Occupational Self-Analysis Programme
Occupational Self-Analysis Programme in Participants With Intellectual Disabilities, Acquired Brain Injury and Students
Introduction There is a growing tendency from Occupational Therapy towards the use of programs based on occupation, which, through significant occupational participation, have shown to obtain beneficial results maintained over time in its participants. For this, these programs carry out processes of occupational self- analysis in which people reflect on the daily activities they usually perform so that they can generate modifications towards more satisfactory routines. However, and despite their proven benefits, these programs have been conducted mainly on older people and in cultural contexts other than Spanish.
The "Occupational Self-Analysis" program, developed in the Spanish context, provides participants with a space where they can learn to analyse the barriers and supports for occupational participation and thus achieve a more significant occupational performance.
Objectives The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of the "Occupational Self-Analysis" program on the subjective perception of health and the number of roles in people with and without disabilities. In the same way, the purpose was to analyse the increase or modification of the performance in the Activities of the Daily Life that the participants did, and to know how the social environment supports the individual participation of the participants in meaningful activities.
Method The implementation of the "Occupational Self-Analysis" program was carried out in 3 different populations; people with intellectual disability, people with acquired brain injury (ABI) and University students. The intervention was performed by comparing it with a control group (vocational guidance or usual rehabilitation in the caso of ABI participants). In people with intellectual disability, the experimental group consisted of 12 participants and the control one of 13. In people with ABI, the experimental group involved 5 participants and the control, 7. In university students, the experimental group involved 7 and the control 7. The SF-36 Health Questionnaire was used for the evaluation of subjective health perception and the Roles Checklist (Part 1) to evaluate the number of roles they play in the present and the future. All of them underwent a final focus group and the diary were they wrote their learning and emotions was analyzed to assess the benefits of the program.
調査の概要
状態
詳細な説明
Results A positive trend was observed in all dimensions of the SF-36 Health Questionnaire in people with intellectual disability and ABI. In the experimental group of people with intellectual disability the improvements were significant compared to the control group in the dimensions of role limitations due to physical problems (Z = -2.41, p = .016), role limitations due to emotional problems (Z = - 1.99; p = .046), social function (Z = -3.35; p = .001) and the accumulated scores of the mental component (Z = -2.66; p = .008). On the other hand, the ABI experimental group obtained significant improvements in vitality after the intervention (Z = -2.20, p = .028), not finding statistically significant improvements compared to the control group.
With respect to the number of roles internalized, both the experimental group with intellectual disability and the one presenting ABI experienced a marginally significant increase in the number of roles that participants wanted to develop in the future after taking part in the program.
Both in people with intellectual disability, ABI and students, the program improved the involvement in meaningful activities through the inclusion of new occupations, modification of previous habits or the transformation of solitary activities into social participation activities. In addition, the participants increased their awareness of those factors that influenced their participation in meaningful activities. This meant becoming aware of aspects related to volition, habituation, personal abilities and the environment.
研究の種類
入学 (実際)
段階
- 適用できない
連絡先と場所
研究場所
-
-
-
Murcia、スペイン、30107
- Universidad Católica San Antonio de Murcia
-
Málaga、スペイン、29004
- Asociación de Daño Cerebral de Málaga (ADACEMA)
-
-
参加基準
適格基準
就学可能な年齢
健康ボランティアの受け入れ
受講資格のある性別
説明
Participants with Intellectual disabilities:
Inclusion Criteria:
- Basic skills such as writing, reading or calculation
Exclusion Criteria:
-Unsuitable social behaviour
Participants with Acquired Brain Injury:
Inclusion Criteria:
- Members of an association for people with neurological impairment.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Behavioral problems
- Problems speaking or understanding.
Students:
Inclusion Criteria:
- Occupational therapy student.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Absenteeism
- Lack of suitable social behavior
研究計画
研究はどのように設計されていますか?
デザインの詳細
- 主な目的:支持療法
- 割り当て:非ランダム化
- 介入モデル:並列代入
- マスキング:なし(オープンラベル)
武器と介入
参加者グループ / アーム |
介入・治療 |
|---|---|
|
実験的:Intervention Group
Occupational Self-Analysis Programme
|
The "Occupational Self-Analysis" program provides participants with a space where they can learn to analyse the barriers and supports for occupational participation.
|
|
アクティブコンパレータ:Control group
Vocational guidance or usual rehabilitation (in the case of ABI participants)
|
To explore participant´s job interests and learned how to find a job and define a professional profile.
Usual rehabilitation: occupational therapy and/or physiotherapy.
|
この研究は何を測定していますか?
主要な結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
SF-36 Health Questionnaire
時間枠:30 minutes
|
Evaluation of subjective health perception. Variables:
|
30 minutes
|
|
Roles Checklist
時間枠:20 minutes
|
Past, present and future occupational roles (Part 1 of Roles Checklist). Variables: - Number of roles in each period (Range 0-10). |
20 minutes
|
|
Focus groups
時間枠:1 hour
|
Qualitative data: Perceived learning and emotions
|
1 hour
|
|
Participant diary
時間枠:2 hours
|
Perceived learning and emotions in a participant diary after sessions
|
2 hours
|
協力者と研究者
スポンサー
捜査官
- 主任研究者:Ana Judit Fernández-Solano, PhD、Universidad Católica San Antonio de Murcia
出版物と役立つリンク
研究記録日
主要日程の研究
研究開始 (実際)
一次修了 (実際)
研究の完了 (実際)
試験登録日
最初に提出
QC基準を満たした最初の提出物
最初の投稿 (実際)
学習記録の更新
投稿された最後の更新 (実際)
QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました
最終確認日
詳しくは
この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。