cite
Copy Download .nbib
Format: AMA APA MLA NLM
Figure 4
Figure 4
Whiskers boxplot (5th–95th centile) representing the C-reactive protein concentration (mg/L) in samples with an infliximab (IFX) trough concentration above or below the threshold of 3 μg/mL, both for antibody to IFX (ATI) negative (

References

    1. Baert F, Noman M, Vermeire S, et al. . Influence of immunogenicity on the long-term efficacy of infliximab in Crohn's disease. N Engl J Med 2003;348:601–8.
    1. Steenholdt C, Bendtzen K, Brynskov J, et al. . Cut-off levels and diagnostic accuracy of infliximab trough levels and anti-infliximab antibodies in Crohn's disease. Scand J Gastroenterol 2011;46:310–18.
    1. Vande Casteele N, Gils A, Singh S, et al. . Antibody response to infliximab and its impact on pharmacokinetics can be transient. Am J Gastroenterol 2013;108:962–71.
    1. Steenholdt C, Ainsworth MA, Tovey M, et al. . Comparison of techniques for monitoring infliximab and antibodies against infliximab in Crohn's disease. Ther Drug Monit 2013;35:530–8.
    1. Vande Casteele N, Buurman DJ, Sturkenboom MGG, et al. . Detection of infliximab levels and anti-infliximab antibodies: a comparison of three different assays. Aliment Pharmacol Therap 2012;36:765–71.
    1. Ungar B, Chowers Y, Yavzori M, et al. . The temporal evolution of antidrug antibodies in patients with inflammatory bowel disease treated with infliximab. Gut 2014;63:1258–64.
    1. Steenholdt C, Al-Khalaf M, Brynskov J, et al. . Clinical implications of variations in anti-infliximab antibody levels in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2012;18:2209–17.
    1. Nanda KS, Cheifetz AS, Moss AC. Impact of antibodies to infliximab on clinical outcomes and serum infliximab levels in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD): a meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 2013;108:40–7.
    1. Seow CH, Newman A, Irwin SP, et al. . Trough serum infliximab: a predictive factor of clinical outcome for infliximab treatment in acute ulcerative colitis. Gut 2010;59:49–54.
    1. Maser EA, Villela R, Silverberg MS, et al. . Association of trough serum infliximab to clinical outcome after scheduled maintenance treatment for Crohn's disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006;4:1248–54.
    1. Bortlik M, Duricova D, Malickova K, et al. . Infliximab trough levels may predict sustained response to infliximab in patients with Crohn's disease. J Crohns Colitis 2013;7:736–43.
    1. Karmiris K, Paintaud G, Noman M, et al. . Influence of trough serum levels and immunogenicity on long-term outcome of adalimumab therapy in Crohn's disease. Gastroenterology 2009;137:1628–40.
    1. Baert F, Drobne D, Gils A, et al. . Early trough levels and antibodies to infliximab predict safety and success of reinitiation of infliximab therapy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014;12:1474–1481.e2.
    1. Roblin X, Marotte H, Rinaudo M, et al. . Association between pharmacokinetics of adalimumab and mucosal healing in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014;12:80–4.
    1. Paul S, Del Tedesco E, Marotte H, et al. . Therapeutic drug monitoring of infliximab and mucosal healing in inflammatory bowel disease: a prospective study. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2013;19:2568–76.
    1. Hanauer SB, Feagan BG, Lichtenstein GR, et al. . Maintenance infliximab for Crohn's disease: the ACCENT I randomised trial. Lancet 2002;359:1541–9.
    1. Cornillie F, Hanauer SB, Diamond RH, et al. . Postinduction serum infliximab trough level and decrease of C-reactive protein level are associated with durable sustained response to infliximab: a retrospective analysis of the ACCENT I trial. Gut 2014;63:1721–7..
    1. Steenholdt C, Brynskov J, Thomsen OO, et al. . Individualised therapy is more cost-effective than dose intensification in patients with Crohn's disease who lose response to anti-TNF treatment: a randomised, controlled trial. Gut 2014;63:919–27.
    1. Afif W, Loftus EV Jr, Faubion WA, et al. . Clinical utility of measuring infliximab and human anti-chimeric antibody concentrations in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2010;105:1133–9.
    1. Vande Casteele N, Feagan BG, Gils A, et al. . Therapeutic drug monitoring in inflammatory bowel disease: current state and future perspectives. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2014;16:378.
    1. Ben-Horin S, Chowers Y. Tailoring anti-TNF therapy in IBD: drug levels and disease activity. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014;11:243–55.
    1. Mao R, Xiao YL, Gao X, et al. . Fecal calprotectin in predicting relapse of inflammatory bowel diseases: a meta-analysis of prospective studies. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2012;18:1894–9.
    1. Peyrin-Biroulet L, Reinisch W, Colombel JF, et al. . Clinical disease activity, C-reactive protein normalisation and mucosal healing in Crohn's disease in the SONIC trial. Gut 2014;63:88–95.
    1. Feagan BG, McDonald JW, Panaccione R, et al. . Methotrexate in combination with infliximab is no more effective than infliximab alone in patients with Crohn's disease. Gastroenterology 2014;146:681–8.
    1. Levesque BG, Greenberg GR, Zou G, et al. . A prospective cohort study to determine the relationship between serum infliximab concentration and efficacy in patients with luminal Crohn's disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2014;39:1126–35.
    1. Drobne D, Bossuyt P, Breynaert C, et al. . Withdrawal of Immunomodulators After Co-treatment Does not Reduce Trough Level of Infliximab in Patients with Crohn's Disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. Published Online First: 24 July 2014. doi:
    1. Wang SL, Ohrmund L, Hauenstein S, et al. . Development and validation of a homogeneous mobility shift assay for the measurement of infliximab and antibodies-to-infliximab levels in patient serum. J Immunol Methods 2012;382:177–88.
    1. Obuchowski NA. Nonparametric analysis of clustered ROC curve data. Biometrics 1997;53:567–78.
    1. Rehlaender BN, Cho MJ. Antibodies as carrier proteins. Pharm Res 1998;15:1652–6.
    1. Brandse JF, van der Kleij D, Wolbink G-J, et al. . 786 the pharmacokinetics of infliximab induction therapy in patients with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology 2014;146:S–134.
    1. Yamada A, Sono K, Hosoe N, et al. . Monitoring functional serum antitumor necrosis factor antibody level in Crohn's disease patients who maintained and those who lost response to anti-TNF. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2010;16:1898–904.
    1. Sandborn WJ, Feagan BG, Rutgeerts P, et al. . Vedolizumab as induction and maintenance therapy for Crohn's disease. N Engl J Med 2013;369:711–21.
    1. Velayos FS, Kahn JG, Sandborn WJ, et al. . A test-based strategy is more cost effective than empiric dose escalation for patients with Crohn's disease who lose responsiveness to infliximab. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013;11:654–66.
    1. Krieckaert CL, Nair SC, Nurmohamed MT, et al. . Personalised treatment using serum drug levels of adalimumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: an evaluation of costs and effects. Ann Rheum Dis 2015;74:361–8..
    1. Vande Casteele N, Compernolle G, Ballet V, et al. . OP11 Individualised infliximab treatment using therapeutic drug monitoring: a prospective controlled Trough level Adapted infliXImab Treatment (TAXIT) trial. J Crohns Colitis 2012;6:S6.
    1. Vande Casteele N, Gils A, Ballet V, et al. . OP001 Randomised controlled trial of drug level versus clinically based dosing of infliximab maintenance therapy in IBD: final results of the TAXIT study. United European Gastroenterol J 2013;1:A1.
    1. Jürgens M, Mahachie John JM, Cleynen I, et al. . Levels of C-reactive protein are associated with response to infliximab therapy in patients with Crohn's disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011;9:421–7.

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner