Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

Stimulation zur Verbesserung des Gedächtnisses (STIM)

29. Juni 2026 aktualisiert von: Benjamin Hampstead, PhD, University of Michigan

Testen der hochauflösenden transkraniellen Gleichstromstimulation (HD-tDCS) als Behandlung von leichter kognitiver Beeinträchtigung

Diese Studie wird die Wirkungen verschiedener Dosen einer Form der nicht-invasiven Hirnstimulation zur Behandlung von Personen mit leichter kognitiver Beeinträchtigung (MCI) und Demenz vom Alzheimer-Typ (DAT) testen.

Studienübersicht

Detaillierte Beschreibung

Diese Forschungsstudie wird durchgeführt, um wichtige Informationen über die Auswirkungen einer schwachen elektrischen Stimulation auf die Gehirnfunktion bei Personen mit leichter kognitiver Beeinträchtigung (MCI) und Demenz vom Alzheimer-Typ (DAT) zu erhalten. Die Ergebnisse werden dabei helfen zu bestimmen, „wie viel“ Stimulation benötigt wird, um das Gedächtnis und die Denkfähigkeit zu verbessern, wie sie die Gehirnfunktion beeinflusst und wer am wahrscheinlichsten davon profitiert. Letztendlich können diese Informationen die Behandlungsbemühungen für Menschen in verschiedenen Stadien der Alzheimer-Krankheit leiten. Die Studie wird Bildgebung des Gehirns verwenden, um zu sehen, ob diese Behandlungen die Art und Weise verändern, wie die Teilnehmer Informationen lernen und sich daran erinnern. Es werden funktionelle Magnetresonanztomographie (fMRT) und Positronen-Emissions-Tomographie (PET)-Scans verwendet. Die Studie wird auch kognitive Tests und Fragebögen verwenden, um zu untersuchen, ob sich das Gedächtnis (und die damit verbundenen Fähigkeiten) der Teilnehmer aufgrund der Behandlung verändert. In die Studie werden Teilnehmer mit einer MCI- oder DAT-Diagnose aufgenommen. Es wird erwartet, ist aber nicht erforderlich, dass die Teilnehmer am Memory and Aging Project der University of Michigan (UM-MAP; HUM00000382) teilnehmen.

Studientyp

Interventionell

Einschreibung (Tatsächlich)

233

Phase

  • Unzutreffend

Kontakte und Standorte

Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.

Studienorte

    • Michigan
      • Ann Arbor, Michigan, Vereinigte Staaten, 48105
        • University of Michigan

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

55 Jahre und älter (Erwachsene, Älterer Erwachsener)

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Nein

Beschreibung

Einschlusskriterien:

  1. Diagnose von Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) oder Demenz vom Alzheimer-Typ (DAT)
  2. Muss MRT-kompatibel sein, Kriterien, die auch für die transkranielle High-Definition-Gleichstromstimulation (HD-tDCS) gelten; z. B. das Fehlen metallischer oder elektronischer Implantate im Oberkörper oder Kopf
  3. Stabil auf relevanten Medikamenten für mindestens 4 Wochen vor Studieneinschluss

Ausschlusskriterien:

  1. Bestimmte neurologische Erkrankungen
  2. Bestimmte psychiatrische Erkrankungen
  3. Schwere sensorische Beeinträchtigung

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

  • Hauptzweck: Behandlung
  • Zuteilung: Zufällig
  • Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
  • Maskierung: Verdreifachen

Waffen und Interventionen

Teilnehmergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandlung
Schein-Komparator: Scheinstimulation
Schein-(Placebo-)Dosis der HD-tDCS-Behandlung für 30 Minuten für zwischen 5-30 Sitzungen.
Die Teilnehmer erhalten Schein (Placebo) HD-tDCS für 30 Minuten für zwischen 5-30 Sitzungen.
Experimental: 1 mA Dosierung Stimulation
1 Milliampere-Dosis der HD-tDCS-Behandlung für 30 Minuten für zwischen 5-30 Sitzungen.
Die Teilnehmer erhalten HD-tDCS bei 1 mA für 30 Minuten für zwischen 5-30 Sitzungen.
Experimental: 2 mA Dosierung Stimulation
2-Milliampere-Dosis HD-tDCS-Behandlung für 30 Minuten für zwischen 5-30 Sitzungen.
Die Teilnehmer erhalten HD-tDCS bei 2 mA für 30 Minuten für zwischen 5-30 Sitzungen.
Experimental: 3-mA-Dosis-Stimulation
3-Milliampere-Dosis HD-tDCS-Behandlung für 30 Minuten für zwischen 5-30 Sitzungen.
Die Teilnehmer erhalten HD-tDCS bei 3 mA für 30 Minuten für zwischen 5-30 Sitzungen.

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Change in Lateral Temporal Cortex Connectivity
Zeitfenster: Change from Baseline to Post-Intervention (after tDCS Session 5 - day 5 of treatment) and from Baseline to Post-Expansion (after the participant's final tDCS session beyond Session 5, up to 43 weeks).
Primary outcome focuses on default mode network (DMN) between-network functional connectivity because the lateral temporal cortex is a core component of the DMN. Between-network functional connectivity is estimated from fMRI data as strength of temporal coupling between the DMN and other high-level (association) brain networks. For each participant and time point, correlation-based connectivity (Pearson r; Fisher r-to-z transformed; arbitrary units) computed between DMN regions and other regions of the association cortex defined using standard functional atlas. Higher values reflect stronger functional connectivity between DMN and other regions. A Z-score's range is infinite. Expected value is between -3 to 3. Analyses conducted separately for amyloid negative (A-) and amyloid positive (A+) participants. Post Intervention data collection was on day 5 of treatment. Post-Expansion (PE) appointments were not consecutive. Mean time between enrollment and PE was 10 wks, longest was 43 wks.
Change from Baseline to Post-Intervention (after tDCS Session 5 - day 5 of treatment) and from Baseline to Post-Expansion (after the participant's final tDCS session beyond Session 5, up to 43 weeks).

Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Self-Report of Contentment With Memory
Zeitfenster: Change from Baseline to Post-Intervention (after tDCS Session 5 - day 5 of treatment) and from Baseline to Post-Expansion (after the participant's final tDCS session beyond Session 5, up to 43 weeks).

The Multifactorial Memory Questionnaire (MMQ) consists of three scales measuring separate aspects of metamemory. Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale (0-4) based on the test taker's experiences over the previous two weeks.

MMQ-Satisfaction (formerly called MMQ-Contentment) scale measures satisfaction, concern, and overall appraisal of one's own memory. Each of 18 statements is rated based on degree of agreement. The score range is 0 to 72, with higher scores indicating a higher degree of satisfaction.

Post Intervention data collection was on day 5 of treatment. Post-Expansion (PE) appointments were not consecutive. Mean time between enrollment and PE was 10 wks, longest was 43 wks.

Change from Baseline to Post-Intervention (after tDCS Session 5 - day 5 of treatment) and from Baseline to Post-Expansion (after the participant's final tDCS session beyond Session 5, up to 43 weeks).
Self-Report of Memory Mistakes
Zeitfenster: Change from Baseline to Post-Intervention (after tDCS Session 5 - day 5 of treatment) and from Baseline to Post-Expansion (after the participant's final tDCS session beyond Session 5, up to 43 weeks).

Multifactorial Memory Questionnaire (MMQ) Ability Score - This scale measures self-perception of everyday memory ability. Respondents rate how often they experienced each of 20 common memory mistakes over the previous two weeks. The score range is 0 to 80, with higher scores indicating better self-reported memory ability.

Post Intervention data collection was on day 5 of treatment. Post-Expansion (PE) appointments were not consecutive. Mean time between enrollment and PE was 10 wks, longest was 43 wks.

Change from Baseline to Post-Intervention (after tDCS Session 5 - day 5 of treatment) and from Baseline to Post-Expansion (after the participant's final tDCS session beyond Session 5, up to 43 weeks).
Self-Report of Memory Strategies Used
Zeitfenster: Change from Baseline to Post-Intervention (after tDCS Session 5 - day 5 of treatment) and from Baseline to Post-Expansion (after the participant's final tDCS session beyond Session 5, up to 43 weeks).

Multifactorial Memory Questionnaire (MMQ) Strategies Score - This scale measures the use of practical memory strategies and aids in day-to-day life. Respondents rate how often they used each of 19 memory strategies over the previous two weeks. The score range is 0 to 76, with higher scores indicating greater use of memory strategies.

Post Intervention data collection was on day 5 of treatment. Post-Expansion (PE) appointments were not consecutive. Mean time between enrollment and PE was 10 wks, longest was 43 wks.

Change from Baseline to Post-Intervention (after tDCS Session 5 - day 5 of treatment) and from Baseline to Post-Expansion (after the participant's final tDCS session beyond Session 5, up to 43 weeks).
Change in Memory Functioning
Zeitfenster: Change from Baseline to Post-Intervention (after tDCS Session 5 - day 5 of treatment) and from Baseline to Post-Expansion (after the participant's final tDCS session beyond Session 5, up to 43 weeks).
The Repeatable Battery of the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) is a comprehensive neuropsychological battery for the evaluation of global cognition. The delayed memory section is a measure of delayed recall and recognition for verbal and visual information. It includes the subtests List Recall, List Recognition, Story Memory, and Figure Recall. Low scores on this index indicate difficulties with recognition and retrieval of information from long-term memory stores This index is composed of both auditory and visual measures; therefore, a severe deficit in language, auditory processing, or visual functioning may impact one of the measures more than the other. Analysis included the sum of the raw scores for each of the delayed memory subtests, with possible scores ranging from 0 to 62. Post Intervention data collection was on day 5 of treatment. Post-Expansion (PE) appointments were not consecutive. Mean time between enrollment and PE was 10 wks, longest was 43 wks.
Change from Baseline to Post-Intervention (after tDCS Session 5 - day 5 of treatment) and from Baseline to Post-Expansion (after the participant's final tDCS session beyond Session 5, up to 43 weeks).
Change in Overall Fluid Cognitive Abilities
Zeitfenster: Change from Baseline to Post-Intervention (after tDCS Session 5 - day 5 of treatment) and from Baseline to Post-Expansion (after the participant's final tDCS session beyond Session 5, up to 43 weeks).

Cognitive function was determined using the NIH Toolbox-Cognition Battery computerized tests, specifically the Fluid composite score. It is derived by averaging the subtests in the Fluid domain to achieve an overall standard score. Fully Corrected T-scores are adjusted for for age, gender, race/ethnicity, and educational attainment. The score compares the score of the participant to those in the NIH Toolbox nationally representative normative sampling. The T-score has a mean of 50 in the general population and a SD of 10. Scores higher than the mean indicate better performance.

Post Intervention data collection was on day 5 of treatment. Post-Expansion (PE) appointments were not consecutive. Mean time between enrollment and PE was 10 wks, longest was 43 wks.

Change from Baseline to Post-Intervention (after tDCS Session 5 - day 5 of treatment) and from Baseline to Post-Expansion (after the participant's final tDCS session beyond Session 5, up to 43 weeks).
Cumulative Working Memory Effects of HD-tDCS Across Treatment Sessions
Zeitfenster: Change from Baseline to Post-Intervention (after tDCS Session 5 - day 5 of treatment) and from Baseline to Post-Expansion (after the participant's final tDCS session beyond Session 5, up to 43 weeks).

The n-back test is a working memory task where participants identify stimulus that matches stimulus experienced "n" steps back. Participants performed a 2-back test, in which they were asked to remember and press a button when shown a stimulus that appeared 2 steps before the current one (e.g. square, circle, square).

The number of correct and incorrect identifications are normalized (z-score). Total score is the z-score of correct button presses minus the z-score of incorrect button presses. A higher score (d') reflects better working memory performance. Possible scores range from -4.85 to 4.85. Positive change (increase) in 2-back score across treatment sessions indicates improvement in working memory performance. Data is shown as the mean slope calculation of participants across first 5 days of treatment and across all treatments, x=days of treatment, y=n-back score.

Post-Expansion (PE) appointments were not consecutive. Mean time between enrollment and PE was 10 wks.

Change from Baseline to Post-Intervention (after tDCS Session 5 - day 5 of treatment) and from Baseline to Post-Expansion (after the participant's final tDCS session beyond Session 5, up to 43 weeks).
Cumulative Memory Accuracy Effects of HD-tDCS Across Treatment Sessions
Zeitfenster: Change from Baseline to Post-Intervention (after tDCS Session 5 - day 5 of treatment) and from Baseline to Post-Expansion (after the participant's final tDCS session beyond Session 5, up to 43 weeks).

Paired Associates task is a verbal memory task that asks participants to learn a list of word pairs. After a delay, participants are shown correct and mismatched word pairs one at a time and asked to identify if the displayed word pair was from the list they were asked to learn or not.

Total accuracy is a proportion (total correct responses divided by total trials completed) ranging from 0 to 1 that measures the accuracy of a participant's responses to both correct and mismatched word pairs. Higher scores indicate better verbal memory performance, and positive changes over time indicate an improvement in verbal memory performance, measured after baseline (Session 1) and every intervention session (Sessions 2-5)

Data is shown as the mean slope calculation of participants across first 5 days of treatment and across all treatments, x=days of treatment, y= total accuracy.

Post-Expansion (PE) appointments were not consecutive. Mean time between enrollment and PE was 10 wks.

Change from Baseline to Post-Intervention (after tDCS Session 5 - day 5 of treatment) and from Baseline to Post-Expansion (after the participant's final tDCS session beyond Session 5, up to 43 weeks).
Cumulative Memory Sensitivity Effects of HD-tDCS Across Daily Sessions
Zeitfenster: Baseline
Verbal memory performance for computerized Paired Associates task, summarized with a computational model (linear ballistic accumulator decision model). The model uses each participant's accuracy and reaction times across trials to estimate how efficiently they accumulate information to distinguish previously studied (target) word pairs from new (lure) pairs. Reported outcome is the average memory sensitivity score at baseline, expressed as unitless model values (scores on a scale) where higher scores indicate better discrimination, scores near zero indicate chance-level performance, and negative scores (if present) indicate performance worse than chance.
Baseline
Tolerability of HD-tDCS
Zeitfenster: Assessed immediately after each HD-tDCS session (participants received up to 30 sessions over approximately 1-12 weeks); values represent mean symptom burden averaged across all post-stimulation assessments
Tolerability was assessed using the HD-tDCS Safety Questionnaire, an 11-item symptom checklist. The questionnaire assesses the presence (yes/no) of 10 specific self-reported symptoms (Itching, Burning, Tingling, Scalp Pain, Trouble Concentrating, Sleep problems, Headache, Mood Change, Neck Pain, and Other symptoms) and 1 oberserved symptom, Skin Redness. Skin Redness was excluded from this analysis as it is not related to the participant's perception of tolerability. The total score (symptom burden) was calculated by summing the number of symptoms present across the 10 items for each session. Score range: 0 to 10 symptoms, where 0 = no symptoms present and 10 = all symptoms present. Higher scores indicate worse tolerability (more symptoms experienced). Values represent the mean number of symptoms per session, calculated by averaging symptom burden scores across all post-stimulation assessments within each treatment group.
Assessed immediately after each HD-tDCS session (participants received up to 30 sessions over approximately 1-12 weeks); values represent mean symptom burden averaged across all post-stimulation assessments
Effectiveness of Blinding of HD-tDCS
Zeitfenster: Assessed immediately after each HD-tDCS session (participants received up to 30 sessions over approximately 1-12 weeks)
Participant's perception of treatment assignment assessed after each stimulation session using a 3-category ordinal scale. Participants guessed whether they received: (0) Sham stimulation, (1) Don't Know, or (2) Active stimulation. The scale is ordinal with Sham < Don't Know < Active. Effective blinding is indicated by no significant difference in the distribution of perceived assignment between active and sham groups (i.e., participants in active groups cannot reliably distinguish their treatment from sham). Higher proportional odds ratios would indicate active group participants were more likely to guess "active"; lower ratios would indicate sham participants were more likely to guess "active" (paradoxical pattern suggesting convincing sham condition).
Assessed immediately after each HD-tDCS session (participants received up to 30 sessions over approximately 1-12 weeks)
Change in Default Mode Network Connectivity
Zeitfenster: Change from Baseline to Post-Intervention (after tDCS Session 5 - day 5 of treatment) and from Baseline to Post-Expansion (after the participant's final tDCS session beyond Session 5, up to 43 weeks).

The outcome focuses on default mode network (DMN) within-network functional connectivity. Within-network functional connectivity is estimated from fMRI data as strength of temporal coupling within DMN regions (nodes). For each participant and time point, correlation-based connectivity (Pearson r; Fisher r-to-z transformed; arbitrary units) was computed between DMN regions defined using a standard functional atlas. Higher values reflect stronger functional connectivity within DMN. A Z-score's range is infinite. Expected value is around -3 to 3. Analyses are conducted separately for amyloid negative (A-) and amyloid positive (A+) participants.

Post Intervention data collection was on day 5 of treatment. Post-Expansion (PE) appointments were not consecutive. Mean time between enrollment and PE was 10 wks, longest was 43 wks.

Change from Baseline to Post-Intervention (after tDCS Session 5 - day 5 of treatment) and from Baseline to Post-Expansion (after the participant's final tDCS session beyond Session 5, up to 43 weeks).
Cumulative Cognitive Change Across Daily Consecutive Sessions
Zeitfenster: Change from Baseline to Post-Intervention (after tDCS Session 5 - day 5 of treatment) and from Baseline to Post-Expansion (after the participant's final tDCS session beyond Session 5, up to 43 weeks).
Measured through change in Cogstate or other comparable computerized cognitive testing scores across consecutive daily sessions.
Change from Baseline to Post-Intervention (after tDCS Session 5 - day 5 of treatment) and from Baseline to Post-Expansion (after the participant's final tDCS session beyond Session 5, up to 43 weeks).
Change in Global Cognition
Zeitfenster: Change from Baseline to Post-Intervention (after tDCS Session 5 - day 5 of treatment) and from Baseline to Post-Expansion (after the participant's final tDCS session beyond Session 5, up to 43 weeks).

The Repeatable Battery of the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) is a comprehensive neuropsychological battery for the evaluation of global cognition and has been validated in subjects with mild cognitive impairment, moderate to severe traumatic brain injuries, vascular dementias, and Alzheimer's disease. Data was analyzed using the sum of the subtest raw scores, which is an indicator of the general cognitive functioning of the examinee. Low scores suggest general cognitive impairment even when some individual subtest scores may be within normal limits. Individuals with low scores on this measure exhibit problems with attention, memory, language, and construction skills. Possible scores range from 0 to 321.

Post Intervention data collection was on day 5 of treatment. Post-Expansion (PE) appointments were not consecutive. Mean time between enrollment and PE was 10 wks, longest was 43 wks.

Change from Baseline to Post-Intervention (after tDCS Session 5 - day 5 of treatment) and from Baseline to Post-Expansion (after the participant's final tDCS session beyond Session 5, up to 43 weeks).

Andere Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Änderung der Hemmungsfähigkeit
Zeitfenster: Baseline und Post-Intervention (nach tDCS-Sitzungen 5 & 30)
A priori Absicht, durch Änderung des NIH Toolbox Flanker Inhibitory Control and Attention Test Score zu messen
Baseline und Post-Intervention (nach tDCS-Sitzungen 5 & 30)
Veränderung der Konzeptualisierungsfähigkeit
Zeitfenster: Baseline und Post-Intervention (nach tDCS-Sitzungen 5 & 30)
A priori Absicht, durch Änderung in der NIH Toolbox Dimensional Change Card Sort Test Score zu messen
Baseline und Post-Intervention (nach tDCS-Sitzungen 5 & 30)
Änderung im Bildfolgespeicher
Zeitfenster: Baseline und Post-Intervention (nach tDCS-Sitzungen 5 & 30)
A priori beabsichtigt, durch Änderung des NIH Toolbox Picture Sequence Memory Test Score zu messen
Baseline und Post-Intervention (nach tDCS-Sitzungen 5 & 30)
Änderung der Arbeitsgedächtnisfähigkeit
Zeitfenster: Baseline und Post-Intervention (nach tDCS-Sitzungen 5 & 30)
A priori Absicht zur Messung durch Änderung des NIH Toolbox List Sorting Working Memory Test Score
Baseline und Post-Intervention (nach tDCS-Sitzungen 5 & 30)
Änderung der Verarbeitungsgeschwindigkeit
Zeitfenster: Baseline und Post-Intervention (nach tDCS-Sitzungen 5 & 30)
A priori Absicht, durch Änderung des NIH Toolbox Pattern Comparison Processing Speed ​​Test Score zu messen
Baseline und Post-Intervention (nach tDCS-Sitzungen 5 & 30)
Veränderung der visuell-räumlichen Funktionsweise
Zeitfenster: Baseline und Post-Intervention (nach tDCS-Sitzungen 5 & 30)
Gemessen durch Veränderung des RBANS Visuospatial Index-Scores
Baseline und Post-Intervention (nach tDCS-Sitzungen 5 & 30)
Änderung der Sprachfunktion
Zeitfenster: Baseline und Post-Intervention (nach tDCS-Sitzungen 5 & 30)
Gemessen durch die Änderung des RBANS-Sprachindex-Scores
Baseline und Post-Intervention (nach tDCS-Sitzungen 5 & 30)
Änderung der Aufmerksamkeit
Zeitfenster: Baseline und Post-Intervention (nach tDCS-Sitzungen 5 & 30)
Gemessen durch die Veränderung des RBANS-Aufmerksamkeitsindex-Scores
Baseline und Post-Intervention (nach tDCS-Sitzungen 5 & 30)
Änderung der Speicherfunktion
Zeitfenster: Baseline und Post-Intervention (nach tDCS-Sitzungen 5 & 30)
Gemessen durch die Veränderung des RBANS Immediate Memory Index-Scores
Baseline und Post-Intervention (nach tDCS-Sitzungen 5 & 30)
Veränderung der kognitiven Funktionsweise
Zeitfenster: Baseline und Post-Intervention (nach tDCS-Sitzungen 5 & 30)
A priori Absicht, durch Änderungen in den RBANS-Untertestergebnissen zu messen
Baseline und Post-Intervention (nach tDCS-Sitzungen 5 & 30)

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Ermittler

  • Hauptermittler: Benjamin Hampstead, PhD, Associate Professor

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn (Tatsächlich)

1. April 2019

Primärer Abschluss (Tatsächlich)

6. Dezember 2024

Studienabschluss (Tatsächlich)

19. Dezember 2024

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

11. März 2019

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

13. März 2019

Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)

14. März 2019

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)

2. Juli 2026

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

29. Juni 2026

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. Juni 2026

Mehr Informationen

Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie

Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)

Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?

NEIN

Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt

Nein

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt

Ja

Produkt, das in den USA hergestellt und aus den USA exportiert wird

Nein

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .

Abonnieren