Phase 2 Study of the Safety and Antitumor Activity of Apalutamide (ARN-509), a Potent Androgen Receptor Antagonist, in the High-risk Nonmetastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Cohort

Matthew R Smith, Emmanuel S Antonarakis, Charles J Ryan, William R Berry, Neal D Shore, Glenn Liu, Joshi J Alumkal, Celestia S Higano, Edna Chow Maneval, Rajesh Bandekar, Carla J de Boer, Margaret K Yu, Dana E Rathkopf, Matthew R Smith, Emmanuel S Antonarakis, Charles J Ryan, William R Berry, Neal D Shore, Glenn Liu, Joshi J Alumkal, Celestia S Higano, Edna Chow Maneval, Rajesh Bandekar, Carla J de Boer, Margaret K Yu, Dana E Rathkopf

Abstract

Background: Apalutamide is a potent androgen receptor (AR) antagonist that targets the AR ligand-binding domain and prevents AR nuclear translocation, DNA binding, and transcription of AR gene targets.

Objective: To evaluate the activity and safety of apalutamide in patients with high-risk nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC).

Design, setting, and participants: We conducted a multicenter phase 2 study of nmCRPC patients with a high risk for progression (prostate-specific antigen [PSA] ≥8 ng/ml or PSA doubling time [PSA DT] ≤10 mo).

Intervention: Patients received 240mg/d apalutamide while continuing on androgen-deprivation therapy.

Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Primary end point was 12-wk PSA response (Prostate Cancer Working Group 2 criteria). Secondary end points included safety, time to PSA progression (TTPP), and metastasis-free survival (MFS).

Results and limitations: A total of 51 patients were enrolled; four patients with metastatic disease were excluded from the efficacy analysis. Patient characteristics included median age, 71 yr; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 (76%); Gleason score ≤7 (57%); median PSA 10.7 ng/ml; and PSA DT ≤10 mo (45%). At median follow-up of 28.0 mo, 18 patients (35%) remained in the study. Overall, 89% of patients had ≥50% PSA decline at 12 wk. Median TTPP was 24.0 mo (95% confidence interval [CI], 16.3 mo-not reached [NR]); median MFS was NR (95% CI, 33.4 mo-NR). Most of the patients discontinued study treatment (n=33) due to disease progression (n=11 [22%]) or adverse events (AEs) (n=9 [18%]). The most common AE was fatigue (any grade, n=31 [61%]) although grade ≥3 fatigue was uncommon (n=2 [4%]). These represent the first apalutamide nmCRPC patient clinical data.

Conclusions: In high-risk nmCRPC patients, apalutamide was safe with robust activity based on durable PSA responses and disease control.

Patient summary: Antitumor activity and the safety of apalutamide in patients with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer support continued development in this setting.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01171898.

Keywords: Antitumor activity; Apalutamide; Castration-resistant prostate cancer; Safety.

Conflict of interest statement

Financial disclosures: Matthew R. Smith certifies that all conflicts of interest, including specific financial interests and relationships and affiliations relevant to the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript (eg, employment/affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, or patents filed, received, or pending), are the following: Matthew R. Smith has served as a consultant to Janssen Research & Development. Emmanuel S. Antonarakis has served as a consultant/adviser to Janssen Biotech, Astellas, Medivation, ESSA, Sanofi, and Dendreon; he has received research funding from Aragon Pharmaceuticals, Johnson & Johnson, Janssen Biotech, Astellas, Tokai, Sanofi, Dendreon, Exelixis, Novartis, and Genentech. Charles J. Ryan has received honoraria from Janssen Research & Development. William R. Berry has received research grants from AHRQ. Neal D. Shore is a consultant/adviser to Algeta, Amgen, Bayer, BNI, Dendreon, Ferring, Janssen, Millennium, and Sanofi. Glenn Liu has nothing to report. Joshi J. Alumkal has received research funding from Aragon Pharmaceuticals. Celestia S. Higano received consulting fees or honoraria from AbbVie, Algeta, Astellas, Bayer, Dendreon, Genentech, Johnson & Johnson, Medivation, Novartis, Pfizer, and Veridex; grants or research support from Amgen, Aragon Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Dendreon, Exelixis, Genentech, Johnson & Johnson, Medivation, Millennium, Novartis, OncoGenex, Sanofi-Aventis US, Taxynergy, and Teva; and other financial benefits from Cell Therapeutics. Edna Chow Maneval was an employee at Aragon Pharmaceuticals. Rajesh Bandekar is an employee of Janssen Research & Development and holds stock and stock options in Johnson & Johnson. Carla J. de Boer is an employee of Janssen Biologics and holds stock and stock options in Johnson & Johnson. Margaret K. Yu is an employee of Janssen Research & Development and holds stock and stock options in Johnson & Johnson. Dana E. Rathkopf has served as a consultant/adviser to and has received research funding from Janssen Research & Development, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Ferring, Medivation, Millennium/ Takeda, and Novartis.

Copyright © 2016 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study design. Progression-free survival not analyzed for the nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) cohort and for four patients with metastatic disease not included in the nmCRPC efficacy analysis. AA = abiraterone acetate; CRPC = castration-resistant prostate cancer; mCRPC = metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer; PSA = prostate-specific antigen.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Patient disposition. PSA = prostate-specific antigen. *Patients may have discontinued due to more than one type of progression.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Waterfall plot for (A) 12-wk prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response and (B) maximal PSA response at any time.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Secondary end points: (A) Time to prostate-specific antigen progression (PSA); (B) metastasis-free survival. CI = confidence interval; NR = not reached.

References

    1. Chi KN, Bjartell A, Dearnaley D, et al. Castration-resistant prostate cancer: from new pathophysiology to new treatment targets. Eur Urol. 2009;56:594–605.
    1. Smith MR, Kabbinavar F, Saad F, et al. Natural history of rising serum prostate-specific antigen in men with castrate nonmetastatic prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:2918–25.
    1. Smith MR, Cook R, Lee KA, Nelson JB. Disease and host characteristics as predictors of time to first bone metastasis and death in men with progressive castration-resistant nonmetastatic prostate cancer. Cancer. 2011;117:2077–85.
    1. Smith MR, Saad F, Oudard S, et al. Denosumab and bone metastasis-free survival in men with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: exploratory analyses by baseline prostate-specific antigen doubling time. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:3800–6.
    1. Prostate cancer, v.1.2016. National Comprehensive Cancer Network; NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology (NCCN Guidelines) Web site. .
    1. Clegg NJ, Wongvipat J, Joseph JD, et al. ARN-509: a novel antiandrogen for prostate cancer treatment. Cancer Res. 2012;72:1494–503.
    1. Jung ME, Ouk S, Yoo D, et al. Structure-activity relationship for thiohydantoin androgen receptor antagonists for castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) J Med Chem. 2010;53:2779–96.
    1. Rathkopf DE, Morris MJ, Fox JJ, et al. Phase I study of ARN-509, a novel antiandrogen, in the treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:3525–30.
    1. Scher HI, Halabi S, Tannock I, et al. Design and end points of clinical trials for patients with progressive prostate cancer and castrate levels of testosterone: recommendations of the Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:1148–59.
    1. Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, et al. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92:205–16.
    1. Foster WR, Car BD, Shi H, et al. Drug safety is a barrier to the discovery and development of new androgen receptor antagonists. Prostate. 2011;71:480–8.
    1. Beer TM, Armstrong AJ, Rathkopf DE, et al. Enzalutamide in metastatic prostate cancer before chemotherapy. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:424–33.
    1. Penson DF, Armstrong AJ, Concepcion R, et al. Enzalutamide versus bicalutamide in castration-resistant prostate cancer: the STRIVE trial. J Clin Oncol. 2016 Jan 25; [Epub ahead of print]
    1. Scher HI, Fizazi K, Saad F, et al. Increased survival with enzalutamide in prostate cancer after chemotherapy. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:1187–97.
    1. Mason MD, Sydes MR, Glaholm J, et al. Oral sodium clodronate for nonmetastatic prostate cancer–results of a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial: Medical Research Council PR04 (ISRCTN61384873) J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007;99:765–76.
    1. Nelson JB, Love W, Chin JL, et al. Phase 3, randomized, controlled trial of atrasentan in patients with nonmetastatic, hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Cancer. 2008;113:2478–87.
    1. Smith MR, Saad F, Coleman R, et al. Denosumab and bone-metastasis-free survival in men with castration-resistant prostate cancer: results of a phase 3, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2012;379:39–46.
    1. Wirth M, Tammela T, Cicalese V, et al. Prevention of bone metastases in patients with high-risk nonmetastatic prostate cancer treated with zoledronic acid: efficacy and safety results of the Zometa European Study (ZEUS) Eur Urol. 2015;67:482–91.
    1. Tombal B, Jassem J, Shreeve SM, et al. SPARTAN - a randomized double-blind, comparative study of ARN-509 plus androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) vs ADT alone in nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (M0-CRPC) [abstract 806TiP]. Paper presented at: European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Annual Congress; September 26–30, 2014; Madrid, Spain.
    1. Sternberg CN, Fizazi K, Saad F, et al. PROSPER: A phase 3 study of enzalutamide in non-metastatic (M0) castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) patients [abstract 802TiP]. Paper presented at: European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Annual Congress; September 26–30, 2014; Madrid, Spain.
    1. Efficacy and safety study of ODM-201 in men with high-risk non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (ARAMIS) . Web site. . Accessed April 15, 2015.

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner