このページは自動翻訳されたものであり、翻訳の正確性は保証されていません。を参照してください。 英語版 ソーステキスト用。

Evaluation of Spinal Metastatic Tumour for Aggressive Spinal Sugery by Dual Energy CT

2021年2月2日 更新者:National Taiwan University Hospital
Metastatic vertebral disease is a major hazard for oncological patients because the performance and life quality will substantially deteriorate if presence of neoplastic compression. And the subsequent treatment and overall survival will be dismal. Restoration of vertebral stability and prevention of neurological deterioration are treatment goal. Surgical treatment is an important and effective method for metastatic spinal disease. For aggressive surgical method, long-term control is better. However, massive bleeding is often encountered in this surgery, and preoperative evaluation is very important for successful operation. Imaging play major role in this tasks. MRI, angiography, and nuclear medicine studies are common modalities, but take longer time and are often suboptimal. Dual-energy CT has the ability to detect contrast medium enhancement in osseous structure. It therefore is a potential optimal tool in the evaluate the metastatic spinal malignancy. It also own advantage of rapid scanning, optimal resolution, and easy reformatting.In this study, we intend to use this tool to establish the imaging biomarker for tumoural vascularity, to compare its performance with other modalities, and to investigate its optimal imaging condition, which will bring valuable information for treatment planning for aggressive spinal surgery before metastatic disease.

調査の概要

状態

完了

条件

詳細な説明

Spinal metastasis is the leading course of vertebral malignancy. It cause neoplastic spinal cord compression and neurological deficit. The treatment strategy depend on the pathological type, performance status, and life expectancy.(1, 2) The goal of treatment is to avoid neurological deterioration, to keep functional life, and to control bone pain. Because disease cure is rarely the treatment goal in the circumstance of metastatic disease, the treatment strategy involve multidisciplinary approaches. When evidence of neoplastic compression, local oncological treatment is often needed to preserve neurological function and to restore vertebral column stability. Radiation therapy can be applied for some radiosensitive tumour, but surgery is often required to meet above goal. Simple decompression and fixation is often applied, but the long-term control rate is suboptimal. Aggressive spinal surgery has relative longstanding effect to maintain neurological and oncological outcome in selective patients. (3)

Aggressive spinal surgery, including extensive corpectomy, vertebrotrectomy, and even spondylectomy, however, is a massive procedure and may result in large amount, sometime life-threatening blood loss. To achieve better surgical outcome and decrease complication, preoperative evaluation needs understanding the detailed skeleton and vascular anatomy. The status of vertebral column stability, extent of tumour involvement, condition of neurological tissue, and vascularity of the tumoural tissue, are all important in determination of the surgical planning and outcome. In many circumstances, preoperative embolization is often required to control blood loss as well.(4, 5) Imaging plays major role in the above information related to the surgical decision and planning.

Current preoperative imaging evaluation include MRI, angiography, bone scan and PET. (6) The MRI is paramount in the spinal imaging. It provides outstanding soft tissue differentiation, which usually depicting the abnormal tumoural tissue clearly. Therefore, MRI stands central role in the surgical evaluation. Nevertheless, in real world, many patients are frail to tolerate lengthy MRI study period, and the MR imaging quality is often suboptimal. For vascular survey, angiography is capable to demonstrate spinal artery and tumour vascularity. Since its relative invasiveness, it is only reserved for patients when preoperative embolization is required or detection of spinal artery is warranted. And because the angiography study for tumour involves selective catheterization of separate segmental artery, the global evaluation of tumoural tissue is not possible. As for nuclear medicine studies, including bone scan and PET, they are highly sensitive and very convenient in detecting multifocal disease. But they are relative non-specific for variable pathology and the spatial resolution is not adequate for surgical evaluation. Therefore, they provide less information when diagnosis has been established.

CT is an important imaging tool for spinal disease. Because of its rapid acquisition, adequate resolution, and easy reformatting, it is optimal for intolerable patients. (7) Nevertheless, osseous structure is extremely radiopaque, evaluation of tumoural enhancement in vertebrae is not easy. It is reserved in special condition, such as detection of vascular structure for embolization and surgery. Recently commercialized dual-energy CT (DECT) can meet the prior result of conventional CT with added value. (8) It uses different energy level simultaneously to image the object. Therefore, optimal bony removal and contrast-noise-ratio can be expected.(9, 10) In spinal disease, it has been used in the detection of marrow edema and compression fracture. (9, 11) On the other hand, material-specific information can be obtained, quantitative evaluation of tumoural enhancement by contrast medium is possible. (12) Along with imaging post-processing technique, DECT can highlight the tumoural part in the background of hyperdense bone. (13) DECT is a promising tool to study the vascularity of the metastatic vertebral tumour. This information is valuable for the surgeon in the decision making and planning for the operation.

We intend to use the dual energy CT in the preoperative evaluation of the vertebral metastasis before aggressive surgery. The research potential and purposes are manifold. First, we want to establish imaging biomarker for tumoural vascularity. Many different enhancement parameters as potential candidate will be measured. Second, we intend to establish one-stop imaging method; therefore, we will compare the diagnostic performance with other imaging modalities. Third, the optimal imaging parameter in the evaluation of bony lesion will be investigated, and many image technical condition will be studied.

Purpose:

  1. To establish the quantitative imaging biomarker for vascularity in metastatic vertebral tumour
  2. To obtain the optimal DECT scanning parameter and reformatting method in vertebral osseous tumour
  3. To provide detailed anatomical information for embolization and surgery

研究の種類

観察的

入学 (実際)

61

連絡先と場所

このセクションには、調査を実施する担当者の連絡先の詳細と、この調査が実施されている場所に関する情報が記載されています。

研究場所

      • Taipei、台湾
        • National Taiwan University Hospital

参加基準

研究者は、適格基準と呼ばれる特定の説明に適合する人を探します。これらの基準のいくつかの例は、人の一般的な健康状態または以前の治療です。

適格基準

就学可能な年齢

20年歳以上 (大人、高齢者)

健康ボランティアの受け入れ

いいえ

受講資格のある性別

全て

サンプリング方法

非確率サンプル

調査対象母集団

Patient with vertebral metastasis for aggressive spinal surgery

説明

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient with clinical suspicious for vertebral metastasis and operation is a treatment option
  2. Life expectancy more than 6 months
  3. Serum creatinine less than 2.0 mg/dL

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Age less than 20 year old
  2. Woman in pregnancy or breast feeding
  3. Serious allergic reaction to contrast medium

研究計画

このセクションでは、研究がどのように設計され、研究が何を測定しているかなど、研究計画の詳細を提供します。

研究はどのように設計されていますか?

デザインの詳細

この研究は何を測定していますか?

主要な結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
overall survivial
時間枠:5 year
overall survival after operation
5 year

二次結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
blood loss
時間枠:one week
during operation
one week

その他の成果指標

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
local recurrence
時間枠:5 years
local disease after operation
5 years

協力者と研究者

ここでは、この調査に関係する人々や組織を見つけることができます。

研究記録日

これらの日付は、ClinicalTrials.gov への研究記録と要約結果の提出の進捗状況を追跡します。研究記録と報告された結果は、国立医学図書館 (NLM) によって審査され、公開 Web サイトに掲載される前に、特定の品質管理基準を満たしていることが確認されます。

主要日程の研究

研究開始 (実際)

2018年8月10日

一次修了 (実際)

2020年10月29日

研究の完了 (実際)

2020年10月29日

試験登録日

最初に提出

2018年8月12日

QC基準を満たした最初の提出物

2018年8月12日

最初の投稿 (実際)

2018年8月15日

学習記録の更新

投稿された最後の更新 (実際)

2021年2月4日

QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました

2021年2月2日

最終確認日

2020年3月1日

詳しくは

本研究に関する用語

その他の研究ID番号

  • 201805119RINA

この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。

脊髄転移の臨床試験

3
購読する