Economic Evaluation and Communication in Remote Monitoring of People With Pacemakers
Sustainability of Cardiology Services: Economic Evaluation and Communication in Remote Monitoring of People With Pacemakers.
The purpose of this research is to estimate the outcomes in health and cost of the follow-up of patients with pacemakers.
The initial hypothesize of this study is that remote monitoring of pacemaker will show a best relation of outcomes in costs and effectiveness than the conventional follow-up in hospital.
調査の概要
詳細な説明
Cardiovascular Diseases are a major cause of global morbidity and mortality, being responsible according to the World Health Organization of the 30% of overall mortality.
Since 2001 that the first pacemaker of remote monitoring was implanted in Europe, more than 300,000 pacemaker have been implanted around the world. Despite this sharp expansion, the scientific evidence on economic evaluations of pacemaker with remote monitoring is very limited, and in our knowledge, studies including informal costs have not been conducted.
In the field of cardiology, telemedicine allows consultations with patients through monitoring systems and remote communication analyzing the ongoing heart rates of people with pacemakers, implantable cardioverter defibrillators, cardiac resynchronization therapy and subcutaneous Holter. The use of remote monitoring may save time and efforts to both healthcare professionals and patients, including their informal caregivers, reducing the number of follow up visits to the hospital and reducing the associated costs with patient follow-up, which will help to improve sustainability of healthcare services.
During the 06 months of study, the patients with implant of pacemakers of both groups will be assessed of the same parameters, in 3 different moments (pre-implant and months 1, and 6 post-implantation).
Pacemakers that are going to be used in the project:
- Remote monitoring group: Biotronik Estella SR-T and DR-T & Biotronik Evia SR-T and DR-T.
- Hospital monitoring group: St Jude Medical Endurity SR and DR & Sorin Reply 200 SR and DR.
The study will estimate: 1) The Clinical features of the patients. 2) The effectiveness through of administration of Health-Related Quality of Life questionnaires and 3) Finally, hospital and informal costs of patients with pacemakers will be estimated by the researches.
研究の種類
入学 (実際)
段階
- 適用できない
連絡先と場所
研究場所
-
-
Nordland
-
Bodo、Nordland、ノルウェー、N - 8092
- Nordland Hospital
-
-
参加基準
適格基準
就学可能な年齢
健康ボランティアの受け入れ
受講資格のある性別
説明
Inclusion Criteria:
- Be 18 years of age
- Have a pacemaker implanted
- Understand and be able to properly perform self-monitoring at home
Exclusion Criteria:
- Be participating in another study
- Refuse to participate in the study
- Have implanted a different cardiac device to the pacemaker
研究計画
研究はどのように設計されていますか?
デザインの詳細
- 主な目的:ヘルスサービス研究
- 割り当て:ランダム化
- 介入モデル:並列代入
- マスキング:独身
武器と介入
参加者グループ / アーム |
介入・治療 |
|---|---|
|
介入なし:病院でのペースメーカーのモニタリング
患者は監視を受けるために病院に行かなければなりません
|
|
|
実験的:ペースメーカーの遠隔監視
遠隔医療システム: 患者は監視のために病院に行く必要はありません |
遠隔監視グループで遠隔医療システムを活用
他の名前:
|
この研究は何を測定していますか?
主要な結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Clinical features
時間枠:6 months
|
Selected variables from the medical history records:
|
6 months
|
二次結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Health-Related Quality of Life
時間枠:6 months
|
EuroQol-5Dimensions (EQ-5D)
|
6 months
|
|
Health-Related Quality of Life
時間枠:6 months
|
Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHF)
|
6 months
|
|
Safety
時間枠:6 months
|
|
6 months
|
|
Consultations and Hospitalizations unscheduled
時間枠:6 months
|
Number of unscheduled visits and hospitalizations
|
6 months
|
|
Direct costs
時間枠:6 months
|
Direct costs taken into account:
|
6 months
|
|
Indirect cost
時間枠:6 months
|
Maintenance of the medical consultation (hospital):
|
6 months
|
|
Informal costs
時間枠:6 months
|
Costs related to the care and displacements of patients to hospital:
|
6 months
|
協力者と研究者
スポンサー
出版物と役立つリンク
一般刊行物
- Lopez-Villegas A, Catalan-Matamoros D, Peiro S, Lappegard KT, Lopez-Liria R. Cost-utility analysis of telemonitoring versus conventional hospital-based follow-up of patients with pacemakers. The NORDLAND randomized clinical trial. PLoS One. 2020 Jan 29;15(1):e0226188. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226188. eCollection 2020.
- Lopez-Liria R, Lopez-Villegas A, Enebakk T, Thunhaug H, Lappegard KT, Catalan-Matamoros D. Telemonitoring and Quality of Life in Patients after 12 Months Following a Pacemaker Implant: the Nordland Study, a Randomised Trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jun 5;16(11):2001. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16112001.
- Lopez-Villegas A, Catalan-Matamoros D, Lopez-Liria R, Enebakk T, Thunhaug H, Lappegard KT. Health-related quality of life on tele-monitoring for users with pacemakers 6 months after implant: the NORDLAND study, a randomized trial. BMC Geriatr. 2018 Sep 21;18(1):223. doi: 10.1186/s12877-018-0911-3.
研究記録日
主要日程の研究
研究開始
一次修了 (実際)
研究の完了 (実際)
試験登録日
最初に提出
QC基準を満たした最初の提出物
最初の投稿 (見積もり)
学習記録の更新
投稿された最後の更新 (実際)
QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました
最終確認日
詳しくは
本研究に関する用語
この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。