Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Occupational Self-Analysis Programme

17 juin 2019 mis à jour par: María Rodríguez Bailón, University of Malaga

Occupational Self-Analysis Programme in Participants With Intellectual Disabilities, Acquired Brain Injury and Students

Introduction There is a growing tendency from Occupational Therapy towards the use of programs based on occupation, which, through significant occupational participation, have shown to obtain beneficial results maintained over time in its participants. For this, these programs carry out processes of occupational self- analysis in which people reflect on the daily activities they usually perform so that they can generate modifications towards more satisfactory routines. However, and despite their proven benefits, these programs have been conducted mainly on older people and in cultural contexts other than Spanish.

The "Occupational Self-Analysis" program, developed in the Spanish context, provides participants with a space where they can learn to analyse the barriers and supports for occupational participation and thus achieve a more significant occupational performance.

Objectives The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of the "Occupational Self-Analysis" program on the subjective perception of health and the number of roles in people with and without disabilities. In the same way, the purpose was to analyse the increase or modification of the performance in the Activities of the Daily Life that the participants did, and to know how the social environment supports the individual participation of the participants in meaningful activities.

Method The implementation of the "Occupational Self-Analysis" program was carried out in 3 different populations; people with intellectual disability, people with acquired brain injury (ABI) and University students. The intervention was performed by comparing it with a control group (vocational guidance or usual rehabilitation in the caso of ABI participants). In people with intellectual disability, the experimental group consisted of 12 participants and the control one of 13. In people with ABI, the experimental group involved 5 participants and the control, 7. In university students, the experimental group involved 7 and the control 7. The SF-36 Health Questionnaire was used for the evaluation of subjective health perception and the Roles Checklist (Part 1) to evaluate the number of roles they play in the present and the future. All of them underwent a final focus group and the diary were they wrote their learning and emotions was analyzed to assess the benefits of the program.

Aperçu de l'étude

Description détaillée

Results A positive trend was observed in all dimensions of the SF-36 Health Questionnaire in people with intellectual disability and ABI. In the experimental group of people with intellectual disability the improvements were significant compared to the control group in the dimensions of role limitations due to physical problems (Z = -2.41, p = .016), role limitations due to emotional problems (Z = - 1.99; p = .046), social function (Z = -3.35; p = .001) and the accumulated scores of the mental component (Z = -2.66; p = .008). On the other hand, the ABI experimental group obtained significant improvements in vitality after the intervention (Z = -2.20, p = .028), not finding statistically significant improvements compared to the control group.

With respect to the number of roles internalized, both the experimental group with intellectual disability and the one presenting ABI experienced a marginally significant increase in the number of roles that participants wanted to develop in the future after taking part in the program.

Both in people with intellectual disability, ABI and students, the program improved the involvement in meaningful activities through the inclusion of new occupations, modification of previous habits or the transformation of solitary activities into social participation activities. In addition, the participants increased their awareness of those factors that influenced their participation in meaningful activities. This meant becoming aware of aspects related to volition, habituation, personal abilities and the environment.

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Réel)

37

Phase

  • N'est pas applicable

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Lieux d'étude

      • Murcia, Espagne, 30107
        • Universidad Católica San Antonio de Murcia
      • Málaga, Espagne, 29004
        • Asociación de Daño Cerebral de Málaga (ADACEMA)

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

18 ans à 70 ans (Adulte, Adulte plus âgé)

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

Sexes éligibles pour l'étude

Tout

La description

Participants with Intellectual disabilities:

Inclusion Criteria:

- Basic skills such as writing, reading or calculation

Exclusion Criteria:

-Unsuitable social behaviour

Participants with Acquired Brain Injury:

Inclusion Criteria:

- Members of an association for people with neurological impairment.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Behavioral problems
  • Problems speaking or understanding.

Students:

Inclusion Criteria:

- Occupational therapy student.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Absenteeism
  • Lack of suitable social behavior

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Soins de soutien
  • Répartition: Non randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
  • Masquage: Aucun (étiquette ouverte)

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Expérimental: Intervention Group
Occupational Self-Analysis Programme
The "Occupational Self-Analysis" program provides participants with a space where they can learn to analyse the barriers and supports for occupational participation.
Comparateur actif: Control group
Vocational guidance or usual rehabilitation (in the case of ABI participants)
To explore participant´s job interests and learned how to find a job and define a professional profile.
Usual rehabilitation: occupational therapy and/or physiotherapy.

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
SF-36 Health Questionnaire
Délai: 30 minutes

Evaluation of subjective health perception.

Variables:

  • Eight health domains: physical functioning (10 items), bodily pain (2 items), role limitations due to physical health problems (4 items), role limitations due to personal or emotional problems (4 items), emotional well-being (5 items), social functioning (2 items), energy/fatigue (4 items), and general health (5 items). Scores for each domain range from 0 to 100, with a higher score defining a more favorable health state.
  • Physical component summary (Mean scores of four domains: physical functioning, role limitations caused by physical health problems, bodily pain, and general health) (Range 0-100)
  • Mental component summary scores (Mean scores of four domains: role limitations caused by emotional problems, vitality, social functioning, and mental health) (Range 0-100)
30 minutes
Roles Checklist
Délai: 20 minutes

Past, present and future occupational roles (Part 1 of Roles Checklist). Variables:

- Number of roles in each period (Range 0-10).

20 minutes
Focus groups
Délai: 1 hour
Qualitative data: Perceived learning and emotions
1 hour
Participant diary
Délai: 2 hours
Perceived learning and emotions in a participant diary after sessions
2 hours

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Les enquêteurs

  • Chercheur principal: Ana Judit Fernández-Solano, PhD, Universidad Católica San Antonio de Murcia

Publications et liens utiles

La personne responsable de la saisie des informations sur l'étude fournit volontairement ces publications. Il peut s'agir de tout ce qui concerne l'étude.

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Réel)

1 octobre 2014

Achèvement primaire (Réel)

1 juillet 2016

Achèvement de l'étude (Réel)

1 juillet 2016

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

13 juin 2019

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

13 juin 2019

Première publication (Réel)

18 juin 2019

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

19 juin 2019

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

17 juin 2019

Dernière vérification

1 juin 2019

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

Essais cliniques sur Occupational self-analysis

3
S'abonner