Motor Imagery Training and Shooting Performance in Adolescent Basketball Players
2026年8月29日 更新者：Mertkan Öncü、Uludag University
Effects of Motor Imagery Training on Shooting Performance Under Cognitive-Motor Dual-Task Conditions in Adolescent Basketball Players
This randomized controlled trial evaluated the effects of an eight-week motor imagery training program on shooting performance in adolescent basketball players under single-task and cognitive-motor dual-task conditions.
Thirty male basketball players aged 15-17 years were randomly assigned to either a motor imagery group or a control group.
Both groups continued their routine basketball training, while the motor imagery group additionally completed a structured PETTLEP-based motor imagery program three times per week for eight weeks.
Two-point and three-point shooting performance was assessed before and after the intervention under both single-task and cognitive-motor dual-task conditions.
The study aimed to determine whether adding motor imagery training to routine basketball training improves shooting performance and the ability to maintain shooting performance while simultaneously performing a cognitive task.
調査の概要
状態
完了
研究の種類
介入
入学 (実際)
30
段階
- 適用できない
連絡先と場所
このセクションには、調査を実施する担当者の連絡先の詳細と、この調査が実施されている場所に関する情報が記載されています。
研究場所
-
-
-
Bursa、トルコ（Türkiye）、16000
- Bursa Uludag University
-
-
参加基準
研究者は、適格基準と呼ばれる特定の説明に適合する人を探します。これらの基準のいくつかの例は、人の一般的な健康状態または以前の治療です。
適格基準
就学可能な年齢
- 子
健康ボランティアの受け入れ
はい
説明
Inclusion Criteria:
- Male basketball players aged 15-17 years.
- Regular participation in basketball training.
- Voluntary participation in the study.
- Written informed consent from a parent or legal guardian and assent from the participant.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Presence of a musculoskeletal injury or health condition that could prevent participation in basketball training or performance testing.
研究計画
このセクションでは、研究がどのように設計され、研究が何を測定しているかなど、研究計画の詳細を提供します。
研究はどのように設計されていますか？
デザインの詳細
- 主な目的：他の
- 割り当て：ランダム化
- 介入モデル：並列代入
- マスキング：なし（オープンラベル）
武器と介入
参加者グループ / アーム |
介入・治療 |
|---|---|
|
実験的：Motor Imagery Group
Participants in this arm continued their routine basketball training and additionally completed a structured PETTLEP-based motor imagery training program three times per week for eight weeks.
Each motor imagery session lasted approximately 20-30 minutes and was performed before routine basketball training.
The imagery exercises emphasized an internal visual perspective and kinesthetic sensations related to basketball shooting performance.
|
Participants completed a structured PETTLEP-based motor imagery training program three times per week for eight weeks, in addition to their routine basketball training.
Each session lasted approximately 20-30 minutes and was performed before routine basketball training.
The program was structured according to the PETTLEP model (Physical, Environment, Task, Timing, Learning, Emotion, and Perspective) and adapted to basketball shooting.
Participants predominantly used an internal visual perspective and were instructed to imagine kinesthetic sensations associated with shooting, including ball release, wrist movement, jumping, balance, and the ball entering the basket.
|
|
介入なし：Control Group
Participants in this arm continued their routine basketball training throughout the eight-week study period and did not receive any additional motor imagery intervention.
|
この研究は何を測定していますか？
主要な結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Two-Point Shooting Performance
時間枠：Baseline and immediately after the 8-week intervention
|
Two-point shooting performance was assessed using the basketball-specific shooting test described by Pojskic et al. (2011).
Participants moved between six designated two-point shooting positions and attempted shots after receiving a pass.
The test lasted 60 seconds, and the total number of successful two-point shots was recorded as the performance score.
The test was performed three times with full recovery between trials, and the best score was used for analysis.
Higher scores indicate better shooting performance.
|
Baseline and immediately after the 8-week intervention
|
|
Three-Point Shooting Performance
時間枠：Baseline and immediately after the 8-week intervention
|
Three-point shooting performance was assessed using the basketball-specific shooting test described by Pojskic et al. (2011).
Participants moved between six designated three-point shooting positions and attempted shots after receiving a pass.
The test lasted 60 seconds, and the total number of successful three-point shots was recorded as the performance score.
The test was performed three times with full recovery between trials, and the best score was used for analysis.
Higher scores indicate better shooting performance.
|
Baseline and immediately after the 8-week intervention
|
|
Two-Point Shooting Performance Under Cognitive-Motor Dual-Task Conditions
時間枠：Baseline and immediately after the 8-week intervention
|
Two-point shooting performance under cognitive-motor dual-task conditions was assessed while participants performed the standard two-point shooting test concurrently with a verbal cognitive task.
The test lasted 60 seconds, and the total number of successful two-point shots was recorded as the performance score.
Cognitive-task accuracy and number of responses were not assessed; therefore, dual-task performance was evaluated based solely on shooting performance under concurrent cognitive load.
Higher scores indicate better shooting performance under dual-task conditions.
|
Baseline and immediately after the 8-week intervention
|
|
Three-Point Shooting Performance Under Cognitive-Motor Dual-Task Conditions
時間枠：Baseline and immediately after the 8-week intervention
|
Three-point shooting performance under cognitive-motor dual-task conditions was assessed while participants performed the standard three-point shooting test concurrently with a verbal cognitive task.
The test lasted 60 seconds, and the total number of successful three-point shots was recorded as the performance score.
Cognitive-task accuracy and number of responses were not assessed; therefore, dual-task performance was evaluated based solely on shooting performance under concurrent cognitive load.
Higher scores indicate better shooting performance under dual-task conditions.
|
Baseline and immediately after the 8-week intervention
|
協力者と研究者
ここでは、この調査に関係する人々や組織を見つけることができます。
スポンサー
捜査官
- スタディチェア：Sadettin Erol, PhD、Uludag University
研究記録日
これらの日付は、ClinicalTrials.gov への研究記録と要約結果の提出の進捗状況を追跡します。研究記録と報告された結果は、国立医学図書館 (NLM) によって審査され、公開 Web サイトに掲載される前に、特定の品質管理基準を満たしていることが確認されます。
主要日程の研究
研究開始 (実際)
2026年4月25日
一次修了 (実際)
2026年6月20日
研究の完了 (実際)
2026年6月20日
試験登録日
最初に提出
2026年8月25日
QC基準を満たした最初の提出物
2026年8月29日
最初の投稿 (実際)
2026年9月1日
学習記録の更新
投稿された最後の更新 (実際)
2026年9月1日
QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました
2026年8月29日
最終確認日
2026年8月1日
詳しくは
本研究に関する用語
その他の研究ID番号
- 2026/176/6/23
個々の参加者データ (IPD) の計画
個々の参加者データ (IPD) を共有する予定はありますか?
未定
医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書
米国FDA規制医薬品の研究
いいえ
米国FDA規制機器製品の研究
いいえ
この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。