Mesh Sutured Repairs of Abdominal Wall Defects

Steven T Lanier, Gregory A Dumanian, Sumanas W Jordan, Kyle R Miller, Nada A Ali, Stuart R Stock, Steven T Lanier, Gregory A Dumanian, Sumanas W Jordan, Kyle R Miller, Nada A Ali, Stuart R Stock

Abstract

A new closure technique is introduced, which uses strips of macroporous polypropylene mesh as a suture for closure of abdominal wall defects due to failures of standard sutures and difficulties with planar meshes.

Methods: Strips of macroporous polypropylene mesh of 2 cm width were passed through the abdominal wall and tied as simple interrupted sutures. The surgical technique and surgical outcomes are presented.

Results: One hundred and seven patients underwent a mesh sutured abdominal wall closure. Seventy-six patients had preoperative hernias, and the mean hernia width by CT scan for those with scans was 9.1 cm. Forty-nine surgical fields were clean-contaminated, contaminated, or dirty. Five patients had infections within the first 30 days. Only one knot was removed as an office procedure. Mean follow-up at 234 days revealed 4 recurrent hernias.

Conclusions: Mesh sutured repairs reliably appose tissue under tension using concepts of force distribution and resistance to suture pull-through. The technique reduces the amount of foreign material required in comparison to sheet meshes, and avoids the shortcomings of monofilament sutures. Mesh sutured closures seem to be tolerant of bacterial contamination with low hernia recurrence rates and have replaced our routine use of mesh sheets and bioprosthetic grafts.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Artist’s drawing of mesh sutured closure of the abdominal wall.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Multiple recurrent enterocutaneous fistula patient with scarred skin and abdominal wall. CT scan shows a bowel obstruction and separation of the rectus muscles of 6 cm. The patient had already undergone an anterior components release.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Complex abdominal wound after bowel repair.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Closure of abdominal defect using interrupted strips of polypropylene mesh that are tied as simple sutures.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.
A, Immediate postoperative result. Mesh strips left exposed in a central area due to an inability to close the skin due to prior scarring. B, Four-month result at the time of diverting ostomy takedown showing closure of soft tissues over mesh sutured repair with local wound care.
Video Graphic 1.
Video Graphic 1.
See video, Supplemental Digital Content, a sharp hemostat is used to pierce the abdominal wall approximately 1 cm from the newly debrided edge of the rectus muscle. The mesh strip is then pulled through the substance of the abdominal wall and then tied like a suture with 3 throws to close the defect, http://links.lww.com/PRSGO/A265.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 6.
Large skin grafted abdominal wall hernia with end colostomy.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 7.
Abdomen after end colostomy takedown and placement of diverting ileostomy.
Fig. 8.
Fig. 8.
Closure of abdominal wall hernia with mesh strips. A components release was not required in this compliant abdominal wall.
Fig. 9.
Fig. 9.
Closed abdominal wall with mesh strips.
Fig. 10.
Fig. 10.
Three-month postoperative result showing closed abdominal defect and diverting ileostomy.
Fig. 11.
Fig. 11.
Spontaneous small-bowel lymphoma-induced enterocutaneous fistula emerging through 9-cm hernia defect in a patient with a prior ileal conduit.
Fig. 12.
Fig. 12.
Image after resection and repair of enterocutaneous fistula. Due to chronically inflamed and infected tissues, a polyglactin mesh was placed for 2 days to obtain wound control.
Fig. 13.
Fig. 13.
After polyglactin mesh removal and bilateral components releases with perforator preservation, mesh sutures were placed across the abdominal defect. The wound was relatively clean, with one pocket of purulence that was debrided.
Fig. 14.
Fig. 14.
Closure of 9-cm hernia defect with mesh sutured technique.
Fig. 15.
Fig. 15.
Early postoperative result demonstrating primary healing.

References

    1. Muysoms FE, Detry O, Vierendeels T, et al. Prevention of incisional hernias by prophylactic mesh-augmented reinforcement of midline laparotomies for abdominal aortic aneurysm treatment: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2016;263:638–645.
    1. Burger JW, Luijendijk RW, Hop WC, et al. Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of suture versus mesh repair of incisional hernia. Ann Surg. 2004;240:578–583.
    1. Höer J, Fischer L, Schachtrupp A. Laparotomy closure and incisional hernia prevention - what are the surgical requirements? Zentralbl Chir. 2011;136:42–49.
    1. Souza JM, Dumanian Z, Gurjala D, et al. In vivo evaluation of a novel mesh suture design for abdominal wall closure. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;135:322e–330e.
    1. Dumanian GA, Tulaimat A, Dumanian ZP. Experimental study of the characteristics of a novel mesh suture. Br J Surg. 2015;102:1285–1292.
    1. Stock SR. Recent advances in X-ray microtomography applied to materials. Int Mat Rev. 2008;53:129–181.
    1. Doube M, Kłosowski MM, Arganda-Carreras I, et al. BoneJ: free and extensible bone image analysis in ImageJ. Bone. 2010;47:1076–1079.
    1. Ko JH, Salvay DM, Paul BC, et al. Soft polypropylene mesh, but not cadaveric dermis, significantly improves outcomes in midline hernia repairs using the components separation technique. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124:836–847.
    1. Available at: . Accessed June 24, 2016.
    1. Breuing K, Butler CE, Ferzoco S, et al. Ventral Hernia Working Group. Incisional ventral hernias: review of the literature and recommendations regarding the grading and technique of repair. Surgery. 2010;148:544–558.
    1. Witherbee OO US Patent 784018, 2/28/1905
    1. Reid MR, Zinninger MM, Merrell P. Closure of the abdomen with through-and-through silver wire sutures in cases of acute abdominal emergencies. Ann Surg. 1933;98:890–896.
    1. Marchac D, Kaddoura R. Repair of large midline abdominal-wall hernias by a running strip of abdominal skin. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1983;72:341–346.
    1. Didusch WP US Patent 2143910, 1/17/1939
    1. Petter-Puchner AH. The state of midline closure of the abdominal wall. Br J Surg. 2015;102:1446–1447.
    1. Fischer John P, Basta Marten N, Mirzabeigi Michael N, et al. A risk modeal and cost analysis of incisional hernia after elective abdominal surgery based upon 12373 cases: the case for targeted prophylactic intervention. Ann Surg. 2016;263:1010–1017.
    1. Burger JWA, Luijendijk RW, Hop WCJ, et al. Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of suture versus mesh repair of incisional hernia. Ann Surg. 2004;240:578–585.
    1. Ellis H, Gajraj H, George CD. Incisional hernias: when do they occur? Br J Surg. 1983;70:290–291.
    1. Sauvage LR, Berger KE, Wood SJ, et al. Interspecies healing of porous arterial prostheses. Arch Surg. 1974;109:698–705.
    1. Thomson HG. The fate of the pseudosheath pocket around silicone implants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1973;51:667–671.
    1. Otto J, Binnebosel M, Pietsch S, et al. Large-pore PDS mesh compared to small-pore PG mesh. J Invest Surg. 2010;23:190–196.
    1. Hollinsky C, Sandberg S. Measurement of the tensile strength of the ventral abdominal wall in comparison with scar tissue. Clin Biomechanics. 2007;22:88–92.
    1. Vogels RR, Lambertz A, Schuster P, et al. Biocompatibility and biomechanical analysis of elastic TPU threads as new suture material. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2015 [Epub ahead of print]
    1. Ko JH, Salvay DM, Paul BC, et al. “Components Separation” technique for the treatment of complex abdominal wall defects: an 11-year experience in 200 patients. Arch Surg. 2009;144:1047–1055.
    1. Sahm M, Kube R, Rose J, et al. Rectusbanding: a method for the repair of incisional hernias. Hernia. 2009;13:481–486.
    1. Nguyen MT, Berger RL, Hicks SC, et al. Comparison of outcomes of synthetic mesh vs suture repair of elective primary ventral herniorrhapy: a systemic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Surg. 2014;149:415–421.
    1. Carbonell AM, Criss CN, Cobb WS, et al. Outcomes of synthetic mesh in contaminated ventral hernia repairs. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;217:991–998.
    1. Bondre IL, Holihan JL, Askenasy EP, et al. Suture, synthetic, or biologic in contaminated ventral hernia repair. J Surg Res. 2016;200:488–494.
    1. Abbott DE, Dumanian GA, Halverson AL. Management of laparotomy wound dehiscence. Am Surg. 2007;73:1224–1227.
    1. Zhu LM, Schuster P, Klinge U. Mesh implants: an overview of crucial mesh parameters. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2015;7:226–236.
    1. Elieson M, Mixon T, Carpenter J. Coronary stent infections: a case report and literature review. Tex Heart Inst J. 2012;39:884–889.

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner