此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

Occupational Self-Analysis Programme

2019年6月17日 更新者:María Rodríguez Bailón、University of Malaga

Occupational Self-Analysis Programme in Participants With Intellectual Disabilities, Acquired Brain Injury and Students

Introduction There is a growing tendency from Occupational Therapy towards the use of programs based on occupation, which, through significant occupational participation, have shown to obtain beneficial results maintained over time in its participants. For this, these programs carry out processes of occupational self- analysis in which people reflect on the daily activities they usually perform so that they can generate modifications towards more satisfactory routines. However, and despite their proven benefits, these programs have been conducted mainly on older people and in cultural contexts other than Spanish.

The "Occupational Self-Analysis" program, developed in the Spanish context, provides participants with a space where they can learn to analyse the barriers and supports for occupational participation and thus achieve a more significant occupational performance.

Objectives The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of the "Occupational Self-Analysis" program on the subjective perception of health and the number of roles in people with and without disabilities. In the same way, the purpose was to analyse the increase or modification of the performance in the Activities of the Daily Life that the participants did, and to know how the social environment supports the individual participation of the participants in meaningful activities.

Method The implementation of the "Occupational Self-Analysis" program was carried out in 3 different populations; people with intellectual disability, people with acquired brain injury (ABI) and University students. The intervention was performed by comparing it with a control group (vocational guidance or usual rehabilitation in the caso of ABI participants). In people with intellectual disability, the experimental group consisted of 12 participants and the control one of 13. In people with ABI, the experimental group involved 5 participants and the control, 7. In university students, the experimental group involved 7 and the control 7. The SF-36 Health Questionnaire was used for the evaluation of subjective health perception and the Roles Checklist (Part 1) to evaluate the number of roles they play in the present and the future. All of them underwent a final focus group and the diary were they wrote their learning and emotions was analyzed to assess the benefits of the program.

研究概览

详细说明

Results A positive trend was observed in all dimensions of the SF-36 Health Questionnaire in people with intellectual disability and ABI. In the experimental group of people with intellectual disability the improvements were significant compared to the control group in the dimensions of role limitations due to physical problems (Z = -2.41, p = .016), role limitations due to emotional problems (Z = - 1.99; p = .046), social function (Z = -3.35; p = .001) and the accumulated scores of the mental component (Z = -2.66; p = .008). On the other hand, the ABI experimental group obtained significant improvements in vitality after the intervention (Z = -2.20, p = .028), not finding statistically significant improvements compared to the control group.

With respect to the number of roles internalized, both the experimental group with intellectual disability and the one presenting ABI experienced a marginally significant increase in the number of roles that participants wanted to develop in the future after taking part in the program.

Both in people with intellectual disability, ABI and students, the program improved the involvement in meaningful activities through the inclusion of new occupations, modification of previous habits or the transformation of solitary activities into social participation activities. In addition, the participants increased their awareness of those factors that influenced their participation in meaningful activities. This meant becoming aware of aspects related to volition, habituation, personal abilities and the environment.

研究类型

介入性

注册 (实际的)

37

阶段

  • 不适用

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习地点

      • Murcia、西班牙、30107
        • Universidad Católica San Antonio de Murcia
      • Málaga、西班牙、29004
        • Asociación de Daño Cerebral de Málaga (ADACEMA)

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

18年 至 70年 (成人、年长者)

接受健康志愿者

不

有资格学习的性别

全部

描述

Participants with Intellectual disabilities:

Inclusion Criteria:

- Basic skills such as writing, reading or calculation

Exclusion Criteria:

-Unsuitable social behaviour

Participants with Acquired Brain Injury:

Inclusion Criteria:

- Members of an association for people with neurological impairment.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Behavioral problems
  • Problems speaking or understanding.

Students:

Inclusion Criteria:

- Occupational therapy student.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Absenteeism
  • Lack of suitable social behavior

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

  • 主要用途:支持治疗
  • 分配:非随机化
  • 介入模型:并行分配
  • 屏蔽:无(打开标签)

武器和干预

参与者组/臂
干预/治疗
实验性的:Intervention Group
Occupational Self-Analysis Programme
The "Occupational Self-Analysis" program provides participants with a space where they can learn to analyse the barriers and supports for occupational participation.
有源比较器:Control group
Vocational guidance or usual rehabilitation (in the case of ABI participants)
To explore participant´s job interests and learned how to find a job and define a professional profile.
Usual rehabilitation: occupational therapy and/or physiotherapy.

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
SF-36 Health Questionnaire
大体时间:30 minutes

Evaluation of subjective health perception.

Variables:

  • Eight health domains: physical functioning (10 items), bodily pain (2 items), role limitations due to physical health problems (4 items), role limitations due to personal or emotional problems (4 items), emotional well-being (5 items), social functioning (2 items), energy/fatigue (4 items), and general health (5 items). Scores for each domain range from 0 to 100, with a higher score defining a more favorable health state.
  • Physical component summary (Mean scores of four domains: physical functioning, role limitations caused by physical health problems, bodily pain, and general health) (Range 0-100)
  • Mental component summary scores (Mean scores of four domains: role limitations caused by emotional problems, vitality, social functioning, and mental health) (Range 0-100)
30 minutes
Roles Checklist
大体时间:20 minutes

Past, present and future occupational roles (Part 1 of Roles Checklist). Variables:

- Number of roles in each period (Range 0-10).

20 minutes
Focus groups
大体时间:1 hour
Qualitative data: Perceived learning and emotions
1 hour
Participant diary
大体时间:2 hours
Perceived learning and emotions in a participant diary after sessions
2 hours

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

调查人员

  • 首席研究员:Ana Judit Fernández-Solano, PhD、Universidad Católica San Antonio de Murcia

出版物和有用的链接

负责输入研究信息的人员自愿提供这些出版物。这些可能与研究有关。

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始 (实际的)

2014年10月1日

初级完成 (实际的)

2016年7月1日

研究完成 (实际的)

2016年7月1日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2019年6月13日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2019年6月13日

首次发布 (实际的)

2019年6月18日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2019年6月19日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2019年6月17日

最后验证

2019年6月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

药物和器械信息、研究文件

研究美国 FDA 监管的药品

不

研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品

不

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

订阅