Esta página foi traduzida automaticamente e a precisão da tradução não é garantida. Por favor, consulte o versão em inglês para um texto fonte.

Study to Assess the Immunogenicity, Safety, and Efficacy of High Capacity Process Etanercept in Rheumatoid Arthritis Subjects

10 de maio de 2017 atualizado por: Pfizer

A Single-arm, Open-label Study To Assess The Immunogenicity, Safety, And Efficacy Of Etanercept Manufactured Using The High Capacity Process Administered To Subjects With Rheumatoid Arthritis

Open-label immunogenicity, safety and efficacy study of etanercept manufactured using the high capacity process. Descriptive results will be provided however a formal hypothesis will not be tested in this trial.

Visão geral do estudo

Status

Concluído

Condições

Intervenção / Tratamento

Tipo de estudo

Intervencional

Inscrição (Real)

188

Estágio

  • Fase 3

Contactos e Locais

Esta seção fornece os detalhes de contato para aqueles que conduzem o estudo e informações sobre onde este estudo está sendo realizado.

Locais de estudo

  • Alemanha
      • Berlin, Alemanha, 14059
        • Schlosspark-Klinik, Innere Medizin II, Rheumatologie
      • Hannover, Alemanha, 30625
        • Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
      • Vogelsang-Gommern, Alemanha, 39245
        • Immunologisches Zentrum Vogelsang-Gommern GmbH
    • Hessen
      • Frankfurt/Main, Hessen, Alemanha, 60528
        • Centrum für innovative Diagnostik und Therapie
    • Nordrhein-westfalen
      • Ratingen, Nordrhein-westfalen, Alemanha, 40882
        • Rheumaforschung - Studienambulanz Dr. Wassenberg
  • Bulgária
      • Plovdiv, Bulgária, 4000
        • MHAT Plovdiv
      • Sofia, Bulgária, 1431
        • DCC "Aleksandrovska" EOOD
      • Sofia, Bulgária, 1612
        • UMHAT "Sv. Ivan Rilski" EAD, Sofia
      • Stara Zagora, Bulgária, 6000
        • Medical Center - "New rehabilitation center" EOOD
  • Croácia
      • Rijeka, Croácia, 51000
        • CHC Rijeka
      • Zagreb, Croácia, 10000
        • Medicinski Centar Kuna Peric
  • Eslováquia
      • Bratislava, Eslováquia, 841 04
        • Reumatologicka ambulancia
      • Dunajska Streda, Eslováquia, 929 01
        • AAGS, s.r.o.
      • Poprad, Eslováquia, 058 01
        • Reumatologicka ambulancia, MUDr. Zuzana Cizmarikova, s.r.o.
      • Rimavska Sobota, Eslováquia, 979 01
        • Reumex S.R.O.
      • Trnava, Eslováquia, 917 01
        • REUMA-GLOBAL s.r.o.
      • Zilina, Eslováquia, 010 01
        • Reumatologicka ambulancia
  • Grécia
      • Thessaloniki, Grécia, 56429
        • Rheumatology Unit
    • Achaia
      • Rion Patras, Achaia, Grécia, 26500
        • Rheumatology department
    • Crete
      • Heraklion, Crete, Grécia, 71110
        • University Hospital of Heraklion
  • Hungria
      • Budapest, Hungria, 1036
        • Qualiclinic Kft.
      • Kistarcsa, Hungria, 2143
        • Pest Megyei Flor Ferenc Korhaz
      • Nyiregyhaza, Hungria, 4400
        • Szabolcs-Szatmar-Bereg megyei
  • Polônia
      • Krakow, Polônia, 31-501
        • Krakowskie Centrum Medyczne sp. Z.O.O
      • Nadarzyn, Polônia, 05-830
        • NZOZ Lecznica MAK-MED s.c.
      • Poznan, Polônia, 61-397
        • Prywatna Praktyka Lekarska Prof. UM dr hab.med. Pawel Hrycaj
      • Warszawa, Polônia, 02-691
        • Reumatika-Centrum Reumatologii
  • Sérvia
    • Beograd
      • Belgrade, Beograd, Sérvia, 11000
        • Institute of Rheumatology
  • África do Sul
    • Cape Town
      • Panorama, Cape Town, África do Sul, 7500
        • Panorama Medical Centre
    • Johannesburg
      • Parktown, Johannesburg, África do Sul, 2193
        • Wits Clinical Research CMJAH Clinical Trial Site
    • Kwazulu-natal
      • Durban/Berea, Kwazulu-natal, África do Sul, 4001
        • St. Augustines Hospital

Critérios de participação

Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.

Critérios de elegibilidade

Idades elegíveis para estudo

18 anos e mais velhos (Adulto, Adulto mais velho)

Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis

Não

Gêneros Elegíveis para o Estudo

Tudo

Descrição

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Moderate to severe active disease with presence of at least 4 tender joints and 4 swollen joints.
  • Either the patient or a designee must be capable of administering the subcutaneous injection of study drug.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior treatment with etanercept.
  • Presence of active infection or active or untreated tuberculosis.

Plano de estudo

Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.

Como o estudo é projetado?

Detalhes do projeto

  • Finalidade Principal: Tratamento
  • Alocação: N / D
  • Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição de grupo único
  • Mascaramento: Nenhum (rótulo aberto)

Armas e Intervenções

Grupo de Participantes / Braço
Intervenção / Tratamento
Experimental: ETN 50mg QW
Biológico: etanercept
50mg subcutaneous, once weekly, 24 weeks

O que o estudo está medindo?

Medidas de resultados primários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Percentage of Participants With Positive Etanercept Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Status at Week 12
Prazo: Week 12
Participants who developed anti-drug antibodies after treatment with Etanercept were evaluated. Percentage of participants with positive Etanercept anti-drug antibodies were summarized.
Week 12
Percentage of Participants With Positive Etanercept Anti-Drug Antibody Status at Week 24
Prazo: Week 24
Participants who developed anti-drug antibodies after treatment with Etanercept were evaluated. Percentage of participants with positive Etanercept anti-drug antibodies were summarized.
Week 24
Percentage of Participants With Positive Etanercept Anti-Drug Antibody Status: Throughout Study Treatment
Prazo: Baseline up to Week 24
Participants who developed anti-drug antibodies after treatment with Etanercept were evaluated. Percentage of participants with positive Etanercept anti-drug antibodies were summarized.
Baseline up to Week 24

Medidas de resultados secundários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Percentage of Participants With Positive Etanercept Neutralizing Anti-Drug Antibody Status: Throughout Study Treatment
Prazo: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 24
Percentage of participants with positive Etanercept neutralizing anti-drug antibodies were summarized.
Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 24
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Prazo: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 28 (Follow-up)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent were events between first dose of study drug and up to 28 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. AEs included both serious and non-serious adverse events.
Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 28 (Follow-up)
Number of Participants With Investigator-Identified Serious Infections
Prazo: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 28 (Follow-up)
Infection was considered as serious by investigator for any of the following outcomes: death; life-threatening; required initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; persistent or significant disability/incapacity or congenital anomaly/birth defect.
Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 28 (Follow-up)
Number of Participants With Injection Site Reactions
Prazo: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 28 (Follow-up)
Injection site reactions included injection site erythema, swelling, pain and warmth.
Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 28 (Follow-up)
Number of Participants With Grade 3 and 4 Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities
Prazo: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 28 (Follow-up)
Laboratory abnormalities(national cancer institute toxicity criteria version 4.0),Grade 3:neutrophil (greater than or equal to[>=]0.5,less than[<]1.0 10^9/L),lymphocyte (<0.5 10^9/L),hemoglobin (Hb) (<80,>=65 gram per liter [g/L]),platelet(<50.0,>=25.0 10^9/L),white blood count(WBC) (<2.0, >=1.0 10^9/L);alkaline phosphatase (AP),aspartate aminotransferase(AST),alanine aminotransferase(ALT) (greater than[>]5.0*upper range [UR], <=20.0*UR unit per liter[U/L]);bilirubin(>1.5*UR, less than or equal to[<=]3.0*UR micromole per liter[mcmol/L]);creatinine(>3.0*UR, <=6.0*UR mcmol/L);albumin (<20.0 g/L),urea(>3.0*UR, <=4.0*UR g/L);potassium (K)-high,low (>6.0,<=7.0or<3.0,>=2.5 mcmol/L); sodium(Na)-high,low(>155, <=160 or <130, >=120 mcmol/L)and Grade 4: neutrophil(<0.5 10^9/L),Hb (<65 g/L);platelet (<25.0 10^9/L); WBC(<1.0 10^9/L);AP,AST,ALT(>20.0*UR U/L);bilirubin(>3.0*UR mcmol/L);creatinine (>6.0*UR mcmol/L);urea (>4.0*UR g/L);K-high,low (>7.0or<2.5 mcmol/L);Na-high, low (>160or<120 mcmol/L).
Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 28 (Follow-up)
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response
Prazo: Week 4, 12, 24
ACR20 responder: participants with 20 percent (%) improvement in tender and swollen 28-joint counts and 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 measures: participant global assessment of arthritis (PtGA), physician global assessment of arthritis (PGA), participant pain visual analogue scale (Pain-VAS), health assessment questionnaire-disability index (HAQ-DI) and C-reactive protein. PtGA: participant assessed overall disease activity, score: 0 (no arthritis) to 10 (extreme arthritis), higher score=more arthritis. PGA: physician judged participant's overall disease activity, score: 0 (no arthritis) to 10 (extreme arthritis), higher score=more arthritis. Pain-VAS: participant assessed arthritis pain by 100 millimeter (mm) VAS, score: 0 mm (no pain) to 100 mm (extreme pain), higher score=more pain. HAQ-DI: functional disability evaluation, score: 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (extreme difficulty), higher score=more disability. Percentage of participants with ACR20 response were reported.
Week 4, 12, 24
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response
Prazo: Week 4, 12, 24
ACR50 responder: participants with 50% improvement in tender and swollen 28-joint counts and 50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 measures: participant global assessment of arthritis (PtGA), physician global assessment of arthritis (PGA), participant pain visual analogue scale (Pain-VAS), health assessment questionnaire-disability index (HAQ-DI) and C-reactive protein. PtGA: participant assessed overall disease activity, score: 0 (no arthritis) to 10 (extreme arthritis), higher score=more arthritis. PGA: physician judged participant's overall disease activity, score: 0 (no arthritis) to 10 (extreme arthritis), higher score=more arthritis. Pain-VAS: participant assessed arthritis pain by 100 millimeter (mm) VAS, score: 0 mm (no pain) to 100 mm (extreme pain), higher score=more pain. HAQ-DI: functional disability evaluation, score: 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (extreme difficulty), higher score=more disability. Percentage of participants with ACR50 response were reported.
Week 4, 12, 24
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response
Prazo: Week 4, 12, 24
ACR70 responder: participants with 70% improvement in tender and swollen 28-joint counts and 70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 measures: participant global assessment of arthritis (PtGA), physician global assessment of arthritis (PGA), participant pain visual analogue scale (Pain-VAS), health assessment questionnaire-disability index (HAQ-DI) and C-reactive protein. PtGA: participant assessed overall disease activity, score: 0 (no arthritis) to 10 (extreme arthritis), higher score=more arthritis. PGA: physician judged participant's overall disease activity, score: 0 (no arthritis) to 10 (extreme arthritis), higher score=more arthritis. Pain-VAS: participant assessed arthritis pain by 100 millimeter (mm) VAS, score: 0 mm (no pain) to 100 mm (extreme pain), higher score=more pain. HAQ-DI: functional disability evaluation, score: 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (extreme difficulty), higher score=more disability. Percentage of participants with ACR70 response were reported.
Week 4, 12, 24
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Scale Based on 28 Joint Count Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR]) at Week 4, 12 and 24
Prazo: Baseline, Week 4, 12, 24
DAS28: measure of disease activity in participants with rheumatoid arthritis. DAS28-4 (ESR) was calculated from number of swollen joints (SJC) and tender joints (TJC ) using the 28 joints count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (millimeter per hour [mm/hour]) and participant's general health visual analog scale assessment (scores: 0 mm [very well] to 100 mm [extremely bad], higher scores indicate worse health condition). Total DAS28-4 (ESR) score: 0 (none) to 10 (extreme disease activity), higher scores indicate more disease activity. DAS28-4 (ESR) less than (<) 2.6= remission, <3.2= low disease activity, greater than or equal to (>=) 3.2 to 5.1= moderate disease activity and >5.1= high disease activity.
Baseline, Week 4, 12, 24
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Scale Based on 28 Joint Count C-Reactive Protein (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [CRP]) at Week 4, 12 and 24
Prazo: Baseline, Week 4, 12, 24
DAS28 is a measure of disease activity in participants with rheumatoid arthritis. DAS28-4 (CRP) was calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28 joints count, C-Reactive protein (milligram per liter [mg/L]) and participant's general health visual analog scale assessment (scores ranging 0 mm [very well] to 100 mm [extremely bad], higher scores indicate worse health condition). Total DAS28-4 (CRP) score range: 0 (none) to 10 (extreme disease activity), higher scores indicate more disease activity. DAS28-4 (CRP) less than (<) 2.6= remission, <3.2= low disease activity, greater than or equal to (>=) 3.2 to 5.1= moderate disease activity and >5.1= high disease activity.
Baseline, Week 4, 12, 24
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 4, 12 and 24
Prazo: Baseline, Week 4, 12, 24
HAQ-DI assesses the degree of difficulty a participant has experienced during the past week in 8 domains of daily living activities: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and other activities. Each item scored on 4-point scale from 0 to 3: 0= no difficulty; 1= some difficulty; 2= much difficulty; 3= unable to do. Overall score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible score range 0 (least difficulty) and 3 (extreme difficulty), where higher scores indicate more difficulty while performing daily living activities.
Baseline, Week 4, 12, 24

Colaboradores e Investigadores

É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.

Patrocinador

Pfizer

Publicações e links úteis

A pessoa responsável por inserir informações sobre o estudo fornece voluntariamente essas publicações. Estes podem ser sobre qualquer coisa relacionada ao estudo.

Publicações Gerais

Datas de registro do estudo

Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados ​​pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.

Datas Principais do Estudo

Início do estudo

1 de abril de 2015

Conclusão Primária (Real)

1 de maio de 2016

Conclusão do estudo (Real)

1 de junho de 2016

Datas de inscrição no estudo

Enviado pela primeira vez

13 de fevereiro de 2015

Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ

26 de fevereiro de 2015

Primeira postagem (Estimativa)

4 de março de 2015

Atualizações de registro de estudo

Última Atualização Postada (Real)

15 de maio de 2017

Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade

10 de maio de 2017

Última verificação

1 de março de 2017

Mais Informações

Termos relacionados a este estudo

Termos MeSH relevantes adicionais

Outros números de identificação do estudo

  • B1801359
  • 2013-004569-16 (Número EudraCT)

Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .

Se inscrever