Interleukin-1 blockade with high-dose anakinra in patients with COVID-19, acute respiratory distress syndrome, and hyperinflammation: a retrospective cohort study

Giulio Cavalli, Giacomo De Luca, Corrado Campochiaro, Emanuel Della-Torre, Marco Ripa, Diana Canetti, Chiara Oltolini, Barbara Castiglioni, Chiara Tassan Din, Nicola Boffini, Alessandro Tomelleri, Nicola Farina, Annalisa Ruggeri, Patrizia Rovere-Querini, Giuseppe Di Lucca, Sabina Martinenghi, Raffaella Scotti, Moreno Tresoldi, Fabio Ciceri, Giovanni Landoni, Alberto Zangrillo, Paolo Scarpellini, Lorenzo Dagna, Giulio Cavalli, Giacomo De Luca, Corrado Campochiaro, Emanuel Della-Torre, Marco Ripa, Diana Canetti, Chiara Oltolini, Barbara Castiglioni, Chiara Tassan Din, Nicola Boffini, Alessandro Tomelleri, Nicola Farina, Annalisa Ruggeri, Patrizia Rovere-Querini, Giuseppe Di Lucca, Sabina Martinenghi, Raffaella Scotti, Moreno Tresoldi, Fabio Ciceri, Giovanni Landoni, Alberto Zangrillo, Paolo Scarpellini, Lorenzo Dagna

Abstract

Background: Mortality of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and systemic inflammation is high. In areas of pandemic outbreak, the number of patients can exceed maximum capacity of intensive care units (ICUs), and, thus, these individuals often receive non-invasive ventilation outside of the ICU. Effective treatments for this population are needed urgently. Anakinra is a recombinant interleukin-1 receptor antagonist that might be beneficial in this patient population.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study at the San Raffaele Hospital in Milan, Italy. We included consecutive patients (aged ≥18 years) with COVID-19, moderate-to-severe ARDS, and hyperinflammation (defined as serum C-reactive protein ≥100 mg/L, ferritin ≥900 ng/mL, or both) who were managed with non-invasive ventilation outside of the ICU and who received standard treatment of 200 mg hydroxychloroquine twice a day orally and 400 mg lopinavir with 100 mg ritonavir twice a day orally. We compared survival, mechanical ventilation-free survival, changes in C-reactive protein, respiratory function, and clinical status in a cohort of patients who received additional treatment with anakinra (either 5 mg/kg twice a day intravenously [high dose] or 100 mg twice a day subcutaneously [low dose]) with a retrospective cohort of patients who did not receive anakinra (referred to as the standard treatment group). All outcomes were assessed at 21 days. This study is part of the COVID-19 Biobank study, which is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04318366.

Findings: Between March 17 and March 27, 2020, 29 patients received high-dose intravenous anakinra, non-invasive ventilation, and standard treatment. Between March 10 and March 17, 2020, 16 patients received non-invasive ventilation and standard treatment only and comprised the comparison group for this study. A further seven patients received low-dose subcutaneous anakinra in addition to non-invasive ventilation and standard treatment; however, anakinra treatment was interrupted after 7 days because of a paucity of effects on serum C-reactive protein and clinical status. At 21 days, treatment with high-dose anakinra was associated with reductions in serum C-reactive protein and progressive improvements in respiratory function in 21 (72%) of 29 patients; five (17%) patients were on mechanical ventilation and three (10%) died. In the standard treatment group, eight (50%) of 16 patients showed respiratory improvement at 21 days; one (6%) patient was on mechanical ventilation and seven (44%) died. At 21 days, survival was 90% in the high-dose anakinra group and 56% in the standard treatment group (p=0·009). Mechanical ventilation-free survival was 72% in the anakinra group versus 50% in the standard treatment group (p=0·15). Bacteraemia occurred in four (14%) of 29 patients receiving high-dose anakinra and two (13%) of 16 patients receiving standard treatment. Discontinuation of anakinra was not followed by inflammatory relapses.

Interpretation: In this retrospective cohort study of patients with COVID-19 and ARDS managed with non-invasive ventilation outside of the ICU, treatment with high-dose anakinra was safe and associated with clinical improvement in 72% of patients. Confirmation of efficacy will require controlled trials.

Funding: None.

© 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Survival and mechanical ventilation-free survival at 21 days Plots show survival (A) and mechanical ventilation-free survival (B) at 21 days of patients with COVID-19, ARDS, and hyperinflammation managed outside the intensive care unit with CPAP and high-dose anakinra (n=29) or receiving CPAP and standard treatment only (n=16). For mechanical ventilation-free survival (B), death and mechanical ventilation were considered equivalent to treatment failure. COVID-19=coronavirus disease 2019. ARDS=acute respiratory distress syndrome. CPAP=continuous positive airway pressure. HR=hazard ratio.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Daily changes in C-reactive protein and PaO2:FiO2 Before and after graphs show daily measurements of C-reactive protein (A) and (C) and PaO2:FiO2 (B) and (D) obtained for patients (red dots) receiving high-dose anakinra (upper panels) and standard treatment (lower panels) for 14 days, until discharge from hospital, or until death or mechanical ventilation, whichever came first. Horizontal black dotted line in (A) and (C) marks the 100 mg/L threshold, which was used to define hyperinflammation. Horizontal black dotted lines in (B) and (D) indicate thresholds for moderate ARDS (PaO2:FiO2 100–200 mm Hg) and severe ARDS (PaO2:FiO2 <100 mm Hg). PaO2=partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood. FiO2=fractional concentration of oxygen in inspired air. ARDS=acute respiratory distress syndrome.

References

    1. WHO Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): situation report—100. April 29, 2020.
    1. Zhou F, Yu T, Du R. Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 2020;395:1054–1062.
    1. Ruan Q, Yang K, Wang W, Jiang L, Song J. Clinical predictors of mortality due to COVID-19 based on an analysis of data of 150 patients from Wuhan, China. Intensive Care Med. 2020 doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-05991. published online March 3.
    1. Bhatraju PK, Ghassemieh BJ, Nichols M. COVID-19 in critically ill patients in the Seattle region: case series. N Engl J Med. 2020 doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2004500. published online March 30.
    1. Huang C, Wang Y, Li X. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet. 2020;395:497–506.
    1. Yang X, Yu Y, Xu J. Clinical course and outcomes of critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a single-centered, retrospective, observational study. Lancet Respir Med. 2020 doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30079-5. published online Feb 24.
    1. Arentz M, Yim E, Klaff L. Characteristics and outcomes of 21 critically ill patients with COVID-19 in Washington State. JAMA. 2020 doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.4326. published online March 19.
    1. Grasselli G, Zangrillo A, Zanella A. Baseline characteristics and outcomes of 1591 patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 admitted to ICUs of the Lombardy region, Italy. JAMA. 2020 doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.5394. published online April 6.
    1. Remuzzi A, Remuzzi G. COVID-19 and Italy: what next? Lancet. 2020;395:1225–1228.
    1. Cavalli G, Dinarello CA. Treating rheumatological diseases and co-morbidities with interleukin-1 blocking therapies. Rheumatology. 2015;54:2134–2144.
    1. Mehta P, McAuley DF, Brown M. COVID-19: consider cytokine storm syndromes and immunosuppression. Lancet. 2020;395:1033–1034.
    1. Giavridis T, van der Stegen SJC, Eyquem J, Hamieh M, Piersigilli A, Sadelain M. CAR T cell-induced cytokine release syndrome is mediated by macrophages and abated by IL-1 blockade. Nat Med. 2018;24:731–738.
    1. Grom AA, Horne A, De Benedetti F. Macrophage activation syndrome in the era of biologic therapy. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2016;12:259–268.
    1. Eloseily EM, Weiser P, Crayne CB. Benefit of anakinra in treating pediatric secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020;72:326–334.
    1. Cavalli G, Fallanca F, Dinarello CA, Dagna L. Treating pulmonary silicosis by blocking interleukin 1. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015;191:596–598.
    1. Cavalli G, Pappalardo F, Mangieri A, Dinarello CA, Dagna L, Tresoldi M. Treating life-threatening myocarditis by blocking interleukin-1. Crit Care Med. 2016;44:e751–e754.
    1. Shakoory B, Carcillo JA, Chatham WW. Interleukin-1 receptor blockade is associated with reduced mortality in sepsis patients with features of macrophage activation syndrome: reanalysis of a prior phase III trial. Crit Care Med. 2016;44:275–281.
    1. Fan E, Brodie D, Slutsky AS. Acute respiratory distress syndrome: advances in diagnosis and treatment. JAMA. 2018;319:698–710.
    1. Zangrillo A, Beretta L, Silvani P. Fast reshaping of intensive care unit facilities in a large metropolitan hospital in Milan, Italy: facing the COVID-19 pandemic emergency. April 1, 2020.
    1. Cao B, Wang Y, Wen D. A trial of lopinavir–ritonavir in adults hospitalized with severe COVID-19. N Engl J Med. 2020 doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2001282. published online March 18.
    1. Rice TW, Wheeler AP, Bernard GR. Comparison of the SpO2/FiO2 ratio and the PaO2/FiO2 ratio in patients with acute lung injury or ARDS. Chest. 2007;132:410–417.
    1. Thompson BT, Chambers RC, Liu KD. Acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:562–572.
    1. Dinarello CA. Interleukin-1 in the pathogenesis and treatment of inflammatory diseases. Blood. 2011;117:3720–3732.
    1. Park WY, Goodman RB, Steinberg KP. Cytokine balance in the lungs of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001;164:1896–1903.
    1. Rajasekaran S, Kruse K, Kovey K. Therapeutic role of anakinra, an interleukin-1 receptor antagonist, in the management of secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis/sepsis/multiple organ dysfunction/macrophage activating syndrome in critically ill children. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2014;15:401–408.
    1. Stebbing J, Phelan A, Griffin I. COVID-19: combining antiviral and anti-inflammatory treatments. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020;20:400–402.
    1. Fleischmann RM, Tesser J, Schiff MH. Safety of extended treatment with anakinra in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2006;65:1006–1012.
    1. Cavalli G, Dinarello CA. Anakinra therapy for non-cancer inflammatory diseases. Front Pharmacol. 2018;9
    1. Kullenberg T, Lofqvist M, Leinonen M, Goldbach-Mansky R, Olivecrona H. Long-term safety profile of anakinra in patients with severe cryopyrin-associated periodic syndromes. Rheumatology. 2016;55:1499–1506.
    1. Pawar A, Desai RJ, Solomon DH. Risk of serious infections in tocilizumab versus other biologic drugs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a multidatabase cohort study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019;78:456–464.
    1. Grein J, Ohmagari N, Shin D. Compassionate use of remdesivir for patients with severe COVID-19. N Engl J Med. 2020 doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2007016. published online April 10.
    1. Touret F, de Lamballerie X. Of chloroquine and COVID-19. Antiviral Res. 2020;177
    1. Shen C, Wang Z, Zhao F. Treatment of 5 critically ill patients with COVID-19 with convalescent plasma. JAMA. 2020 doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.4783. published online March 27.
    1. Ikonomidis I, Lekakis JP, Nikolaou M. Inhibition of interleukin-1 by anakinra improves vascular and left ventricular function in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Circulation. 2008;117:2662–2669.
    1. Ciceri F, Beretta L, Scandroglio AM. Microvascular COVID-19 lung vessels obstructive thromboinflammatory syndrome (MicroCLOTS): an atypical acute respiratory distress syndrome working hypothesis. April 15, 2020.

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner