このページは自動翻訳されたものであり、翻訳の正確性は保証されていません。を参照してください。 英語版 ソーステキスト用。

Practice-Based Learning to Predict Polyp Histology at Colonoscopy

2012年7月10日 更新者:Stanford University

Practice-Based Learning to Predict Polyp Histology at Colonoscopy: A Demonstration Project in Community Practice

Most colorectal cancers arise from polyps. Most polyps removed at colonoscopy are small. New technologies such as narrowband imaging (NBI) offer the possibility of in differentiation between precancerous and unimportant small polyps. Use of these technologies could decrease the costs and potentially the risks of screening and surveillance colonoscopy.

Multiple studies have demonstrated the ability of experienced endoscopists to achieve high accuracy in differentiating polyp types using NBI.

The investigators hypothesize that community-based endoscopists can learn to identify polyp type at colonoscopy with the aid of NBI through the use of an introductory didactic program, followed by practice based-learning, and that their experience can serve as guidelines for wider dissemination.

The purpose of this study is to test an educational program combining a didactic program followed by practice-based learning that is designed to allow community-based endoscopists to become proficient at the use of NBI in the colon. This study will not affect the care of patients in any way. The research subjects will be the endoscopists, who will perform colonoscopy and polyp removal in the usual clinical fashion, with the addition of attempting to predict polyp type before resection.

調査の概要

詳細な説明

A) Study Purpose and Rationale Most polyps removed at colonoscopy are small. The natural history of these polyps is not understood completely, but the risk of subsequent cancer in persons with small rectosigmoid adenomas may not be higher than in persons without rectosigmoid adenomas [1]. With improvements in colonoscopic imaging, experienced endoscopists can detect polyps in a large fraction of patients. Removal of all small polyps followed by formal histopathological examination increases the costs associated with colorectal cancer screening, and may increase the risk of complications, depending on the technique that is used for polypectomy.

New technologies such as narrowband imaging (NBI) offer the possibility of in vivo differentiation between adenomatous and hyperplastic polyps. Policies to leave in place small polyps that appear to be hyperplastic, or to remove and discard small polyps after in vivo histologic categorization without formal histopathology review could significantly decrease the costs and potentially the risks of screening and surveillance colonoscopy.

Multiple studies have demonstrated the ability of experienced endoscopists to achieve high accuracy in differentiating adenomatous from hyperplastic polyps using NBI [2, 3, 4, 5]. The level of confidence associated with in vivo histologic categorization of a particular polyp is a valuable adjunct measure in determining subsequent clinical management. Dissemination to the community setting of policies that promote in vivo histologic categorization is likely to require practice-based learning.

B) Hypotheses The investigators hypothesize that community-based endoscopists can learn to identify polyp histology at colonoscopy with the aid of NBI through the use of an introductory didactic program, followed by practice based-learning, and that representative learning curves can be generated that can serve as guidelines for wider dissemination.

C) Purpose The purpose of this study is to test an educational program combining a didactic program followed by practice-based learning that is designed to allow community-based endoscopists to become proficient at in vivo histologic characterization of small polyps with the aid of NBI. This study will not require any changes in endoscopists' decisions regarding the indications and methods for polypectomy.

This study will not address directly whether polyps predicted to be hyperplastic or even diminutive adenomas should be left in place, or discarded and not submitted for formal histopathological review.

D) Specific Aims This study has two primary and two secondary aims

  1. One primary aim is to assess the proficiency of community-based endoscopists at ex vivo histologic characterization of polyps using NBI based on photographs before and after a didactic program designed to familiarize them with in vivo histologic characterization.
  2. The central primary aim is to assess whether the currently designed program is effective at training endoscopists to classify adenomatous vs. hyperplastic polyps in practice with at least 90% accuracy.
  3. A secondary aim is to characterize endoscopists' individual and group average learning curves for in vivo histologic characterization using NBI during practice-based learning, with attention to level of confidence, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values.
  4. Another secondary aim is to determine whether surveillance recommendations that would be made based on in vivo histologic characterization using NBI are comparable to those based on formal histopathological assessment.

E) Timeline for assessments:

Endoscopists' accuracy will be determined at three pre-specified points: after assessment of 50, 70 and 90 independent diminutive polyps (defined as <=5mm polyps, one per study colonoscopy, with random selection in cases of >1 diminutive polyp per study colonoscopy). We estimate that in order to assess 90 independent diminutive polyps, endoscopists will need to participate for 6-12 months.

研究の種類

介入

入学 (実際)

14

段階

  • 適用できない

連絡先と場所

このセクションには、調査を実施する担当者の連絡先の詳細と、この調査が実施されている場所に関する情報が記載されています。

研究場所

    • California
      • Stanford、California、アメリカ、94305
        • Stanford University
    • Michigan
      • Ann Arbor、Michigan、アメリカ、48106
        • Huron Gastroenterology

参加基準

研究者は、適格基準と呼ばれる特定の説明に適合する人を探します。これらの基準のいくつかの例は、人の一般的な健康状態または以前の治療です。

適格基準

就学可能な年齢

  • 大人
  • 高齢者

健康ボランティアの受け入れ

いいえ

受講資格のある性別

全て

説明

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Community-based endoscopist who performs screening colonoscopy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability or lack of willingness to provide informed consent

研究計画

このセクションでは、研究がどのように設計され、研究が何を測定しているかなど、研究計画の詳細を提供します。

研究はどのように設計されていますか?

デザインの詳細

  • 主な目的:診断
  • 割り当て:なし
  • 介入モデル:単一グループの割り当て
  • マスキング:なし(オープンラベル)

武器と介入

参加者グループ / アーム
介入・治療
実験的:All participating endoscopists
All endoscopists will undergo ex vivo training and will participate in in vivo practice-based learning.
Pre-test, ex vivo computerized training module, post-test
Prediction of polyp histology in real time, comparison to pathology reports, and review of cumulative individual performance.

この研究は何を測定していますか?

主要な結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Proportion of participants achieving 90% accuracy
時間枠:6-12 months depending on when an endoscopist has assessed 50, 70 and 90 independent diminutive polyps
Success for a participant was defined as achieving ≥90% accuracy in optical diagnosis of diminutive polyps. This was based on the last 30 consecutive independent diminutive polyps per participant at one of three pre-specified points (at polyp #50, 70 or 90).
6-12 months depending on when an endoscopist has assessed 50, 70 and 90 independent diminutive polyps

二次結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Learning curves
時間枠:6-12 months depending on when an endoscopist has assessed 50, 70 and 90 independent diminutive polyps
Leraning curves as a function of polyp batch, for sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy
6-12 months depending on when an endoscopist has assessed 50, 70 and 90 independent diminutive polyps
Surveillance recommendations
時間枠:6-12 months depending on when an endoscopist has assessed 50, 70 and 90 independent diminutive polyps
Agreement between NBI-aided surveillance recommendations vs. those based on pathology examination of all polyps
6-12 months depending on when an endoscopist has assessed 50, 70 and 90 independent diminutive polyps

協力者と研究者

ここでは、この調査に関係する人々や組織を見つけることができます。

スポンサー

出版物と役立つリンク

研究に関する情報を入力する責任者は、自発的にこれらの出版物を提供します。これらは、研究に関連するあらゆるものに関するものである可能性があります。

研究記録日

これらの日付は、ClinicalTrials.gov への研究記録と要約結果の提出の進捗状況を追跡します。研究記録と報告された結果は、国立医学図書館 (NLM) によって審査され、公開 Web サイトに掲載される前に、特定の品質管理基準を満たしていることが確認されます。

主要日程の研究

研究開始

2011年3月1日

一次修了 (実際)

2012年3月1日

研究の完了

2022年12月8日

試験登録日

最初に提出

2012年7月6日

QC基準を満たした最初の提出物

2012年7月10日

最初の投稿 (見積もり)

2012年7月11日

学習記録の更新

投稿された最後の更新 (見積もり)

2012年7月11日

QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました

2012年7月10日

最終確認日

2012年7月1日

詳しくは

本研究に関する用語

医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書

米国FDA規制医薬品の研究

いいえ

米国FDA規制機器製品の研究

いいえ

米国で製造され、米国から輸出された製品。

いいえ

この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。

Ex vivo moduleの臨床試験

購読する