Questa pagina è stata tradotta automaticamente e l'accuratezza della traduzione non è garantita. Si prega di fare riferimento al Versione inglese per un testo di partenza.

Study to Assess the Immunogenicity, Safety, and Efficacy of High Capacity Process Etanercept in Rheumatoid Arthritis Subjects

10 maggio 2017 aggiornato da: Pfizer

A Single-arm, Open-label Study To Assess The Immunogenicity, Safety, And Efficacy Of Etanercept Manufactured Using The High Capacity Process Administered To Subjects With Rheumatoid Arthritis

Open-label immunogenicity, safety and efficacy study of etanercept manufactured using the high capacity process. Descriptive results will be provided however a formal hypothesis will not be tested in this trial.

Panoramica dello studio

Stato

Completato

Condizioni

Intervento / Trattamento

Tipo di studio

Interventistico

Iscrizione (Effettivo)

188

Fase

  • Fase 3

Contatti e Sedi

Questa sezione fornisce i recapiti di coloro che conducono lo studio e informazioni su dove viene condotto lo studio.

Luoghi di studio

  • Bulgaria
      • Plovdiv, Bulgaria, 4000
        • MHAT Plovdiv
      • Sofia, Bulgaria, 1431
        • DCC "Aleksandrovska" EOOD
      • Sofia, Bulgaria, 1612
        • UMHAT "Sv. Ivan Rilski" EAD, Sofia
      • Stara Zagora, Bulgaria, 6000
        • Medical Center - "New rehabilitation center" EOOD
  • Croazia
      • Rijeka, Croazia, 51000
        • CHC Rijeka
      • Zagreb, Croazia, 10000
        • Medicinski Centar Kuna Peric
  • Germania
      • Berlin, Germania, 14059
        • Schlosspark-Klinik, Innere Medizin II, Rheumatologie
      • Hannover, Germania, 30625
        • Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
      • Vogelsang-Gommern, Germania, 39245
        • Immunologisches Zentrum Vogelsang-Gommern GmbH
    • Hessen
      • Frankfurt/Main, Hessen, Germania, 60528
        • Centrum für innovative Diagnostik und Therapie
    • Nordrhein-westfalen
      • Ratingen, Nordrhein-westfalen, Germania, 40882
        • Rheumaforschung - Studienambulanz Dr. Wassenberg
  • Grecia
      • Thessaloniki, Grecia, 56429
        • Rheumatology Unit
    • Achaia
      • Rion Patras, Achaia, Grecia, 26500
        • Rheumatology department
    • Crete
      • Heraklion, Crete, Grecia, 71110
        • University Hospital of Heraklion
  • Polonia
      • Krakow, Polonia, 31-501
        • Krakowskie Centrum Medyczne sp. Z.O.O
      • Nadarzyn, Polonia, 05-830
        • NZOZ Lecznica MAK-MED s.c.
      • Poznan, Polonia, 61-397
        • Prywatna Praktyka Lekarska Prof. UM dr hab.med. Pawel Hrycaj
      • Warszawa, Polonia, 02-691
        • Reumatika-Centrum Reumatologii
  • Serbia
    • Beograd
      • Belgrade, Beograd, Serbia, 11000
        • Institute of Rheumatology
  • Slovacchia
      • Bratislava, Slovacchia, 841 04
        • Reumatologicka ambulancia
      • Dunajska Streda, Slovacchia, 929 01
        • AAGS, s.r.o.
      • Poprad, Slovacchia, 058 01
        • Reumatologicka ambulancia, MUDr. Zuzana Cizmarikova, s.r.o.
      • Rimavska Sobota, Slovacchia, 979 01
        • Reumex S.R.O.
      • Trnava, Slovacchia, 917 01
        • REUMA-GLOBAL s.r.o.
      • Zilina, Slovacchia, 010 01
        • Reumatologicka ambulancia
  • Sud Africa
    • Cape Town
      • Panorama, Cape Town, Sud Africa, 7500
        • Panorama Medical Centre
    • Johannesburg
      • Parktown, Johannesburg, Sud Africa, 2193
        • Wits Clinical Research CMJAH Clinical Trial Site
    • Kwazulu-natal
      • Durban/Berea, Kwazulu-natal, Sud Africa, 4001
        • St. Augustines Hospital
  • Ungheria
      • Budapest, Ungheria, 1036
        • Qualiclinic Kft.
      • Kistarcsa, Ungheria, 2143
        • Pest Megyei Flor Ferenc Korhaz
      • Nyiregyhaza, Ungheria, 4400
        • Szabolcs-Szatmar-Bereg megyei

Criteri di partecipazione

I ricercatori cercano persone che corrispondano a una certa descrizione, chiamata criteri di ammissibilità. Alcuni esempi di questi criteri sono le condizioni generali di salute di una persona o trattamenti precedenti.

Criteri di ammissibilità

Età idonea allo studio

18 anni e precedenti (Adulto, Adulto più anziano)

Accetta volontari sani

No

Sessi ammissibili allo studio

Tutto

Descrizione

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Moderate to severe active disease with presence of at least 4 tender joints and 4 swollen joints.
  • Either the patient or a designee must be capable of administering the subcutaneous injection of study drug.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior treatment with etanercept.
  • Presence of active infection or active or untreated tuberculosis.

Piano di studio

Questa sezione fornisce i dettagli del piano di studio, compreso il modo in cui lo studio è progettato e ciò che lo studio sta misurando.

Come è strutturato lo studio?

Dettagli di progettazione

  • Scopo principale: Trattamento
  • Assegnazione: N / A
  • Modello interventistico: Assegnazione di gruppo singolo
  • Mascheramento: Nessuno (etichetta aperta)

Armi e interventi

Gruppo di partecipanti / Arm
Intervento / Trattamento
Sperimentale: ETN 50mg QW
Biologico: etanercept
50mg subcutaneous, once weekly, 24 weeks

Cosa sta misurando lo studio?

Misure di risultato primarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Percentage of Participants With Positive Etanercept Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Status at Week 12
Lasso di tempo: Week 12
Participants who developed anti-drug antibodies after treatment with Etanercept were evaluated. Percentage of participants with positive Etanercept anti-drug antibodies were summarized.
Week 12
Percentage of Participants With Positive Etanercept Anti-Drug Antibody Status at Week 24
Lasso di tempo: Week 24
Participants who developed anti-drug antibodies after treatment with Etanercept were evaluated. Percentage of participants with positive Etanercept anti-drug antibodies were summarized.
Week 24
Percentage of Participants With Positive Etanercept Anti-Drug Antibody Status: Throughout Study Treatment
Lasso di tempo: Baseline up to Week 24
Participants who developed anti-drug antibodies after treatment with Etanercept were evaluated. Percentage of participants with positive Etanercept anti-drug antibodies were summarized.
Baseline up to Week 24

Misure di risultato secondarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Percentage of Participants With Positive Etanercept Neutralizing Anti-Drug Antibody Status: Throughout Study Treatment
Lasso di tempo: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 24
Percentage of participants with positive Etanercept neutralizing anti-drug antibodies were summarized.
Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 24
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Lasso di tempo: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 28 (Follow-up)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent were events between first dose of study drug and up to 28 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. AEs included both serious and non-serious adverse events.
Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 28 (Follow-up)
Number of Participants With Investigator-Identified Serious Infections
Lasso di tempo: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 28 (Follow-up)
Infection was considered as serious by investigator for any of the following outcomes: death; life-threatening; required initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; persistent or significant disability/incapacity or congenital anomaly/birth defect.
Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 28 (Follow-up)
Number of Participants With Injection Site Reactions
Lasso di tempo: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 28 (Follow-up)
Injection site reactions included injection site erythema, swelling, pain and warmth.
Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 28 (Follow-up)
Number of Participants With Grade 3 and 4 Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities
Lasso di tempo: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 28 (Follow-up)
Laboratory abnormalities(national cancer institute toxicity criteria version 4.0),Grade 3:neutrophil (greater than or equal to[>=]0.5,less than[<]1.0 10^9/L),lymphocyte (<0.5 10^9/L),hemoglobin (Hb) (<80,>=65 gram per liter [g/L]),platelet(<50.0,>=25.0 10^9/L),white blood count(WBC) (<2.0, >=1.0 10^9/L);alkaline phosphatase (AP),aspartate aminotransferase(AST),alanine aminotransferase(ALT) (greater than[>]5.0*upper range [UR], <=20.0*UR unit per liter[U/L]);bilirubin(>1.5*UR, less than or equal to[<=]3.0*UR micromole per liter[mcmol/L]);creatinine(>3.0*UR, <=6.0*UR mcmol/L);albumin (<20.0 g/L),urea(>3.0*UR, <=4.0*UR g/L);potassium (K)-high,low (>6.0,<=7.0or<3.0,>=2.5 mcmol/L); sodium(Na)-high,low(>155, <=160 or <130, >=120 mcmol/L)and Grade 4: neutrophil(<0.5 10^9/L),Hb (<65 g/L);platelet (<25.0 10^9/L); WBC(<1.0 10^9/L);AP,AST,ALT(>20.0*UR U/L);bilirubin(>3.0*UR mcmol/L);creatinine (>6.0*UR mcmol/L);urea (>4.0*UR g/L);K-high,low (>7.0or<2.5 mcmol/L);Na-high, low (>160or<120 mcmol/L).
Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 28 (Follow-up)
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response
Lasso di tempo: Week 4, 12, 24
ACR20 responder: participants with 20 percent (%) improvement in tender and swollen 28-joint counts and 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 measures: participant global assessment of arthritis (PtGA), physician global assessment of arthritis (PGA), participant pain visual analogue scale (Pain-VAS), health assessment questionnaire-disability index (HAQ-DI) and C-reactive protein. PtGA: participant assessed overall disease activity, score: 0 (no arthritis) to 10 (extreme arthritis), higher score=more arthritis. PGA: physician judged participant's overall disease activity, score: 0 (no arthritis) to 10 (extreme arthritis), higher score=more arthritis. Pain-VAS: participant assessed arthritis pain by 100 millimeter (mm) VAS, score: 0 mm (no pain) to 100 mm (extreme pain), higher score=more pain. HAQ-DI: functional disability evaluation, score: 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (extreme difficulty), higher score=more disability. Percentage of participants with ACR20 response were reported.
Week 4, 12, 24
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response
Lasso di tempo: Week 4, 12, 24
ACR50 responder: participants with 50% improvement in tender and swollen 28-joint counts and 50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 measures: participant global assessment of arthritis (PtGA), physician global assessment of arthritis (PGA), participant pain visual analogue scale (Pain-VAS), health assessment questionnaire-disability index (HAQ-DI) and C-reactive protein. PtGA: participant assessed overall disease activity, score: 0 (no arthritis) to 10 (extreme arthritis), higher score=more arthritis. PGA: physician judged participant's overall disease activity, score: 0 (no arthritis) to 10 (extreme arthritis), higher score=more arthritis. Pain-VAS: participant assessed arthritis pain by 100 millimeter (mm) VAS, score: 0 mm (no pain) to 100 mm (extreme pain), higher score=more pain. HAQ-DI: functional disability evaluation, score: 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (extreme difficulty), higher score=more disability. Percentage of participants with ACR50 response were reported.
Week 4, 12, 24
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response
Lasso di tempo: Week 4, 12, 24
ACR70 responder: participants with 70% improvement in tender and swollen 28-joint counts and 70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 measures: participant global assessment of arthritis (PtGA), physician global assessment of arthritis (PGA), participant pain visual analogue scale (Pain-VAS), health assessment questionnaire-disability index (HAQ-DI) and C-reactive protein. PtGA: participant assessed overall disease activity, score: 0 (no arthritis) to 10 (extreme arthritis), higher score=more arthritis. PGA: physician judged participant's overall disease activity, score: 0 (no arthritis) to 10 (extreme arthritis), higher score=more arthritis. Pain-VAS: participant assessed arthritis pain by 100 millimeter (mm) VAS, score: 0 mm (no pain) to 100 mm (extreme pain), higher score=more pain. HAQ-DI: functional disability evaluation, score: 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (extreme difficulty), higher score=more disability. Percentage of participants with ACR70 response were reported.
Week 4, 12, 24
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Scale Based on 28 Joint Count Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR]) at Week 4, 12 and 24
Lasso di tempo: Baseline, Week 4, 12, 24
DAS28: measure of disease activity in participants with rheumatoid arthritis. DAS28-4 (ESR) was calculated from number of swollen joints (SJC) and tender joints (TJC ) using the 28 joints count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (millimeter per hour [mm/hour]) and participant's general health visual analog scale assessment (scores: 0 mm [very well] to 100 mm [extremely bad], higher scores indicate worse health condition). Total DAS28-4 (ESR) score: 0 (none) to 10 (extreme disease activity), higher scores indicate more disease activity. DAS28-4 (ESR) less than (<) 2.6= remission, <3.2= low disease activity, greater than or equal to (>=) 3.2 to 5.1= moderate disease activity and >5.1= high disease activity.
Baseline, Week 4, 12, 24
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Scale Based on 28 Joint Count C-Reactive Protein (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [CRP]) at Week 4, 12 and 24
Lasso di tempo: Baseline, Week 4, 12, 24
DAS28 is a measure of disease activity in participants with rheumatoid arthritis. DAS28-4 (CRP) was calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28 joints count, C-Reactive protein (milligram per liter [mg/L]) and participant's general health visual analog scale assessment (scores ranging 0 mm [very well] to 100 mm [extremely bad], higher scores indicate worse health condition). Total DAS28-4 (CRP) score range: 0 (none) to 10 (extreme disease activity), higher scores indicate more disease activity. DAS28-4 (CRP) less than (<) 2.6= remission, <3.2= low disease activity, greater than or equal to (>=) 3.2 to 5.1= moderate disease activity and >5.1= high disease activity.
Baseline, Week 4, 12, 24
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 4, 12 and 24
Lasso di tempo: Baseline, Week 4, 12, 24
HAQ-DI assesses the degree of difficulty a participant has experienced during the past week in 8 domains of daily living activities: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and other activities. Each item scored on 4-point scale from 0 to 3: 0= no difficulty; 1= some difficulty; 2= much difficulty; 3= unable to do. Overall score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible score range 0 (least difficulty) and 3 (extreme difficulty), where higher scores indicate more difficulty while performing daily living activities.
Baseline, Week 4, 12, 24

Collaboratori e investigatori

Qui è dove troverai le persone e le organizzazioni coinvolte in questo studio.

Sponsor

Pfizer

Pubblicazioni e link utili

La persona responsabile dell'inserimento delle informazioni sullo studio fornisce volontariamente queste pubblicazioni. Questi possono riguardare qualsiasi cosa relativa allo studio.

Pubblicazioni generali

Studiare le date dei record

Queste date tengono traccia dell'avanzamento della registrazione dello studio e dell'invio dei risultati di sintesi a ClinicalTrials.gov. I record degli studi e i risultati riportati vengono esaminati dalla National Library of Medicine (NLM) per assicurarsi che soddisfino specifici standard di controllo della qualità prima di essere pubblicati sul sito Web pubblico.

Studia le date principali

Inizio studio

1 aprile 2015

Completamento primario (Effettivo)

1 maggio 2016

Completamento dello studio (Effettivo)

1 giugno 2016

Date di iscrizione allo studio

Primo inviato

13 febbraio 2015

Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità

26 febbraio 2015

Primo Inserito (Stima)

4 marzo 2015

Aggiornamenti dei record di studio

Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)

15 maggio 2017

Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC

10 maggio 2017

Ultimo verificato

1 marzo 2017

Maggiori informazioni

Termini relativi a questo studio

Termini MeSH pertinenti aggiuntivi

Altri numeri di identificazione dello studio

  • B1801359
  • 2013-004569-16 (Numero EudraCT)

Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .

Sottoscrivi