The Usability and Effectiveness of Mobile Health Technology-Based Lifestyle and Medical Intervention Apps Supporting Health Care During Pregnancy: Systematic Review

Sanne B Overdijkink, Adeline V Velu, Ageeth N Rosman, Monique Dm van Beukering, Marjolein Kok, Regine Pm Steegers-Theunissen, Sanne B Overdijkink, Adeline V Velu, Ageeth N Rosman, Monique Dm van Beukering, Marjolein Kok, Regine Pm Steegers-Theunissen

Abstract

Background: A growing number of mobile health (mHealth) technology-based apps are being developed for personal lifestyle and medical health care support, of which several apps are related to pregnancy. Evidence on usability and effectiveness is limited but crucial for successful implementation.

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the usability, that is, feasibility and acceptability, as well as effectiveness of mHealth lifestyle and medical apps to support health care during pregnancy in high-income countries. Feasibility was defined as the actual use, interest, intention, and continued use; perceived suitability; and ability of users to carry out the activities of the app. Acceptability was assessed by user satisfaction, appreciation, and the recommendation of the app to others.

Methods: We performed a systematic review searching the following electronic databases for studies on mHealth technology-based apps in maternal health care in developed countries: EMBASE, MEDLINE Epub (Ovid), Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. All included studies were scored on quality, using the ErasmusAGE Quality Score or the consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research. Main outcome measures were usability and effectiveness of mHealth lifestyle and medical health care support apps related to pregnancy. All studies were screened by 2 reviewers individually, and the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement were followed.

Results: Our search identified 4204 titles and abstracts, of which 2487 original studies remained after removing duplicates. We performed full-text screening of 217 studies, of which 29 were included in our study. In total, 19 out of 29 studies reported on mHealth apps to adopt healthy lifestyles and 10 out of 29 studies to support medical care. The lifestyle apps evaluated in 19 studies reported on usability and effectiveness: 10 studies reported positive on acceptability, and 14 studies reported on feasibility with positive results except one study. In total, 4 out of 19 studies evaluating effectiveness showed significant results on weight gain restriction during pregnancy, intake of vegetables and fruits, and smoking cessation. The 10 studies on medical mHealth apps involved asthma care, diabetic treatment, and encouraging vaccination. Only one study on diabetic treatment reported on acceptability with a positive user satisfaction. In total, 9 out of 10 studies reported on effectiveness. Moreover, the power of most studies was inadequate to show significant effects.

Conclusions: Most studies on mHealth apps to support lifestyle and medical care for high-income countries reveal the usability of these apps to reduce gestational weight gain, increase intakes of vegetables and fruit, to quit smoking cessation, and to support health care for prevention of asthma and infections during pregnancy. In general, the evidence on effectiveness of these apps is limited and needs further investigation before implementation in medical health care.

Keywords: health care; lifestyle; mHealth; maternal health; pregnancy.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: From 2016, RST is CEO of eHealth Care Solutions and CSO of Slimmere Zorg BV. Other authors have no conflicts of interests to declare.

©Sanne B Overdijkink, Adeline V Velu, Ageeth N Rosman, Monique DM van Beukering, Marjolein Kok, Regine PM Steegers-Theunissen. Originally published in JMIR Mhealth and Uhealth (http://mhealth.jmir.org), 24.04.2018.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) flow diagram.

References

    1. World Health Organization. Geneva: WHO Press; 2011. [2017-01-02]. mHealth New horizons for health through mobile technologies .
    1. Whittaker R, McRobbie H, Bullen C, Rodgers A, Gu Y. Mobile phone-based interventions for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;4:CD006611. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006611.pub4.
    1. Pal K, Eastwood SV, Michie S, Farmer AJ, Barnard ML, Peacock R, Wood B, Inniss JD, Murray E. Computer-based diabetes self-management interventions for adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;3:CD008776. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008776.pub2.
    1. Thomairy NA, Mummaneni M, Alsalamah S, Moussa N, Coustasse A. Use of smartphones in hospitals. Health Care Manag (Frederick) 2015;34(4):297–307. doi: 10.1097/HCM.0000000000000080.
    1. Carroll JK, Moorhead A, Bond R, LeBlanc WG, Petrella RJ, Fiscella K. Who uses mobile phone health apps and does use matter? A secondary data analysis approach. J Med Internet Res. 2017 Apr 19;19(4):e125. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5604.
    1. Central Bureau of Statistics, the Netherlands. Den Haag/Heerlen: Central Bureau of Statistics, the Netherlands; [2017-01-02]. Internet; access, use and facilities .
    1. Tripp N, Hainey K, Liu A, Poulton A, Peek M, Kim J, Nanan R. An emerging model of maternity care: smartphone, midwife, doctor? Women Birth. 2014 Mar;27(1):64–7. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2013.11.001.
    1. Bert F, Passi S, Scaioli G, Gualano MR, Siliquini R. There comes a baby! What should I do? Smartphones' pregnancy-related applications: a web-based overview. Health Informatics J. 2016 Sep;22(3):608–17. doi: 10.1177/1460458215574120.
    1. Scott KM, Gome GA, Richards D, Caldwell PH. How trustworthy are apps for maternal and child health? Health Technol. 2015 Mar 12;4(4):329–336. doi: 10.1007/s12553-015-0099-x.
    1. United Nations UN. Country classification: data sources, country classifications and aggregation methodology .
    1. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Br Med J. 2009 Jul 21;339:b2535.
    1. Bowen DJ, Kreuter M, Spring B, Cofta-Woerpel L, Linnan L, Weiner D, Bakken S, Kaplan CP, Squiers L, Fabrizio C, Fernandez M. How we design feasibility studies. Am J Prev Med. 2009 May;36(5):452–7. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.02.002.
    1. Carter P, Gray L, Troughton J, Khunti K, Davies M. Fruit and vegetable intake and incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br Med J. 2010 Aug 18;341:c4229.
    1. National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools. Hamilton, ON: 2008. Oct 21, [2018-04-11]. Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies .
    1. Tielemans MJ, Garcia AH, Peralta Santos A, Bramer WM, Luksa N, Luvizotto MJ, Moreira E, Topi G, de Jonge E, Visser TL, Voortman T, Felix JF, Steegers EA, Kiefte-de Jong JC, Franco OH. Macronutrient composition and gestational weight gain: a systematic review. Am J Clin Nutr. 2016 Jan;103(1):83–99. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.115.110742.
    1. Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007 Dec;19(6):349–57. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzm042.
    1. van Zutphen M, Milder IE, Bemelmans WJ. Usage of an online healthy lifestyle program by pregnant women attending midwifery practices in Amsterdam. Prev Med. 2008 Jun;46(6):552–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.01.003.
    1. Bot M, Milder IE, Bemelmans WJ. Nationwide implementation of Hello World: a Dutch email-based health promotion program for pregnant women. J Med Internet Res. 2009;11(3):e24. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1183.
    1. Gazmararian JA, Elon L, Yang B, Graham M, Parker R. Text4baby program: an opportunity to reach underserved pregnant and postpartum women? Matern Child Health J. 2014 Jan;18(1):223–32. doi: 10.1007/s10995-013-1258-1.
    1. Choi J, Lee JH, Vittinghoff E, Fukuoka Y. mHealth physical activity intervention: a randomized pilot study in physically inactive pregnant women. Matern Child Health J. 2016 May;20(5):1091–101. doi: 10.1007/s10995-015-1895-7.
    1. Pollak KI, Alexander SC, Bennett G, Lyna P, Coffman CJ, Bilheimer A, Farrell D, Bodner ME, Swamy GK, Østbye T. Weight-related SMS texts promoting appropriate pregnancy weight gain: a pilot study. Patient Educ Couns. 2014 Nov;97(2):256–60. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.07.030.
    1. Naughton F, Prevost AT, Gilbert H, Sutton S. Randomized controlled trial evaluation of a tailored leaflet and SMS text message self-help intervention for pregnant smokers (MiQuit) Nicotine Tob Res. 2012 May;14(5):569–77. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntr254.
    1. Pollak KI, Lyna P, Bilheimer A, Farrell D, Gao X, Swamy GK, Fish LJ. A pilot study testing SMS text delivered scheduled gradual reduction to pregnant smokers. Nicotine Tob Res. 2013 Oct;15(10):1773–6. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntt045.
    1. Davis AM, Wambach KA, Nelson EL, Odar C, Lillis T, McKinley A, Gallagher M. Health behavior change in pregnant women: a two-phase study. Telemed J E Health. 2014 Dec;20(12):1165–9. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2013.0374.
    1. Abroms LC, Johnson PR, Heminger CL, Van Alstyn JM, Leavitt LE, Schindler-Ruwisch JM, Bushar JA. Quit4baby: results from a pilot test of a mobile smoking cessation program for pregnant women. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015;3(1):e10. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.3846.
    1. Dalrymple PW, Rogers M, Zach L, Turner K, Green M. Collaborating to develop and test an enhanced text messaging system to encourage health information seeking. J Med Libr Assoc. 2013 Jul;101(3):224–7. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.101.3.014.
    1. Knight-Agarwal C, Davis DL, Williams L, Davey R, Cox R, Clarke A. Development and pilot testing of the Eating4two mobile phone app to monitor gestational weight gain. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015;3(2):e44. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.4071.
    1. Soltani H, Duxbury AM, Arden MA, Dearden A, Furness PJ, Garland C. Maternal obesity management using mobile technology: a feasibility study to evaluate a text messaging based complex intervention during pregnancy. J Obes. 2015;2015:814830. doi: 10.1155/2015/814830. doi: 10.1155/2015/814830.
    1. Naughton F, Jamison J, Sutton S. Attitudes towards SMS text message smoking cessation support: a qualitative study of pregnant smokers. Health Educ Res. 2013 Oct;28(5):911–22. doi: 10.1093/her/cyt057.
    1. Song H, May A, Vaidhyanathan V, Cramer EM, Owais RW, McRoy S. A two-way text-messaging system answering health questions for low-income pregnant women. Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Aug;92(2):182–7. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.04.016.
    1. Herring SJ, Cruice JF, Bennett GG, Rose MZ, Davey A, Foster GD. Preventing excessive gestational weight gain among African American women: a randomized clinical trial. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2016 Jan;24(1):30–6. doi: 10.1002/oby.21240. doi: 10.1002/oby.21240.
    1. Fujioka N, Kobayashi T, Turale S. Short-term behavioral changes in pregnant women after a quit-smoking program via e-learning: a descriptive study from Japan. Nurs Health Sci. 2012 Sep;14(3):304–11. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2018.2012.00702.x.
    1. Moniz MH, Meyn LA, Beigi RH. Text messaging to improve preventive health attitudes and behaviors during pregnancy: a prospective cohort analysis. J Reprod Med. 2015;60(9-10):378–82.
    1. Evans W, Nielsen PE, Szekely DR, Bihm JW, Murray EA, Snider J, Abroms LC. Dose-response effects of the text4baby mobile health program: randomized controlled trial. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015;3(1):e12. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.3909.
    1. Van Dijk MR, Huijgen NA, Willemsen SP, Laven JS, Steegers EA, Steegers-Theunissen RP. Impact of an mHealth platform for pregnancy on nutrition and lifestyle of the reproductive population: a survey. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016 May 27;4(2):e53. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.5197.
    1. Nicholson WK, Beckham AJ, Hatley K, Diamond M, Johnson LS, Green SL, Tate D. The Gestational Diabetes Management System (GooDMomS): development, feasibility and lessons learned from a patient-informed, web-based pregnancy and postpartum lifestyle intervention. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Sep 21;16(1):277. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-1064-z.
    1. Hirst JE, Mackillop L, Loerup L, Kevat DA, Bartlett K, Gibson O, Kenworthy Y, Levy JC, Tarassenko L, Farmer A. Acceptability and user satisfaction of a smartphone-based, interactive blood glucose management system in women with gestational diabetes mellitus. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015 Jan;9(1):111–5. doi: 10.1177/1932296814556506.
    1. Zairina E, Abramson MJ, McDonald CF, Li J, Dharmasiri T, Stewart K, Walker SP, Paul E, George J. Telehealth to improve asthma control in pregnancy: A randomized controlled trial. Respirology. 2016 Jul;21(5):867–74. doi: 10.1111/resp.12773.
    1. Homko CJ, Santamore WP, Whiteman V, Bower M, Berger P, Geifman-Holtzman O, Bove AA. Use of an internet-based telemedicine system to manage underserved women with gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2007 Jun;9(3):297–306. doi: 10.1089/dia.2006.0034.
    1. Pérez-Ferre N, Galindo M, Fernández MD, Velasco V, Runkle I, de la Cruz MJ, Martín Rojas-Marcos P, Del Valle L, Calle-Pascual AL. The outcomes of gestational diabetes mellitus after a telecare approach are not inferior to traditional outpatient clinic visits. Int J Endocrinol. 2010;2010:386941. doi: 10.1155/2010/386941. doi: 10.1155/2010/386941.
    1. Homko CJ, Deeb LC, Rohrbacher K, Mulla W, Mastrogiannis D, Gaughan J, Santamore WP, Bove AA. Impact of a telemedicine system with automated reminders on outcomes in women with gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2012 Jul;14(7):624–9. doi: 10.1089/dia.2012.0010.
    1. Carral F, Ayala Mdel C, Fernández JJ, González C, Piñero A, García G, Cañavate C, Jiménez AI, García C. Web-based telemedicine system is useful for monitoring glucose control in pregnant women with diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2015 May;17(5):349–54. doi: 10.1089/dia.2014.0223.
    1. Stockwell MS, Westhoff C, Kharbanda EO, Vargas CY, Camargo S, Vawdrey DK, Castaño PM. Influenza vaccine text message reminders for urban, low-income pregnant women: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Public Health. 2014 Feb;104 Suppl 1:e7–12. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301620.
    1. Jordan ET, Bushar JA, Kendrick JS, Johnson P, Wang J. Encouraging influenza vaccination among Text4baby pregnant women and mothers. Am J Prev Med. 2015 Oct;49(4):563–72. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.04.029.
    1. Yudin MH, Mistry N, De Souza LR, Besel K, Patel V, Blanco Mejia S, Bernick R, Ryan V, Urquia M, Beigi RH, Moniz MH, Sgro M. Text messages for influenza vaccination among pregnant women: a randomized controlled trial. Vaccine. 2017 Dec 01;35(5):842–848. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.12.002.
    1. Badawy SM, Kuhns LM. Texting and mobile phone app interventions for improving adherence to preventive behavior in adolescents: a systematic review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017 Apr 19;5(4):e50. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.6837.
    1. Dennison L, Morrison L, Conway G, Yardley L. Opportunities and challenges for smartphone applications in supporting health behavior change: qualitative study. J Med Internet Res. 2013 Apr 18;15(4):e86. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2583.
    1. Nes AA, van Dulmen S, Eide E, Finset A, Kristjánsdóttir OB, Steen IS, Eide H. The development and feasibility of a web-based intervention with diaries and situational feedback via smartphone to support self-management in patients with diabetes type 2. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2012 Sep;97(3):385–93. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2012.04.019.
    1. Hayashi A, Yamaguchi S, Waki K, Fujiu K, Hanafusa N, Nishi T, Tomita H, Kobayashi H, Fujita H, Kadowaki T, Nangaku M, Ohe K. Testing the feasibility and usability of a novel smartphone-based self-management support system for dialysis patients: a pilot study. JMIR Res Protoc. 2017 Apr 20;6(4):e63. doi: 10.2196/resprot.7105.
    1. Ming WK, Mackillop LH, Farmer AJ, Loerup L, Bartlett K, Levy JC, Tarassenko L, Velardo C, Kenworthy Y, Hirst JE. Telemedicine technologies for diabetes in pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2016 Nov 09;18(11):e290. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6556.
    1. Rehman H, Kamal AK, Sayani S, Morris PB, Merchant AT, Virani SS. Using mobile health (mHealth) technology in the management of diabetes mellitus, physical inactivity, and smoking. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2017 Apr;19(4):16. doi: 10.1007/s11883-017-0650-5.
    1. Badawy SM, Barrera L, Sinno MG, Kaviany S, O'Dwyer LC, Kuhns LM. Text messaging and mobile phone apps as interventions to improve adherence in adolescents with chronic health conditions: a systematic review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017 May 15;5(5):e66. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.7798.
    1. Kotz D, Gunter CA, Kumar S, Weiner JP. Privacy and security in mobile health: a research agenda. Computer. 2016 Jun;49(6):22–30. doi: 10.1109/MC.2016.185.
    1. Badawy SM, Kuhns LM. Economic evaluation of text-messaging and smartphone-based interventions to improve medication adherence in adolescents with chronic health conditions: a systematic review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016 Oct 25;4(4):e121. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.6425.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors et collaborateurs

Les conditions médicales

Interventions en matière de drogue

3
S'abonner