Cold Compress for Intrauterine Device Insertional Pain: A Randomized Control Trial

Jordan Hylton, Sarah Milton, Adam P Sima, Nicole W Karjane, Jordan Hylton, Sarah Milton, Adam P Sima, Nicole W Karjane

Abstract

Background: Pain with intrauterine device (IUD) insertion is identified as a barrier to uptake of this highly effective long-acting reversible contraceptive. Several studies have assessed the efficacy of interventions to alleviate patient discomfort associated with IUD insertion, but no interventions have been clearly shown to improve procedural pain. The aim of this study was to determine whether use of a cold compress on the abdomen during IUD insertion reduces pain. Materials and Methods: This was a prospective randomized control trial of women presenting to Virginia Commonwealth University for insertion of IUD from September 2016 to October 2017. A power analysis determined that 69 subjects were needed in each arm to detect a 30% reduction in pain with a power of 80%, significance value of p < 0.05. One hundred forty-two participants were consented for the study, 69 were randomized to the control group, which received the usual management, and 73 were randomized to the study group, which received a cold compress to the abdomen before the procedure. In addition to data on the difference from pre- to postprocedure pain scales, we collected information regarding inserting provider type, gravidity/parity, body mass index, demographic information (age, race, insurance type, and level of education), history of IUD placement or cervical procedure, history of chronic pain, and the use of regular pain medications (defined as more than once per week). Statistical analysis was accomplished using t-test and chi square tests. Results: There was no difference in pre and postinsertional pain in those who received a cold compress versus the control during insertion of an IUD (3.4 vs. 3.5). The insertional pain was rated at 4.3 and 4.6 for patients who received the cold compress and the control group, respectively (p = 0.805). Conclusion: Although a cold compress is a simple, inexpensive, and safe method of pain control, this study shows no reduction in insertional pain for IUD placement.

Keywords: contraception; insertional pain; intrauterine device.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

© Jordan Hylton et al. 2020; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.

Figures

FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.
Questionnaire women were asked to complete both before and after the IUD insertion. IUD, intrauterine device.

References

    1. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecology. Long acting reversible contraception: Implants and intrauterine devices. Practice bulletin 186. Obstet Gynecol 2017;130:1173–1175
    1. World Health Organization. Intrauterine devices: Technical and managerial guidelines for services. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1997
    1. Population Reference Bureau Family Planning Worldwide. 2002. data sheet
    1. American Academy of Pediatrics. Contraception for adolescents. Pediatrics 134;4:1244–1256
    1. Grimet D, Lopez L, Marion C, Schulz R. Cochrane systematic reviews of IUD trials: Lessons learned. Contraception 2007;75:S55–S59
    1. Edelman A, Schaefer E, Olson A, et al. . Effects of prophylatic misoprostol administration prior to intrauterine device insertion in nulliparous women. Contraception 2011;84:234–239
    1. McNicholas C, Madden T, Zhao Q, Secura G, Allsworth J, Peipert J. Cervical lidocaine for IUD insertional pain: A randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012;207:384–390
    1. Goldstuck ND. Pain reduction during and after insertion of an intrauterine contraceptive device. Adv Contracept 1987;25–36
    1. Mody S, Kiley J, Rademaker A, Gawron L, Stika C, Hammond C. Pain control for intrauterine device insertion: A randomized trial of 1% lidocaine paracervical block. Contraception 2012;86:704–709
    1. Saav I, Aronsson A, Marions L, Stephansson D, Gemzell-Danielsson K. Cervical priming with sublingual misoprostol prior to insertion of an intrauterine device in nulliparous women: a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod 2007;22:2647–2652
    1. Massey SE, Varady JC, Henzyl MR. Pain relief with naproxen following insertion of and intrauterine device. J Reprod Med 1974;13:226–231
    1. Akers A, Steinway C, Sonalkar S, et al. . Reducing pain during intrauterine device insertion: A randomized controlled trial in adolescents and young women. Obstet Gynecol 2017;130:795–802
    1. Swenson C, Sward L, Karlsson J. Cryotherapy in sports medicine. Med Sci Sports 2007;6:193–200
    1. Levy A, Marmar E. The role of cold compression dressings in the postoperative treatment of total knee arthroplasty. Curr Orthop Pract 1993;297:174–178
    1. Abdoullah Al-Otaibi R, Mokabel FM and AL-Ghuneimy Y. The effect of cold application on pain and anxiety during chest tube removal. J Am Sci 2013;9:13–23
    1. Akdemir Y, Karadeniz M. The relationship between pain at IUD insertion and negative perceptions, anxiety and previous mode of delivery. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health 2019;24:240–245
    1. Dina B, Peipert LJ, Zhao Q, Peipert JF. Anticipated pain as a predictor of discomfort with intrauterine device placement. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018;218:236.
    1. Nguyen L, Lamarche L, Lennox R, et al. . Strategies to mitigate anxiety and pain in intrauterine device insertion: A systematic review. J Obstet Gynaeco Can 2019. Pii:

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner