Postmortem fetal magnetic resonance imaging: where do we stand?
Aurélie D'Hondt, Marie Cassart, Raymond De Maubeuge, Gustavo Soto Ares, Jacques Rommens, E Fred Avni, Aurélie D'Hondt, Marie Cassart, Raymond De Maubeuge, Gustavo Soto Ares, Jacques Rommens, E Fred Avni
Abstract
Postmortem fetal magnetic resonance imaging (PMFMRI) is increasingly used thanks to its good overall concordance with histology paralleling the rising incidence of parental refusal of autopsy. The technique could become a routine clinical examination but it needs to be standardized and conducted by trained radiologists. Such radiologists should be aware of not only the (congenital and acquired) anomalies that can involve the fetus, but also of the "physiological" postmortem changes. In this article, we intend to focus on the contribution of PMFMRI based on the existing literature and on our own experience, as we presently perform the technique routinely in our clinical practice.
Key points: • Concordance rates between PMFMRI and autopsy are high for detecting fetal pathologies. • PMFMRI is more acceptable for parents than traditional autopsy. • PMFMRI is becoming widely used as a part of the postmortem investigations. • A dedicated radiologist needs to learn to interpret correctly a PMFMRI. • PMFMRI can be easily realized in daily clinical practice.
Keywords: Autopsy; Fetus; Magnetic resonance imaging; Perinatal; Postmortem.
Figures
References
- Dickinson JE, Prime DK, Charles AK. The role of autopsy following pregnancy termination for fetal abnormality. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2007;47(6):445–449. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2007.00777.x.
- Piercecchi-Marti MD, Liprandi A, Sigaudy S, et al. Value of fetal autopsy after medical termination of pregnancy. Forensic Sci Int. 2004;144(1):7–10. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.01.022.
- Addison S, Arthurs OJ, Thayyil S. Post-mortem MRI as an alternative to non-forensic autopsy in foetuses and children: from research into clinical practice. Br J Radiol. 2014;87(1036):20130621. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20130621.
- Shojania KG, Burton EC. The vanishing nonforensic autopsy. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(9):873–875. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp0707996.
- Arthurs OJ, Taylor AM, Sebire NJ. Indications, advantages and limitations of perinatal postmortem imaging in clinical practice. Pediatr Radiol. 2015;45(4):491–500. doi: 10.1007/s00247-014-3165-z.
- Ben-Sasi K, Chitty LS, Franck LS, et al. Acceptability of a minimally invasive perinatal/paediatric autopsy: healthcare professionals' views and implications for practice. Prenat Diagn. 2013;33(4):307–312.
- Lewis C, Hill M, Arthurs OJ, Hutchinson C, Chitty LS, Sebire NJ. Factors affecting uptake of postmortem examination in the prenatal, perinatal and paediatric setting. BJOG. 2018;125(2):172–181. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14600.
- Arthurs OJ, van Rijn RR, Sebire NJ. Current status of paediatric post-mortem imaging: an ESPR questionnaire-based survey. Pediatr Radiol. 2014;44(3):244–251. doi: 10.1007/s00247-013-2827-6.
- Thayyil S, Sebire NJ, Chitty LS, et al. Taylor AM; MARIAS collaborative group. Post-mortem MRI versus conventional autopsy in fetuses and children: a prospective validation study. Lancet. 2013;382(9888):223–233. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60134-8.
- Jawad N, Sebire NJ, Wade A, Taylor AM, Chitty LS, Arthurs OJ. Body weight lower limits of fetal postmortem MRI at 1.5 T. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;48(1):92–97. doi: 10.1002/uog.14948.
- D’Hondt A, D’Haene N, Rommens J, Cassart M, Avni EF. The contribution of mid-trimester virtual autopsy with MR imaging. Pediatr Radiol. 2017;47(suppl 2):S297–S421.
- Sarda-Quarello L, Tuchtan L, Bartoli C, et al. Post-mortem perinatal imaging: state of the art and perspectives, with an emphasis on ultrasound. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2015;43(9):612–615. doi: 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2015.07.020.
- Thayyil S, Sebire NJ, Chitty LS, et al. Post mortem magnetic resonance imaging in the fetus, infant and child: a comparative study with conventional autopsy (MaRIAS protocol) BMC Pediatr. 2011;11:120. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-11-120.
- Kang X, Cannie MM, Arthurs OJ, et al. Post-mortem whole-body magnetic resonance imaging of human fetuses: a comparison of 3-T vs. 1.5-T MR imaging with classical autopsy. Eur Radiol. 2017;27(8):3542–3553. doi: 10.1007/s00330-016-4725-4.
- Judge-Kronis L, Hutchinson JC, Sebire NJ, Arthurs OJ. Consent for paediatric and perinatal postmortem investigations: implications of less invasive autopsy. J Forensic Radiol Imaging. 2016;4:7–11. doi: 10.1016/j.jofri.2015.12.001.
- Norman W, Jawad N, Jones R, Taylor AM, Arthurs OJ. Perinatal and paediatric post-mortem magnetic resonance imaging (PMMR): sequences and technique. Br J Radiol. 2016;89(1062):20151028. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20151028.
- Scola E, Conte G, Palumbo G, et al. High resolution post-mortem MRI of non-fixed in situ foetal brain in the second trimester of gestation: normal foetal brain development. Eur Radiol. 2018;28(1):363–371. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-4965-y.
- Papadopoulou I, Langan D, Sebire NJ, Jacques TS, Arthurs OJ. Diffusion-weighted post-mortem magnetic resonance imaging of the human fetal brain in situ. Eur J Radiol. 2016;85(6):1167–1173. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.03.024.
- Arthurs OJ, Barber JL, Taylor AM, Sebire NJ. Normal perinatal and paediatric postmortem magnetic resonance imaging appearances. Pediatr Radiol. 2015;45(4):527–535. doi: 10.1007/s00247-014-3166-y.
- Barber JL, Sebire NJ, Chitty LS, Taylor AM, Arthurs OJ. Lung aeration on post-mortem magnetic resonance imaging is a useful marker of live birth versus stillbirth. Int J Legal Med. 2015;129(3):531–536. doi: 10.1007/s00414-014-1125-7.
- Arthurs OJ, Thayyil S, Olsen OE, et al. Owens CM; magnetic resonance imaging autopsy study (MaRIAS) collaborative group. Diagnostic accuracy of post-mortem MRI for thoracic abnormalities in fetuses and children. Eur Radiol. 2014;24(11):2876–2884. doi: 10.1007/s00330-014-3313-8.
- Arthurs OJ, Hutchinson JC, Sebire NJ. Current issues in postmortem imaging of perinatal and forensic childhood deaths. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2017;13(1):58. doi: 10.1007/s12024-016-9821-x.
- Arthurs OJ, Thayyil S, Pauliah SS, et al. Diagnostic accuracy and limitations of post-mortem MRI for neurological abnormalities in fetuses and children. Clin Radiol. 2015;70(8):872–880. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2015.04.008.
- Arthurs OJ, Thayyil S, Owens CM, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging autopsy study (MaRIAS) collaborative group. Diagnostic accuracy of post mortem MRI for abdominal abnormalities in foetuses and children. Eur J Radiol. 2015;84(3):474–481. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.11.030.
- Taylor AM, Sebire NJ, Ashworth MT, et al. Postmortem cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in fetuses and children: a masked comparison study with conventional autopsy. Circulation. 2014;129(19):1937–1944. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.005641.
- Arthurs OJ, Thayyil S, Addison S, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of postmortem MRI for musculoskeletal abnormalities in fetuses and children. Prenat Diagn. 2014;34(13):1254–1261. doi: 10.1002/pd.4460.
- Breeze AC, Gallagher FA, Lomas DJ, Smith GC, Lees CC, Cambridge Post-Mortem MRI Study Group Postmortem fetal organ volumetry using magnetic resonance imaging and comparison to organ weights at conventional autopsy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008;31(2):187–193. doi: 10.1002/uog.5199.
- Ashwin C, Hutchinson JC, Kang X, et al. Learning effect on perinatal post-mortem magnetic resonance imaging reporting: single reporter diagnostic accuracy of 200 cases. Prenat Diagn. 2017;37(6):566–574. doi: 10.1002/pd.5043.
- Hutchinson JC, Arthurs OJ, Sebire NJ. Postmortem research: innovations and future directions for the perinatal and paediatric autopsy. Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed. 2016;101(1):54–56. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2015-309321.
Source: PubMed