記憶を改善するための刺激 (STIM)
軽度認知障害の治療としての高解像度経頭蓋直流刺激 (HD-tDCS) のテスト
調査の概要
詳細な説明
研究の種類
入学 (実際)
段階
- 適用できない
連絡先と場所
研究場所
-
-
Michigan
-
Ann Arbor、Michigan、アメリカ、48105
- University of Michigan
-
-
参加基準
適格基準
就学可能な年齢
健康ボランティアの受け入れ
説明
包含基準:
- 軽度認知障害(MCI)またはアルツハイマー型認知症(DAT)の診断
- MRI 対応である必要があり、高精細経頭蓋直流刺激 (HD-tDCS; 上半身または頭部に金属または電子インプラントがないなど) にも適用される基準
- -研究登録前の少なくとも4週間、関連する薬物療法で安定している
除外基準:
- 特定の神経疾患
- 特定の精神状態
- 重度の感覚障害
研究計画
研究はどのように設計されていますか?
デザインの詳細
- 主な目的:処理
- 割り当て:ランダム化
- 介入モデル:並列代入
- マスキング:トリプル
武器と介入
参加者グループ / アーム |
介入・治療 |
|---|---|
|
偽コンパレータ:シャム刺激
HD-tDCS 治療の偽 (プラセボ) 用量を 30 分間、5 ~ 30 セッションの間。
|
参加者は、偽 (プラセボ) HD-tDCS を 30 分間、5 ~ 30 セッションで受け取ります。
|
|
実験的:1 mA 投与刺激
HD-tDCS 治療の 1 ミリアンペアの用量を 30 分間、5 ~ 30 セッションの間。
|
参加者は、5 ~ 30 セッションの間、30 分間 1 mA で HD-tDCS を受け取ります。
|
|
実験的:2 mA 投与刺激
HD-tDCS 治療の 2 ミリアンペア線量を 30 分間、5 ~ 30 セッションの間。
|
参加者は、5 ~ 30 セッションの間、30 分間 2 mA で HD-tDCS を受け取ります。
|
|
実験的:3 mA 投与刺激
HD-tDCS 治療の 3 ミリアンペアの用量を 30 分間、5 ~ 30 セッションの間。
|
参加者は、5 ~ 30 セッションの間、30 分間 3 mA で HD-tDCS を受け取ります。
|
この研究は何を測定していますか?
主要な結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Lateral Temporal Cortex Connectivity
時間枠:Change from Baseline to Post-Intervention (after tDCS Session 5 - day 5 of treatment) and from Baseline to Post-Expansion (after the participant's final tDCS session beyond Session 5, up to 43 weeks).
|
Primary outcome focuses on default mode network (DMN) between-network functional connectivity because the lateral temporal cortex is a core component of the DMN.
Between-network functional connectivity is estimated from fMRI data as strength of temporal coupling between the DMN and other high-level (association) brain networks.
For each participant and time point, correlation-based connectivity (Pearson r; Fisher r-to-z transformed; arbitrary units) computed between DMN regions and other regions of the association cortex defined using standard functional atlas.
Higher values reflect stronger functional connectivity between DMN and other regions.
A Z-score's range is infinite.
Expected value is between -3 to 3. Analyses conducted separately for amyloid negative (A-) and amyloid positive (A+) participants.
Post Intervention data collection was on day 5 of treatment.
Post-Expansion (PE) appointments were not consecutive.
Mean time between enrollment and PE was 10 wks, longest was 43 wks.
|
Change from Baseline to Post-Intervention (after tDCS Session 5 - day 5 of treatment) and from Baseline to Post-Expansion (after the participant's final tDCS session beyond Session 5, up to 43 weeks).
|
二次結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Self-Report of Contentment With Memory
時間枠:Change from Baseline to Post-Intervention (after tDCS Session 5 - day 5 of treatment) and from Baseline to Post-Expansion (after the participant's final tDCS session beyond Session 5, up to 43 weeks).
|
The Multifactorial Memory Questionnaire (MMQ) consists of three scales measuring separate aspects of metamemory. Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale (0-4) based on the test taker's experiences over the previous two weeks. MMQ-Satisfaction (formerly called MMQ-Contentment) scale measures satisfaction, concern, and overall appraisal of one's own memory. Each of 18 statements is rated based on degree of agreement. The score range is 0 to 72, with higher scores indicating a higher degree of satisfaction. Post Intervention data collection was on day 5 of treatment. Post-Expansion (PE) appointments were not consecutive. Mean time between enrollment and PE was 10 wks, longest was 43 wks. |
Change from Baseline to Post-Intervention (after tDCS Session 5 - day 5 of treatment) and from Baseline to Post-Expansion (after the participant's final tDCS session beyond Session 5, up to 43 weeks).
|
|
Self-Report of Memory Mistakes
時間枠:Change from Baseline to Post-Intervention (after tDCS Session 5 - day 5 of treatment) and from Baseline to Post-Expansion (after the participant's final tDCS session beyond Session 5, up to 43 weeks).
|
Multifactorial Memory Questionnaire (MMQ) Ability Score - This scale measures self-perception of everyday memory ability. Respondents rate how often they experienced each of 20 common memory mistakes over the previous two weeks. The score range is 0 to 80, with higher scores indicating better self-reported memory ability. Post Intervention data collection was on day 5 of treatment. Post-Expansion (PE) appointments were not consecutive. Mean time between enrollment and PE was 10 wks, longest was 43 wks. |
Change from Baseline to Post-Intervention (after tDCS Session 5 - day 5 of treatment) and from Baseline to Post-Expansion (after the participant's final tDCS session beyond Session 5, up to 43 weeks).
|
|
Self-Report of Memory Strategies Used
時間枠:Change from Baseline to Post-Intervention (after tDCS Session 5 - day 5 of treatment) and from Baseline to Post-Expansion (after the participant's final tDCS session beyond Session 5, up to 43 weeks).
|
Multifactorial Memory Questionnaire (MMQ) Strategies Score - This scale measures the use of practical memory strategies and aids in day-to-day life. Respondents rate how often they used each of 19 memory strategies over the previous two weeks. The score range is 0 to 76, with higher scores indicating greater use of memory strategies. Post Intervention data collection was on day 5 of treatment. Post-Expansion (PE) appointments were not consecutive. Mean time between enrollment and PE was 10 wks, longest was 43 wks. |
Change from Baseline to Post-Intervention (after tDCS Session 5 - day 5 of treatment) and from Baseline to Post-Expansion (after the participant's final tDCS session beyond Session 5, up to 43 weeks).
|
|
Change in Memory Functioning
時間枠:Change from Baseline to Post-Intervention (after tDCS Session 5 - day 5 of treatment) and from Baseline to Post-Expansion (after the participant's final tDCS session beyond Session 5, up to 43 weeks).
|
The Repeatable Battery of the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) is a comprehensive neuropsychological battery for the evaluation of global cognition.
The delayed memory section is a measure of delayed recall and recognition for verbal and visual information.
It includes the subtests List Recall, List Recognition, Story Memory, and Figure Recall.
Low scores on this index indicate difficulties with recognition and retrieval of information from long-term memory stores This index is composed of both auditory and visual measures; therefore, a severe deficit in language, auditory processing, or visual functioning may impact one of the measures more than the other.
Analysis included the sum of the raw scores for each of the delayed memory subtests, with possible scores ranging from 0 to 62. Post Intervention data collection was on day 5 of treatment.
Post-Expansion (PE) appointments were not consecutive.
Mean time between enrollment and PE was 10 wks, longest was 43 wks.
|
Change from Baseline to Post-Intervention (after tDCS Session 5 - day 5 of treatment) and from Baseline to Post-Expansion (after the participant's final tDCS session beyond Session 5, up to 43 weeks).
|
|
Change in Overall Fluid Cognitive Abilities
時間枠:Change from Baseline to Post-Intervention (after tDCS Session 5 - day 5 of treatment) and from Baseline to Post-Expansion (after the participant's final tDCS session beyond Session 5, up to 43 weeks).
|
Cognitive function was determined using the NIH Toolbox-Cognition Battery computerized tests, specifically the Fluid composite score. It is derived by averaging the subtests in the Fluid domain to achieve an overall standard score. Fully Corrected T-scores are adjusted for for age, gender, race/ethnicity, and educational attainment. The score compares the score of the participant to those in the NIH Toolbox nationally representative normative sampling. The T-score has a mean of 50 in the general population and a SD of 10. Scores higher than the mean indicate better performance. Post Intervention data collection was on day 5 of treatment. Post-Expansion (PE) appointments were not consecutive. Mean time between enrollment and PE was 10 wks, longest was 43 wks. |
Change from Baseline to Post-Intervention (after tDCS Session 5 - day 5 of treatment) and from Baseline to Post-Expansion (after the participant's final tDCS session beyond Session 5, up to 43 weeks).
|
|
Cumulative Working Memory Effects of HD-tDCS Across Treatment Sessions
時間枠:Change from Baseline to Post-Intervention (after tDCS Session 5 - day 5 of treatment) and from Baseline to Post-Expansion (after the participant's final tDCS session beyond Session 5, up to 43 weeks).
|
The n-back test is a working memory task where participants identify stimulus that matches stimulus experienced "n" steps back. Participants performed a 2-back test, in which they were asked to remember and press a button when shown a stimulus that appeared 2 steps before the current one (e.g. square, circle, square). The number of correct and incorrect identifications are normalized (z-score). Total score is the z-score of correct button presses minus the z-score of incorrect button presses. A higher score (d') reflects better working memory performance. Possible scores range from -4.85 to 4.85. Positive change (increase) in 2-back score across treatment sessions indicates improvement in working memory performance. Data is shown as the mean slope calculation of participants across first 5 days of treatment and across all treatments, x=days of treatment, y=n-back score. Post-Expansion (PE) appointments were not consecutive. Mean time between enrollment and PE was 10 wks. |
Change from Baseline to Post-Intervention (after tDCS Session 5 - day 5 of treatment) and from Baseline to Post-Expansion (after the participant's final tDCS session beyond Session 5, up to 43 weeks).
|
|
Cumulative Memory Accuracy Effects of HD-tDCS Across Treatment Sessions
時間枠:Change from Baseline to Post-Intervention (after tDCS Session 5 - day 5 of treatment) and from Baseline to Post-Expansion (after the participant's final tDCS session beyond Session 5, up to 43 weeks).
|
Paired Associates task is a verbal memory task that asks participants to learn a list of word pairs. After a delay, participants are shown correct and mismatched word pairs one at a time and asked to identify if the displayed word pair was from the list they were asked to learn or not. Total accuracy is a proportion (total correct responses divided by total trials completed) ranging from 0 to 1 that measures the accuracy of a participant's responses to both correct and mismatched word pairs. Higher scores indicate better verbal memory performance, and positive changes over time indicate an improvement in verbal memory performance, measured after baseline (Session 1) and every intervention session (Sessions 2-5) Data is shown as the mean slope calculation of participants across first 5 days of treatment and across all treatments, x=days of treatment, y= total accuracy. Post-Expansion (PE) appointments were not consecutive. Mean time between enrollment and PE was 10 wks. |
Change from Baseline to Post-Intervention (after tDCS Session 5 - day 5 of treatment) and from Baseline to Post-Expansion (after the participant's final tDCS session beyond Session 5, up to 43 weeks).
|
|
Cumulative Memory Sensitivity Effects of HD-tDCS Across Daily Sessions
時間枠:Baseline
|
Verbal memory performance for computerized Paired Associates task, summarized with a computational model (linear ballistic accumulator decision model).
The model uses each participant's accuracy and reaction times across trials to estimate how efficiently they accumulate information to distinguish previously studied (target) word pairs from new (lure) pairs.
Reported outcome is the average memory sensitivity score at baseline, expressed as unitless model values (scores on a scale) where higher scores indicate better discrimination, scores near zero indicate chance-level performance, and negative scores (if present) indicate performance worse than chance.
|
Baseline
|
|
Tolerability of HD-tDCS
時間枠:Assessed immediately after each HD-tDCS session (participants received up to 30 sessions over approximately 1-12 weeks); values represent mean symptom burden averaged across all post-stimulation assessments
|
Tolerability was assessed using the HD-tDCS Safety Questionnaire, an 11-item symptom checklist.
The questionnaire assesses the presence (yes/no) of 10 specific self-reported symptoms (Itching, Burning, Tingling, Scalp Pain, Trouble Concentrating, Sleep problems, Headache, Mood Change, Neck Pain, and Other symptoms) and 1 oberserved symptom, Skin Redness.
Skin Redness was excluded from this analysis as it is not related to the participant's perception of tolerability.
The total score (symptom burden) was calculated by summing the number of symptoms present across the 10 items for each session.
Score range: 0 to 10 symptoms, where 0 = no symptoms present and 10 = all symptoms present.
Higher scores indicate worse tolerability (more symptoms experienced).
Values represent the mean number of symptoms per session, calculated by averaging symptom burden scores across all post-stimulation assessments within each treatment group.
|
Assessed immediately after each HD-tDCS session (participants received up to 30 sessions over approximately 1-12 weeks); values represent mean symptom burden averaged across all post-stimulation assessments
|
|
Effectiveness of Blinding of HD-tDCS
時間枠:Assessed immediately after each HD-tDCS session (participants received up to 30 sessions over approximately 1-12 weeks)
|
Participant's perception of treatment assignment assessed after each stimulation session using a 3-category ordinal scale.
Participants guessed whether they received: (0) Sham stimulation, (1) Don't Know, or (2) Active stimulation.
The scale is ordinal with Sham < Don't Know < Active.
Effective blinding is indicated by no significant difference in the distribution of perceived assignment between active and sham groups (i.e., participants in active groups cannot reliably distinguish their treatment from sham).
Higher proportional odds ratios would indicate active group participants were more likely to guess "active"; lower ratios would indicate sham participants were more likely to guess "active" (paradoxical pattern suggesting convincing sham condition).
|
Assessed immediately after each HD-tDCS session (participants received up to 30 sessions over approximately 1-12 weeks)
|
|
Change in Default Mode Network Connectivity
時間枠:Change from Baseline to Post-Intervention (after tDCS Session 5 - day 5 of treatment) and from Baseline to Post-Expansion (after the participant's final tDCS session beyond Session 5, up to 43 weeks).
|
The outcome focuses on default mode network (DMN) within-network functional connectivity. Within-network functional connectivity is estimated from fMRI data as strength of temporal coupling within DMN regions (nodes). For each participant and time point, correlation-based connectivity (Pearson r; Fisher r-to-z transformed; arbitrary units) was computed between DMN regions defined using a standard functional atlas. Higher values reflect stronger functional connectivity within DMN. A Z-score's range is infinite. Expected value is around -3 to 3. Analyses are conducted separately for amyloid negative (A-) and amyloid positive (A+) participants. Post Intervention data collection was on day 5 of treatment. Post-Expansion (PE) appointments were not consecutive. Mean time between enrollment and PE was 10 wks, longest was 43 wks. |
Change from Baseline to Post-Intervention (after tDCS Session 5 - day 5 of treatment) and from Baseline to Post-Expansion (after the participant's final tDCS session beyond Session 5, up to 43 weeks).
|
|
Cumulative Cognitive Change Across Daily Consecutive Sessions
時間枠:Change from Baseline to Post-Intervention (after tDCS Session 5 - day 5 of treatment) and from Baseline to Post-Expansion (after the participant's final tDCS session beyond Session 5, up to 43 weeks).
|
Measured through change in Cogstate or other comparable computerized cognitive testing scores across consecutive daily sessions.
|
Change from Baseline to Post-Intervention (after tDCS Session 5 - day 5 of treatment) and from Baseline to Post-Expansion (after the participant's final tDCS session beyond Session 5, up to 43 weeks).
|
|
Change in Global Cognition
時間枠:Change from Baseline to Post-Intervention (after tDCS Session 5 - day 5 of treatment) and from Baseline to Post-Expansion (after the participant's final tDCS session beyond Session 5, up to 43 weeks).
|
The Repeatable Battery of the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) is a comprehensive neuropsychological battery for the evaluation of global cognition and has been validated in subjects with mild cognitive impairment, moderate to severe traumatic brain injuries, vascular dementias, and Alzheimer's disease. Data was analyzed using the sum of the subtest raw scores, which is an indicator of the general cognitive functioning of the examinee. Low scores suggest general cognitive impairment even when some individual subtest scores may be within normal limits. Individuals with low scores on this measure exhibit problems with attention, memory, language, and construction skills. Possible scores range from 0 to 321. Post Intervention data collection was on day 5 of treatment. Post-Expansion (PE) appointments were not consecutive. Mean time between enrollment and PE was 10 wks, longest was 43 wks. |
Change from Baseline to Post-Intervention (after tDCS Session 5 - day 5 of treatment) and from Baseline to Post-Expansion (after the participant's final tDCS session beyond Session 5, up to 43 weeks).
|
その他の成果指標
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
抑制能力の変化
時間枠:ベースラインと介入後 (tDCS セッション 5 & 30 後)
|
NIH ツールボックス フランカー抑制制御および注意テスト スコアの変更を通じて測定するアプリオリな意図
|
ベースラインと介入後 (tDCS セッション 5 & 30 後)
|
|
構想力の変化
時間枠:ベースラインと介入後 (tDCS セッション 5 & 30 後)
|
NIH Toolbox Dimensional Change Card Sort Test Score の変化によって測定するアプリオリな意図
|
ベースラインと介入後 (tDCS セッション 5 & 30 後)
|
|
ピクチャ シーケンス メモリの変更
時間枠:ベースラインと介入後 (tDCS セッション 5 & 30 後)
|
NIH ツールボックスの画像シーケンス メモリ テスト スコアの変化を通じて測定するアプリオリな意図
|
ベースラインと介入後 (tDCS セッション 5 & 30 後)
|
|
ワーキングメモリー能力の変化
時間枠:ベースラインと介入後 (tDCS セッション 5 & 30 後)
|
NIH ツールボックス リスト ソーティング ワーキング メモリ テスト スコアの変更を通じて測定するアプリオリな意図
|
ベースラインと介入後 (tDCS セッション 5 & 30 後)
|
|
処理速度の変化
時間枠:ベースラインと介入後 (tDCS セッション 5 & 30 後)
|
NIH ツールボックス パターン比較処理速度テスト スコアの変化を通じて測定するアプリオリな意図
|
ベースラインと介入後 (tDCS セッション 5 & 30 後)
|
|
視空間機能の変化
時間枠:ベースラインと介入後 (tDCS セッション 5 & 30 後)
|
RBANS 視覚空間インデックス スコアの変化によって測定
|
ベースラインと介入後 (tDCS セッション 5 & 30 後)
|
|
言語機能の変化
時間枠:ベースラインと介入後 (tDCS セッション 5 & 30 後)
|
RBANS 言語インデックス スコアの変化によって測定
|
ベースラインと介入後 (tDCS セッション 5 & 30 後)
|
|
注意の変化
時間枠:ベースラインと介入後 (tDCS セッション 5 & 30 後)
|
RBANS Attention Index スコアの変化によって測定
|
ベースラインと介入後 (tDCS セッション 5 & 30 後)
|
|
記憶機能の変化
時間枠:ベースラインと介入後 (tDCS セッション 5 & 30 後)
|
RBANS Immediate Memory Index スコアの変化によって測定
|
ベースラインと介入後 (tDCS セッション 5 & 30 後)
|
|
認知機能の変化
時間枠:ベースラインと介入後 (tDCS セッション 5 & 30 後)
|
RBANS サブテストのスコアの変化を通じて測定するアプリオリな意図
|
ベースラインと介入後 (tDCS セッション 5 & 30 後)
|
協力者と研究者
スポンサー
捜査官
- 主任研究者:Benjamin Hampstead, PhD、Associate professor
研究記録日
主要日程の研究
研究開始 (実際)
一次修了 (実際)
研究の完了 (実際)
試験登録日
最初に提出
QC基準を満たした最初の提出物
最初の投稿 (実際)
学習記録の更新
投稿された最後の更新 (実際)
QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました
最終確認日
詳しくは
本研究に関する用語
その他の研究ID番号
- HUM00146180
- 1R01AG058724 (米国 NIH グラント/契約)
個々の参加者データ (IPD) の計画
個々の参加者データ (IPD) を共有する予定はありますか?
医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書
米国FDA規制医薬品の研究
米国FDA規制機器製品の研究
米国で製造され、米国から輸出された製品。
この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。