此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

Motor Imagery Training and Shooting Performance in Adolescent Basketball Players

2026年8月29日 更新者:Mertkan Öncü、Uludag University

Effects of Motor Imagery Training on Shooting Performance Under Cognitive-Motor Dual-Task Conditions in Adolescent Basketball Players

This randomized controlled trial evaluated the effects of an eight-week motor imagery training program on shooting performance in adolescent basketball players under single-task and cognitive-motor dual-task conditions. Thirty male basketball players aged 15-17 years were randomly assigned to either a motor imagery group or a control group. Both groups continued their routine basketball training, while the motor imagery group additionally completed a structured PETTLEP-based motor imagery program three times per week for eight weeks. Two-point and three-point shooting performance was assessed before and after the intervention under both single-task and cognitive-motor dual-task conditions. The study aimed to determine whether adding motor imagery training to routine basketball training improves shooting performance and the ability to maintain shooting performance while simultaneously performing a cognitive task.

研究概览

研究类型

介入性

注册 (实际的)

30

阶段

  • 不适用

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习地点

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

  • 孩子

接受健康志愿者

是的

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male basketball players aged 15-17 years.
  • Regular participation in basketball training.
  • Voluntary participation in the study.
  • Written informed consent from a parent or legal guardian and assent from the participant.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of a musculoskeletal injury or health condition that could prevent participation in basketball training or performance testing.

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

  • 主要用途:其他
  • 分配:随机化
  • 介入模型:并行分配
  • 屏蔽:无(打开标签)

武器和干预

参与者组/臂
干预/治疗
实验性的:Motor Imagery Group
Participants in this arm continued their routine basketball training and additionally completed a structured PETTLEP-based motor imagery training program three times per week for eight weeks. Each motor imagery session lasted approximately 20-30 minutes and was performed before routine basketball training. The imagery exercises emphasized an internal visual perspective and kinesthetic sensations related to basketball shooting performance.
Participants completed a structured PETTLEP-based motor imagery training program three times per week for eight weeks, in addition to their routine basketball training. Each session lasted approximately 20-30 minutes and was performed before routine basketball training. The program was structured according to the PETTLEP model (Physical, Environment, Task, Timing, Learning, Emotion, and Perspective) and adapted to basketball shooting. Participants predominantly used an internal visual perspective and were instructed to imagine kinesthetic sensations associated with shooting, including ball release, wrist movement, jumping, balance, and the ball entering the basket.
无干预:Control Group
Participants in this arm continued their routine basketball training throughout the eight-week study period and did not receive any additional motor imagery intervention.

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Two-Point Shooting Performance
大体时间:Baseline and immediately after the 8-week intervention
Two-point shooting performance was assessed using the basketball-specific shooting test described by Pojskic et al. (2011). Participants moved between six designated two-point shooting positions and attempted shots after receiving a pass. The test lasted 60 seconds, and the total number of successful two-point shots was recorded as the performance score. The test was performed three times with full recovery between trials, and the best score was used for analysis. Higher scores indicate better shooting performance.
Baseline and immediately after the 8-week intervention
Three-Point Shooting Performance
大体时间:Baseline and immediately after the 8-week intervention
Three-point shooting performance was assessed using the basketball-specific shooting test described by Pojskic et al. (2011). Participants moved between six designated three-point shooting positions and attempted shots after receiving a pass. The test lasted 60 seconds, and the total number of successful three-point shots was recorded as the performance score. The test was performed three times with full recovery between trials, and the best score was used for analysis. Higher scores indicate better shooting performance.
Baseline and immediately after the 8-week intervention
Two-Point Shooting Performance Under Cognitive-Motor Dual-Task Conditions
大体时间:Baseline and immediately after the 8-week intervention
Two-point shooting performance under cognitive-motor dual-task conditions was assessed while participants performed the standard two-point shooting test concurrently with a verbal cognitive task. The test lasted 60 seconds, and the total number of successful two-point shots was recorded as the performance score. Cognitive-task accuracy and number of responses were not assessed; therefore, dual-task performance was evaluated based solely on shooting performance under concurrent cognitive load. Higher scores indicate better shooting performance under dual-task conditions.
Baseline and immediately after the 8-week intervention
Three-Point Shooting Performance Under Cognitive-Motor Dual-Task Conditions
大体时间:Baseline and immediately after the 8-week intervention
Three-point shooting performance under cognitive-motor dual-task conditions was assessed while participants performed the standard three-point shooting test concurrently with a verbal cognitive task. The test lasted 60 seconds, and the total number of successful three-point shots was recorded as the performance score. Cognitive-task accuracy and number of responses were not assessed; therefore, dual-task performance was evaluated based solely on shooting performance under concurrent cognitive load. Higher scores indicate better shooting performance under dual-task conditions.
Baseline and immediately after the 8-week intervention

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

调查人员

  • 学习椅:Sadettin Erol, PhD、Uludag University

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始 (实际的)

2026年4月25日

初级完成 (实际的)

2026年6月20日

研究完成 (实际的)

2026年6月20日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2026年8月25日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2026年8月29日

首次发布 (实际的)

2026年9月1日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2026年9月1日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2026年8月29日

最后验证

2026年8月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

其他研究编号

  • 2026/176/6/23

计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)

计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)?

未定

药物和器械信息、研究文件

研究美国 FDA 监管的药品

不

研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品

不

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

订阅