Effects of affective picture viewing on postural control

John F Stins, Peter J Beek, John F Stins, Peter J Beek

Abstract

Background: Emotion theory holds that unpleasant events prime withdrawal actions, whereas pleasant events prime approach actions. Recent studies have suggested that passive viewing of emotion eliciting images results in postural adjustments, which become manifest as changes in body center of pressure (COP) trajectories. From those studies it appears that posture is modulated most when viewing pictures with negative valence. The present experiment was conducted to test the hypothesis that pictures with negative valence have a greater impact on postural control than neutral or positive ones. Thirty-four healthy subjects passively viewed a series of emotion eliciting images, while standing either in a bipedal or unipedal stance on a force plate. The images were adopted from the International Affective Picture System (IAPS). We analysed mean and variability of the COP and the length of the associated sway path as a function of emotion.

Results: The mean position of the COP was unaffected by emotion, but unipedal stance resulted in overall greater body sway than bipedal stance. We found a modest effect of emotion on COP: viewing pictures of mutilation resulted in a smaller sway path, but only in unipedal stance. We obtained valence and arousal ratings of the images with an independent sample of viewers. These subjects rated the unpleasant images as significantly less pleasant than neutral images, and the pleasant images as significantly more pleasant than neutral images. However, the subjects rated the images as overall less pleasant and less arousing than viewers in a closely comparable American study, pointing to unknown differences in viewer characteristics.

Conclusion: Overall, viewing emotion eliciting images had little effect on body sway. Our finding of a reduction in sway path length when viewing pictures of mutilation was indicative of a freezing strategy, i.e. fear bradycardia. The results are consistent with current knowledge about the neuroanatomical organization of the emotion system and the neural control of behavior.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Means (+/- 1 standard deviation) of sway path length as a function of stance (unipedal/bipedal) and picture. 1 = faces; 2 = household objects; 3 = erotica; 4 = family scenes; 5 = mutilation; 6 = attack.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Representative time series of the COP from one participant in unipedal stance while watching a scene depicting mutilation (left) and a picture of a household object (right). AP is anterior-posterior; ML is medio-lateral.

References

    1. Alexander GE, Crutcher MD. Functional architecture of basal ganglia circuits: neural substrates of parallel processing. Trends Neurosci. 1990;13:266–271. doi: 10.1016/0166-2236(90)90107-L.
    1. Alexander GE, Crutcher MD, DeLong MR. Basal ganglia-thalamocortical circuits: Parallel substrates for motor, oculomotor, "prefrontal" and "limbic" functions. Prog Brain Res. 1990;85:119–146.
    1. Kandel ER, Schwartz JH, Jessell TM. Principles of neuroscience. 4. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2000.
    1. Darwin C. The expression of emotion in man and animal. London: Murray; 1872.
    1. Lang PJ, Bradley MM, Cuthbert BN. Emotion, motivation, and anxiety: brain mechanisms and psychophysiology. Biol Psychiat. 1998;44:1248–1263. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3223(98)00275-3.
    1. LeDoux JE. The emotional brain: The mysterious underpinnings of emotional life. New York: Simon & Schuster; 1996.
    1. Amorapanth P, Nader K, LeDoux JE. Lesions of periaqueductal gray dissociate conditioned freezing from conditioned suppression behavior in rats. Learn Mem. 1999;6:491–499. doi: 10.1101/lm.6.5.491.
    1. Lang PJ, Bradley MM, Cuthbert BN. Technical Report A-6. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida; 2005. International affective picture system (IAPS): Affective ratings of pictures and instruction manual.
    1. Hillman CH, Rosengren KS, Smith DP. Emotion and motivated behavior: postural adjustments to affective picture viewing. Biol Psychol. 2004;66:51–62. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2003.07.005.
    1. Azevedo TM, Volchan E, Imbiriba LA, Rodrigues EC, Oliveira JM, Oliveira LF, Lutterbach LG, Vargas CD. A freezing-like posture to pictures of mutilation. Psychophysiology. 2005;42:255–260. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2005.00287.x.
    1. Facchinetti LD, Imbiriba LA, Azevedo TM, Vargas CD, Volchan E. Postural modulation induced by pictures depicting prosocial or dangerous contexts. Neurosci Lett. 2006;410:52–56. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2006.09.063.
    1. Stins JF, van Leeuwen WM, de Geus EJ. The multi-source interference task: the effect of randomization. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2005;27:711–717. doi: 10.1080/13803390490918516.
    1. Donker S, Roerdink M, Greven A, Beek PJ. Regularity of center-of-pressure trajectories depends on the amount of attentioninvested in postural control. Exp Brain Res. 2007;181:1–11. doi: 10.1007/s00221-007-0905-4.
    1. Vuillerme N, Nougier V. Attentional demand for regulating postural sway: the effect of expertise in gymnastics. Brain Res Bull. 2004;63:161–165. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2004.02.006.
    1. Marks IM. Fears, phobias and rituals. New York: Oxford University Press; 1987.
    1. Sanchez-Navarro JP, Martinez-Selva JM, Roman F. Uncovering the relationship between defence and orienting in emotion: Cardiac reactivity to unpleasant pictures. Int J Psychophysiol. 2006;61:34–46. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2005.10.023.
    1. Coombes SA, Caraugh JH, Janelle CM. Emotion and movement: Activation of defensive circuitry alters the magnitude of a sustained muscle contraction. Neurosci Lett. 2006;396:192–196. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2005.11.048.
    1. Bradley MM, Codispoti M, Cuthbert BN, Lang PJ. Emotion and motivation I: defensive and appetitive reactions in picture processing. Emotion. 2001;1:276–298.
    1. Carpenter MG, Frank JS, Silcher CP. Surface height effects on postural control: A hypothesis for a stiffness strategy for stance. J Vestib Res. 1999;9:277–286.

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner