このページは自動翻訳されたものであり、翻訳の正確性は保証されていません。を参照してください。 英語版 ソーステキスト用。

Comparing the Treatment Outcomes of Two Interventional Pain Procedures in Chronic Coccygodynia

2021年5月21日 更新者:Marmara University

Comparison of Treatment Outcomes in Chronic Coccygodynia Patients Treated With Ganglion Impar Blockade Versus Caudal Epidural Steroid Injection: A Prospective Randomized Comparison Study

Coccygodynia is a disabling pain in the coccyx exacerbated by sitting or rising from sitting. The pain is often pulling or lancinating in quality, may radiate to the sacrum or buttock, and may coexist with lower back pain. Contributing of many physiologic and psychological factors to its etiology, it may be traumatic or idiopathic in origin. Many risk factors are known such as trauma, female gender and obesity. Despite the identification of chronic coccygeal pain hundreds of years ago, its treatment can be difficult and sometimes controversial because of the multifactorial nature of coccygeal pain. Most cases of coccygodynia resolve within weeks to months with or without conservative treatment, but for a few patients, the pain can become chronic and debilitating. First-line treatment options include analgesic drugs, cushion, sit baths, and manuel therapy. Interventional procedures for pain management can be applied to patients who have no response to other conservative modalities. Ganglion impar block and caudal epidural steroid injection are two treatment options for chronic coccygodynia and both of them can be applied by guidance of fluoroscopy and ultrasonography. Radiofrequency ablation is the other option for treatment and eventually, surgical intervention can be done for patients who have refractory pain despite other treatments.

Although efficacy of two interventional procedure for chronic coccygodynia, ganglion impar block and caudal epidural steroid injection, has been well known, no study is exist comparing the efficacy of them. We aimed to compare the efficacy of ganglion impar block and caudal epidural steroid injection in chronic coccygodynia.

調査の概要

詳細な説明

The main purpose of this prospective study is the compare the efficacy of fluoroscopy-guided ganglion impar block and caudal epidural steroid injection in patients with chronic coccygodynia. Patients with chronic coccygeal pain are randomly divided into two groups based on the type of the interventional procedure: Group A, fluoroscopy-guided ganglion impar block group and, group B, fluoroscopy-guided caudal epidural steroid injection group. The patients who have chronic coccygeal pain not responding to other conservative treatments will be recruited from physical medicine&rehabilitation and pain medicine outpatient clinics. Detailed information including all aspects of interventional procedures will be given to patients, and inform consent will be obtained. Pain severity will be assessed using Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) as primary outcome. Quality of life and neuropathic pain component will be evaluated with Short Form-12 (SF-12) Questionnaire and Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms&Signs Pain Scale (LANSS) as secondary outcomes, respectively. All assessments will be done at pre-interventional period, three weeks and three months after the procedure, with the exception of NRS, it will be also assessed at first hour post-procedure. All assessments will be done by clinician blinding the treatment groups.

研究の種類

介入

入学 (実際)

97

段階

  • 適用できない

連絡先と場所

このセクションには、調査を実施する担当者の連絡先の詳細と、この調査が実施されている場所に関する情報が記載されています。

研究場所

      • Istanbul、七面鳥、34899
        • Marmara University School of Medicine Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

参加基準

研究者は、適格基準と呼ばれる特定の説明に適合する人を探します。これらの基準のいくつかの例は、人の一般的な健康状態または以前の治療です。

適格基準

就学可能な年齢

18年~65年 (大人、高齢者)

健康ボランティアの受け入れ

いいえ

受講資格のある性別

全て

説明

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients diagnosed with chronic coccygodynia between the ages of 18 and 65
  • Intractable pain over the coccyx despite conservative treatment

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of ganglion impar blockade and/or caudal epidural steroid injection carried out in the last 3 months
  • History of lumbar surgery
  • Systemic and/or local infections
  • Malignancy
  • Bleeding diathesis
  • Acute fracture
  • Known allergy to contrast material and/or local anesthetic substances
  • Known history of any psychiatric disorder
  • History of pregnancy

研究計画

このセクションでは、研究がどのように設計され、研究が何を測定しているかなど、研究計画の詳細を提供します。

研究はどのように設計されていますか?

デザインの詳細

  • 主な目的:処理
  • 割り当て:ランダム化
  • 介入モデル:並列代入
  • マスキング:ダブル

武器と介入

参加者グループ / アーム
介入・治療
アクティブコンパレータ:Ganglion impar block group
Fluoroscopy-guided ganglion impar block is applied to patients in this group.
Fluoroscopy guidance is used for correct visualization of injection site, and so obtained more successful results. Patients are placed in the prone position. Injection site is cleaned thrice with povidone iodine %10 solution and covered with sterile drapes. Being most commonly used technic, transsacrococcygeal technique, a 22-gauge, 1.5-inch spinal needle is advanced through the sacrococcygeal disk and positioned carefully anterior to the sacrococcygeal junction. Injection of contrast results in a classical comma sign. A mixture of steroid and local anesthetic is given.
アクティブコンパレータ:Caudal epidural steroid injection group
Fluoroscopy-guided caudal epidural steroid injection is applied to patients in this group.
Fluoroscopy guidance is used for correct visualization of injection site, and so obtained more successful results. Patients are placed in the prone position. Injection site is cleaned thrice with povidone iodine %10 solution and covered with sterile drapes. An 18-gauge epidural needle (Tuohy) is advanced at an angle of 45° to the skin until a 'give-way' sensation is felt and position of the needle is confirmed by lateral and anteroposterior fluoroscopic images. Then 5 ml of iohexol solution is injected through it to confirm the position. A properly placed needle would produce a classical 'inverted fern tree' appearance in anteroposterior view after dye injection or a 'filling defect'. The needle is introduced up to S3 level for proper spread of the drug. A mixture of steroid and local anesthetics is given.

この研究は何を測定していますか?

主要な結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Change in pain severity of patients from baseline to each checkpoints
時間枠:from pre-interventional time to post-interventional 1st hour, 3rd week, 3rd month
Defining the change in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) score
from pre-interventional time to post-interventional 1st hour, 3rd week, 3rd month

二次結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Change in number of patients with neuropathic pain from baseline to each checkpoints
時間枠:from pre-interventional time to post-interventional 3rd week, 3rd month
Defining the change in number of patients with neuropathic pain using Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs Scale (LANSS)
from pre-interventional time to post-interventional 3rd week, 3rd month
Change the patient reported quality of life assessment from baseline to each checkpoints
時間枠:from pre-interventional time to post-interventional 3rd week, 3rd month
Defining the change in quality of life scores of patients using Short Form 12 Health Survey (SF-12)
from pre-interventional time to post-interventional 3rd week, 3rd month

協力者と研究者

ここでは、この調査に関係する人々や組織を見つけることができます。

スポンサー

捜査官

  • 主任研究者:Savaş Şencan, MD、Marmara University

研究記録日

これらの日付は、ClinicalTrials.gov への研究記録と要約結果の提出の進捗状況を追跡します。研究記録と報告された結果は、国立医学図書館 (NLM) によって審査され、公開 Web サイトに掲載される前に、特定の品質管理基準を満たしていることが確認されます。

主要日程の研究

研究開始 (実際)

2019年6月1日

一次修了 (実際)

2021年1月1日

研究の完了 (実際)

2021年3月1日

試験登録日

最初に提出

2021年5月21日

QC基準を満たした最初の提出物

2021年5月21日

最初の投稿 (実際)

2021年5月26日

学習記録の更新

投稿された最後の更新 (実際)

2021年5月26日

QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました

2021年5月21日

最終確認日

2021年5月1日

詳しくは

本研究に関する用語

その他の研究ID番号

  • 09.2019.395

医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書

米国FDA規制医薬品の研究

いいえ

米国FDA規制機器製品の研究

いいえ

この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。

3
購読する