Questa pagina è stata tradotta automaticamente e l'accuratezza della traduzione non è garantita. Si prega di fare riferimento al Versione inglese per un testo di partenza.

Restrictive Fluid Administration vs. Standard of Care in Emergency Department Sepsis Patients (REFACED Sepsis)

24 marzo 2022 aggiornato da: Marie Kristine Jessen, MD

Restrictive Fluid Administration vs. Standard of Care in Emergency Department Sepsis Patients - a Multicenter, Randomized Clinical Feasibility Trial (REFACED Sepsis)

This is an investigator-initiated, multicenter, randomized, parallel-group, open-labeled, feasibility trial investigating volumes of fluid within 24 hours in 124 patients with sepsis allocated to two different IV fluid regimens enrolled at three emergency departments in Central Region Denmark. The primary outcome is total intravenous, crystalloid fluid volume within 24 hours and key secondary outcomes include protocol violations, total fluids (intravenous and oral) within 24 hours, SAEs/SUSARs, and inhospital-, 30- and 90-day mortality.

Panoramica dello studio

Stato

Completato

Condizioni

Intervento / Trattamento

Descrizione dettagliata

BACKGROUND:

Sepsis is common in emergency department (ED) patients. Traditionally, intravenous (IV) fluids are used to optimise the circulation, and the use of higher volumes is recommended by international guidelines, but there are no recommendations for sepsis without hypotension or shock. Studies in septic shock seem to favour fluid restriction. Whether this is true in sepsis without hypotension/shock is unknown.

OBJECTIVES:

The aim of the REFACED Sepsis trial is to test if an IV fluid restrictive protocol in ED patients with sepsis is feasible, i.e., if the protocol decreases the IV fluid volumes administered.

DESIGN:

REFACED Sepsis is a multicenter, randomized, parallel-group, open-labeled, feasibility trial

POPULATION:

ED patients with sepsis expected to be admitted for ≥ 24 hours

EXPERIMENTAL INTERVENTION:

In the IV fluid restriction group no IV fluids should be given unless one of the below mentioned occurs;

A fluid bolus of 250 ml isotonic crystalloid may be given within 15 minutes if one of the following occurs (hypoperfusion criteria):

  • Lactate concentration ≥ 4 mmol/l (arterial or venous blood gas/blood sample)
  • Hypotension (systolic BP < 90 mmHg)
  • Mottling beyond edge of kneecap (i.e., Mottling score >2)53
  • Severe oliguria, i.e., diuresis < 0.1 ml/kg/h, during the first 4 hours of admission

All patients will be ensured min. 1 L of oral/intravenous fluids in 24 hours and electrolytes can be corrected.

CONTROL INTERVENTION:

In the usual care group there will be no upper limit for the use of IV fluids.

OUTCOMES:

The primary outcome is 24-hour intravenous crystalloid fluid administration. Key secondary outcomes are: Feasibility measures: Number of patients with major protocol violations, Number of patients screened vs included, Time from admission to inclusion, Number of patients lost to follow up in terms of 24-hour fluids, Accumulated serious adverse reactions and events (SAEs + Suspected Unexpected Serious Adverse Reaction (SUSARs)) within 48 hours in-hospital, Total fluids (oral and intravenous) at 24 hours,

TRIAL-SIZE:

124 patients will be randomized to restrictive fluid administration or usual care within 24 hours of randomization

Tipo di studio

Interventistico

Iscrizione (Effettivo)

124

Fase

  • Fase 2

Contatti e Sedi

Questa sezione fornisce i recapiti di coloro che conducono lo studio e informazioni su dove viene condotto lo studio.

Luoghi di studio

  • Danimarca
    • Central Denmark Region
      • Aarhus, Central Denmark Region, Danimarca, 8200
        • Department of Emergency Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital
      • Randers, Central Denmark Region, Danimarca, 8930
        • Department of Emergency Medicine, Regional Hospital Randers
      • Viborg, Central Denmark Region, Danimarca, 8800
        • Department of Emergency Medicine, Regional Hospital Viborg

Criteri di partecipazione

I ricercatori cercano persone che corrispondano a una certa descrizione, chiamata criteri di ammissibilità. Alcuni esempi di questi criteri sono le condizioni generali di salute di una persona o trattamenti precedenti.

Criteri di ammissibilità

Età idonea allo studio

18 anni e precedenti (Adulto, Adulto più anziano)

Accetta volontari sani

No

Sessi ammissibili allo studio

Tutto

Descrizione

Inclusion Criteria: All of the below must be fulfilled:

  1. Unplanned emergency department admission
  2. Age ≥ 18 years

  3. Sepsis defined as

    1. suspected infection by the treating clinician AND
    2. blood cultures drawn AND
    3. IV antibiotics administered or planned AND
    4. An infection related increase of SOFA*-score ≥ 2 from baseline

  4. Expected hospital stay > 24 hours as deemed by treating clinician

    • Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score

Further more the patient must fulfill criteria for enrollment in an acute study according to Danish law

Exclusion Criteria: We will exclude patients fulfilling any of following exclusion criteria:

  1. ≥ 500 ml of fluids given prior to randomization
  2. Invasively ventilated or vasopressors initiated at the time of screening
  3. Known or suspected severe bleeding judged by the treating clinician
  4. Known or suspected pregnancy (women aged <45 years will have a pregnancy test performed before enrollment)
  5. Prior enrollment in the trial
  6. Patients, who the clinician expect not to survive the next 24-hours

Piano di studio

Questa sezione fornisce i dettagli del piano di studio, compreso il modo in cui lo studio è progettato e ciò che lo studio sta misurando.

Come è strutturato lo studio?

Dettagli di progettazione

  • Scopo principale: Trattamento
  • Assegnazione: Randomizzato
  • Modello interventistico: Assegnazione parallela
  • Mascheramento: Nessuno (etichetta aperta)

Armi e interventi

Gruppo di partecipanti / Arm
Intervento / Trattamento
Sperimentale: Restrictive fluid administration

No IV fluids unless one of the extenuating circumstances occur;

  1. In case of severe hypoperfusion or severe circulatory impairment defined by either: 1) Lactate≥4 mmol/L, 2) Hypotension (systolic BP < 90 mmHg), 3) Mottling beyond the kneecap (mottling score >2) OR 4) Urinary output<0.1 mL/kg bodyweight/h (only in the first 4hrs after randomization) then a bolus of 250 ml of IV crystalloid solution may be given followed by re-evaluation
  2. In case of overt fluid losses (e.g. vomiting, large aspirates,) IV fluid may be given to correct for the loss, but not above the volume lost.

  3. In case the oral/enteral route for water or electrolyte solutions is contraindicated or has failed, IV fluids may be given to:

    Correct dehydration or electrolyte deficiencies Ensure a total fluid input of 1 L in 24hrs

  4. IV fluids may be given as carrier for medication, but with lowest possible volume
Droga: Isotonic crystalloids

Types of fluids in both intervention groups:

  • Fluids used for electrolyte disturbances: Fluids should be chosen to substitute the specific deficiency
  • Fluids given to substitute overt loss: Isotonic crystalloids are to be used. If large amounts of ascites are tapped, then human albumin may be used.
  • Blood products are only to be used on specific indications including severe bleeding, severe anaemia and prophylactic in case of severe coagulopathy.
Comparatore attivo: Usual care (standard care)

There will be no upper limit for the use of either IV or oral/enteral fluids

  1. IV fluids should be given in the case of hypoperfusion or circulatory impairment and should be continued as long as hemodynamic variables improve including static or dynamic variable(s) as chosen by the clinicians. These criteria are based on the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guideline.
  2. IV fluids should be given as maintenance if the ICU has a protocol recommending maintenance fluid
  3. IV fluids should be given to substitute expected or observed loss, dehydration or electrolyte derangements
Droga: Isotonic crystalloids

Types of fluids in both intervention groups:

  • Fluids used for electrolyte disturbances: Fluids should be chosen to substitute the specific deficiency
  • Fluids given to substitute overt loss: Isotonic crystalloids are to be used. If large amounts of ascites are tapped, then human albumin may be used.
  • Blood products are only to be used on specific indications including severe bleeding, severe anaemia and prophylactic in case of severe coagulopathy.

Cosa sta misurando lo studio?

Misure di risultato primarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
24-hour crystalloid iv. fluids
Lasso di tempo: 24 hours from randomization
total amount of all administered intravenous, crystalloid fluids within 24 hours of randomization
24 hours from randomization

Misure di risultato secondarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Protocol violations
Lasso di tempo: 24 hours from randomization
Feasibility measure: Number of patients with major protocol violations
24 hours from randomization
Screened-vs.-randomized-ratio
Lasso di tempo: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Feasibility measure: Number of patients screened vs included
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Time to inclusion
Lasso di tempo: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Feasibility measure: Time from admission to inclusion/randomization (hours)
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Lost-to-follow-up-rate
Lasso di tempo: 24 hours from randomization
Feasibility measure: Number of patients lost to follow up in terms of 24-hour fluids
24 hours from randomization
Accumulated serious adverse reactions (SARs + SUSARs)
Lasso di tempo: 7 days from randomization
Feasibility measure: Accumulated serious adverse reactions and events (SAEs + SARs+ SUSARs) within 7 days in-hospital
7 days from randomization
Total 24-hour fluids
Lasso di tempo: 24 hours from randomization
Total fluids (oral and intravenous) at 24 hours
24 hours from randomization
Mortality
Lasso di tempo: Total of 90-days
In-hospital, 30- and 90-days mortality
Total of 90-days

Collaboratori e investigatori

Qui è dove troverai le persone e le organizzazioni coinvolte in questo studio.

Sponsor

Marie Kristine Jessen, MD

Collaboratori

Aarhus University Hospital
University of Aarhus
Viborg Regional Hospital
Randers Regional Hospital

Investigatori

  • Investigatore principale: Marie K Jessen, MD, Research Center for Emergency Medicine, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University and Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark

Pubblicazioni e link utili

La persona responsabile dell'inserimento delle informazioni sullo studio fornisce volontariamente queste pubblicazioni. Questi possono riguardare qualsiasi cosa relativa allo studio.

Pubblicazioni generali

Studiare le date dei record

Queste date tengono traccia dell'avanzamento della registrazione dello studio e dell'invio dei risultati di sintesi a ClinicalTrials.gov. I record degli studi e i risultati riportati vengono esaminati dalla National Library of Medicine (NLM) per assicurarsi che soddisfino specifici standard di controllo della qualità prima di essere pubblicati sul sito Web pubblico.

Studia le date principali

Inizio studio (Effettivo)

3 novembre 2021

Completamento primario (Effettivo)

19 dicembre 2021

Completamento dello studio (Effettivo)

19 marzo 2022

Date di iscrizione allo studio

Primo inviato

11 settembre 2021

Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità

30 settembre 2021

Primo Inserito (Effettivo)

13 ottobre 2021

Aggiornamenti dei record di studio

Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)

25 marzo 2022

Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC

24 marzo 2022

Ultimo verificato

1 marzo 2022

Maggiori informazioni

Termini relativi a questo studio

Parole chiave

Termini MeSH pertinenti aggiuntivi

Altri numeri di identificazione dello studio

  • RECEM0001
  • 2021-000224-35 (Numero EudraCT)
  • 1-10-72-163-21 (Altro identificatore: The Committee on Health Research Ethics, Central Denmark Region)

Piano per i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)

Hai intenzione di condividere i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)?

NO

Informazioni su farmaci e dispositivi, documenti di studio

Studia un prodotto farmaceutico regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Studia un dispositivo regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .

Cerca prove simili

Sponsor e collaboratori

Condizioni mediche

Interventi farmacologici

CROs by country

CROs in Papua New Guinea

Condizioni

Malattie rare

Interventi farmacologici

Supplementi dietetici

Sponsor / Collaboratori

Sedi

Sottoscrivi