Comparison of the laryngoscopy views with the size 1 Miller and Macintosh laryngoscope blades lifting the epiglottis or the base of the tongue in infants and children Y Passi  1 , M Sathyamoorthy  1 , J Lerman  2 , C Heard  3 , M Marino  1 Affiliations Expand Affiliations 1 Department of Anesthesia, Women and Children's Hospital of Buffalo, SUNY at Buffalo, 219 Bryant St., Buffalo, NY 14222, USA. 2 Department of Anesthesia, Women and Children's Hospital of Buffalo, SUNY at Buffalo, 219 Bryant St., Buffalo, NY 14222, USA University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA jerrold.lerman@gmail.com. 3 Department of Anesthesia, Women and Children's Hospital of Buffalo, SUNY at Buffalo, 219 Bryant St., Buffalo, NY 14222, USA Department of Pediatrics and Pediatric Dentistry, Women and Children's Hospital of Buffalo, SUNY at Buffalo, 219 Bryant St., Buffalo, NY 14222, USA. PMID: 25062740 DOI: 10.1093/bja/aeu228 Free article Item in Clipboard

Abstract

Background: Miller laryngoscope blades are preferred for laryngoscopy in infants and children <2 yr of age. Despite their long history, the laryngeal view with the Miller blade size 1 has never been compared with that with the Macintosh (MAC) blade in children. This prospective, single-blinded, randomized study was designed to compare the laryngeal views with the size 1 Miller and MAC blades in children <2 yr.

Methods: With IRB approval, 50 ASA I and II children <2 yr undergoing elective surgery were enrolled. After an inhalation induction and neuromuscular block with i.v. rocuronium 0.5 mg kg(-1), two laryngeal views were obtained with a single blade (Miller or MAC) in each child: one lifting the epiglottis and another lifting the tongue base. The best laryngeal views in each blade position were photographed with a SONY(®) Cyber-shot camera and rated by a blinded anaesthesiologist using the percentage of glottic opening scale.

Results: The scores with the Miller blade lifting the epiglottis and the MAC blade lifting the tongue base were similar. The scores with the Miller blade lifting the epiglottis and the tongue base were similar. The scores for the MAC blade lifting the tongue base were greater than those lifting the epiglottis (95% confidence interval: 7.6-26.8) (P=0.0004).

Conclusions: In infants and children <2 yr of age, optimal laryngeal views may be obtained with either the Miller size 1 blade lifting the epiglottis or with the Miller or MAC blades lifting the tongue base.

Clinical trial registration: NCT01717872 at Clinical Trials.gov.

Keywords: age groups; child, infant; equipment, laryngoscopes; larynx, laryngoscopy.

© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Journal of Anaesthesia. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.