Questa pagina è stata tradotta automaticamente e l'accuratezza della traduzione non è garantita. Si prega di fare riferimento al Versione inglese per un testo di partenza.

To Evaluate Efficacy of Monotherapy of Oxcarbazepine Versus Combination of Gabapentin With Oxcarbazepine in the Management of Trigeminal Neuralgia

3 giugno 2026 aggiornato da: Zainab Akbar, Rehman Medical Institute - RMI

To Evaluate Efficacy of Monotherapy of Oxcarbazepine Versus Combination of Gabapentin With Oxcarbazepine in the Management of Trigeminal Neuralgia.

ABSTRACT:

Objective: This study evaluates the effectiveness of oxcarbazepine monotherapy with the combination of gabapentin and oxcarbazepine in managing trigeminal neuralgia(TN).

Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted at Rehman College of Dentistry for the duration of one year, i.e., from 1st May 2023 till May 2024. A total of 44 patients, fulfilling inclusion criteria, were included.Half were given monotherapy with oxcarbazepine (300 mg twice daily) and half were given combination therapy with gabapentin (100 mg daily) plus oxcarbazepine. Pain was evaluated utilizing the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at baseline, 2 weeks, and 2 months. SPSS software version 26 was used for statistical analysis.

KEYWORDS: Combination Therapy, Gabapentin, Monotherapy, Oxcarbazepine, Trigeminal Neuralgia, Visual Analogue Scale.

Panoramica dello studio

Descrizione dettagliata

INTRODUCTION:

Orofacial pain is defined as pain in and around the oral cavity. The orofacial region is complex, and any pain of orofacial origin could be related to the hard or soft tissue in that region or a dysfunction of the nervous system. Amongst all the orofacial pains, trigeminal neuralgia is one of the most debilitating, which badly affects the quality of life of the patient1. Trigeminal neuralgia is defined by the International Classification of Headache Disorders as abrupt, sharp, spontaneous pain that is caused by activation of one or more trigeminal nerve branches and lasts for a few seconds to two minutes. Classic trigeminal neuralgia (idiopathic) typically manifests at 40-60 years of age, whereas symptomatic trigeminal neuralgia (due to compression of the trigeminal ganglion) typically manifests around 30-40 years of age. There are two categories of treatment for trigeminal neuralgia: surgical and medicinal. But no single surgical or medicinal procedure has had a 100% success rate. Neuroleptic medications, muscle relaxants, and anticonvulsants are the recommended medical treatments for TN. However, the most popular invasive therapy choices for individuals not responding to conservative measures include gamma knife surgery, microvascular decompression, and gasserian ganglion percutaneous procedures3. Carbamazepine is generally regarded as the first-line medication for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia among the recommended medical interventions. But not every patient can take carbamazepine, which might make compliance difficult. Moreover, liver failure, aplastic anemia, and hyponatremia are significant side effects of carbamazepine. The structural analogue of carbamazepine is oxcarbazepine. Oxcarbazepine is more well-tolerated in patients than carbamazepine because it selectively induces P450 enzymes, has fewer pharmacologic interactions with other drugs, and has fewer adverse effects. Gabapentin is an analogue of GABA and is useful for the treatment of neuropathic pain. Second-line drugs like gabapentin are added if the patient is unable to tolerate the adverse effects or drug interactions4. Trigeminal neuralgia is a severely incapacitating illness that affects fundamental human activities, including eating, drinking, talking, and touching one's face. As a result, it interferes with day-to-day activities. According to epidemiological research, there is a higher risk of anxiety, depression, and suicide5. For accurate diagnosis and treatment, a thorough history and identification of the affected nerve are crucial. In Pakistan, many trigeminal neuralgia patients have incorrect diagnoses, lead to pointless operations, and receive inefficient therapies. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of gabapentin combination regimens versus monotherapy (oxcarbazepine). The extant literature indicates that there has not yet been a single national or international trial that compares the efficacy of oxcarbazepinemonotherapy with combined therapy using gabapentin, though studies comparing other treatment options or medicines have been conducted 6,7.

METHODS:

Prospective observational study was conducted at Rehman College of Dentistry for the duration of one year, i.e., from 1st May 2023 till May 2024. Universal sampling was used, and 44 patients who reported to our dental OPD and fulfilled the inclusion criteria were included in the study. Patients of either gender, with ages ranging from 20 to 80 years, presenting in the Outpatient Department, who fulfilled the diagnostic criteria of idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia according to the International Headache Society, were included in the study. All patients with orofacial and odontogenic pain other than TN, TMJ disorders having a centralized cause of TN as evidenced by MRI, patients unwilling to participate or who failed to show up for follow-up, pregnant and lactating females, patients who had previous surgical procedures for neuralgia or are allergic to neuralgia medications, and patients with comorbid conditions were excluded from the study. After seeking ethical approval from the Institutional Research Board (via reference number RCD-04-23-167), written consent was taken, and patients were randomly assigned to one of the two groups through block randomization using the lottery method. Patients randomly distributed into two groups were given monotherapy with oxcarbazepine or combination therapy with gabapentin in addition to oxcarbazepine. Pain was calculated on a Visual Analogue Scale (0-10). Pain variable would again be calculated at 2 weeks and 2 months. Data analysis was conducted using the SPSS program 26. Qualitative data were displayed as frequency and percentage, whereas quantitative variables were displayed as mean ± SD. The independent sample t-test was used to compare the mean pain score between the groups; a p-value of less than 0.05 was deemed significant.

Tipo di studio

Interventistico

Iscrizione (Effettivo)

44

Fase

  • Fase 2
  • Fase 3

Contatti e Sedi

Questa sezione fornisce i recapiti di coloro che conducono lo studio e informazioni su dove viene condotto lo studio.

Luoghi di studio

    • Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
      • Peshawar, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan, 25100
        • Rehman College of Dentistry

Criteri di partecipazione

I ricercatori cercano persone che corrispondano a una certa descrizione, chiamata criteri di ammissibilità. Alcuni esempi di questi criteri sono le condizioni generali di salute di una persona o trattamenti precedenti.

Criteri di ammissibilità

Età idonea allo studio

  • Adulto
  • Adulto più anziano

Accetta volontari sani

No

Descrizione

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients of either gender aged 20-80 years
  • Patients presenting to the Outpatient Department (OPD)
  • Patients fulfilling the diagnostic criteria for idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia according to the International Headache Society (IHS)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with orofacial or odontogenic pain conditions other than trigeminal neuralgia (TN)
  • Patients with temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disorders
  • Patients with a centralized cause of TN evident on MRI
  • Patients unwilling to participate in the study
  • Patients who failed to attend follow-up visits
  • Pregnant or lactating females
  • Patients with a history of previous surgical procedures for neuralgia
  • Patients with known allergy to medications used for neuralgia
  • Patients with significant comorbid medical conditions

Piano di studio

Questa sezione fornisce i dettagli del piano di studio, compreso il modo in cui lo studio è progettato e ciò che lo studio sta misurando.

Come è strutturato lo studio?

Dettagli di progettazione

  • Scopo principale: Trattamento
  • Assegnazione: Randomizzato
  • Modello interventistico: Assegnazione parallela
  • Mascheramento: Nessuno (etichetta aperta)

Armi e interventi

Gruppo di partecipanti / Arm
Intervento / Trattamento
Comparatore attivo: Oxcarbamezapine monotherapy
group given monotherapy with oxcarbamezapine
monotherapy with oxcarbamezapine(300 mg twice daily)
Comparatore attivo: Oxcarbamezapine plus gabapentine combination therapy
group given comination therapy(oxcarbamezapine with gabapentine)
combination therapy of oxcarbamezapine with gabapentine was given

Cosa sta misurando lo studio?

Misure di risultato primarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Change in Pain Intensity Scores Assessed by Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Lasso di tempo: Baseline, 2 weeks, and 2 months after initiation of treatment
Pain intensity was assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale , a 10-cm horizontal line ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 represents no pain and 10 represents the worst imaginable pain. Higher scores indicate greater pain severity (worse outcome). Participants will receive either oxcarbazepine monotherapy or combination therapy with gabapentin plus oxcarbazepine. VAS pain scores will be recorded at baseline, 2 weeks, and 2 months to evaluate changes in pain intensity over time.
Baseline, 2 weeks, and 2 months after initiation of treatment

Collaboratori e investigatori

Qui è dove troverai le persone e le organizzazioni coinvolte in questo studio.

Investigatori

  • Direttore dello studio: iftikhar qayum, MBBS, MD, PHD, Rehman Medical Institute

Pubblicazioni e link utili

La persona responsabile dell'inserimento delle informazioni sullo studio fornisce volontariamente queste pubblicazioni. Questi possono riguardare qualsiasi cosa relativa allo studio.

Studiare le date dei record

Queste date tengono traccia dell'avanzamento della registrazione dello studio e dell'invio dei risultati di sintesi a ClinicalTrials.gov. I record degli studi e i risultati riportati vengono esaminati dalla National Library of Medicine (NLM) per assicurarsi che soddisfino specifici standard di controllo della qualità prima di essere pubblicati sul sito Web pubblico.

Studia le date principali

Inizio studio (Effettivo)

1 maggio 2023

Completamento primario (Effettivo)

1 maggio 2024

Completamento dello studio (Effettivo)

1 maggio 2024

Date di iscrizione allo studio

Primo inviato

13 maggio 2026

Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità

3 giugno 2026

Primo Inserito (Effettivo)

4 giugno 2026

Aggiornamenti dei record di studio

Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)

4 giugno 2026

Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC

3 giugno 2026

Ultimo verificato

1 maggio 2026

Maggiori informazioni

Termini relativi a questo studio

Piano per i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)

Hai intenzione di condividere i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)?

SÌ

Descrizione del piano IPD

Relevant data can be shared upon genuine request

Periodo di condivisione IPD

Available indefinitely

Criteri di accesso alla condivisione IPD

Other researchers doing similar drug trials. Access will be through email requests.

Tipo di informazioni di supporto alla condivisione IPD

  • STUDIO_PROTOCOLLO
  • RSI

Dati/documenti di studio

  1. Protocollo di studio
    Identificatore informazioni: journal of RMI
    Commenti informativi: Article will be published in JRMI

Informazioni su farmaci e dispositivi, documenti di studio

Studia un prodotto farmaceutico regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Studia un dispositivo regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

prodotto fabbricato ed esportato dagli Stati Uniti

No

Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .

Sottoscrivi