Esta página foi traduzida automaticamente e a precisão da tradução não é garantida. Por favor, consulte o versão em inglês para um texto fonte.

To Evaluate Efficacy of Monotherapy of Oxcarbazepine Versus Combination of Gabapentin With Oxcarbazepine in the Management of Trigeminal Neuralgia

3 de junho de 2026 atualizado por: Zainab Akbar, Rehman Medical Institute - RMI

To Evaluate Efficacy of Monotherapy of Oxcarbazepine Versus Combination of Gabapentin With Oxcarbazepine in the Management of Trigeminal Neuralgia.

ABSTRACT:

Objective: This study evaluates the effectiveness of oxcarbazepine monotherapy with the combination of gabapentin and oxcarbazepine in managing trigeminal neuralgia(TN).

Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted at Rehman College of Dentistry for the duration of one year, i.e., from 1st May 2023 till May 2024. A total of 44 patients, fulfilling inclusion criteria, were included.Half were given monotherapy with oxcarbazepine (300 mg twice daily) and half were given combination therapy with gabapentin (100 mg daily) plus oxcarbazepine. Pain was evaluated utilizing the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at baseline, 2 weeks, and 2 months. SPSS software version 26 was used for statistical analysis.

KEYWORDS: Combination Therapy, Gabapentin, Monotherapy, Oxcarbazepine, Trigeminal Neuralgia, Visual Analogue Scale.

Visão geral do estudo

Descrição detalhada

INTRODUCTION:

Orofacial pain is defined as pain in and around the oral cavity. The orofacial region is complex, and any pain of orofacial origin could be related to the hard or soft tissue in that region or a dysfunction of the nervous system. Amongst all the orofacial pains, trigeminal neuralgia is one of the most debilitating, which badly affects the quality of life of the patient1. Trigeminal neuralgia is defined by the International Classification of Headache Disorders as abrupt, sharp, spontaneous pain that is caused by activation of one or more trigeminal nerve branches and lasts for a few seconds to two minutes. Classic trigeminal neuralgia (idiopathic) typically manifests at 40-60 years of age, whereas symptomatic trigeminal neuralgia (due to compression of the trigeminal ganglion) typically manifests around 30-40 years of age. There are two categories of treatment for trigeminal neuralgia: surgical and medicinal. But no single surgical or medicinal procedure has had a 100% success rate. Neuroleptic medications, muscle relaxants, and anticonvulsants are the recommended medical treatments for TN. However, the most popular invasive therapy choices for individuals not responding to conservative measures include gamma knife surgery, microvascular decompression, and gasserian ganglion percutaneous procedures3. Carbamazepine is generally regarded as the first-line medication for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia among the recommended medical interventions. But not every patient can take carbamazepine, which might make compliance difficult. Moreover, liver failure, aplastic anemia, and hyponatremia are significant side effects of carbamazepine. The structural analogue of carbamazepine is oxcarbazepine. Oxcarbazepine is more well-tolerated in patients than carbamazepine because it selectively induces P450 enzymes, has fewer pharmacologic interactions with other drugs, and has fewer adverse effects. Gabapentin is an analogue of GABA and is useful for the treatment of neuropathic pain. Second-line drugs like gabapentin are added if the patient is unable to tolerate the adverse effects or drug interactions4. Trigeminal neuralgia is a severely incapacitating illness that affects fundamental human activities, including eating, drinking, talking, and touching one's face. As a result, it interferes with day-to-day activities. According to epidemiological research, there is a higher risk of anxiety, depression, and suicide5. For accurate diagnosis and treatment, a thorough history and identification of the affected nerve are crucial. In Pakistan, many trigeminal neuralgia patients have incorrect diagnoses, lead to pointless operations, and receive inefficient therapies. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of gabapentin combination regimens versus monotherapy (oxcarbazepine). The extant literature indicates that there has not yet been a single national or international trial that compares the efficacy of oxcarbazepinemonotherapy with combined therapy using gabapentin, though studies comparing other treatment options or medicines have been conducted 6,7.

METHODS:

Prospective observational study was conducted at Rehman College of Dentistry for the duration of one year, i.e., from 1st May 2023 till May 2024. Universal sampling was used, and 44 patients who reported to our dental OPD and fulfilled the inclusion criteria were included in the study. Patients of either gender, with ages ranging from 20 to 80 years, presenting in the Outpatient Department, who fulfilled the diagnostic criteria of idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia according to the International Headache Society, were included in the study. All patients with orofacial and odontogenic pain other than TN, TMJ disorders having a centralized cause of TN as evidenced by MRI, patients unwilling to participate or who failed to show up for follow-up, pregnant and lactating females, patients who had previous surgical procedures for neuralgia or are allergic to neuralgia medications, and patients with comorbid conditions were excluded from the study. After seeking ethical approval from the Institutional Research Board (via reference number RCD-04-23-167), written consent was taken, and patients were randomly assigned to one of the two groups through block randomization using the lottery method. Patients randomly distributed into two groups were given monotherapy with oxcarbazepine or combination therapy with gabapentin in addition to oxcarbazepine. Pain was calculated on a Visual Analogue Scale (0-10). Pain variable would again be calculated at 2 weeks and 2 months. Data analysis was conducted using the SPSS program 26. Qualitative data were displayed as frequency and percentage, whereas quantitative variables were displayed as mean ± SD. The independent sample t-test was used to compare the mean pain score between the groups; a p-value of less than 0.05 was deemed significant.

Tipo de estudo

Intervencional

Inscrição (Real)

44

Estágio

  • Fase 2
  • Fase 3

Contactos e Locais

Esta seção fornece os detalhes de contato para aqueles que conduzem o estudo e informações sobre onde este estudo está sendo realizado.

Locais de estudo

    • Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
      • Peshawar, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Paquistão, 25100
        • Rehman College of Dentistry

Critérios de participação

Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.

Critérios de elegibilidade

Idades elegíveis para estudo

  • Adulto
  • Adulto mais velho

Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis

Não

Descrição

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients of either gender aged 20-80 years
  • Patients presenting to the Outpatient Department (OPD)
  • Patients fulfilling the diagnostic criteria for idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia according to the International Headache Society (IHS)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with orofacial or odontogenic pain conditions other than trigeminal neuralgia (TN)
  • Patients with temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disorders
  • Patients with a centralized cause of TN evident on MRI
  • Patients unwilling to participate in the study
  • Patients who failed to attend follow-up visits
  • Pregnant or lactating females
  • Patients with a history of previous surgical procedures for neuralgia
  • Patients with known allergy to medications used for neuralgia
  • Patients with significant comorbid medical conditions

Plano de estudo

Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.

Como o estudo é projetado?

Detalhes do projeto

  • Finalidade Principal: Tratamento
  • Alocação: Randomizado
  • Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição Paralela
  • Mascaramento: Nenhum (rótulo aberto)

Armas e Intervenções

Grupo de Participantes / Braço
Intervenção / Tratamento
Comparador Ativo: Oxcarbamezapine monotherapy
group given monotherapy with oxcarbamezapine
monotherapy with oxcarbamezapine(300 mg twice daily)
Comparador Ativo: Oxcarbamezapine plus gabapentine combination therapy
group given comination therapy(oxcarbamezapine with gabapentine)
combination therapy of oxcarbamezapine with gabapentine was given

O que o estudo está medindo?

Medidas de resultados primários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Change in Pain Intensity Scores Assessed by Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Prazo: Baseline, 2 weeks, and 2 months after initiation of treatment
Pain intensity was assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale , a 10-cm horizontal line ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 represents no pain and 10 represents the worst imaginable pain. Higher scores indicate greater pain severity (worse outcome). Participants will receive either oxcarbazepine monotherapy or combination therapy with gabapentin plus oxcarbazepine. VAS pain scores will be recorded at baseline, 2 weeks, and 2 months to evaluate changes in pain intensity over time.
Baseline, 2 weeks, and 2 months after initiation of treatment

Colaboradores e Investigadores

É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.

Investigadores

  • Diretor de estudo: iftikhar qayum, MBBS, MD, PHD, Rehman Medical Institute

Publicações e links úteis

A pessoa responsável por inserir informações sobre o estudo fornece voluntariamente essas publicações. Estes podem ser sobre qualquer coisa relacionada ao estudo.

Datas de registro do estudo

Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados ​​pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.

Datas Principais do Estudo

Início do estudo (Real)

1 de maio de 2023

Conclusão Primária (Real)

1 de maio de 2024

Conclusão do estudo (Real)

1 de maio de 2024

Datas de inscrição no estudo

Enviado pela primeira vez

13 de maio de 2026

Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ

3 de junho de 2026

Primeira postagem (Real)

4 de junho de 2026

Atualizações de registro de estudo

Última Atualização Postada (Real)

4 de junho de 2026

Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade

3 de junho de 2026

Última verificação

1 de maio de 2026

Mais Informações

Termos relacionados a este estudo

Plano para dados de participantes individuais (IPD)

Planeja compartilhar dados de participantes individuais (IPD)?

SIM

Descrição do plano IPD

Relevant data can be shared upon genuine request

Prazo de Compartilhamento de IPD

Available indefinitely

Critérios de acesso de compartilhamento IPD

Other researchers doing similar drug trials. Access will be through email requests.

Tipo de informação de suporte de compartilhamento de IPD

  • PROTOCOLO DE ESTUDO
  • CSR

Dados/documentos do estudo

  1. Protocolo de estudo
    Identificador de informação: journal of RMI
    Comentários informativos: Article will be published in JRMI

Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo

Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

produto fabricado e exportado dos EUA

Não

Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .

Se inscrever