このページは自動翻訳されたものであり、翻訳の正確性は保証されていません。を参照してください。 英語版 ソーステキスト用。

Comparison of Two Methods of Administration of the Epidural, by Programmed Intermittent Bolus or Continuous Perfusion, on the Incidence of Cesarean Sections and Instrumented Deliveries in Primiparous Women

2018年5月30日 更新者:Philippe VAN DER LINDEN、Brugmann University Hospital

The epidural has been recognized for many years as the most effective analgesia method for obstetrical labor. Several different administration protocols have been evaluated over the years with the aim of reducing side effects.

Epidurals have been incriminated in the increase of instrumented births. It is indeed possible that the motor block induced by the epidural reduces the pelvic tonus and the ability of the mother to push during the second stage of the labor. Furthermore, this motor block might lead to a ill rotation of the foetal head within the pelvis, which could lead to instrumentation (suction cups, forceps).

In the investigator's institution, an ongoing study also provided interim that showed that the use of a low concentration of local anesthetics (as opposed to a higher concentration) tends to decrease the instrumentation and cesarean sections rate in the institution's population.However, the optimal administration mode of the local anesthetic in the epidural remains unknown.

In the last few years, there has been a growing interest for a new method of administration of the solution within the epidural, by programmed intermittent bolus. This method allows a better distribution of the local anesthetics in the epidural space, compared to a continuous perfusion.

This study therefore focuses on the relationship between the use of epidural with programmed intermittent boluses and the rate of instrumented deliveries and cesarean sections.

The exact mode of administration of boluses is also subject to discussion in the literature. One can question whether it is preferable to administer smaller boluses more frequently or larger less frequent boluses. A few studies have investigated this issue and recommend to administer larger and more spaced bolus (10 mL to 60 minutes).This better matches the sought after physiology (ie a wider distribution in the epidural space) and provides equivalent analgesia to smaller, more frequent boluses.

調査の概要

詳細な説明

The epidural has been recognized for many years as the most effective analgesia method for obstetrical labor. Several different administration protocols have been evaluated over the years with the aim of reducing side effects.

Epidurals have been incriminated in the increase of instrumented births. It is indeed possible that the motor block induced by the epidural reduces the pelvic tonus and the ability of the mother to push during the second stage of the labor. Furthermore, this motor block might lead to a ill rotation of the foetal head within the pelvis, which could lead to instrumentation (suction cups, forceps).

In 2001, the COMET study showed that the use of low anesthetics concentrations decreases the motor bloc and allows to increase the rate of vaginal deliveries and decrease the rate of instrumented births.

In the investigator's institution, an ongoing study also provided interim that showed that the use of a low concentration of local anesthetics (as opposed to a higher concentration) tends to decrease the instrumentation and cesarean sections rate in the institution's population.

However, the optimal administration mode of the local anesthetic in the epidural remains unknown.

In the last few years, there has been a growing interest for a new method of administration of the solution within the epidural, by programmed intermittent bolus. This method allows a better distribution of the local anesthetics in the epidural space, compared to a continuous perfusion.

Several studies have been performed and show that this mode of administration allows to decrease the local anesthetics injected dosis and gives a better maternal satisfaction. A meta-analysis performed in 2013 also shows a tendency towards the decrease of instrumented deliveries with this method. Sadly, no studies up to this date have the needed power to prove this point with certainty.

This study therefore focuses on the relationship between the use of epidural with programmed intermittent boluses and the rate of instrumented deliveries and cesarean sections.

The exact mode of administration of boluses is also subject to discussion in the literature. One can question whether it is preferable to administer smaller boluses more frequently or larger less frequent boluses. A few studies have investigated this issue and recommend to administer larger and more spaced bolus (10 mL to 60 minutes).This better matches the sought after physiology (ie a wider distribution in the epidural space) and provides equivalent analgesia to smaller, more frequent boluses.

研究の種類

介入

段階

  • フェーズ2

連絡先と場所

このセクションには、調査を実施する担当者の連絡先の詳細と、この調査が実施されている場所に関する情報が記載されています。

研究場所

参加基準

研究者は、適格基準と呼ばれる特定の説明に適合する人を探します。これらの基準のいくつかの例は、人の一般的な健康状態または以前の治療です。

適格基準

就学可能な年齢

18年歳以上 (大人、高齢者)

健康ボランティアの受け入れ

はい

受講資格のある性別

女性

説明

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Women over 18 years of age
  • Primiparous
  • Pregnancy over 36 weeks of gestational age and <42 weeks of gestational age
  • Written informed consent
  • Cervical dilatation between 3 and 6 cm at recruitment
  • Single pregnancy
  • Foetus in cephalic position

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participation refusal or epidural contra-indication
  • Multiparous
  • Allergy to the products used
  • Twin pregnancy
  • Height <1m55 and/or narrow pelvis, as shown by imagery
  • Language barrier
  • Patients with a BMI superior or equal to 35 (computed with the weight at the beginning of the pregnancy)
  • Cervical dilatation at recruitment <3 or >6 cm
  • ASA score (American Society of Anesthesiologists) 3 or 4
  • Foetus in transverse or seat position

研究計画

このセクションでは、研究がどのように設計され、研究が何を測定しているかなど、研究計画の詳細を提供します。

研究はどのように設計されていますか?

デザインの詳細

  • 主な目的:処理
  • 割り当て:ランダム化
  • 介入モデル:並列代入
  • マスキング:ダブル

武器と介入

参加者グループ / アーム
介入・治療
実験的:Programmed intermittent boluses
Epidural analgesia performed with programmed intermittent boluses.
Injection of programmed intermittent boluses in the epidural space, without continuous perfusion, of the same solution (Chirocaine 0.07% + Sufentanil 0.3 mcg/ml): 10ml each 60 minutes
アクティブコンパレータ:Continuous perfusion
Epidural analgesia performed with a continuous perfusion.
Continuous epidural perfusion: Chirocaine 0.07% + Sufentanil 0.3 mcg/ml with a 10ml/hour rate

この研究は何を測定していますか?

主要な結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Rate of instrumented deliveries (suction pumps, forceps)
時間枠:24h after the baby's birth
Number of deliveries requiring instrumentation (suction pumps, forceps)
24h after the baby's birth
Rate of cesarian sections
時間枠:24h after the baby's birth
Number of deliveries requiring a cesarian section
24h after the baby's birth

二次結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Number of anesthesist interventions
時間枠:Starting from the first injection of the epidural till the baby's birth
Number of visits of the anesthesist, either requested by the patient (request for additional analgesia by the patient because of pain during labor: the pain itself is not measured), either necessary because of side effects (nausea, pruritus).
Starting from the first injection of the epidural till the baby's birth
Maternal satisfaction
時間枠:24h after the baby's birth
Will be assessed by means of a questionnaire (0 to 100 visual scale)
24h after the baby's birth
Presence of a motor block
時間枠:At the precise moment when the cervix reaches complete dilatation (10 cm opening) during labor
Assessed by the anesthesist with the Bromage modified scale
At the precise moment when the cervix reaches complete dilatation (10 cm opening) during labor

協力者と研究者

ここでは、この調査に関係する人々や組織を見つけることができます。

出版物と役立つリンク

研究に関する情報を入力する責任者は、自発的にこれらの出版物を提供します。これらは、研究に関連するあらゆるものに関するものである可能性があります。

一般刊行物

研究記録日

これらの日付は、ClinicalTrials.gov への研究記録と要約結果の提出の進捗状況を追跡します。研究記録と報告された結果は、国立医学図書館 (NLM) によって審査され、公開 Web サイトに掲載される前に、特定の品質管理基準を満たしていることが確認されます。

主要日程の研究

研究開始 (実際)

2016年3月8日

一次修了 (実際)

2018年3月20日

研究の完了 (実際)

2018年3月20日

試験登録日

最初に提出

2016年3月2日

QC基準を満たした最初の提出物

2016年3月7日

最初の投稿 (見積もり)

2016年3月11日

学習記録の更新

投稿された最後の更新 (実際)

2018年5月31日

QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました

2018年5月30日

最終確認日

2018年5月1日

詳しくは

本研究に関する用語

医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書

米国FDA規制医薬品の研究

いいえ

米国FDA規制機器製品の研究

いいえ

この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。

3
購読する