Hematopoietic stem cell mobilization for gene therapy of adult patients with severe β-thalassemia: results of clinical trials using G-CSF or plerixafor in splenectomized and nonsplenectomized subjects

Evangelia Yannaki, Thalia Papayannopoulou, Erica Jonlin, Fani Zervou, Garyfalia Karponi, Angeliki Xagorari, Pamela Becker, Nikoleta Psatha, Ioannis Batsis, Panayotis Kaloyannidis, Varvara Tahynopoulou, Varnavas Constantinou, Asimina Bouinta, Konstantia Kotta, Aglaia Athanassiadou, Achilles Anagnostopoulos, Athanasios Fassas, George Stamatoyannopoulos, Evangelia Yannaki, Thalia Papayannopoulou, Erica Jonlin, Fani Zervou, Garyfalia Karponi, Angeliki Xagorari, Pamela Becker, Nikoleta Psatha, Ioannis Batsis, Panayotis Kaloyannidis, Varvara Tahynopoulou, Varnavas Constantinou, Asimina Bouinta, Konstantia Kotta, Aglaia Athanassiadou, Achilles Anagnostopoulos, Athanasios Fassas, George Stamatoyannopoulos

Abstract

The safety and efficacy of hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) mobilization was investigated in adult splenectomized (SPL) and non-SPL patients with thalassemia major, in two clinical trials, using different mobilization modes: granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)-alone, G-CSF following pretreatment with hydroxyurea (HU), plerixafor-alone. G-CSF-mobilization was both safe and effective in non-SPL patients. However, in SPL patients the procedure resulted in excessive response to G-CSF, expressed as early hyperleukocytosis necessitating significant dose reduction, and suboptimal CD34(+) cells yields. One-month HU-pretreatment prevented hyperleukocytosis and allowed successful CD34(+) cell collections when an optimal washout period was maintained, but it significantly prolonged the mobilization procedure. Plerixafor resulted in rapid and effective mobilization in both SPL and non-SPL patients and was well-tolerated. For gene therapy of thalassemia, G-CSF or Plerixafor could be used as mobilization agents in non-SPL patients whereas Plerixafor appears to be the mobilization agent of choice in SPL adult thalassemics in terms of safety and efficacy.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
CD34+ cell yield. (a) Non-SPL patients. The yields from non-SPL subjects, in total 2 aphereses, are shown individually in bars. Left panel: G-CSF-treated subjects; middle panel: HU+G-CSF-treated subjects; right panel: plerixafor-treated subjects. The mobilization outcome in the HU+G-CSF-treated group is directly correlated with the length of the washout period after HU (gray line). (b) SPL patients. The yields from SPL subjects, in total 2 aphereses, are shown individually in bars. Left panel: G-CSF-treated subjects; left-middle panel: HU+G-CSF-treated subjects; right-middle panel: Plerixafor-treated subjects; right panel: Plerixafor+G-CSF-treated subject. The mobilization outcome in the HU+G-CSF-treated group is directly correlated with the length of the washout period after HU (gray line). The primary y-axis represents the CD34+ cell yield ×106/kg and the secondary y-axis the days of washout period after HU-pretreatment. P25 and P04/P25 (**) is the same patient mobilized initially with G-CSF and later with Plerixafor+G-CSF. Patients P02 (*) and P04/P25 (**) reached the target cell dose in 1 apheresis. G-CSF, granulocyte-colony stimulating factor; HU, hydroxyurea; non-SPL, nonsplenectomized; SPL, splenectomized.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Kinetics of white blood cells (WBCs) and peripheral blood CD34+ cells in splenectomized (SPL) patients and the mean yield of CD34+ cells per patient per apheresis. (a) Kinetics of WBCs and peripheral blood CD34+ cells in the SPL patients treated with G-CSF or HU+G-CSF (with the long washout period) or plerixafor. (b) The mean yield per patient per apheresis in SPL subjects treated with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF), HU+G-CSF (with the long washout period), plerixafor and plerixafor + G-CSF. (c) The mean yield per patient per apheresis in non-SPL subjects treated with G-CSF, HU+G-CSF (with the long washout period), and plerixafor. *P = 0.02 versus G-CSF, #P = 0.09 versus G-CSF. HU, hydroxyurea.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Suggested HSC mobilization algorithm for patients with thalassemia. (a) Nonsplenectomized patients. Non-SPL patients with spleen volume <800 cm3 (arbitrary cutoff) could be mobilized with G-CSF whereas patients with excessive splenomegaly (>800 cm3) would better receive Plerixafor which results in significantly less splenic enlargement. (b) Splenectomized patients. SPL patients with baseline WBC <30.0 × 103/µl (arbitrary cutoff) could be mobilized with Plerixafor which triggers less leukocytosis compared to G-CSF, whereas SPL patients with >30.0 × 103/µl baseline WBCs would better receive pretreatment with HU (with the optimal washout interval) to reduce WBCs before mobilization, either with Plerixafor or low-dose G-CSF. HSC, hematopoietic stem cell; HU, hydroxyurea; non-SPL, nonsplenectomized; SPL, splenectomized.

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner