Deze pagina is automatisch vertaald en de nauwkeurigheid van de vertaling kan niet worden gegarandeerd. Raadpleeg de Engelse versie voor een brontekst.

Occupational Self-Analysis Programme

17 juni 2019 bijgewerkt door: María Rodríguez Bailón, University of Malaga

Occupational Self-Analysis Programme in Participants With Intellectual Disabilities, Acquired Brain Injury and Students

Introduction There is a growing tendency from Occupational Therapy towards the use of programs based on occupation, which, through significant occupational participation, have shown to obtain beneficial results maintained over time in its participants. For this, these programs carry out processes of occupational self- analysis in which people reflect on the daily activities they usually perform so that they can generate modifications towards more satisfactory routines. However, and despite their proven benefits, these programs have been conducted mainly on older people and in cultural contexts other than Spanish.

The "Occupational Self-Analysis" program, developed in the Spanish context, provides participants with a space where they can learn to analyse the barriers and supports for occupational participation and thus achieve a more significant occupational performance.

Objectives The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of the "Occupational Self-Analysis" program on the subjective perception of health and the number of roles in people with and without disabilities. In the same way, the purpose was to analyse the increase or modification of the performance in the Activities of the Daily Life that the participants did, and to know how the social environment supports the individual participation of the participants in meaningful activities.

Method The implementation of the "Occupational Self-Analysis" program was carried out in 3 different populations; people with intellectual disability, people with acquired brain injury (ABI) and University students. The intervention was performed by comparing it with a control group (vocational guidance or usual rehabilitation in the caso of ABI participants). In people with intellectual disability, the experimental group consisted of 12 participants and the control one of 13. In people with ABI, the experimental group involved 5 participants and the control, 7. In university students, the experimental group involved 7 and the control 7. The SF-36 Health Questionnaire was used for the evaluation of subjective health perception and the Roles Checklist (Part 1) to evaluate the number of roles they play in the present and the future. All of them underwent a final focus group and the diary were they wrote their learning and emotions was analyzed to assess the benefits of the program.

Studie Overzicht

Gedetailleerde beschrijving

Results A positive trend was observed in all dimensions of the SF-36 Health Questionnaire in people with intellectual disability and ABI. In the experimental group of people with intellectual disability the improvements were significant compared to the control group in the dimensions of role limitations due to physical problems (Z = -2.41, p = .016), role limitations due to emotional problems (Z = - 1.99; p = .046), social function (Z = -3.35; p = .001) and the accumulated scores of the mental component (Z = -2.66; p = .008). On the other hand, the ABI experimental group obtained significant improvements in vitality after the intervention (Z = -2.20, p = .028), not finding statistically significant improvements compared to the control group.

With respect to the number of roles internalized, both the experimental group with intellectual disability and the one presenting ABI experienced a marginally significant increase in the number of roles that participants wanted to develop in the future after taking part in the program.

Both in people with intellectual disability, ABI and students, the program improved the involvement in meaningful activities through the inclusion of new occupations, modification of previous habits or the transformation of solitary activities into social participation activities. In addition, the participants increased their awareness of those factors that influenced their participation in meaningful activities. This meant becoming aware of aspects related to volition, habituation, personal abilities and the environment.

Studietype

Ingrijpend

Inschrijving (Werkelijk)

37

Fase

  • Niet toepasbaar

Contacten en locaties

In dit gedeelte vindt u de contactgegevens van degenen die het onderzoek uitvoeren en informatie over waar dit onderzoek wordt uitgevoerd.

Studie Locaties

      • Murcia, Spanje, 30107
        • Universidad Católica San Antonio de Murcia
      • Málaga, Spanje, 29004
        • Asociación de Daño Cerebral de Málaga (ADACEMA)

Deelname Criteria

Onderzoekers zoeken naar mensen die aan een bepaalde beschrijving voldoen, de zogenaamde geschiktheidscriteria. Enkele voorbeelden van deze criteria zijn iemands algemene gezondheidstoestand of eerdere behandelingen.

Geschiktheidscriteria

Leeftijden die in aanmerking komen voor studie

18 jaar tot 70 jaar (Volwassen, Oudere volwassene)

Accepteert gezonde vrijwilligers

Nee

Geslachten die in aanmerking komen voor studie

Allemaal

Beschrijving

Participants with Intellectual disabilities:

Inclusion Criteria:

- Basic skills such as writing, reading or calculation

Exclusion Criteria:

-Unsuitable social behaviour

Participants with Acquired Brain Injury:

Inclusion Criteria:

- Members of an association for people with neurological impairment.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Behavioral problems
  • Problems speaking or understanding.

Students:

Inclusion Criteria:

- Occupational therapy student.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Absenteeism
  • Lack of suitable social behavior

Studie plan

Dit gedeelte bevat details van het studieplan, inclusief hoe de studie is opgezet en wat de studie meet.

Hoe is de studie opgezet?

Ontwerpdetails

  • Primair doel: Ondersteunende zorg
  • Toewijzing: Niet-gerandomiseerd
  • Interventioneel model: Parallelle opdracht
  • Masker: Geen (open label)

Wapens en interventies

Deelnemersgroep / Arm
Interventie / Behandeling
Experimenteel: Intervention Group
Occupational Self-Analysis Programme
The "Occupational Self-Analysis" program provides participants with a space where they can learn to analyse the barriers and supports for occupational participation.
Actieve vergelijker: Control group
Vocational guidance or usual rehabilitation (in the case of ABI participants)
To explore participant´s job interests and learned how to find a job and define a professional profile.
Usual rehabilitation: occupational therapy and/or physiotherapy.

Wat meet het onderzoek?

Primaire uitkomstmaten

Uitkomstmaat
Maatregel Beschrijving
Tijdsspanne
SF-36 Health Questionnaire
Tijdsspanne: 30 minutes

Evaluation of subjective health perception.

Variables:

  • Eight health domains: physical functioning (10 items), bodily pain (2 items), role limitations due to physical health problems (4 items), role limitations due to personal or emotional problems (4 items), emotional well-being (5 items), social functioning (2 items), energy/fatigue (4 items), and general health (5 items). Scores for each domain range from 0 to 100, with a higher score defining a more favorable health state.
  • Physical component summary (Mean scores of four domains: physical functioning, role limitations caused by physical health problems, bodily pain, and general health) (Range 0-100)
  • Mental component summary scores (Mean scores of four domains: role limitations caused by emotional problems, vitality, social functioning, and mental health) (Range 0-100)
30 minutes
Roles Checklist
Tijdsspanne: 20 minutes

Past, present and future occupational roles (Part 1 of Roles Checklist). Variables:

- Number of roles in each period (Range 0-10).

20 minutes
Focus groups
Tijdsspanne: 1 hour
Qualitative data: Perceived learning and emotions
1 hour
Participant diary
Tijdsspanne: 2 hours
Perceived learning and emotions in a participant diary after sessions
2 hours

Medewerkers en onderzoekers

Hier vindt u mensen en organisaties die betrokken zijn bij dit onderzoek.

Onderzoekers

  • Hoofdonderzoeker: Ana Judit Fernández-Solano, PhD, Universidad Católica San Antonio de Murcia

Publicaties en nuttige links

De persoon die verantwoordelijk is voor het invoeren van informatie over het onderzoek stelt deze publicaties vrijwillig ter beschikking. Dit kan gaan over alles wat met het onderzoek te maken heeft.

Studie record data

Deze datums volgen de voortgang van het onderzoeksdossier en de samenvatting van de ingediende resultaten bij ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieverslagen en gerapporteerde resultaten worden beoordeeld door de National Library of Medicine (NLM) om er zeker van te zijn dat ze voldoen aan specifieke kwaliteitscontrolenormen voordat ze op de openbare website worden geplaatst.

Bestudeer belangrijke data

Studie start (Werkelijk)

1 oktober 2014

Primaire voltooiing (Werkelijk)

1 juli 2016

Studie voltooiing (Werkelijk)

1 juli 2016

Studieregistratiedata

Eerst ingediend

13 juni 2019

Eerst ingediend dat voldeed aan de QC-criteria

13 juni 2019

Eerst geplaatst (Werkelijk)

18 juni 2019

Updates van studierecords

Laatste update geplaatst (Werkelijk)

19 juni 2019

Laatste update ingediend die voldeed aan QC-criteria

17 juni 2019

Laatst geverifieerd

1 juni 2019

Meer informatie

Termen gerelateerd aan deze studie

Informatie over medicijnen en apparaten, studiedocumenten

Bestudeert een door de Amerikaanse FDA gereguleerd geneesmiddel

Nee

Bestudeert een door de Amerikaanse FDA gereguleerd apparaatproduct

Nee

Deze informatie is zonder wijzigingen rechtstreeks van de website clinicaltrials.gov gehaald. Als u verzoeken heeft om uw onderzoeksgegevens te wijzigen, te verwijderen of bij te werken, neem dan contact op met register@clinicaltrials.gov. Zodra er een wijziging wordt doorgevoerd op clinicaltrials.gov, wordt deze ook automatisch bijgewerkt op onze website .

Abonneren